Ancient pottery reveals the first evidence for honey hunting in prehistoric West Africa
Ancient pottery reveals the first evidence for honey hunting in prehistoric West Africa
Nok terracotta figurines. Credit: Goethe University

A team of scientists, led by the University of Bristol, with colleagues from Goethe University, Frankfurt, has found the first evidence for ancient honey hunting, locked inside pottery fragments from prehistoric West Africa, dating back some 3,500 years ago.

                                              <section class="article-banner first-banner ads-336x280">
     <!-- /4988204/Phys_Story_InText_Box -->

  </section>

Honeybees are an iconic species, being the world’s most important pollinator of food crops. Honeybee hive products, including beeswax, honey and pollen, used both for food and medicinal purposes, support livelihoods and provide sources of income for local communities across much of Africa, through both beekeeping and wild harvest.

Today, honey is collected from wild bee nests in many African countries. In the West African tropical rain forest, hunting for wild honey, found in natural hollows in tree trunks and on the underside of thick branches, is a common subsistence activity.

It is not known how long humans have been exploiting bee products. Honey would certainly have been a rare source of sweetener for ancient people and was probably highly sought after. However, there is very little surviving evidence for ancient human exploitation of the honeybee, except for palaeolithic rock art which shows bees and honeycombs, spanning the period 40,000 to 8,000 years ago, the majority of which is found in Africa.

Historical and ethnographic literature from across Africa also suggests that bee products, honey and larvae, were important both as a food source and in the making of honey-based drinks, such as beer and wine.

The Bristol team were carrying out chemical analysis of more than 450 prehistoric potsherds from the Central Nigerian Nok culture to investigate what foods they were cooking in their pots. The Nok people are known for their remarkable large-scale terracotta figurines and early iron production in West Africa, around the first millennium BC. Acidic soils at Nok archaeological sites meant that organic remains such as animal bones and plants did not survive very well so what Nok people were eating was somewhat of a mystery.

To the team’s great surprise, their findings, published today in the journal Nature Communications, revealed that around one third of the pottery vessels used by the ancient Nok people were used to process or store beeswax. The presence of beeswax in ancient pottery is identified through a complex series of lipids, the fats, oils and waxes of the natural world. The beeswax is probably present as a consequence either of the processing (melting) of wax combs through gentle heating, leading to its absorption within the vessel walls, or, alternatively, beeswax is assumed to act as a proxy for the cooking or storage of honey itself.

Excavated Nok vessels are cleaned and photographed at the Janjala research station, shown in the picture: Dr Gabriele Franke, Goethe University. Credit: Peter Breunig

Honey is often an important food source for hunter-gatherers and there are several groups in Africa, such as the Efe foragers of the Ituri Forest, Eastern Zaire, who have historically relied on honey as their main source of food, collecting all parts of the hive, including honey, pollen and bee larvae, from tree hollows which can be up to 30 m from the ground, using smoke to distract the stinging bees.

Honey may also have been used as a preservative to store other products. Among the Okiek people of Kenya, who rely on the trapping and hunting of a wide variety of game, smoked meat is preserved with honey, being kept for up to three years, A number of the Nok pots contained chemical evidence for the presence of both beeswax and meat products.

As well as using honey as a food source, it may have been used to make honey-based drinks, wine, beer and non-alcoholic beverages, which are commonplace across Africa today, although it should be noted that the chemical identification of ancient fermentation is notoriously difficult. The writings of ancient explorers provide insights into the antiquity of these practices. For example, Ibn Battuta, the Muslim Berber scholar and explorer, whilst visiting Mauritania in 1352, tells of a sour drink made from ground millet mixed with honey and sour milk. A further account of the preparation of wine from honey is found in a record of a Portuguese visit to the west coast of Africa (1506-1510).

Honey and beeswax may also have been used for medicinal, cosmetic and technological purposes. Beeswax has also variously been used from prehistoric times as a sealant or waterproofing agent on Early Neolithic collared flasks in northern Europe, as a lamp illuminant in Minoan Crete and mixed with tallow, possibly for making candles, in medieval vessels at West Cotton, Northamptonshire. Lead author, Dr. Julie Dunne from the University of Bristol’s School of Chemistry, said: “This is a remarkable example of how biomolecular information extracted from prehistoric pottery, combined with ethnographic data, has provided the first insights into ancient honey hunting in West Africa, 3,500 years ago.”

Professor Richard Evershed FRS who heads up Bristol’s Organic Geochemistry Unit and is a co-author of the study, added: “The association of prehistoric people with the honey bee is a recurring theme across the ancient world, however, the discovery of the chemical components of beeswax in the pottery of the Nok people provides a unique window on this relationship, when all other sources of evidence are lacking.”

Professor Peter Breunig from Goethe University who is the archaeological director of the Nok project and co-author of the study, said: “We originally started the study of chemical residues in pottery sherds because of the lack of animal bones at Nok sites, hoping to find evidence for meat processing in the pots. That the Nok people exploited honey 3,500 years ago, was completely unexpected and is unique in West African prehistory.”

Professor Katharina Neumann from Goethe University, Frankfurt, who is the archaeobotanical director of the Nok project and co-author of the study, added: “Plant and animal remains from archaeological sites usually reveal only a small part of what prehistoric people had been eating. Chemical residues of beeswax in potsherds opens up completely new perspectives for the history of resource exploitation and ancient diet.”

                                                                            </p><hr/>                                       
                                    <div class="article-main__explore my-4 d-print-none">
                                        <div class="d-flex align-items-center">
                                            <svg>
                                                <use href="https://phys.b-cdn.net/tmpl/v6/img/svg/sprite.svg#plus" x="0" y="0"/>
                                            </svg>
                                            <p class="text-bold mb-0 ml-2">Explore further
                                        </div>
                                        <a class="text-medium text-info mt-2 d-inline-block" href="https://phys.org/news/2015-11-early-farmers-exploited-beehive-products.html" rel="nofollow">Early farmers exploited beehive products at least 8,500 years ago</a>
                                    </div>                                      
                                    <hr class="mb-4"/>

                                                                                <div class="article-main__more p-4" readability="35.0625">
                                                                                            <strong>More information:</strong>
                                            Honey-collecting in prehistoric West Africa from 3,500 years ago, J. Dunne, N. Neumann, P. Breunig, R. Evershed et al, <i>Nature Communications</i>, 2021.


                                                                                        </div>

                                                                                <div class="d-inline-block text-medium my-4">
                                            Provided by
                                                                                                <a href="https://phys.org/partners/university-of-bristol/" rel="nofollow">University of Bristol</a>
                                                                                                    <a class="icon_open" href="http://www.bris.ac.uk/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">
                                                    <svg>
                                                        <use href="https://phys.b-cdn.net/tmpl/v6/img/svg/sprite.svg#icon_open" x="0" y="0"/>
                                                    </svg>
                                                </a>

                                        </div>

                                    <!-- print only -->
                                    <div class="d-none d-print-block" readability="15">

                                             <strong>Citation</strong>:
                                             Ancient pottery reveals the first evidence for honey hunting in prehistoric West Africa (2021, April 14)
                                             retrieved 14 April 2021
                                             from https://phys.org/news/2021-04-ancient-pottery-reveals-evidence-honey.html


                                        This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
                                        part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

                                    </div>
Spotlight on people who risk losing their sight
Spotlight on people who risk losing their sight

WHO Europe highlights the lack of effective eye screening for people with diabetes

The aims are simple: to reduce the risk of diabetes and ensure that all people who are diagnosed have access to equitable, comprehensive, affordable and quality management of their condition.

Much work remains to be done. Insulin was discovered 100 years ago, yet far too many people still are unable to access this essential, life-saving medicine.

Today, at a high-level online summit,  the World Health Organization calls for renewed action on diabetes by launching the Global Diabetes Compact, a collective effort to improve care for people with diabetes and increase service resources, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when services, including those for people with diabetes, are under increasing pressure.

Linked to this global event, WHO Europe is publishing the provisional results of a survey that reveals wide disparities in European countries in the provision of eye screening for people with diabetes. It is also releasing a case study about the adaptation of a diabetes care service in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Diabetes is a disease that continues to increase, but it is still in the shadows,”  says Dr Nino Berdzuli, Director of the Division of Country Health Programmes at WHO Europe. “Although most countries in the WHO European Region carry out eye screening for people with diabetes, opportunities to prevent blindness and vision impairment still are being missed.  People with diabetes have had their treatment greatly disrupted by the pandemic and have been at particular risk from severe disease and death from COVID-19. Health systems have found ways of coping, but diabetes care often is not included in recovery and response plans.”

Impact in Europe

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision impairment and blindness across the WHO European Region, with an estimated 950 000 people affected. WHO Europe commissioned the University of Liverpool, United Kingdom, to carry out a situational analysis of DR screening in the WHO European Region by seeking the perspectives of ophthalmology and endocrinology professional organizations in Member States. It revealed that very few countries have good systematic DR programmes. Surveys were analysed from respondents in 45 Member States. Only six respondents reported that there was a complete list of all people with diabetes in their country that could be used to call, re-call and monitor people for eye screening regularly. Seventeen could not provide any information at all on DR screening coverage or uptake.

On 15 April, WHO Europe is also holding an online meeting for policy-makers, public health leaders and senior clinicians involved in planning, designing and implementing DR screening programmes in Georgia and Ukraine. The meeting, which is part of a larger initiative – co-funded by the Government of Denmark – that aims to improve the management of diabetes and prevent its complications in selected countries in Europe, will: review DR screening already in place; consider options available for improvement; and identify any potential quick wins over the coming months to increase effectiveness.

This work has been ongoing. In November 2020, WHO published an operational guide that demonstrates the principles and pathways for DR screening and explains how to initiate new programmes or improve the effectiveness of those already existing. The guide forms part of WHO’s efforts to increase the effectiveness of screening programmes within the Region, maximizing benefits and minimizing harm.  A Russian-language version of the guide will also be issued at the launch on 15 April.

Farm Management Software Market Report 2021 Recent Development and Trends, Expected Growth and its Factors, CAGR, Industry Size, Business Prospects and Forecast 2025
Farm Management Software Market Report 2021 Recent Development and Trends, Expected Growth and its Factors, CAGR, Industry Size, Business Prospects and Forecast 2025
            <!--UdmComment--><!--/UdmComment-->
              <h2 class="fe_heading2">Farm Management Software Market Report 2021 Recent Development and Trends, Expected Growth and its Factors, CAGR, Industry Size, Business Prospects and Forecast 2025</h2>
              </p><div readability="174.64308246958">

Apr 13, 2021 (AmericaNewsHour) —

Kenneth Research has published a detailed report on Farm Management Software Market, which has been categorized by market size as well as growth indicators, and further encompasses detailed market analysis on macro trends and region-wise growth in North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Middle East & Africa region. The report also includes the challenges that are affecting the growth of the industry and offers strategic evaluation that is required to boost the growth of the market over the period of 2021-2025.

<p>The <strong>Farm Management Software Market</strong> is estimated to record a significant growth throughout the forecast period. The ICT sector constitutes 4.8% of the European economy. Europe's organization ERDF i.e. European Regional Development Fund has allotted approximately <a href="/chart/US/M">USD</a> 23 billion for investments related to ICT during the funding period 2014-2020. ICT refers to the communication technologies including the internet, wireless networks, social networking, cell phones, video-conferencing, computers, software, and other media applications and services enabling users to access, retrieve, and manipulate information in a digital form.</p>    <p>Market synopsis</p>    <p>The farm management software and services market comprises of major applications that include record keeping, farm mapping, monitoring and forecasting, farm economics, and other applications. The farm management market is majorly driven by factors impacting the growth of the software and IT market such as growing demand for organic food and changing the lifestyle of people, profitability, and production with smart techniques implemented in farming. Additionally, the monitoring and observation of crops and <a href="/chart/LE/M">cattle</a> to yield additional production. The market for farm management software is expected to show a significant growth due to growing demand for a convenient cloud storage that has been widely incorporated in farm management software.</p>    <p>Download Sample of This Strategic Report- <a href="https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10154436" rel="nofollow">https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10154436</a></p>    <p>Apart from the management of crops, farm management software is also used for tax management, profit center analysis, cost accounting, inventory management, livestock management, and financial management. These additional services and features benefit farmers to keep monitored ROI and manage expenses revenue by tracking all the vital information. Various governments have started investing and taking initiative for the need and importance of the management software, thereby promoting farming and agriculture drive the growth of the market. However, higher initial capital investment and limited technical expertise are some of the factors restraining the market growth.</p>    <p>Segmentation</p>    <p>On the basis of the agriculture type, the market is segmented into precision farming, livestock monitoring, fish farming, smart greenhouse farming, and others.On the basis of the delivery model, the market is segmented into on-premise/web-based, and cloud-based.On the basis of service providers, the market is segmented into managed service providers (farm operation services, data services, and analytics services), professional service providers (supply chain management services and climate information services), connectivity service providers,  maintenance, up gradation and support services.On the basis of the application, the market is segmented into record keeping, farm mapping, monitoring and forecasting, farm economics, and others.</p>    <p>Regional analysis</p>    <p>North America is expected to have the largest market share in the forecast period. This growth is due to the on-premise/web-based delivery model of farm management software. Additionally, the government amenability increased the need for farm yield, and growing demand for advanced farming solutions tends to drive the farm management software market. Farmers in countries like the U.S. and Canada are progressively accepting modern farming systems, components, and devices such as farm management software, mobile applications, cloud services, imagery services, hi-speed internet services, and data analytics services.</p>    <p>However, Asia Pacific is the fastest growing market due to the on-cloud delivery model of the farm management software market. The rate of acceptance of farm management software is expected to be high as the Asia Pacific comprises of emerging countries such as India, China, and Southeast Asian countries. Increased government spending, improved standard of living, urbanization, and growing awareness among agriculturists regarding advanced farming solutions are some of the key drivers for the growth of the farm management software market in this region.</p>    <p>Key players</p>    <p>The key players in the global farm management software market include Deere & Company (U.S.), Trimble Inc (U.S.), AG Junction, Inc (U.S.), Raven Industries, Inc. (U.S.), Iteris, Inc. (U.S.), AG Leader Technology Inc (U.S.), Dickey-John Corporation (U.S.), SST Development Group, Inc. (U.S.), Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc.(U.S.) among others.</p>    <p>Request For Full Report- <a href="https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10154436" rel="nofollow">https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10154436</a></p>    <p>Global Farm Management Software Market, <a href="/chart/US/M">USD</a> Billion</p>    <p>Intended Audience</p>    <p>Farm Management Software services providers</p>    <p>IT service providers</p>    <p>Farm equipment manufacturers</p>    <p>Government agencies</p>    <p>Cloud Service providers</p>    <p>Agriculture components manufacturers</p>    <p>Value-added resellers</p>    <p>Construction builders</p>    <p>Research Firms</p>    <p>About Kenneth Research:</p>    <p>Kenneth Research provides market research reports to different individuals, industries, associations and organizations with an aim of helping them to take prominent decisions. Our research library comprises of more than 10,000 research reports provided by more than 15 market research publishers across different industries. Our collection of market research solutions covers both macro level as well as micro level categories with relevant and suitable market research titles. As a global market research reselling firm, Kenneth Research provides significant analysis on various markets with pure business intelligence and consulting services on different industries across the globe. In addition to that, our internal research team always keep a track on the international and domestic market for any economic changes impacting the products' demand, growth and opportunities for new and existing players.</p>    <p>Contact Us</p>    <p>Kenneth Research<br />Email: Sales@kennethresearch.com<br />Phone: +1 313 462 0609</p> <p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.americanewshour.com/2021/04/13/farm-management-software-market-report-2021-recent-development-and-trends-expected-growth-and-its-factors-cagr-industry-size-business-prospects-and-forecast-2025/644990/">Farm Management Software Market Report 2021 Recent Development and Trends, Expected Growth and its Factors, CAGR, Industry Size, Business Prospects and Forecast 2025</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.americanewshour.com">America News Hour</a>.
WHO and partners urge countries to halt sales of wild mammals at food markets
WHO and partners urge countries to halt sales of wild mammals at food markets

The interim guidance, published on Tuesday, is aimed at reducing public health risks associated with these transactions as most emerging infectious diseases have wildlife origins. 

“Globally, traditional markets play a central role in providing food and livelihoods for large populations. Banning the sale of these animals can protect people’s health – both those working there and those shopping there”, they said in a press release. 

No way to check for viruses 

The temporary guidelines were issued by WHO alongside the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).   

They said animals, particularly wild animals, are the source of more than 70 per cent of all emerging infectious diseases in humans, many of which are caused by novel viruses. Wild mammals sold in markets pose particular risk as there is no way to check if they carry dangerous viruses. 

“Traditional markets, where live animals are held, slaughtered and dressed, pose a particular risk for pathogen transmission to workers and customers alike,” the guidance stated.

The partners noted that some of the earliest known cases of COVID-19, which is caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, were linked to a traditional food market in Wuhan, China.  Many of the first people to have the disease were stall owners, market employees or regular visitors. 

“It is likely that the virus that causes COVID-19 originated in wild animals, as it belongs to a group of coronaviruses normally found in bats”, they said.    

“One hypothesis is that the virus was initially transmitted to humans through an intermediary animal host that is, as yet, unknown. Another possibility is that the virus was transmitted directly from a host species of animal to humans.” 

Additional hygiene guidance 

In addition to halting sales of wild animals, the guidelines also call for governments to close markets, or sections of markets, and to re-open them “only on condition that they meet required food safety, hygiene and environmental standards and comply with regulations.” 

Authorities are also urged to improve hygiene and sanitation at traditional food markets to reduce transmission of zoonotic diseases. 

“During this pandemic, additional measures for crowd control and physical distancing, hand washing and sanitizing stations as well as education on respiratory hygiene including on use of face masks should be introduced in market settings to limit the possibility of person-to-person transmission of disease,” they added.

EFSA presents data on pesticide residues in food
EFSA presents data on pesticide residues in food

The non-compliance rate for pesticides in foods decreased in 2019, according to a report published by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

The report is based on data from official national controls done by EU member states, Iceland and Norway.

For 2019, 96.1 percent of the 96,302 samples analyzed fell below the maximum residue level (MRL), 3.9 percent, or 3,720 samples, exceeded this level, of which 2,252 were non‐compliant based on measurement uncertainty.

The number of samples tested in 2019 increased compared to 91,015 in 2018. The MRL exceedance rate was 4.5 percent and the non-compliance rate was 2.7 percent in 2018.

Fipronil findings still featured in eggs with 23 samples and animal fat with eight. It is a veterinary medicinal product or biocide and presence in eggs is the result of illegal use. EFSA advised that member states continue analyzing for it in animal products. Ethylene oxide, which has prompted thousands of recalls across Europe from late 2020, was not mentioned.

Multiple findings and origin details
Reporting countries looked for 799 different pesticides in 2019. On average, 233 different ones were analyzed per sample. National control programs are risk-based, targeting products likely to contain pesticide residues or for which infringements have been identified in previous years.

Of all samples, 44.1 percent contained one or several pesticides in quantifiable concentrations, which is down from 47.8 percent in 2018. Multiple residues were reported in 25,584 samples. In a dried vine fruit sample with unknown origin, up to 28 different pesticides were found. In 313 tests, more than 10 pesticides were detected in the same sample.

The most frequently quantified pesticides were copper compounds, fosetyl, phosphane, bromide ion and chlorates. The one with the highest MRL exceedance rate was chlorate, a result in line with past years.

More than 61,000 samples came from one of the reporting countries and a quarter were from non-EU nations. Samples with unknown origin increased to 11.3 percent compared to 10 percent in 2018. France reported nearly half of its samples as unknown origin. Country of origin is a valuable piece of information for traceability reasons in the case of non-compliance, according to EFSA.

Of samples from the reporting countries, 2.7 percent exceeded the MRL and 1.3 percent were non-compliant. Samples from non-EU countries had a higher exceedance rate of 7.8 percent and a higher non-compliance level at 5.6 percent.

The highest MRL exceedance rates were linked to products from Malta, Cyprus and Poland, with more than 5 percent of samples above the MRL. The non-compliant rate was most for products grown in Malta, Cyprus and Bulgaria. The top exceedance rates for non-EU countries were in Laos, Malaysia, Ghana, Uganda, Vietnam, Pakistan, Dominican Republic, Thailand and Cambodia.

Food for children, organic and glyphosate
The MRL exceedance rate in processed food products for 9,983 samples, was 2.8 percent, which is lower than that for unprocessed products.

Among 86,319 samples of unprocessed food products, 4 percent had residues above their corresponding MRLs and 2.4 percent were non-compliant samples. The percentage of non-compliances is slightly lower than 2018.

The highest MRL exceedance rates were in grape leaves, yard-long beans, coriander leaves, chili peppers, watercress, passion fruits/maracujas, pitahaya (dragon fruit), celery leaves, pomegranates, teas, and prickly pears/cactus fruits.

Reporting countries analyzed 1,513 samples of foods for infants and young children. MRL exceedances were reported in 20 samples and non-compliance was found five times. In one case, five pesticide residues were reported in the same sample.

More than 6,000 samples of organic food were tested. In total, 76 samples had residue levels above their corresponding MRLs, of which 31 were non-compliant. Animal products showed a higher quantification rate in organic samples of 15 percent than conventional samples at 6 percent mainly because of hexachlorobenzene, DDT, thiacloprid and copper findings.

Glyphosate was analyzed by 26 countries. From the 13,336 samples of different products, it was quantified at levels below the MRL in 364 samples and levels exceeded the limit for 12 samples.

For the 12,579 samples in the EU‐coordinated control program (EUCP), 2 percent, or 241, exceeded the MRL and 120 were non‐compliant.

The EUCP covered apples, head cabbages, lettuce, peaches, spinach, strawberries, tomatoes, oat grain, barley grain, wine, cow’s milk and swine fat. Samples were analyzed for 182 pesticide residues.

Pesticides, not approved in the EU and found on crops grown there at non-compliant levels, included acephate, carbofuran, chlorfenapyr, chlorothalonil, chlorpropham, clothianidin, cyfluthrin, dieldrin, iprodione, methomyl, oxadixyl and triadimefon. Non-approved residues found to be non-compliant on imported samples were acephate, chlorfenapyr, clothianidin, dichlorvos, fipronil, permethrin and thiamethoxam.

Because these results indicate possible misuse of non-approved substances, EFSA recommended that member states follow-up the findings to investigate reasons for their presence and use and take action where appropriate.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

Get to know your oats, and all the types and ways to eat them
Get to know your oats, and all the types and ways to eat them

Please enable cookies on your web browser in order to continue.

The new European data protection law requires us to inform you of the following before you use our website:

We use cookies and other technologies to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests. By clicking “I agree” below, you consent to the use by us and our third-party partners of cookies and data gathered from your use of our platforms. See our Privacy Policy and Third Party Partners to learn more about the use of data and your rights. You also agree to our Terms of Service.

COVID ‘long way from over’ as cases and deaths surge – WHO
COVID ‘long way from over’ as cases and deaths surge – WHO

Although January and February saw six consecutive weeks of plummeting COVID-19 cases, the World Health Organization (WHO) chief said that had gone into reverse, with last week yielding “the fourth-highest number of cases in a single week so far”. 

“We have now seen seven consecutive weeks of increasing cases, and four weeks of increasing deaths”, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told journalists at a regular media briefing. 

Keep physical distancing 

More than 780 million doses of vaccine have now been administered globally, but several Asian and Middle Eastern countries have seen large increases in infections, he said. 

While acknowledging that vaccines are “vital and powerful” instruments, the WHO chief reiterated that they are not the only tools needed to defeat the coronavirus.  

“Physical distancing works. Masks work. Hand hygiene works. Ventilation works. Surveillance, testing, contact tracing, isolation, supportive quarantine and compassionate care – they all work to stop infections and save lives”, Tedros underscored. 

‘Complacency and inconsistency’ 

While stressing the need for “a consistent, coordinated and comprehensive approach” in battling the virus, he said that “confusion, complacency and inconsistency in public health measures and their application, are driving transmission and costing lives”. 

WHO wants to see societies and economies reopening, and travel and trade resuming, instead it is witnessing intensive care units overflowing and people dying, which Tedros maintained “is totally avoidable”. 

He said proven public health measures and strong systems that have enabled countries to respond rapidly and consistently, illustrate that COVID “can be stopped and contained”, adding that those nations are now able to enjoy sporting events, concerts, restaurants and seeing their family and friends safely. 

Increase vaccine output 

Currently, global manufacturing is insufficient to deliver quick, equitable vaccines and other essential health products, according to the WHO official. 

Early in the pandemic, African countries agreed on a coordinated continental approach, “and now they’re coming together for a coordinated approach to scaling up manufacturing”, he said. 

Tedros stressed the importance of investing in “sustainable and secure domestic manufacturing capacity and national regulatory authorities”, asserted that “what can be done today, should be done today”. 

Noting that WHO and its partners have established a COVAX manufacturing taskforce, to increase supply and build a sustainable vaccine manufacturing platform, he offered the UN agency’s technical assistance in assessing the feasibility of local production and to access technology and know-how. 

Bad choices 

Despite continuing transmissions, some countries are re-opening restaurants, night clubs and indoor markets, with too few people taking precautions. 

Moreover, the UN health chief observed that some young people appear to feel that it doesn’t matter if they get COVID-19. 

“Young, healthy people have died. And we still don’t fully understand the long-term consequences of infection for those who survive”, he reminded, echoing reports of some mild cases that have left long-term symptoms, including fatigue, weakness and anxiety. 

While the pandemic is “a long way from over”, Tedros said there were numerous reasons to be optimistic. 

He pointed to the decline in cases and deaths during the first two months of the year as evidence that the virus and its variants can be stopped. 

“With a concerted effort to apply public health measures alongside equitable vaccination, we could bring this pandemic under control in a matter of months”, he attested. 

However, the WHO chief added that this hinges on the decisions and actions that governments and individuals make every day, spelling out: “The choice is ours”.

Cheshire Trafford (UK) Limited, a Fully-Owned Subsidiary of Argentum 47, Inc. Increases Its Total Funds Under Administration by 40%
Cheshire Trafford (UK) Limited, a Fully-Owned Subsidiary of Argentum 47, Inc. Increases Its Total Funds Under Administration by 40%


Cheshire Trafford (UK) Limited, a Fully-Owned Subsidiary of Argentum 47, Inc. Increases Its Total Funds Under Administration by 40% – Organic Food News Today – EIN Presswire




















  <div class="eh-ribbon">

      Trusted News Since 1995

    <span class="prof not-if-mobile-w820">A service for food industry professionals</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w820">·</span>
    <span class="date">Monday, April 12, 2021</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w430">
      ·
      <a class="article_live_counter" href="/live_feed">538,489,042</a>
      Articles
    </span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w550">
      ·
      3+ Million Readers
    </span>
  </div>
</header>

<footer>
  <div class="sitemap">
    <h2 class="subheading-osc g_roboto">News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools</h2>
    <div class="row-fluid">
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>News Topics</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Newsletters</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>Press Releases</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Events & Conferences</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>RSS Feeds</h3>

        </section>
        <section>
          <h3>Other Services</h3>

        </section>
      </div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section>
          <h3>Questions?</h3>

        </section>
        <br/><section>

        </section>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>









<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="/js/excanvas.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<![endif]-->



<!-- Start Alexa Certify Javascript -->

<noscript/>
<!-- End Alexa Certify Javascript -->
<!--[if IE 7]>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/json2.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

Top 12 Chocolate Companies in the World
Top 12 Chocolate Companies in the World

In this article we presented top 12 chocolate companies in the world. Click to skip our detailed discussion of the chocolate industry and see the Top 5 Chocolate Companies in the World.

The global chocolate industry is on a growth trajectory as taste for chocolate is being adopted around the world. In 2019, this market was already valued at over $130 billion. It is expected to grow at a CAGR of at least 5% by 2024, according to the market report by Technavio. The overall market value for the industry is projected to exceed almost $187 billion by 2026, according to Statista. The largest market for chocolate confectionary in the world is in Western Europe, which accounts for one-third of the global chocolate market.

The Changing Trends in the Chocolate Industry

The chocolate industry has been rapidly evolving over the last several years amid changing tastes and preferences of consumers. The trend of dark and premium chocolates forms the largest segment of the chocolate market in the U.S. With leading companies like Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Hershey’s, Mars and General Mills, the American chocolate industry is thriving in the world. Unique products and luxurious consumption experiences are keeping consumers coming back for more. The growth in the chocolate market can be attributed to Asia Pacific countries where consumer preferences are becoming accustomed to western tastes. Thus, demand for chocolate is booming which has in turn raised the demand for cocoa by 30% as of 2020 according to Grand View Research.

There are growing preferences for chocolate products which are low in sugar content and which use organic ingredients. In 2019, Mars Wrigley Confectionary launched a new low-calorie range of single-serve bars with more protein and less sugar. Moreover, the packaging of chocolates has become even more innovative which is doing wonders for the gift-giving businesses as well. The Ferrero Rocher chocolate made by the Ferrero Group has a tin gold foil wrapping that gives it a premium look and is a popular choice for gifts.

Some of the notable developments identified in the industry include the health benefits of dark chocolates that are rich in cocoa, increasing demand for premium-based dark chocolates that are made as gifts, more regulated seasonal chocolates by producers, and flourishing marketing initiatives. There is a growing awareness regarding the health benefits of chocolate as well that has contributed towards the growth of the industry. Many prominent companies such as Mondelez have stepped up to meet this growing demand and brought about creative and delicious chocolate products that are enjoyed by consumers worldwide.

Image by Hans Braxmeier from Pixabay

Here is a list of the top 12 chocolate companies in the world:

12. MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC Common Stock (NASDAQ: MDLZ)

Revenue: $27 billion in 2020

Mondelez International is an American multinational food, confectionary, holding, beverage, and snack food company which is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. It operates in 160 countries and has an annual revenue of about $26 billion. In 2018, Mondelez was ranked 117 in the Fortune 500 list of the largest companies in USA in terms of their total revenues. The company manufactures products like chocolates, cookies, gum, biscuits, confectionary, and other powdered beverages. They also own several billion-dollar brands such as Milka and Cadbury chocolates, LU, Oreo biscuits, Tang beverages, BelVita and Trident gum. The company has a portfolio consisting of national, regional, and global brands, most of which are more than a hundred years old. Chocolates and biscuits account for most of the company’s annual revenue. Global markets account for a huge chunk of the company’s revenue. The company ranks 12th in the list of top chocolate companies in the world.

11. Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. (TYO: 2206.T)

Revenue: $344,048,000 million in 2020 via Yahoo Finance

Ezaki Glico Co Ltd. is a Japanese food company which is headquartered in Osaka. Its primary focus is the production and sale of confectionary and other food items such as ice cream, milk and dairy products etc. The confectionaries segment of the company produces chocolates, gums, snacks and cookies. The company has raised high revenues with the sale of its biggest selling brands like Pocky and Pretz lines which feature chocolate cookies and pretzels. They have also become the biggest international sellers of these items. Another popular item that has boosted the company’s sales is their almond chocolate.

10. Pladis

Revenue: 3.5 billion GBP

Pladis Global is a confectionary and snacks food manufacturing company which is based in London, England. It was founded in 2016 as a subsidiary of Yildiz Holding and now has acquired multiple food brands such as United Biscuits, Godiva Chocolatier, DeMet’s Candy Company and Ulker. Pladis has 34 manufacturing units across 13 countries and its products are distributed to about 4 billion people around the world across 120 countries. Pladis has established itself as a leading chocolate company which makes sweet and savory treats which is recognized by consumers globally. The company is earning an annual revenue of £3.5 billion which has made it one of the most prominent companies in Europe. Pladis currently has 26,000 people working for them across different countries.

9. Lindt & Sprüngli AG

Revenue: $4.02 billion in 2020 via Yahoo Finance

Lindt is a swiss chocolatier and confectionary company that is based in Kilchberg, Switzerland. It was founded in 1845 and has become a household name across the world since then. The company is famous for making premium chocolates, truffles, and other sweets. Its main factory and museum are also located in Kilchberg. Lindt specializes in creating high quality, premium chocolates, and chocolate desserts. It has established chocolate cafes around the world. They also sell handmade chocolates, cakes, ice cream and macaroons. Their most popular chocolate products include the LINDOR truffle and the Lindt Gold Bunny. According to Statista, the company’s total worldwide sales amounted to abour four billion Swiss francs in 2020.

8. The Hershey Company (NYSE: HSY)

Revenue: $8,149,719 in 2020 via Yahoo Finance

The Hershey Co. was found in 1894 and is headquartered in Hershey, PA. It is involved in the manufacturing and marketing of chocolate and sugar confectionary products that are available across 60 countries worldwide. The company is divided into three segments. The North American segment is responsible for the traditional chocolate and non-chocolate confectionery market position of the company. It has multiple brands such as Hershey’s, Reese’s and Kisses. The company has three huge distribution centers that cater to the worldwide demand of its products. It is also associated with the Giant Center and the Hershey Park Stadium in the US. The most popular products of the company include Reese’s peanut butter cups, Hershey’s kisses, twizzlers, mounds, almond joy candy bars, Kit Kat bars and York peppermint patties. Apart from these, Hershey’s also produces grocery items like baking products, toppings, syrups, cookies, bubble gum and cocoa mixes. The US accounts for most of the sales of the company. The North American segment of Hershey’s had net sales of $1.844 billion as of 2020 according to the candyindustry.

7. General Mills, Inc. (NYSE: GIS)

Revenue: $17,626,600 in 2020 via Yahoo Finance

General Mills is an American multinational company which manufactures branded consumer foods. It is among the list of top chocolate companies in the world. It is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota and its brand portfolio consists of more than 89 leading US brands such as Betty Crocker, Totino’s, Haagen-Dazs, Annie’s Homegrown, Cheerios, Cocoa Puffs and Lucky Charms amongst others. Founded over 150 years ago, the company has become a leading name in the chocolate industry with its largest global operating segment generating $10 billion of net sales in 2020, according to Statista. The largest division of the company is the US Meals and Baking division which alone generated $4.5 billion worth of net sales in 2020. Its most popular chocolate products include cereals like Chocolate Toast Crunch, Cocoa Puffs, Count Chocula, Cookie Crisp and cookies and cream puffs etc.

6. The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ: KHC)

Revenue: $26,185,000 in 2020 via Yahoo Finance

The Kraft Heinz Company is an American food company which is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. It ranks 6th in the list of 12 top chocolate companies in the world. It was formed by the merger of Kraft Foods and Heinz and has since become the 3rd largest food and beverage company in North America and the 5th largest in the world with $26 billion in annual sales in 2020. The company has in its portfolio several more brands such as Oscar Mayer, Philadelphia Cream cheese, Wattie’s and Planters. In 2018, Kraft was ranked number 114 in the Fortune 500 list of the largest corporations in the US based on its revenue. Its most popular chocolate products include Baker’s chocolate, Daim, Freia, Jet-puffed, Cote d’or, Lacta, Marabou, Milka, Toblerone, Terry’s, Prince Polo and Trakinas.

Click to continue reading and see the Top 5 Chocolate Companies in the World.

Suggested articles:

Disclosure: None. Top 10 Chocolate Companies in the World is originally published on Insider Monkey.

Covering Climate Now: How do we decarbonise NZ's energy sector?
Covering Climate Now: How do we decarbonise NZ’s energy sector?

Geothermal steam bellows from the cooling tower of the Ohaaki Power Station, near Taupō. About 85 per cent of electricity generated here comes from renewable sources. Photo / Alan Gibson

As part of the global Covering Climate Now initiative, the Herald is dedicating a week of coverage to the issues surrounding the climate crisis. In the first of a series of in-depth interviews with leading experts on key policy areas, Herald science reporter Jamie Morton speaks with Emeritus Professor Ralph Sims, of Massey University, about how we can make New Zealand’s energy sector greener.

As of 2018, heat, industry and power emissions made up some 41 per cent of total long-lived greenhouse gases in New Zealand. Why do these sectors contribute such a large share of our emissions?

Many industries still burn coal and gas to provide high to medium temperature heat for their processes such as smelting steel, drying milk, growing greenhouse crops, or producing cement.

The Government has recently announced policies and grants to encourage businesses to displace these fossil fuels with high-temperature heat pumps, electro-thermal technologies, and sustainably produced biomass to meet their heat demands.

Electricity generation in New Zealand is mainly from low-carbon renewable resources like hydro, wind, geothermal, bioenergy, solar – but at present around 15 per cent of total electricity still comes from burning coal and gas that produce carbon dioxide (CO2).

A coal-fired power station such as Huntly emits around 900g CO2/kWh generated, and gas-fired plants emit around 600g CO2/kWh.

Renewable electricity, however, is closer to zero, with the exception of geothermal that releases around 20 to 40g CO2/kWh, when extracting the hot brine.

So, what barriers have been in the way of decarbonising these sectors?

Coal and gas have been relatively cheap fuels in New Zealand, even with a carbon price added under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).

New Zealand has been very slow to act compared with, say, Sweden that introduced a carbon charge on fossil fuels 30 years ago.

That tax is now around $180 per tonne of CO2, so has made a difference to fossil fuel consumption – whereas the ETS price in NZ has only slowly crept up to $35 per tonne over the past few years.

This price remains far too low to have any real impact on behavioural change or encouraging businesses to move away from using fossil fuels.

After the carbon tax was imposed in Sweden, biomass – mainly from forest residues and municipal solid wastes – soon became the common heating fuel, with a large supply industry now well established.

It employs many people to provide solid biomass fuels to numerous district heating, industrial heating and co-generation plants.

This week, the Government announced New Zealand would seek to phase out coal boilers for process heat by 2037 – starting with a ban on new low to medium temperature boilers from next year. What difference will this make? And is it ambitious enough?

The concept has been analysed and promoted in New Zealand for decades given the relatively high CO2 emissions involved.

So the Government policy to ban installation of new coal-fired boilers is long overdue.

Given that a molecule of CO2 emitted from a gas or coal-fired boiler today – or over the next 16 years until 2037 – will remain in the atmosphere for hundreds of years and thereby add to the global warming effect, a policy to encourage deployment of low-carbon heating systems should have been implemented years ago.

Many examples already exist in New Zealand of successful and cost-effective electro-thermal, solar thermal and bioenergy heating systems, as well as using geothermal heat in regions where it is available.

Technological developments to improve biomass boiler efficiencies have long been demonstrated in countries such as Austria, Denmark, Thailand and elsewhere.

Partly depending on the future carbon price, it is likely some operators of coal-fired boilers will phase them about before the end of their life.

The Government also has its own fleet of coal boilers still operating in schools and public buildings.

Hopefully, it will lead by example and phase them out well before 2037.

A further 16 years of continuing to emit CO2 emissions from coal combustion is simply not tolerable.

We’ve heard much discussion about New Zealand’s 2035 target for an electricity grid using solely renewable sources of energy. Is this realistic?

Achieving 100 per cent renewable electricity is technically possible, but not cost-effective, based on current technologies.

Continual fluctuations in the national electricity load means the generation system has to be able to quickly respond to maintain voltage and security of supply since electricity cannot be easily stored.

With more variable wind and solar generation now in the mix, the challenge to continually meet supply with demand has increased.

The electricity industry strives to produce an affordable and sustainable supply that is reliable.

Consumers expect the system to work at all times and become disgruntled with their electricity company whenever there is an outage.

Peak demand loads in the mornings and evenings used to be managed by the power companies controlling domestic hot water heating systems using “ripple control” to turn them off at peak times and on again once the peak had passed.

Consumers knew no difference.

This demand-side facility has been lost under the free-market we now have, though other demand-side options exist such as paying cool-store operators to turn their refrigeration plants off for an hour or two at peak times, aiming to flatten the peak.

The bigger challenge than meeting daily peaks is to meet seasonal demands, especially in a dry year when the hydro lakes are low so generation is constrained.

The Government has committed to phasing out all coal boilers by 2037. Photo / Supplied

As one possible solution, the Government is investigating using a pumped-hydro scheme to store large volumes of water behind a dam for use when additional power is needed.

Battery storage is also becoming cheaper and large-scale storage systems have been demonstrated in South Australia and elsewhere.

But there is a cost associated with any form of energy storage.

Making the grid more flexible – such as by using demand-side options and time-of-use pricing – is a part solution.

But it could be that on rare occasions when needed, a back-up gas-fired power plant could be kept on standby for limited use.

Or, a number of bioenergy plants built with the woody biomass fuel could provide a store of energy, as is common in Sweden and elsewhere.

Since they would only be run when needed in dry years, the Government will need to own and operate them.

Electrifying our energy use is a major part of New Zealand’s “just transition” away from fossil fuels – but it would require a major expansion of the electricity system. Is it possible for sources like wind, geothermal and solar power to meet the expected growth in demand from electrifying transport and heat to 2050, while keeping electricity affordable?

The projected increasing demand for electricity for process heat, domestic heat, and electric vehicles has been assessed.

Improving energy efficiency, so that the same energy services are provided but with lower energy inputs, will help to control the demand growth.

Further improving energy efficiency further across all sectors is a critical part of moving towards renewable energy systems.

Educating consumers how to save electricity and hence save money is a key component.

New Zealand is blessed with large resources of wind, solar radiation, biomass, geothermal fields and hydro, which is why we have reached around 85 per cent renewable electricity without any government subsidies that are common in most other countries.

Many wind farms and geothermal sites that can compete economically with gas-fired power plants have been consented but not yet built.

Solar farms covering several hectares of land each are now being developed, and more home-owners are investing in solar PV systems and using them to also charge their EVs.

The main problem is the incumbent electricity market, consisting of generators, line companies and retailers, is not designed to readily adapt to changing technologies.

Many of the “old school” were educated that electricity is generated in large central power stations and sent down wires to users who are distributed.

The advent of smart-grids, distributed generation systems, solar heating, and other small-scale generators has not been fully accommodated by the market that is resisting change.

Therefore, the goal should be for a think-tank to determine what the future market should look like in order to generate affordable and reliable electricity to meet the growing demand but without producing CO2 – and then to determine how we best get from where the system is to where it needs to be.

Given all our renewable resources and the rapid rate of technological developments, it shouldn’t be difficult.

There’s also growing interest and investment in “green hydrogen” as a viable alternative fuel source – and one that could provide a sustainable future for the oil and gas industry. What hope and potential is there here?

The concept for a hydrogen economy has come and gone in recent decades but is currently being reconsidered in many countries, including New Zealand.

Most hydrogen is currently produced from natural gas (brown hydrogen) or industrial processes (grey hydrogen) so is linked with greenhouse gas emissions.

Its future therefore has to be around producing low-carbon “green hydrogen” using renewable electricity.

Emeritus Professor Ralph Sims, of Massey University. Photo / Supplied

Hydrogen cars have been around for decades and a hydrogen bus is now running around Auckland with a refuelling station at the Port of Auckland.

Also, a Massey University project 20 years ago, in association with Callaghan Innovation, produced hydrogen for use by a small rural community, using a small wind turbine on top of a hill to power an electrolyser.

The point is that hydrogen as an energy carrier is not a new concept whether for electricity generation, heat supply or transport fuel.

The question is whether now is the right time for its wider deployment.

Japan, the European Union, the UK and other countries are moving along the hydrogen pathway, but there are issues to overcome.

On the downside, green hydrogen is more costly to produce than other sources though electrolysers, like batteries, are becoming cheaper.

Also, there is a considerable energy efficiency loss throughout the entire system.

For example, generating electricity used for electrolysis of water to give hydrogen that is then stored before combustion or conversion to electricity in a fuel cell is a far less efficient process (around 30 per cent) than generating electricity for direct use (around 80 per cent).

The main benefit from the hydrogen route is that it can be relatively easily stored compared with electricity and with possible marine and aviation applications.

So once again in regard to a future hydrogen economy it is a case of “watch this space”.

You’ve long been a proponent of a “bio-economy”. Can you recap what this is? And why do you believe it would be a good model for New Zealand?

Using woody biomass, straw, animal manure, sewage, municipal solid wastes to produce useful bioenergy for heat, power or transport biofuels is commonplace around the world.

When biomass is combusted, CO2 is produced during the process the same as when burning fossil fuels.

However, instead of the carbon being suddenly released into the atmosphere after millions of years of being stored underground, the CO2 from biomass is recycled through photosynthesis by the next crop or forest growing to replace the one harvested.

Thus, biomass has been agreed internationally to be carbon neutral.

New Zealand has large area of plantation forests harvested for the logs, so thereby leaving large volumes of woody residues behind.

Massey University was contracted around 30 years ago to look at using these “arisings” for generating electricity.

Cheap coal and gas made it economically unviable at the time, but the technology was proven and the resource remains.

Z Energy’s biodiesel plant in Wiri, South Auckland. Biofuels are already a tangible example of what could drive a “bioeconomy”. Photo / NZME

Indeed, forest residues – or “slash” – can cause environmental issues when left on the land such as when large amounts were washed on to Tolaga Bay beach a few years ago during a storm.

The technologies involved in simultaneously harvesting, processing and transporting both the logs and the residues as two separate products has been successfully used commercially in many European countries for decades.

It can easily be used here in New Zealand too and generate employment and another revenue stream for forest owners.

The small wood pellet processing industry that has been operating in New Zealand for several years using mainly wood process residues such as sawdust could be expanded if more residues become available.

Interestingly, the 4000 MW Drax power station in UK has been converted from coal to biomass.

Fuelled by 12.5 million tonnes of wood pellets imported by ship from western Canada, it generates over 12 per cent of all renewable electricity in the UK.

In addition, producing biogas can also be more widely produced and deployed here than at present.

Community scale biogas digesters have long existed in Denmark, UK, Germany for processing a range of organic wastes into bio-methane gas and the effluent by-product used for soil conditioning.

Given the long-term aim to ultimately phase out CO2 producing natural gas and LPG for cooking in barbecues and stoves, compressed biogas could be the solution using existing cooking equipment.

It’s not a new concept.

Liquid biofuels used for transport fuels have also been successfully deployed in many countries – including in New Zealand by Gull, Z Energy, and others.

In fact, given that crude oil was once biomass millions of years ago, then any use of petroleum products for fuels, chemicals or plastics can be substituted by biomass in one form or another.

There is on-going debate over whether the use of biomass for energy is sustainable or not.

The answer is that there is good biomass and bad biomass.

Bad biomass results from deforestation activities or when growing energy crops competes for fertile agricultural land and water with food crops.

Good biomass comes from organic municipal wastes, farm wastes, food wastes, crop residues and forest residues that would otherwise decay naturally and produce a range of greenhouse gases or cause disposal problems.

New Zealand has considerable resources of “good biomass”; many commercial bioenergy applications already exist; and the Bioenergy Association of New Zealand has a wide business membership.

However, bioenergy remains poorly understood even though its potential to contribute to New Zealand’s low-carbon future is significant.

Generally, what countries could New Zealand learn from when it comes to greening our energy sector?

Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Austria are leading in the use of woody biomass for process heat, power and co-generation – with UK and the US close behind.

Norway has near 100 per cent renewable electricity – mostly hydro – with an extensive EV network successfully operating as a result.

Iceland has 75 per cent hydro and 25 per cent geothermal for its 100 per cent renewable electricity, but in New Zealand, more large-scale hydro projects are unlikely.

So, we’re limited to the current 65 per cent share that will decline as wind, geothermal, bioenergy and solar increase.

Canada also has high hydro shares at 63 per cent of total generation and woody biomass is commonly used for heat. Large volumes of wood pellets are also exported.

Bioethanol is a common fuel in US, Brazil and several other countries; biodiesel is used in Northern Europe; and hydro-treated vegetable oil is common in Sweden as encouraged by the truck and automobile company Volvo.

Suez canal blockage may spur rush for Arctic shipping
Suez canal blockage may spur rush for Arctic shipping

Last week, Egyptian crews finally freed the 1,300-foot cargo freighter Ever Given after it was stuck for six days in the Suez Canal, grinding much of international commerce to a halt. A week after it was cleared, transit through the canal has rebounded, but the incident illustrated the vulnerability of some global shipping chokepoints and the importance of alternate routes.

For shipping companies, the most promising of these routes would take ships from Europe via the Northern Sea Route, NSR for short, over the Siberian coast and through the Bering Strait. Traveling between China and central Europe by way of the NSR is 40 percent shorter than through the Suez Canal, and as Arctic sea ice recedes and icebreaking technology improves, it may be the next big development in international shipping.

This year for the first time, three Russian tankers ferried liquid natural gas through the Bering Strait during the darkest months of winter. The Nikolai Zubov came through in the beginning of January, and later that month the Christophe de Margerie and the Nikolay Yevgenov followed suit.

The ships are Arc7 Ice-Class tankers, specially designed to move through thin and spotty sea ice. In January, they sailed from Sabetta on the northern Russian coast to China without any icebreaker assistance. On the way back in February, at the height of ice thickness in the Siberian Arctic, they were escorted by Russian nuclear icebreakers.

While the transit of tankers through the strait in the dead of winter was unprecedented, the use of the NSR for commercial shipping is not. Norway’s Center for High North Logistics reported a record 62 transits in 2020, up from just 37 in 2019. Most of these transits were during the relatively ice-free summer and fall months, but as the climate warms and the ice recedes, the navigable timeframe is growing.

Technological innovations are also making Arctic shipping more viable. While the Suez Canal was at a standstill, Finnish engineering firm Aker Arctic announced their new icebreaking container ship, built to navigate thick winter sea ice without an escort.

While it will be some years before icebreaking cargo ships are widely used, their ultimate adoption appears inevitable.

So how is Nome and the rest of Western Alaska preparing for the coming influx of commercial traffic? “The big thing is, we’re really behind the eight ball with what’s going on in the Arctic compared to everybody else,” according to Tom Vaden, chair of Nome’s Local Emergency Planning Committee, LEPC for short.

In 2016 the region hosted an exercise called Arctic Chinook, which involved a wide range of agencies including the Coast Guard, Alaskan Command and six foreign nations. Vaden and the LEPC participated as well in a mock shipwreck south of the Bering Strait.

In the scenario, a large cruise ship filled with elderly passengers went down in high seas near Diomede. “They were going to take everyone to Tin City, and from Tin City they were going to take the injured people to Kotzebue, and the rest to Nome,” Vaden explained.

But the operation soon ran into problems. High winds blew down the temporary tents in Tin City, and the weather was so bad in the strait they decided any physical mock rescue would be too risky. Instead, they did a number of tabletop and communication exercises in Nome. The experience illustrated how ill-prepared the region is for an actual high-seas rescue, Vaden said. The ships going through the strait now are even bigger than the cruise ships five years ago, and they’re starting to come through at all times of year.

Another major concern is environmental pollution. Last August, an unexplained marine debris pulse saw plastic and organic trash washing up on regional beaches in alarming quantities. Many of the packages had Russian and Korean writing, but the source of the debris was never pinpointed.

Instead, regional communities took it upon themselves to clean plastic off their shores. Around the same time, a white oily substance started popping up around St. Lawrence Island, smothering birds and marine mammals

“As we learned from the 2020 debris event, our region is essentially on its own to respond,” said Kawerak Inc.’s Marine Advocate Austin Ahmasuk. “There are few resources to tackle debris events and I am not aware of dedicated funding coming our way for debris events or other necessary programmatic funding to protect public resources.”

An oil spill would be especially catastrophic, since many regional residents rely on its productive ecosystem for subsistence foods, and the area’s remoteness makes response especially challenging. Vaden said the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation has oil booms in Nome and some other regional communities, but likely not enough in the event of a serious accident.

“A lot of people don’t understand that you can’t put boom out in the ocean if you’ve got ocean waves. It just doesn’t work,” Vaden said. “And if it’s under the ice, we’re pretty much all shafted.”

The Coast Guard currently only has two polar-class icebreakers, both of which are nearing the end of their lives and split their time between Alaska, the Atlantic Arctic and Antarctica.

While Congress approved funding for new icebreakers in December, it will be years before they’re built and operational. If one of the tankers had an accident passing through the ice, there would be no way for the U.S. to reach it.

In January, the tanker Nikolay Yevgenov came to a standstill in the sea ice north of the Bering Strait after a malfunction with one of its propellers. It eventually crawled out of the ice using its remaining propellors, but the incident had many in the region worried.

“Myself and others who were following this as it unfolded were greatly concerned.  Our region may have only narrowly avoided a major catastrophe just a few months ago,” Ahmasuk said. “One can only imagine the potential impact of such a large vessel having a catastrophic failure in our remote region.”

Those concerns aren’t going totally unheard. In the summer of 2022, a number of military and disaster response organizations will hold a set of exercises called Arctic Eagle, which will happen simultaneously across Alaska. Part of the exercise will take place in Nome, playing out what would happen if the region were “under threat of attack from a near-peer adversary,” according to a presentation on the exercise.

Vaden said the exercise would see about 200 troops coming to Nome, although the precise details have yet to be hashed out. He said an increased military presence in the area would be critical as the Bering Strait becomes busier, both for security and disaster relief.

“We definitely need a U.S. presence in the Arctic. Right now we don’t have any,” he said. “I’m really hoping that with the port being built out, we’ll get a Coast Guard Sector Nome. It needs to be inevitable.”

The nearest Coast Guard base is currently in Kodiak. The Coast Guard also stations two rescue helicopters in Kotzebue during the summer months but has no year-round presence in the Arctic.

Scott McCann, a public affairs officer with Alaska’s Coast Guard district, couldn’t comment on future plans for expansion into the Arctic, but said they were monitoring the area closely and working with their counterparts in the Russian Border Guard to come up with ways to respond to emergencies.

“The Coast Guard has a long history of patrolling the Bering Strait and the polar region,” he said. “We could always use more assets, but we’re doing the best we can with what we got by employing them strategically.”

Ahmasuk said Kawerak recently met with the International Maritime Organization’s Pollution, Prevention and Response Sub-Committee to try to reduce pollutants from ships. “We were not immediately successful as international relations take years to materialize,” he said. They’ve also been trying to raise the issue with the Biden administration, but have yet to gain an audience.

In the meantime, the number of ships coming through the Bering Strait is likely only to increase. Ahmasuk said anyone in the region looking to learn more about shipping related concerns could email him at aahmasuk@kawerak.org, and to report any evidence of an oil spill to the National Response Center at 1-800-424-8802.­

Why rescuing the climate and saving biodiversity go hand in hand
Why rescuing the climate and saving biodiversity go hand in hand
                    <figure class="article-image-inline" data-method="caption-shortcode" readability="28"> <figcaption readability="6"><p class="image__caption">A kangaroo and her joey survey the aftermath of a wildfire in Mallacoota, Australia, in 2020</p><p class="image__credit">Jo-Anne McArthur/We Animals/naturepl</p></figcaption></figure>

THE Great Barrier Reef is already in a critical state. Rising sea temperatures are killing corals faster than they can recover. As temperatures continue to increase, more and more of the reef will die, along with the rich variety of life and the AUS$6 billion tourism industry that depend on it.

It is one headline-grabbing example among many. The continued rapid warming of the planet would wipe out many species, even if it were the only change happening. As it is, a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is already under way as farms replace forests and factory ships overfish the oceans.

                &#13;
                        <h5>Advertisement</h5>&#13;
                        &#13;

The heating of the planet will push many struggling species over the brink. Some will just have no place left to go. For biodiversity, climate change is, in military jargon, a threat multiplier. Worse still, measures to limit warming often don’t take biodiversity into account. Some, such as the push for biofuels, directly harm it.

Yet there is little that is inevitable about what happens next. We might not be able to save all the species under threat, but we can save an awful lot of them. “We could cut the number of extinctions in half,” says John Wiens at the University of Arizona. “I think that’s the biggest cause for optimism.”

But our chances are better if we think more smartly about the links between biodiversity loss and climate change, and tackle both of these issues together. Done right, a rescue plan for nature can be part of a plan for saving humanity from the worst of climate change – and vice versa.

“Many species are already moving to stay within their comfort zone”

The world has warmed around 1°C since pre-industrial times. That is already having a dramatic effect on wildlife. In the Arctic, for example, the loss of more and more sea ice each summer is affecting many animals, from walruses to polar bears.

Unique species

Polar inhabitants have nowhere colder to go, but many creatures elsewhere are already moving to stay in their comfort zone. Some marine species, including mammals, birds, fish and plankton, have shifted their ranges by hundreds of kilometres. Other effects are more subtle. Oceanic low-oxygen zones are expanding because oxygen is less soluble in warm water. This is forcing species such as blue sharks to stay closer to the surface, making them more likely to be caught by fishing boats.

Rising sea levels, meanwhile, could wipe out species as low-lying islands are inundated. Mainland species are also at risk, such as the few hundred Bengal tigers in the Sundarbans, a network of mangrove forests along the coast of Bangladesh and north-east India. The effects of habitat destruction and rising water levels mean there will probably be no suitable habitat left there for these tigers by 2070.

Once the ice has melted, polar inhabitants have nowhere colder to go

Ole Jorgen Liodden/naturepl.com

Not all of those threats are as gradual as the melting of ice caps and the rising of sea levels. Extreme weather, fuelled by climate change, is one example. Hurricane Dorian, one of the strongest Atlantic storms ever recorded, may have wiped out several bird species in the Bahamas, including the Bahama nuthatch and the Abaco parrot, when it hit the islands in 2019. Warming-fuelled wildfires could also take out species with smaller populations. In 2015, for instance, fires in Western Australia burned much of the remaining habitat of Gilbert’s potoroo, one of the world’s rarest mammals.

A warming world isn’t bad news for all species. Some, especially small, highly adaptable and fast-reproducing ones, are thriving. But these tend to be things we regard as weeds, pests or unwanted invaders, such as mosquitoes, bark beetles and jellyfish.

So far, few species have been conclusively driven to extinction by climate change. The most clear-cut case is the loss of the Bramble Cay melomys (Melomys rubicola). This rat-like rodent was found only on its namesake island home, a tiny, low-lying Australian cay on the northern edge of the Great Barrier Reef. It died out some time after 2009 as rising sea levels led to the island being inundated during storms. Warming may have contributed to other extinctions as well. For example, climate change is thought to have aided the spread of a fungal disease called chytridiomycosis that has wiped out nearly 100 amphibian species.

So far, Earth hasn’t warmed much beyond the bounds of natural variations experienced over the past few million years. But many slower feedbacks, such as the melting of permafrost and the Antarctic ice sheet, have barely begun to kick in, so this will change.

We are heading into this with wildlife already devastated by our activities. Humans have altered three-quarters of all land and two-thirds of the oceans, according to a major 2019 report on biodiversity. More than a third of land and three-quarters of freshwater resources are devoted to crops or livestock.

It is in our own interests to turn things around. The “ecosystem services” that nature provides for free are worth trillions of dollars and underpin many livelihoods. For instance, hundreds of millions of people depend on coral reefs for tourism and the fish stocks they support, says Ove Hoegh-Guldberg at the University of Queensland in Australia. “This is an issue of people as much as it is about ecosystems and biodiversity,” he says.

By intruding into wild areas and exploiting wildlife, we are also giving pathogens such as the virus causing the covid-19 pandemic more chances to make the jump into humans or domesticated animals. Warming is generally expected to make matters worse, for example by allowing disease-carrying tropical mosquitoes to spread more widely.

Mark Bowler/naturepl.com

Overall, though, the populations of most plants and animals have been greatly reduced, and they are already in shrinking, often fragmented areas. One recent study looked at the effect of future climate change on 80,000 species in 35 of the most wildlife-rich areas, including the Amazon rainforest and the Galapagos Islands. With warming of 5°C by around the 2080s, half of these species would no longer be able to survive in these areas.

In many parts of the world, even if suitable habitat remains, many species may not be able to reach it, because their paths are blocked by cities, roads, farms and fences. The same study found that if animals were able to move freely, 2°C of warming would result in the loss of 20 per cent rather than 25 per cent of species.

One issue with studies of this kind is that they assume species can’t survive outside their current climatic range. But many are already evolving and adapting as their habitats warm. In Finland, for instance, tawny owls are turning brown as snow cover declines.

There is a limit to what evolution can achieve, though, especially in species that reproduce slowly. Not only is the climate starting to change much faster than it has during the past few million years, but many species have suffered huge losses of genetic diversity as their numbers have declined. This makes it much harder to adapt to a changing environment.

To get a better picture of how wildlife will cope, in a recent study Wiens focused on about 500 plants and animals worldwide, looking at where they have already become locally extinct as the world has warmed. His results suggest that what matters most is the maximum annual temperature, not mean temperature, as many other studies assume. “The most straightforward explanation is that it just literally gets too hot and they die,” he says.

Extinction debt

Despite this, his conclusions are similar to those of many other studies, suggesting that about a third of terrestrial species could be lost altogether by 2070. “That could be cut in half by following the Paris Agreement and keeping temperature below an increase of about 1.5°C,” says Wiens.

As dire as these forecasts are, they may underestimate future extinction risk. “There could be a lot more extinctions caused by things like sea level rise,” says Wiens. “There’s a whole bunch of other threats.” It can take hundreds or even thousands of years for the full effects of changes such as habitat loss to play out – a phenomenon called extinction debt. In Europe, for instance, the number of extinctions happening today is more strongly linked to what happened a century ago than to current events.

Bleached corals off Heron Island in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef

Gary Bell/Oceanwide/Minden/naturepl.com

One reason is that populations can become unsustainable once they shrink beyond a certain point. And a decline in one species can have knock-on effects on many others, leading to cascading ecological effects. One New Zealand flowering shrub, Rhabdothamnus solandri, for example, is slowly declining in numbers after the loss of the birds that pollinated it.

Multiplying effects

Some threats to biodiversity can’t be forecast with any certainty. For instance, people forced from their homes by disasters or conflict can have a severe impact on biodiversity in the places they flee to, rapidly deforesting vast areas and greatly reducing wildlife populations. Floods and storms displaced 15 million people in 2018 alone, and these numbers will rise as extreme weather keeps on getting more extreme. For some, there will be no going home: sea level rise will force hundreds of millions of people to move out of low-lying areas over the coming decades.

The combined effect of all these threats can multiply and be worse than any one alone. “For example, corals recover from bleaching episodes more slowly when they suffer stress from pollution, or damage from coastal development or poorly regulated sport or commercial activities,” says Sandra Díaz at the National University of CÓrdoba in Argentina. Similarly, in tropical forests, unusually hot and dry years, combined with the creation of roads, greatly increase the chances of destructive fires, she says.

On the one hand, these multiplier effects mean we may be greatly underestimating our impact on biodiversity over the coming century. “Our best calculations and projections do not incorporate all the possible cascading and non-linear effects,” says Díaz. “They are on the conservative side.”

A badly damaged house on Great Abaco in the Bahamas in the wake of Hurricane Dorian in 2019

REUTERS/Loren Elliott

On the other hand, this shows the importance of protecting and restoring wildlife areas – and that the benefits of such actions could be even greater than we think. For instance, creating wildlife corridors or deliberately relocating species to more suitable areas may save those that would otherwise be doomed.

“Climate policies often show anything but joined-up thinking”

For all these reasons, there is growing awareness that climate change and biodiversity are inextricably linked, and that we need joined-up policies to tackle both. One consequence is that the separate UN conventions on biodiversity and climate change should be merged, says Eric Dinerstein of the environmental organisation RESOLVE in Washington DC.

“The two are so interdependent and the solutions are interdependent,” he says. “We can’t save biodiversity without staying below 1.5 degrees, and we can’t stay below 1.5 degrees without saving biodiversity.”

In general, more has been done to try to tackle climate change than to stem biodiversity loss. Unfortunately, climate policies often show anything but joined-up thinking. Exhibit A are the various incentives or laws promoting biofuels because they are seen as “green”. “There is no doubt that the push for biofuels has seriously harmed biodiversity,” says Tim Searchinger at Princeton University.

Growing use of biodiesel is responsible for 90 per cent of the increased demand for vegetable oil since 2015, says Searchinger. In Europe, more than half of imported palm oil ends up powering cars, driving the destruction of wildlife and carbon-rich forests in South-East Asia for palm oil plantations. Europe is also fuelling deforestation elsewhere by importing wood to burn for energy, while still counting this as a means to reduce carbon emissions.

The fundamental issue that is overlooked is that land is limited. If existing farmland is switched to new uses such as growing bioenergy crops, more farmland is generally carved out of wild habitats elsewhere, destroying biodiversity and adding carbon to the air in the process. The situation is complex: a few biofuels, mainly those made from genuine waste, can be beneficial overall. But many policies wrongly treat any biofuel as green. With the aviation industry now eyeing biofuels as a way to claim it is limiting emissions, matters could get even worse.

Switching farmland to growing energy crops such as oilseed rape increases pressure on land elsewhere

Ashley Cooper/naturepl.com

If climate policies fail to take biodiversity into account, the reverse is often true, too. For instance, efforts to save the Iberian lynx are focused on the southern part of the Iberian peninsula, where conditions will become too dry for the cats this century.

Some measures really can help us preserve biodiversity and cut carbon emissions at the same time. In general, areas that are rich in wildlife also store lots of carbon, says Dinerstein. His team has mapped out what additional areas around the world, for example in the Amazon basin or on Madagascar and Borneo, need to be protected to help the greatest number of species and maximise carbon storage. Many other groups support this approach.

This could be done without taking existing farmland out of production and at a relatively low cost, says Dinerstein. In some places, tree planting with native species may be necessary, but often there is no need. “The most effective thing we can do is to allow degraded areas to grow back,” he says – rewilding and restoring ecosystems, in other words.

Preserving biodiversity isn’t just a fringe benefit of protecting carbon-storing trees, but is important to maximise carbon storage. In tropical forests, the largest trees typically have big seeds that are dispersed by animals, says Dinerstein – and they are the ones that are most valuable to loggers. “If we hunt them out, those massive, large-seeded trees are replaced with those with smaller seeds that don’t grow as tall, don’t grow as large and sequester much less carbon.”

Better future

At the same time, we need to slow and eventually halt the clearing of land for farms. Encouraging people to eat less meat would help enormously. If everyone shifted to a plant-based diet, we would only need a quarter of the farmland used now, while vastly reducing the greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing food.

But with meat consumption increasing rather than falling, it is vital to maximise yields on existing farmland. “The expansion of farmland and the associated habitat loss is still very ongoing,” says Emma Kovak at the Breakthrough Institute in California. “The intensification of farming can spare habitat for wildlife.”

A low-intensity organic farm might have more wildlife on it, but it produces less food, which means more farmland is needed elsewhere in the world, she says. Per unit of food, high-intensity farming has a much lower impact. Kovak has shown that if the European Union had embraced higher-yielding, genetically engineered crops, it would have led to a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions via less land use.

Despite the dire outlook, many researchers remain optimistic. “I’m incredibly hopeful,” says Dinerstein. For a start, protecting more land would actually cost relatively little, he says. There is even hope for the coral reefs. “If we stabilise the climate, there is a very good chance that coral reefs will grow back over time,” says Hoegh-Guldberg.

Many initiatives and studies around the world show that we can protect biodiversity and tackle climate change while offering a better and fairer future for people, says Díaz.

“But these studies also show, very clearly, that this will only work with very fast, very deep, very bold changes in the way we consume, eat, trade and value,” she says. “The opportunity to shift gears and do what needs to be done for a better future will close soon.”

Rescue plan for nature
Join a live panel discussion on saving biodiversity, presented in association with UNEP, on 15 April: newscientist.com/events

About this feature

This is the fifth and final feature in our “Rescue Plan for Nature” series produced in association with the United Nations Environment Programme and UNEP partner agency GRID-Arendal. New Scientist retains full editorial control over, and responsibility for, the content

                    <section class="article-topics article-topics--row"><p class="font-sans-serif-xxs--bold">More on these topics: </p></section>                    
Low-income countries have received just 0.2 per cent of all COVID-19 shots given
Low-income countries have received just 0.2 per cent of all COVID-19 shots given

Although more than 700 million vaccine doses have been administered globally, richer countries have received more than 87 per cent, and low-income countries just 0.2 per cent. 

“There remains a shocking imbalance in the global distribution of vaccines”, said WHO chief Tedros Adhanonom Ghebreyesus, speaking during the agency’s regular briefing from Geneva.   

“On average in high-income countries, almost one in four people has received a vaccine. In low-income countries, it’s one in more than 500.  Let me repeat that: one in four versus one in 500.” 

Bilateral deals hurt COVAX 

The global solidarity initiative, COVAX, has also experienced a shortage of vaccines.  While the mechanism has distributed some 38 million doses so far, it was expected to deliver nearly 100 million by the end of March. 

“The problem is not getting vaccines out of COVAX; the problem is getting them in”, he said. 

“We understand that some countries and companies plan to do their own bilateral vaccine donations, bypassing COVAX for their own political or commercial reasons. These bilateral arrangements run the risk of fanning the flames of vaccine inequity.” 

Scaling up solidarity 

COVAX partners, who include Gavi, the vaccine alliance, are working on several options to scale up production to meet the goal of delivering two billion doses by the end of the year. 

Dr Seth Berkley, the Chief Executive Officer at Gavi, highlighted the need for continued solidarity. 

“What we are now beginning to see are supply constraints, not just of vaccines, but also of the goods that go into making vaccines”, he said. 

COVAX is in discussions with several high-income countries to get them to share surplus vaccine doses, he said. It is also developing cost-sharing mechanisms so that low income countries can buy additional doses through COVAX, funded by multilateral development banks. 

Dr Berkley added that financing is also needed as demand for vaccines has risen with the emergence of new COVID-19 variants. 

IMF/Raphael Alves

A man wearing a protective mask against Covid-19, circulates in the port area of ​​Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, on September 16, 2020.

Concern over the ‘raging inferno’ in Brazil 

WHO remains deeply concerned about what one of its experts labelled the “raging inferno of an outbreak” in Brazil, in response to a journalist’s question about scaling up vaccines to address the emergency there. 

South America’s largest country has recorded more than 340,000 deaths since the pandemic began, making it second only to the United States. 

Tedros said he has spoken with the newly appointed health minister, and officials at the federal level, which he hoped will “help with moving forward in our partnership.” 

Continue prevention measures

Dr. Bruce Aylward, a WHO Senior Adviser, described the situation in Brazil as “very, very concerning”.  Delivering more vaccines would have minimal impact, he said, emphasizing the need to continue measures that have proved to slow virus spread. 

“Even by the time you get vaccines into a country, by the time you get them into people – and you’re getting them to a relatively small proportion of the population – that will have a small effect in limiting the risk to some people”, he said. 

“But what you’re dealing with here is a raging inferno of an outbreak, and that requires population-level action in the rapid identification, isolation, quarantining, because you have to approach this at that scale to slow this thing down.” 

Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO Technical Lead on COVID-19, added that while vaccines are a powerful tool, they alone will not end the pandemic.   

“The trajectory of this pandemic around the world is going in the wrong direction”, she said, referring to six consecutive weeks of increased cases and rising deaths.  

“We have tools right now that can prevent infections and can save lives, so we need to find reasons why measures aren’t in place…and find solutions to actually get these in place.” 

EU funding of meat and dairy promotions ‘irresponsible’ – Greenpeace
EU funding of meat and dairy promotions ‘irresponsible’ – Greenpeace

European Union spending of hundreds of millions of euro on promoting agricultural products is “at odds with warnings from scientists on the disastrous impact industrial animal farming has on nature, the climate and our health” and is an irresponsible use of taxpayers’ money, according to Greenpeace Europe.

                                                    <p class="no_name">The <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=European+Commission" rel="nofollow">European Commission</a> spent 32 per cent of its €777 million five-year farm product promotion budget on advertising campaigns for meat and dairy that ran between 2016 and 2020, a Greenpeace report published on Thursday found.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">In <a href="/news">Ireland</a>, 78 per cent of funded promotions were targeted at meat and dairy consumption over a four-year period up to 2019 – the highest proportion of European Union countries analysed by Greenpeace.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Its EU agriculture and forest campaigner Sini Eräjää said: “When all the science is telling us to cut meat and dairy for our health, and the planet’s health, it’s unacceptable that the EU spends a quarter of a billion euro to accelerate consumption.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“Farming and eating industrial meat and dairy puts us at risk of new pandemics, wrecks the climate and destroys nature – it’s irresponsible for the EU to continue promoting this with taxpayers’ money.”</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">The research found the commission spent €146 million on campaigns for fruit and vegetables over the five years – 19 per cent of advertising spend.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Leaked versions of the EU’s flagship Farm to Fork strategy and the Beating Cancer Plan suggested the commission intended to stop funding promotion of red and processed meat, which are particularly harmful, Ms Eräjää said. The final versions of both strategies contained more vague wording on promoting healthier diets, she said.</p>
                                                                                                                                                                                        <p class="no_name">The commission is reviewing its policy on the promotion of EU farm products, with a new proposal expected in early 2022. Last month it opened public consultation on promotion policy.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Greenpeace is calling on the EU to end public funding for the promotion of meat and dairy products and recommending it be used to support ecological, small-scale farmers in Europe, and to help conventional farmers to transition to ecological methods.</p>

                                                    <h4 class="crosshead">‘Skewed’ numbers</h4><p class="no_name">The numbers for Ireland “are even more skewed” in favour of meat and dairy products, Ms Eräjää said, as “78 per cent of the EU spending on projects run by Irish organisations was used to promote exclusively meat and dairy in the period 2016-2019 – country-level information isn’t yet available for 2020”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">This was “certainly not in line with encouraging consumption that’s better for the environment and public health”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Ireland received €13.4 million in total EU funding, €10.5 million of which was to support meat and dairy promotion projects – just €1.4 million was spent targeting consumption of fruits and vegetables. Of nine countries subjected to deeper analysis, <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_location=Spain" rel="nofollow">Spain</a> and Ireland were found to have spent nothing on promoting organic products.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">While there are some differences between countries, the overall picture remains the same, the report concluded, much more funding is being used to exclusively promote meat and dairy products than is used to promote fruits and vegetables.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Objectives in the approved funding applications of several meat and dairy promotional campaigns funded by the EU “explicitly state they aim to reverse declines in, or maintain the growth of, meat and dairy consumption in Europe – even if this reduction is much needed according to health and environmental research”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">More than 70 per cent of EU farmland is used to raise livestock or produce animal feed. “Two-thirds of EU farm subsidies currently end up supporting the production of animal products, directly and indirectly, including by supporting feed production,” the report said.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Europeans consume about twice as much meat as the global average, and about three times as much dairy. “To protect public health and nature, and to tackle the climate emergency, scientists are recommending a reduction of European meat and dairy consumption by at least 70 per cent by 2030,” Greenpeace said.</p>

                                                    <p class="no_name">The report featured examples of promotions including a “proud of beef campaign”, with €3.6 million of EU funding, which promoted the idea of becoming a “beefatarian”, supposedly to promote “balanced, healthy diets”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“The campaign fails to make any reference to the widely-recognised health risks or environmental damage associated with red and processed meat,” the report said.</p>
Organic Beef Meat Market 2021 | Latest Trends, Demand, Growth, Opportunities & Outlook till 2027
Organic Beef Meat Market 2021 | Latest Trends, Demand, Growth, Opportunities & Outlook till 2027
            <!--UdmComment--><!--/UdmComment-->
              <h2 class="fe_heading2">Organic Beef Meat Market 2021 | Latest Trends, Demand, Growth, Opportunities & Outlook till 2027</h2>
              </p><div readability="143.80601596071">

Apr 08, 2021 (MarketersMedia) —

2019 Analysis and Review Organic Beef Meat Market by Product – Fresh Meat and Processed Meat for 2019 – 2027

The global organic beef meat market is set to proliferate at a steady 6.7% CAGR during the forecast period (2019-2027), as projected by a new report of Future Market Insights (FMI). The growth is primarily fueled by increasing awareness among consumers regarding the potential negative effects of the antibiotics and chemical additives used in the manufacturing of processed beef meat.

To Get Sample Copy of Report Visit @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-4463

Organic Beef Meat Market: Key Findings

The global value of the organic beef meat market is projected to be valued 1.6X the current value by the end of the forecast period.
North America will remain the leading regional market for organic beef meat owing to high consumption and awareness.
Owing to higher consumption, USA and Canada will account for 2/5th of overall market value
The growing trend of organic beef consumption in Eastern Europe will bestow lucrative opportunities for market players.

Organic Beef Meat Market: Key Driving Factors

The trend of large retail chains such as Whole Foods pushing the organic agricultural produce across their stores in Europe will increase the availability and give a boost the organic beef meat.
Inclination towards organic beef meat as a result of growing awareness among consumers concerning the side effects of processed meat, is propelling the growth.

Organic Beef Meat Market: Key Restraint

High price point of organic beef is likely to hinder the sales, thus limiting rapid growth of the market.

For More Details, Ask Analyst @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/ask-question/rep-gb-4463

Impact of COVID 19 on Organic Beef Market

The outbreak of COVID-19 has led to a significant impact on various internal and internal factors across industries which includes purchasing, selling, exports, value-added services among other key components for businesses. The organic beef industry is one such market that is currently facing a negative impact due to the pandemic. The industry is being indirectly affected on the back of retail stores being closed down and disruption of the supply chain, which is limiting the overall sales. Furthermore, the market is being affected due to distancing practices coupled with hindered import and export of organic beef.

However, the demand for organic beef has been stronger and the economic downturn is hampering the strong grocery sales. On a positive note, despite the decline in sales, the organic beef market is likely to regain the lost ground in the remaining quarters of the year.

Competition Landscape of Organic Beef Market

Some of the key players in the global organic beef landscape that are covered in this study include, but are not limited to, Neat Meat company, organic Prairie, Aurelian organic meat supplier group, Swillington Organic Farm Arcadian Organic Meat Co., River ford organic farmers and Eversfield, among others. The market players are focusing on building a strong brand image to gain a competitive edge.

Download Methodology of this Report @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/askus/rep-gb-4463

More About the Report

This Future Market Insights study of 200 pages offers actionable insights on the organic beef market. The market analysis is based on product type (Fresh Meat and Processed Meat), flavor (ground beef, steak beef, chucks, and patty), distribution channel (direct sales, indirect sales, modern trade, convenience stores, online retailers, and independent retailers) across seven major regions (North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Latin America, APEJ, Japan, and Middle East & Africa)

Explore Extensive Coverage of FMI’s Food & Beverages Landscape             

Policosanol Market

Resveratrol Market

Grape Skin Extract Market

Contact Info:
Name: Abhishek Budholiya
Email: Send Email
Organization: Future Market Insights
Website: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/organic-beef-meat-market

Source URL: https://marketersmedia.com/organic-beef-meat-market-2021-latest-trends-demand-growth-opportunities-outlook-till-2027/89004397

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 89004397

This press release is syndicated from MarketersMEDIA, your global press release service which provides business announcements, market trends, financial analysis, expected growth forecast, predictions, and more since 2012.

MarketersMEDIA press releases syndicated on this website are accurate at the time of release. Information provided in the release such as global trends, analysis, growth forecast, and expected market share in dollars may change over time, and may or may not be accurate after the date of release.

Migrants left stranded and without assistance by COVID-19 lockdowns 
Migrants left stranded and without assistance by COVID-19 lockdowns 

According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the first year of the pandemic saw more than 111,000 travel restrictions and border closures around the world at their peak in December.  

These measures “have thwarted many people’s ability to pursue migration as a tool to escape conflict, economic collapse, environmental disaster and other crises”, IOM maintained. 

In mid-July, nearly three million people were stranded, sometimes without access to consular assistance, nor the means to meet their basic needs.  

In Panama, the UN agency said that thousands were cut off in the jungle while attempting to travel north to the United States; in Lebanon, migrant workers were affected significantly by the August 2020 explosion in Beirut and the subsequent surge of COVID-19 cases. 

Business as usual 

Border closures also prevented displaced people from seeking refuge, IOM maintained, but not business travellers, who “have continued to move fairly freely”, including through agreed ‘green lanes’, such as the one between Singapore and Malaysia.  

By contrast, those who moved out of necessity – such as migrant workers and refugees – have had to absorb expensive quarantine and self-isolation costs, IOM said, noting that in the first half of 2020, asylum applications fell by one-third, compared to the same period a year earlier.  

Unequal restrictions 

As the COVID crisis continues, this distinction between those who can move and those who cannot, will likely become even more pronounced, IOM said, “between those with the resources and opportunities to move freely, and those whose movement is severely restricted by COVID-19-related or pre-existing travel and visa restrictions and limited resources”. 

This inequality is even more likely if travel is allowed for anyone who has been vaccinated or tested negative for COVID-19, or for those with access to digital health records – an impossibility for many migrants. 

Health risks 

Frontier lockdowns also reduced options for those living in overcrowded camps with high coronavirus infection rates in Bangladesh and Greece, IOM’s report indicated.  

In South America, meanwhile, many displaced Venezuelans in Colombia, Peru, Chile, Ecuador and Brazil, lost their livelihoods and some have sought to return home – including by enlisting the services of smugglers. 

Report: majority of consumers want compulsory labelling on all genetically modified food
Report: genetically modified food majority of consumers want compulsory labelling

A majority of European consumers want to see compulsory labelling on food products containing genetically modified crops, according to a recent Ipsos report, but industry players insist that this is impossible to implement.

The report, commissioned by the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament and carried out by the polling organisation Ipsos, surveyed thousands of consumers across all 27 member states between February and March of this year in an attempt to gauge their understanding and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) crops.

This included both “conventional” genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which involves the genetic transfer between different species, as well as gene edited (GE) crops, created using new genetic engineering techniques such as CRISPR.

It found that, of those which have heard of the technology, 86% of people want food containing GMOs to be labelled accordingly, while 68% of respondents that have heard of new genomic techniques would also like these to be clearly labelled.

While 78% of those surveyed had heard of GM crops, only 40% on average across all EU member states reported prior knowledge of GE crops.

As it currently stands, EU legislation stipulates that GM food must be clearly labelled, stating that, in the case of pre-packaged GM food/feed products, the list of ingredients must indicate “genetically modified” or “produced from genetically modified [name of the organism]”, while non-packaged products require a notice nearby.

However, products from animals fed with GM crops are exempt from GMO labelling.

The report comes amid heated debate over the future of the technology after a 2018 European Court of Justice ruling found that GE crops fall, in principle, under the EU’s GMO directive.

However, the outcome of this ruling has since been heavily disputed, with industry players pushing for the decision to be revised so as to exclude GE crops from the scope of EU regulations governing GMOs.

This would include labelling rules, something the Greens/EFA warn would deprive consumers of their right to know how their food is produced, and leave them “no opportunity to avoid GM food”.

Contacted by EURACTIV, a Commission official said that the next step for the EU executive will be the publication of a study on new genomic techniques, which aims to clarify the situation in light of the 2018 court ruling.

“The Commission is currently finalising the study which had been requested by the Council,” the official said, highlighting that issues such as consumers’ perception will be addressed in it.

The study is expected to be published at the end of April.

EU study to clarify gene editing court ruling further muddies waters

After the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling that organisms obtained by new plant breeding techniques (NBTs) should, in principle, fall under the GMO Directive, the Council of the EU has requested a study from the Commission to clarify the situation. But what this means in practice remains unclear.

Martin Häusling, agricultural policy spokesman for the Greens/EFA Group, said that the Commission “must respect the will of consumers and ensure that existing rules are applied and that to label animal products that have been fed GMOs, including new methods of genetic engineering”.

“We demand that the same rules for authorisation and labelling apply to all types of genetically modified organisms,” he said, stressing that consumer protection means “freedom of choice and transparency about whether our food has been produced with genetic engineering, be it old or new methods of genetic engineering.”

Contacted by EURACTIV, the EU consumer group BEUC declined to offer a direct comment on the subject.

However, their position paper on the EU’s flagship food policy, the Farm to Fork strategy, which notes the potential role that “innovative techniques, including biotechnology” may play in increasing the sustainability of food production,  the organisation highlights that “traceability and labelling of products produced using these [gene editing] techniques must guarantee consumers’ right to know and freedom of choice.”

They add that a lack of labelling of these products would risk “eroding consumer confidence in organic food,” pointing out that this would run counter to the strategy’s objective to stimulate organic food production and consumption in the EU.

First detection test developed for gene-edited crop, campaign groups claim

The first open-source detection method for a gene-edited crop has been developed, according to a scientific paper. Environmental NGOs and campaign groups said this could hypothetically allow the EU to carry out checks to prevent unauthorised imports, but the EU seed sector quickly refuted this claim.

There is a will, but is there a way?

Asked about the feasibility of labelling GM food this way, EU seed sector organisation Euroseeds told EURACTIV that it is “not aware of any practical strategies that could be used for clearly identifying conventional-like gene editing products, when such products are part of commodity flows.”

Garlich Von Essen, Euroseeds secretary general, stressed that non-unique changes in the genome could also occur naturally or through conventional breeding methods.

“As we are of the opinion that these products do not constitute transgenics and are thus fundamentally different from and should not be regulated as products falling under the GM Directive, we see no value or justification for putting respective conventional-like genome editing plant varieties under the labelling obligations of the current GMO directive,” he said, warning this could lead to a “discriminatory situation”.

Likewise, centre-right MEP Herbert Dorfmann, who is the agriculture coordinator of the centre-right Europe’s People Party (EPP), recently told EURACTIV in an interview that he is frequently in contact with scientific experts on the matter who maintain that it is not possible to differentiate between GMOs and GE crops.

“In my opinion, labelling is simply not possible and [without regulating gene editing] we will have plants, seeds that will come from outside Europe, where we don’t know which technology of genetic improvement was applied,” he said.

[Edited by Benjamin Fox]

Best Legal Steroids – Natural Alternatives of Steroids for Sale 
Best Legal Steroids – Natural Alternatives of Steroids for Sale 

Brand Partner Content

Do you feel you are hitting the gym hard but not getting that toned body? You see your gym buddy work out much less on that strength trainer but he has much better muscles than you. Why does this happen? Is exercise enough to get you a stronger & sturdier body? 

We are told time and again that a healthy diet and disciplined exercise regimen is prerequisite to gain muscles.”. 

What you need is a boost using natural steroids that are not only safe to use but also give the desired results, fast! Here we have compared the 7 Best Legal Steroids in the market that are worth your time and money.

However if you are interested in gaining AND maintaining that sturdy muscle in the long run, a strict diet would be just as helpful as the numerous advertisements of “Anabolic Steroids

Anabolic Steroids are “lab- made” testosterone supplements that have minimal impact on your muscles but come with a baggage of side effects. In fact just possessing them without a doctor’s prescription can end you in prison for upto a year and a fine of at least $1000.

If you are seriously interested in health fitness, MUSCLE FITNESS is your major goal. 

Top 7 Best Legal Steroids of 2021:

  • D-Bal– Natural Alternative to Dianabol
  • Winsol– Best for Vascularity

#1. Testo-Max– Highest Quality & Editor’s Pick

Testosterone boosters have gained a lot of popularity in the last few decades as they are helpful in increasing the levels of testosterone to a required amount. These natural boosters are usually herbal based and do not cause any harmful side effects. 

TestoMax is one such supplement that is specially formulated from a testo-boosting mega mix which increases the level of testosterone. It helps you achieve maximum muscle gain and ultra rapid recovery. 

⇒ Visit the Official Website of Testo-Max for the Best Discount

Brand Overview- What is Testo-Max?

Testo-max is a natural testosterone stimulator that directly impacts the levels of testosterone. It is an all herbal product that helps you achieve the desired results without any use of steroids or illegal substances. 

The manufacturer of Testo-Max, CrazyBulk is a well known name in the nutrition industry and has company headquarters in Cyprus, Europe. They also have warehouses in South Portland, Maine, US and Glasgow, U.K.  Crazy Bulk has been the successful creator of many nutritionist staples like D-Bal, Anadrol and so on. 

PROS:

  • Safe and legal alternative to Sustanon.
  • Free from harmful side-effects.
  • Improves physical health and promotes muscle building.
  • Gives super strength and stamina
  • Enhances sex drive and performance
  • Non Invasive and can be easily used.
  • No prescriptions required.
  • Speedy Results
  • 100% herbal
  • Carefully researched ingredients

CONS:

  • Only available on its official website to save its customers from the numerous product frauds happening online. 
  • It is not recommended for pregnant ladies, people with serious health conditions and children below age of 18 years

⇒ Click Here to Get the Latest Deal on Testo-Max 

How Does Testo-Max Work?

Testo-Max works on increasing the production of testosterone naturally. The natural ingredients present in testo-max especially D-aspartic acid promotes the production of a hormone which in turn oversees increase in testosterone development in the body.

Testo-max contains a massive 2352mg serving of D-aspartic acid per serving,which triggers your body harder, to produce testosterone. Testosterone increase helps in building more muscles, increasing bone mass and improving stamina and libido.

Ingredients of Testo-Max:

  • D-Aspartic acid- An amino acid regulator, D aspartic acid creates luteinizing hormone- the main hormone that powers your testosterone production. Testo-Max contains an immense amount of D-Aspartic acid in addition to 10 more, completely herbal testo- boosting  ingredients to increase your testosterone level safely and naturally. 
  • Fenugreek extract- Fenugreek extract functions to heighten testosterone production by unprecedented levels and concomitantly help to burn fat. 
  • Nettle Leaf extract- Nettle leaf is a shrub that belongs to Northern Europe and Asia.  This leaf extract is highly rich in antioxidants, Vitamins, Polyphenols and Amino acid. Nettle leaf is also known to reduce inflammation
  • Ginseng Red powder- Ginseng is a traditional Chinese medicine used for centuries. Red Ginseng is harvested after 6 or more years and is known to be potent antioxidant as well as has anti-inflammatory properties. 
  • Magnesium- Magnesium is a mineral found in abundance in the earth. About 60% of magnesium is found in bones and rest is in muscles, soft tissues, fluids and blood. Magnesium has a major role in Energy creation, Protein formation, Gene maintenance, Muscle movement and Nervous system regulation. 

Another crucial role that Magnesium has is to boost exercise performance. 

⇒ Click Here to Lean More about the Ingredients of Testo-Max

Where can You Find Testo-Max and How Much Does it Cost?

This all rounder pill is available for purchase only on the official website of Crazy Bulk. There are two packages from which the customers can choose according to their needs:

  1. Buy 2 Testo-Max bottles for $119.98 and get an additional bottle absolutely free (sufficient dosage for 3 months). The shipping is free on this order!
  2. Buy 1 Testo-Max bottle for $ 59.99 and save $16.00 (sufficient dosage for 1 month)

#2.Clenbutrol – Most Powerful Steroid

Losing weight and building lean muscle go hand in hand. While it may seem like an impossible task for many to shed those extra kilos, people work day in, day out on the treadmill trying to get rid of those pounds of fat. 

To achieve your goal smartly, we recommend you use a herbal steroid alternative like Clenbutrol which gives you the same results as a steroid, all the while being easier and safer to use to help in fat loss and muscle strength. 

⇒ Visit the Official Website of Clenbutrol for the Best Discount

Brand overview- What is Clenbutrol?

Clenbutrol is a legal alternative to the anabolic steroid Clenbuterol. CrazyBulk supplies and manufactures Clenbutrol along with many other legal steroids that can help during different stages of bodybuilding like cutting and bulking.

CrazyBulk is a trusted brand based in the USA, which claims to provide 100% natural, safe and risk free products. It achieved a customer experience rating of 4.4 on Feefo and all its products are thoroughly researched for maximum effectiveness.

Clenbutrol is one such product of CrazyBulk and is an all natural thermogenic which possesses all the properties of a steroid however with no side effects.

Pros:

  • Safe and legal alternative of Clenbuterol 
    • Powerful Fat Burning supplement with thermogenic property
  • Increases Basal metabolic Rate Resulting in the body’s utilization of stored fat. 
    • Increases muscle to fat ratio 
  • Increases the oxygen flow in the body giving cardiovascular functioning a boost
  • Provides sufficient energy to the muscles for a longer time
  • Preserves Lean muscle mass 
  • Gives a ripped physique
  • Improves performance and enhances Stamina & endurance

Cons:

  • Clenbutrol can only be purchased from the official website of Crazy Bulk
  • Yields best results if used with a proper exercise regimen and healthy meal plan

How Does Clenbutrol Work?

Clenbutrol burns fat and improves cardiovascular performance by increasing the oxygen transportation thereby giving you that sculpted body you always wanted. It also gives your cardiovascular performance a boost and charges up your body for a long time, enabling you to do a more intense workout. 

Clenbutrol fuels your workout and turns your body into a full time, fat blasting furnace.

Ingredients of Clenbutrol:

  • Garcinia Cambogia – An exotic tropical fruit found in Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and parts of Africa, is a popular supplement for weight loss. It is said to block the body’s ability to make fat and puts a brake on your appetite. Also helps you keep blood sugar level in check.  
  • Bitter Orange extract- Bitter orange plant extracts are known to be potent remedy for gastrointestinal problems, anemia, to fight obesity, better athletic performance and many other conditions. 
  • Guarana Extracts- Guarana is a Brazilian plant native to the Amazon Basin and the Amazonian tribes have used this for centuries for its therapeutic properties. Guarana contains a wide range of stimulants such as caffeine, theophylline, and theobromine. 
  • Niacinamide- Also known commonly as Vitamin B3, is widely used in pre workout supplement. Vitamin B3 plays a vital role in converting the food we eat into usable energy and helps the body cells carry out important chemical reactions. 

⇒ Click Here to Learn More about the Ingredients of Clenbutrol

Where Can You Find Clenbutrol and How Much Does it cost?

Clenbutrol is available for purchase on the CrazyBulk website with two package deals:

  1. Buy 2 Clenbutrol bottles for $123.98 and get an additional bottle absolutely free. The shipping is free on this order!
  2. Buy 1 Clenbutrol bottle for $ 61.99 

#3. Testogen – Natural Steroid

Do you constantly find yourself low on energy, irritable and tired? Are you making excuses to have sex with your partner? If yes, then you have nothing to worry about. It’s just your testosterone levels declining, which is a natural process that happens as you age. 

To get your Testosterone back on track, all you need is a healthy diet, daily exercise and a natural booster like Testogen to kickstart your T-hormone production.

⇒ Visit the Official Website of Testogen for the Best Discount

Brand Overview – What is Testogen?

Testogen is supplied and manufactured by Muscle Club Limited based in Nottingham,UK. Muscle Club, founded in 2015 is one of the leading brands of all natural products in the health and fitness industry. 

Their versatile team of athletes, nutrition professionals and scientists design supplements that are herbal and safe, using well-researched organic ingredients.

Testogen is one of these products of Muscle Club Limited, which is easy to use, effective, safe and all natural.  Its unique combination of all potent ingredients work together to increase testosterone production in your body naturally

Pros:

  • 100% pure and natural ingredients.
  • Easy to use and Effective.
  • Thousands of satisfied customers.
  • Backed by a 100% money-back guarantee policy.
  • Free worldwide shipping
  • Helps you reverse your diminishing libido
  • Improves muscle size and fastens muscle recovery
  • Improves performance in the bedroom.
  • A great energy and endurance booster.

Cons:

  • Should only be bought from the official website to avail the best discount offers
  • May take a while to work for some people

⇒ Click Here to Get the Latest Deal on Testogen

How Does Testogen Work?

Testogen does not contain any artificial testosterone, but its blend of effective and natural ingredients work together to pump up more testosterone in the body. And how does Testogen do this, by regulating amino acid production in your body and by improving the production of enzymes that in turn help produce more Testosterone.

Testogen can help you build up stronger muscles and burn fat accumulation around your waist and thighs. You can also refer to this review to know more about the benefits of testogen By providing you with bursts of energy, it can improve your constant mood swings and even anxiety and depression. 

Ingredients of Testogen:

Testogen is a powerful blend of 11 all-natural and proven ingredients which are – 

  • D-Aspartic Acid – This is an amino acid regulator which can boost your declining testosterone levels. It works on increasing production of follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones which helps increase t-levels in the body.
  • Nettle Leaf Extract – This natural extract helps increase the amounts of active or free testosterone in the body, by itself binding to the globulin that inhibits the production of testosterone. 
  • Vitamin D3 – This essential nutrient can help strengthen your bones and muscles and help increase your immunity It even promotes weight loss and helps improve the functioning of your heart.
  • Korean Red Ginseng Extract –This is an effective antioxidant that helps reduce pain and inflammation. It promotes faster muscle recovery and prevents and helps treat erectile dysfunction.
  • Fenugreek Extract – this natural  extract helps prevent type 2 diabetes and reduce the risk of heart diseases and blood pressure problems. It helps with weight loss and improves testosterone and sperm count.
  • Magnesium- Magnesium helps increase oxygen absorption and intake by body providing bursts of energy and stamina. It is used by athletes and bodybuilders to increase their total work output during workouts. 
  • Vitamin K1 – This vitamin helps promote bone health by promoting the infusion of calcium phosphate into the bones.  It also helps with blood clotting and helps absorb vitamin D better.
  • Vitamin B6 – This nutrient helps promote better brain functioning and reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression. 
  • Zinc – This is another essential nutrient used in testogen which boosts immunity and improves metabolism. It also helps in quick healing of wounds.
  • Boron –  Boron is used to build stronger bones and muscles. It helps in quick muscle building and improves testosterone levels in the body .
  • Bioperine – This is a thermogenic ingredient which helps in burning fat by increasing the body’s core temperature. 

⇒ Click Here to Learn More about the Ingredients of Testogen

Where Can You Find Testogen and How Much Does it Cost?

For better prices and guarantee of quality, it is recommended to always buy Testogen from its original website. 

It is available in 3 packages – 

  1. One Month Supply – You can get this at $59.99 only with a standard shipping fee of $7.95.
  2. Two Months Supply + One Month Supply Free – You can buy this package at $119.99 with free shipping. 
  3. Three Months Supply + Two Months Supply Free – this package can be bought at $179.99 with free worldwide shipping. 

Our recommendation is to buy the two months supply with one month free, as you won’t have to pay for shipping. Also Testogen takes a little time to work, so give it a try for at least 2 months before giving up.

#4. Instant knockout – Best Muscle Building Steroid

Do you want bigger and stronger muscles, fast? Strenuous workouts and strict diets can only get you so far. Sometimes our body needs an external push which can kickstart the burning process of the stubborn fat accumulated on our tummy and thighs.

Instant Knockout, as the name suggests, can help you knock off your excess fat and get a firm and sculpted body with regular use. 

⇒ Visit the Official Website of Instant Knockout for the Best Discount

Brand Overview – What is Instant Knockout?

Formulated by Roar Ambition Ltd based in the UK, Instant Knockout is an all-natural fat burner which was originally created for Pro Boxers and MMA fighters to help them burn fat quickly in time for a fight. 

All Roar Ambition products are made in high-class facilities in the USA and UK, which follows the standards set by FDA. Their products are GMP certified and created using only natural plant based ingredients. 

They claim to have used the latest technology and stay at the forefront of nutritional research while developing all their products for an extensive customer base of fitness enthusiasts, bodybuilders and athletes.

Pros:

  • Fast and free shipping worldwide.
  • Unique formula for shredding fat quickly
  • Fuels energy levels pushing your to workout more
  • Works on burning fat from the whole body.
  • Only uses high–quality natural ingredients
  • Easy to use pills
  • Suppresses appetite and controls munchies
  • Helps build better muscles

Cons:

  • Must not be taken too close to bedtime as it might disrupt your sleep

⇒ Click Here to Get the Latest Deal on Instant Knockout

How Does Instant Knockout Work?

Instant Knockout uses it 10powerful fat burning ingredients to work on your metabolism. By harnessing the natural powers of outfit ingredients, Instant knockout boosts your metabolic process, and it’s a known fact that faster metabolism means faster fat burning. 

It also keeps your appetite in check, resulting in less fat consumption and promoting more fat burning. Instant knockout burns the stored fat in your body and uses it as energy to fuel your workouts.

Ingredients of Instant Knockout:

  • Green Tea Extract – Green tea extract is a rich source of antioxidants and has been credited with a range of health benefits such as promoting heart, liver and brain health. Additionally green tea extract has the ability to aid weight loss, exercise performance and enhance recovery. 
  • Cayenne Pepper Seeds – Cayenne pepper is known to be the king of medicinal herbs. Cayenne pepper is a type of chilli pepper and boosts your metabolism. B increasing the amount of heat in your body, Cayenne pepper makes you burn more calories per day. 
  • Glucomannan- Glucomannan is a natural, water soluble dietary fibre extracted from the roots of elephant yam. Being a soluble fibres glucomannan absorbs water in the stomach, contributing to the feeling of fullness. Additionally, it may promote reduced calorie intake. 
  • Vitamin B6 – It helps patients with Alzhiemer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Vitamin B6 also helps convert food into energy providing you with long-lasting stamina.
  • Caffeine Anhydrous – Caffeine is a naturally occurring substance found in many different plant species. It is known to increase strength, muscle power, cardiovascular exercise endurance and sprinting power. 
  • Vitamin B12 – Vitamin B12 is an essential vitamin that has numerous roles in our body. It helps with red blood cell formation and supports bone health by preventing Osteoporosis. 
  • GTF Chromium – Chromium is a mineral that plays a key role in nutrient metabolism. Chromium supplements help in improving blood sugar levels. 
  • Zinc – This is an essential nutrient which is present throughout our bodies. This promotes better functioning of the immune system and improves metabolism.
  • Piperine – This is a bioactive compound extracted from black pepper which works to improve your gut health. It can help with nausea, vomiting and also help boost your metabolism.
  • Green Coffee Bean – These are nothing but unroasted coffee beans which contain compounds called chlorogenic acid which can act as powerful antioxidants. These can help lower blood pressure and promote fat and weight loss. 

⇒ Click Here to Learn More about the Ingredients of Instant Knockout

Where Can You Find Instant Knockout and How Much Does it Cost?

Instant Knockout should only be purchased from its official website. 

It is available in three different stacks – 

  1. One Month Supply – 1 bottle of Instant Knockout at only €45
  2. Two Months Supply – Two bottles of Instant Knockout at €90 with free and fast shipping in the USA and UK.
  3. The Ultimate Shredding Stack – Three bottles of Instant Knockout with One Bottle free at only €140 with free worldwide shipping. 

#5. D-Bal – Natural Alternative to Dianabol

Bulking is the phase of muscle-gaining, when you intentionally consume a lot of calories – more than your body actually needs. This is done for a defined period of maybe 3-6 months depending on your body type. 

These extra calories are eaten to provide your body with the extra energy it needs for intensive workouts in the gym and to fuel your muscle size. 

However sometimes calorie consumption is not enough, what you also need is an external push which kick starts your bulking process. 

With D-Bal you can gain muscles quickly and easily  and may also be able to recover quickly from muscle injuries and soreness. 

⇒ Visit the Official Website of D-Bal for the Best Discount

Brand Overview – What is D-Bal?

Manufactured by CrazyBulk in a GMP approved facility, D-Bal is a dietary supplement that can help you during your Bulking stage. 

D-Bal is a powerful blend of all-natural ingredients that can result in all the gains and positives of Dianabol, without the side-effects. Dianabol is an illegal anabolic steroids which was used by bodybuilders in the USA to bulk up. 

However due to numerous harmful side-effects, Dianabol was banned in the USA. CrazyBulk therefore created D-Bal, as a legal alternative to Dianabol. The new D-Bal formula can be safe for use and 7times more powerful than its predecessor.  

Pros:

  • Fast Bulking
  • Legal Steroid alternative to Dianabol
  • Increases focus and concentration
  • Boosts up Energy Levels
  • Balances Testosterone Level
  • No need for Prescriptions
  • Helps Speed up Bone and Tendon Healing
  • Free Delivery and Money Back Guarantee

Cons:

  • Is only Available online.
  • You need to combine it with a suitable diet for best results.

⇒ Click Here to Get the Latest Deal on D-Bal 

How Does D-Bal Work?

D-bal is created using a unique combination of potent ingredients that don’t just increase muscle mass and strength but also help improve our overall body health.

The herbal and powerful ingredients present in D-Bal work on the root cause of slow bulking in your body and help in fat reduction and muscle building. You can also refer to this article to get detailed Information about D-Bal to know how it can reduce muscle soreness and speed up tendon recovery With just 3 capsules a day, D-Bal can help you gain muscles, strength and stamina.

Ingredients of D-Bal:

  • Magnesium – Magnesium helps improve flexibility and by loosening up tight muscles decreases the risk of injuries. This happens when muscles can’t possibly relax and cause cramps, there is where Magnesium shines.
  • Vitamin D2 – This nutrient helps decrease the risk of muscle stress related fractures and improves muscle recovery. Vitamin D2 also helps with depression and contributes to improving overall health.
  • Ashwagandha Extract – Ashwagandha helps decrease accumulated body fat, increases muscle and bone mass and rebalances hormonal levels.
  • MSM –  Methylsulfonylmethane commonly known as MSM, is a dietary supplement that has gained popularity recently among athletes and bodybuilders. It helps improve exercise recovery time and bulk up your muscles.
  • L-Isoleucine – This amino acid helps regulate blood sugar levels and promote the production of the Human Growth Hormones (HGH). It also helps fasten wound healing.
  • DHEA – This is an androgen that can help balance testosterone levels in men. Testosterone levels directly influence the manly characteristics in a man like muscle and bone mass, strength building and recovery of injuries. 
  • Tribulus Terrestris Extract – This is another ingredient which can help decrease stored body fat and increase muscle gains. This can also be beneficial for skin diseases and sexual problems like Erectile dysfunction.
  • Hyaluronic Acid – This helps relieve joint and muscle pain and improves bone strength.

⇒ Click Here to Learn More about the Ingredients of D-Bal

Where Can you find D-Bal and How Much Does it Cost?

D-Bal can only be purchased from the official site of CrazyBulks. 

  1. For 1 Bottle of D-Bal – You save $25.01 and get it for the discounted price of $59.99/bottle.
  2. For 2 Bottles of D-Bal – You get 1 more Bottle of D-Bal absolutely free and you save $135.02 and get three bottles at a discounted price of $119.98 only. You also get free shipping only with Bulk order.

#6. Winsol – Closest Supplement to Steroids

Have you reached a plateau in your weight loss, especially when you are working hard in the gym and the kitchen? You are making sure to do all things right, working out a few times a week, eating healthy, doing your cardio. What more should you do, you ask?

Winsol, unlike anabolic drugs, doesn’t give temporary results. It is a body building supplement used by athletes all over the world to supercharge their power and enhance their performance. Winsol is an alternative to Winstrol, a popular steroid with serious side effects. 

⇒ Visit the Official Website of Winsol for the Best Discount

Brand Overview – What is Winsol?

Winsol is a safe and legal alternative to Winstrol, the anabolic steroid used by most athletes and bodybuilders, giving better results than Winstrol and without the serious side effects that come with the use of an anabolic steroid. Winsol  is for anyone who is in the cutting phase and wants to increase strength and performance while burning away fat and creating muscles. 

Pros:

  • Starts working immediately and burns fat even when you are not working out
  • Preserves muscles and strength while burning fat, thus retaining quality muscles
  • Helps in losing water weight and enhancing vascularity
  • Boosts the level testosterone and enhances muscle mass
  • Enhances blood supply
  • Gives rapid result within 30 days 
  • Free worldwide shipping

Cons:

  • Only available on the official Crazy Bulk website 

How Does Winsol Work?

Winsol is a highly thermogenic fat burner. The preparation for this natural supplement has been researched and tested in FDA approved labs and has absolutely no side effects. Winsol works by preserving muscle and fat, while converting stored fat, especially stubborn belly fat, into energy even during periods of limited activity. 

Winsol contains weight loss ingredients like Acetyl- L-carnitine that acts by sparing muscle and strength while burning fat. 

Ingredients of Winsol:

    • Acetyl-L- Carnitine- L Carnitine is a naturally occurring amino acid and is often taken as a supplement . Studies have shown that L- Carnitine plays a crucial role in production of energy by transporting fatty acids into our cells. L- Carnitine may also benefit brain function by preventing age- related mental decline and improving markers of learning. 
  • Choline- Choline is a newly discovered nutrient that is made by the liver in very small amounts. This nutrient is similar to the vitamin B complex and impacts liver function, healthy brain development, muscle movement and nervous system. 
  • Dimethylaminoethanol- DMAE is naturally produced in the body and is thought to help regulate many functions of the brain. DMAE helps control the amount and effectiveness of choline and fights anxiety and cortisol production. The powerful anti-inflammatory action of DMAE helps keep the performance level up and reduces inflammation in joints. 
  • Wild Yam Roots- Wild Yam, a vine found mostly in North America, is said to help treat numerous conditions such as hormone production and imbalance, Arthritis, skin health etc. 
  • Safflower Oil-  Safflower is high in linoleic oil, which regulates hormones and is also a potent anti-inflammatory. 

⇒ Click Here to Learn More about the Ingredients of Winsol

Where Can You Find Winsol and How Much Does it Cost?

Winsol is only available at the manufacturer’s website Crazybulk USA to save the users from any fake product. 

  1. For 1 Bottle of Winsol – You save $20.01 and get it for the discounted price of $61.99/bottle.
  2. For 2 Bottles of Winsol – You get 1 more Bottle of Winsol absolutely free and you save $122.02 and get three bottles at a discounted price of $123.98 only. You also get free shipping only with Bulk order.

#7. Trenorol  – Best Steroid for Bulking

To magnify your muscle gain possibilities, you have to go through the endless cycles of bulking and cutting. Some might say that building up muscle is a body builder’s forte, however deep down we all want to look healthy, attractive and toned. 

Bodybuilding supplements are  made of elements that help in gaining muscle mass, increased endurance and performance. Trenorol, a legal substitute of Trenbolone, will give you the strength you desired all along your fitness journey. 

⇒ Visit the Official Website of Trenorol for the Best Discount

Brand Overview – What is Trenorol?

Trenorol will recreate for you, the androgenic effect that came with consumption of Trenbolone. Trenorol is the proven formula for that ripped physique you always wanted. Created by the popular and trusted brand by thousands of athletes, trainers be it men or women, Crazybulk  is offering Trenorol, the best bodybuilding supplement.

According to WPHC, Trenorol is an all purpose supplement that is perfectly suitable for any kind of workout. Trenorol is especially effective for people involved in hard training sessions and want to increase energy and endurance. Crazy bulk says that this is 100% natural and safe, and claims it to be the most versatile steroid of all times. 

 Pros:

  • Is a safe and legal Trenbolone alternative 
  • Gives you the Mega muscle mass 
  • Helps you to shred fat without losing mass
  • Provides enhanced Vascularity
  • Gives you super strength and stamina
  • Gives rapid result within 30 days 
  • Free worldwide shipping 

Cons: 

  • Only available on the official website of Crazybulk

⇒ Click Here to Get the Latest Deal on Trenorol 

How Does It Work?

Trenorol, the legal substitute for Trenborol helps your muscle tissues to retain maximum Nitrogen. Nitrogen is the building blocks of protein, hence more Nitrogen leads to more protein and thereby increasing muscle gain and improved fat burning. Nitrogen is also needed by the muscle to heal faster. 

Trenorol also boosts the flow of oxygen to the muscles by stepping up the red blood cell production. The increase of RBCs in the body give greater vascularity and a defined look to you. 

Ingredients of Trenorol:

  • Beta Sitosterol-  It is the most crucial ingredient in Trenorol and is a naturally occurring substance found in plants. Used in many medicines, Beta Sitosterol is most commonly used for lowering blood cholesterol level and improving symptoms of enlarged prostate. Most importantly it prevents the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. This aids in reducing body fat and muscle mass. 
  • Curcumin- Curcumin is the main active ingredient in turmeric and has powerful anti inflammatory effects. Curcumin is also a very strong antioxidant, boosts brain derived neurotrophic factor, is linked to improve brain function and lowers risk of brain diseases.  
  • Nettle leaf extract- Nettle has been a staples herbal medicine since ancient times. It is used widely in arthritis and lower back pain medicines. Nettle extract also is full of Vitamins, minerals, amino acids and polyphenols. It also helps to reduce inflammation. 
  • Pepsin- Pepsin is a digestive enzyme vital in breakdown and nutrient absorption. Pepsin helps in bodybuilding regimen as the body needs a lot of carbohydrates and proteins to replenish the lost energy during workouts. 

⇒ Click Here to Learn More about the Ingredients of Trenorol

Where Can you find Trenorol and How Much Does it Cost?

However, you can find it online. Purchasing the supplements from the official website is the only safe way. 

  1. For 1 Bottle of Trenorol- You save $23.01 and get it for the discounted price of $61.99/bottle.
  2. For 2 Bottles of Winsol – You get 1 more Bottle of Winsol absolutely free and you save $131.02 and get three bottles at a discounted price of $123.98 only. You also get free shipping only with Bulk order.

In Conclusion – Which Is The Best Legal Steroid For You? 

There are a lot of legal steroids available in the market, shortlisting the top is quite a tough task. Although, When we think of muscles the first thing that comes to our mind are well cut biceps or abs. But muscles are so much more than that. Muscles and nerve fibres allow us to move our body, enable our internal organs to function and are essential to maintain your body strength and body weight. Therefore, We need the best!

Maintaining strong core muscles can help you look taller and straighter which enhances your posture as well as overall appearance. All these steroids mentioned above will help you to get your desired result but we would highly recommend you to either go for Testo-Max or Clenbutrol. These two are the most favored ones. They help to keep the rest of your body aligned. Strengthening and maintaining muscles can boost metabolism thereby utilizing more energy for every action you do. 

These natural pre- workout, dietary supplements are 100% legal, non invasive and non prescription. However, It is always better to consult your doctor before taking any of it. No matter your gender or age, these Natural Steroids might help you in building and maintaining muscles and live a much healthier life.

                         &#13;
COVID-19: WHO chief outlines five ‘vital changes’ to address inequities
COVID-19: WHO chief outlines five ‘vital changes’ to address inequities

“While we have all undoubtedly been impacted by the pandemic, the poorest and most marginalized have been hit hardest – both in terms of lives and livelihoods lost,” said Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization, speaking in Geneva on Tuesday. 

A major barrier 

At the beginning of the year, Tedros called for countries to start vaccinating all health workers within the first 100 days of 2021.  Some 190 nations have meet the deadline, while the global vaccine equity initiative, COVAX, as delivered 36 million doses worldwide. 

Tedros said scaling up production and equitable distribution remains the major barrier to ending the acute stage of the pandemic. “It is a travesty that in some countries health workers and those at-risk groups remain completely unvaccinated”, he stated. 

WHO will continue to call on governments to share vaccine doses and to support the ACT Accelerator for the equitable distribution of vaccines, rapid tests and therapeutics. 

Invest in primary health care 

With the pandemic exposing the fragility of health systems, Tedros stressed investment in primary health care must also be stepped up.  At least half of the world’s population still do not have access to essential health services, while 100 million are pushed into poverty each year due to medical expenses. 

“As countries move forward post-COVID-19, it will be vital to avoid cuts in public spending on health and other social sectors. Such cuts are likely to increase hardship among already disadvantaged groups,” he said. 

Instead, governments should target spending an additional one per cent of GDP on primary health care, while also working to address the shortfall of 18 million health workers needed globally to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. 

Social protection, safe neighbourhoods 

Tedros also encouraged national authorities to prioritize health and social protection, and to build safe, healthy and inclusive neighbourhoods.  

“Access to healthy housing, in safe neighbourhoods, is key to achieving health for all”, he said.  “But too often, the lack of basic social services for some communities traps them in a spiral of sickness and insecurity. That must change.” 

Countries must also intensify efforts to reach rural communities with health and other basic services.  Tedros noted that “80 per cent of the world’s populations living in extreme poverty are in rural areas where 7 out of 10 people lack access to basic sanitation and water services.” 

For his final point, the WHO chief emphasized the need to enhance data and health information systems, which are critical to finding and addressing inequalities. 

“Health inequality monitoring has to be an integral part of all national health information systems – at present just half the world’s countries have any capacity to do this”, he said. 

Change the rules

The huge inequalities in health care also figured heavily in the statement from the Executive Director of UNAIDS, Winnie Byanyima, for World Health Day, which further revealed that 10,000 people die every day because they cannot access services.  

She warned that the gaps will continue to widen as health systems increasingly become profit-led, but added that the pandemic could lead to greater commitment towards ensuring all people have access to quality healthcare.

“Now, in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, leaders across the world have an opportunity to build the health systems that were always needed, and which cannot be delayed any longer,” Ms Byanyima said. 

“We cannot tinker around the edges—we need radical, transformative shifts. The COVID-19 response gives us an opportunity to change the rules and guarantee equality.”