Lebanon’s politicians to face sanctions from EU for negligence

France, with the support of the EU Commission, is preparing sanctions against Lebanese politicians, intended to target their unwillingness to form a  government despite the country’s nearly complete collapse.

It has been eight months since Saad Hariri was named prime minister and asked to form a government. Meanwhile  Lebanon’s squabbling politicians, after months of crisis that have left Lebanon facing financial crisis, hyperinflation, electricity blackouts and fuel and food shortages. Nearly half of the total population currently lives under the poverty line.

Lebanon’s caretaker government hasn’t yet met the required conditions for a World Bank $246-million loan for social security programs, despite an upcoming deadline.

The French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jean-Yves Le Drian has therefore proposed sanctions against Lebanese personalities “involved in the current political blockage or in corruption.”

The EU Commission has declared it will take up these sanctions. “”The level of impatience with the ruling class in Lebanon is growing. They don’t seem to have their peoples’ interest at heart. Expect to see a decision soon,” a senior EU diplomat told Reuters.

The sanctions regime is expected to include travel bans and asset freezes.

“The people are suffering but the political leaders are not taking responsibility while the country is literally falling apart,” EU foreign policy chief Joseph Borrell told reporters last week.

Professor Habib Malik of the Lebanese American University told Voice of America that the US should step up pressure on entrenched politicians — whom critics describe as a “mafia” — by demanding the recovery of Lebanon’s stolen assets and impose sanctions on them.  Malik says the sanctions would also hit the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia.

“Lebanon is hijacked and held hostage by a mafia-militia cartel which is beholden to Iran,” he said. “The ultimate victims are the Lebanese people. The US possesses a great deal of information about the stolen money.” The US can weaken the mafia a lot and pull the rug out from Hezbollah’s feet.”

France may act first with the publication of the list of those penalised and the freezing of the questionable assets they own in France. Requests from the National Financial Prosecutor’s Office in favour of opening a judicial investigation in Paris for “ill-gotten gains” against Riad Salamé, governor of the Central Bank of Lebanon, would constitute another signal.

Switzerland has already initiated such an investigation, and another is underway in Lebanon itself.

On May 11, the US on Tuesday called on governments worldwide to take action against Lebanon’s Iranian-backed militant group Hezbozllah, as the Treasury Department sanctioned seven Lebanese nationals it said were connected to the group and its financial firm, Al-Qard al-Hassan (AQAH), Reuters reported.

“The threat that Hizballah (Hezbollah) poses to the United States, our allies, and interests in the Middle East and globally, calls for countries around the world to take steps to restrict its activities and disrupt its facilitation networks,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement on the action against the group, designated a terrorist organisation by Washington.

The Treasury Department said in a statement that it had blacklisted Ibrahim Ali Daher, who it described as chief of Hezbollah’s Central Finance Unit, as a specially designated global terrorist, accusing him of acting on behalf of Hezbollah.

The United States also slapped sanctions on six others linked to AQAH, including a man it said was the financial director, Ahmad Mohamad Yazbeck, as well as Abbas Hassan Gharib, Wahid Mahmud Subayti, Mostafa Habib Harb, Ezzat Youssef Akar, and Hasan Chehadeh Othman.

The Treasury accused the six men of using the cover of personal accounts at Lebanese banks to evade sanctions targeting AQAH and transfer $500 million on behalf of the US-blacklisted firm.

MEPs seek to tackle Orbán and Babiš over EU farm funds

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš are in the European Parliament’s crosshairs as lawmakers are pushing to use a high-tech data tool to root out longstanding misallocation of EU farm funds.

A lack of transparency and corruption in EU farm spending, the biggest single plank of the bloc’s regular budget, are being raised as core problems in the run-up to next week’s endgame of negotiations over the €270 billion budget of the new five-year Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

The Parliament wants to expand the use of a data-mining tool called ARACHNE to keep a closer check on where CAP funds end up. But the parliamentarians face severe opposition in next week’s talks. The 27 EU countries, as represented in the Council of the European Union, argue against the tool being mandatory in the next CAP, preferring a voluntary approach, where the tool is merely available to countries if they want to use it.

For Ulrike Müller, one of the Parliament’s three main CAP negotiators, that is not good enough. “The Parliament wants to do something against Babiš and Orbán,” she told POLITICO in an interview.

Projects in Hungary and the Czech Republic, along with some in Slovakia and Italy, have triggered major concern about the allocation of agricultural funds. Hungary featured proinently in a 2019 New York Times exposé about EU farm subsidies enriching politically connected kingpins. A European Commission probe into Czech Prime Minister Babiš found he is still pulling the strings of his agriculture empire Agrofert, a big recipient of EU farm funds. Hungary says reports of misspending are biased and politically motivated, while Babiš repeatedly insists he has done nothing wrong.

The European Commission’s ARACHNE system is already used for EU subsidy programs in regional policy — on a voluntary basis. Müller’s proposal would see it included in the CAP for direct payments.

An EU Parliament insider said that the likes of Babiš and Orbán “would not be thrilled” if the use of the tool was made mandatory by Brussels in line with the Parliament’s wishes, but said that the main reason countries are opposing this is because of concerns the tool is simply not sufficiently developed yet.

Müller, the main rapporteur for the CAP file on financing and monitoring, is also concerned about the administrative burden this could create for national authorities. “We don’t want to control each small farmer with the system, which would create a lot of administrative burden,” she said. It is easier to use the technology to track cohesion funds because they tend to be fewer and bulkier payments.

EU countries have already signaled they would only be open to using such a system provided the onus is on beneficiaries to provide the data to them, and it is not mandatory.

The proposal is also bogged down in technical difficulties. “The Commission is not ready to adopt this for all CAP payments now,” Müller said.

However, a European Commission spokesperson replied that the institution is pushing for the tool to be mandatory for governments to deploy in the next CAP. “The Commission is encouraging member states to use ARACHNE as it is useful for checking conflict of interest, fraud and irregularities but it takes time for all member states to harness the full potential of this tool,” the spokesperson said.

European People’s Party MEP Norbert Lins, the chair of the agriculture committee, said: “This system could help indeed to bring the corruption more under control. ” He said that the Parliament’s position as a whole is also to make this mandatory but that he could also understand doubts as to whether it is fit for purpose in the CAP.

According to the European Commission spokesperson, the EU executive will “ensure its obligation” to get the tool up and running for all EU governments to use in the new CAP starting 2023. Brussels also insists that the so-called error rate of funds being misused “remains at a very low level.”

Despite doubts about ARACHNE, the next farm policy does look likely to take a small step toward a more transparent system. Negotiators have agreed to increase the transparency of who is getting farm subsidies by obliging beneficiaries to disclose what broader legal entities they belong to. This could in theory reveal if a corrupt politician secretly controls a swathe of EU farmland, but is still a step short of full transparency about the original owner of every hectare of subsidized land. There is likely to be an attempt by the Parliament to ensure full transparency about CAP recipients during the negotiations next week, the EU Parliament insider said.

The spokesperson confirmed that the European Commission will start collecting and publishing information that governments collect about the legal entities receiving CAP payments.

Müller said: “We have really a huge success, because the information on the groups of beneficiaries will be published.” The Commission is not, however, planning to publish the information ARACHNE tool picks up, but could offer the Parliament a report in 2025 on how well it is working.

Gabriela Galindo contributed reporting.

Want more analysis from POLITICO? POLITICO Pro is our premium intelligence service for professionals. From financial services to trade, technology, cybersecurity and more, Pro delivers real time intelligence, deep insight and breaking scoops you need to keep one step ahead. Email [email protected] to request a complimentary trial.

EU ‘seriously concerned’ about press rights in Ethiopia

The EU on Saturday demanded an investigation into the killing of an Ethiopian journalist early this month and expressed “serious concern” over the expulsion from the country on Friday of Simon Marks, a reporter who had worked for the New York Times, POLITICO, and other outlets.

“The EU is seriously concerned about the shrinking space for freedom of the media and harrassment, arrests as well as restrictions imposed on Ethiopian and international journalists in Ethiopia,” an EU spokesperson said, in a statement.

“The recent news about the killing of one journalist from the Oromia Broadcasting Network is completely unacceptable and the case must be thoroughly investigated,” the statement said, adding: “The expulsion from the country this week of a journalist from The New York Times is also a matter of serious concern.”

Sisay Fida, the reporter for Oromia Broadcasting Network, was shot dead by unidentified attackers in the town of Dembi Dollo in the western part of the country, on May 9. The motive of the killing is still unknown. The television channel is controlled by the regional government. Oromia is the home region of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, and Abiy served on the network’s board of directors before taking office.

Marks, who had reported on atrocities committed by the Ethiopian military and its allies in the Tigray region, where a civil war has raged for months, was deported from Ethiopia in the early hours of Friday morning. His press accreditation had been rescinded in March and an appeal was recently denied, though his residence permit in the country was valid until October.

“The European Union will continue to stand up for the role of independent and reliable media all around the world,” the EU’s statement said. “We are committed, in compliance with international human rights law, to safeguarding media freedom and pluralism, as well as protecting the right to freedom of expression online and offline, including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information without interference. Freedom of the press is an essential right and as such must be respected.”

EU’s Borrell Says EU Ready to Support Colombia in Crisis Resolution

According to the document, Borrell expressed EU solidarity with Colombia, but stressed the importance of respecting and protecting human rights, including the right to peaceful protest. He urged the Colombian president to find a solution to the current crisis “via dialogue and negotiations, as well as through an inclusive agenda for the youth.”

“High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell held a phone call with the President of Colombia Iván Duque Márquez on Friday evening. They discussed the situation in the country and possible support of the European Union in overcoming the current crisis,” the official statement said.

The top EU diplomat expressed readiness to cooperate further on the issue and offered EU support in diffusing tensions, the statement said.

Since late April, Colombia has been grappling with an internal crisis caused by massive protests and street violence, with a new bout of rallies scheduled for the last week of May. Initially, thousands took to the streets to protest against tax reform. Although the reform bill was later withdrawn, protests continue. Labor and student organizations are demanding social and healthcare reforms, the demilitarization of the cities, and the dissolution of the Mobile Anti-Disturbance Squadron forces.

Since the beginning of the unrest, over 1,900 people have been injured in clashes with police. A reported 966 of those casualties are said to be police officers. Authorities have confirmed the deaths of 15, while human rights activists suggest that over 50 have been killed in the ongoing protests.

North Macedonia Gets EU Backing From Austria, Czech Republic, Slovenia

… in its bid to begin European Union membership talks from Austria, … to start talks with the EU, saying that separate bilateral issues … Silva, whose country holds the EU‘s rotating presidency, … , which first applied for EU membership in 2004, received a …

Armenian Ambassador welcomes European Parliament’s adoption of annual resolution-report on Turkey

YEREVAN, MAY 22, ARMENPRESS. Head of the Mission of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union, Ambassador Anna Aghadjanian commented on the recent adoption of the annual resolution-report on Turkey by the European Parliament, the Armenian foreign ministry told Armenpress.The Ambassador’s comment runs as follows:“We welcome the calls made by the European Parliament in its annual report on Turkey, particularly, those to recognize the Armenian Genocide and to refrain from anti-Armenian propaganda. We urge Turkey to respect these calls, including refraining from any action or rhetoric that may escalate the tension in the South Caucasus, defending the rights of ethnic and religious minorities living in Turkey, including citizens of Armenian descent and Christians, as well as urgently putting in place comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation.The resolution of the European Parliament strongly condemns the transfer of the militants and mercenaries from the jihadist groups in the Northern Syria to Lybia and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.It is noteworthy that the European Parliament calls on the EU and EU member states to examine the possibility of adding the extremist movement “Gray Wolves” in the EU list of terrorist organizations and to ban the activities of its associations in the EU countries. The EU and its member states are urged to closely monitor their activities and to counter their influence, which is especially threatening for people with a Kurdish, Armenian or Greek background and anyone they consider an opponent”. 

We urge Turkey to respect these calls: Head of the Mission of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union

Comment by Head of the Mission of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union, Ambassador Anna Aghadjanian regarding the adoption of the European Parliament’s annual resolution-report on Turkey

We welcome the calls made by the European Parliament in its annual report on Turkey, particularly, those to recognize the Armenian Genocide and to refrain from anti-Armenian propaganda. We urge Turkey to respect these calls, including refraining from any action or rhetoric that may escalate the tension in the South Caucasus, defending the rights of ethnic and religious minorities living in Turkey, including citizens of Armenian descent and Christians, as well as urgently putting in place comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation.

The resolution of the European Parliament strongly condemns the transfer of the militants and mercenaries from the jihadist groups in the Northern Syria to Lybia and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

It is noteworthy that the European Parliament calls on the EU and EU member states to examine the possibility of adding the extremist movement “Gray Wolves” in the EU list of terrorist organizations and to ban the activities of its associations in the EU countries. The EU and its member states are urged to closely monitor their activities and to counter their influence, which is especially threatening for people with a Kurdish, Armenian or Greek background and anyone they consider an opponent.

Austria, Slovenia, Czech Republic want North Macedonia in EU

Tensions rise at Irish border over EU inspectors with a finger in too many pies

“Burdensome” checks on supermarket pork pies and ham by European Union inspectors risks exacerbating tensions in Northern Ireland, a Cabinet minister has said, calling for the EU to demonstrate common sense.

Brandon Lewis, the Northern Ireland Secretary, warns that the damage caused by the EU’s “unilateral move to put a hard border on the island of Ireland for vaccine exports in January cannot be overstated”.

Ministers are increasingly worried about the way that the European Union is enforcing checks when goods move from Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

The checks under the terms of the Northern Ireland Protocol, signed as part of the terms of the UK’s exit from the EU, are meant to stop goods crossing the EU’s border into the Republic of Ireland.

However, the UK Government has complained that the EU is carrying out 20 per cent of its external border checks at the so-called “sea border” in the Irish Sea.

Calling on the EU to “listen to and take into account the experience of people and businesses”, Mr Lewis says that EU checks were now so extreme that supermarket chain Sainsbury’s has difficulties sending its goods to its own shops in Northern Ireland – even though there are no Sainsbury’s stores in Ireland.

“At the moment a big supermarket, like Sainsbury’s, cannot send a box of pork pies or packet of ham from one of its stores in England, Wales or Scotland to another branch in Northern Ireland without going through a burdensome regime of checks and processes to allow it to cross the Irish Sea,” he says.

“In theory, this is to make sure that there is no risk of ‘non-compliant’ goods ending up in the EU’s single market, via Northern Ireland. Except Sainsbury’s does not have any stores in the Republic of Ireland – so such checks are unnecessary.

“They are attempting to mitigate a risk that does not exist. The sooner the EU is able to find new solutions and embrace a more pragmatic approach the better.”

He adds: “It is our hope that the EU will embrace a more constructive approach to the Protocol so that it can support the peace process, be implemented in the proportionate way that we always intended, and ensure the people of Northern Ireland can continue to see the benefits of continued prosperity and stability. That is the only way it can be sustained.

Story continues

“I would urge the EU to take the proportionate, risk-based approach that is needed so that we can all look forward to a more positive and optimistic future for the whole of Northern Ireland – one that fully embraces all that it has to offer the rest of the UK and the world.”

War of words with Dublin

Mr Lewis’s comments came as a war of words broke out with Dublin, with ministers incensed by a report from respected RTE journalist Tony Connelly that the UK was “dangerously fuelling tensions” in the province.

In a column on Saturday, Mr Connelly wrote: “The view in Dublin is that UK rhetoric is dangerously fuelling tensions, and raising expectations that the Protocol will be ditched or radically changed.”

He added: “Warning about violence during the loyalist marching season is a subtler part of the message. David Frost, the UK’s Brexit minister, told the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee on Monday: ‘We all know that the late spring and summer in Northern Ireland can sometimes be turbulent. Such rhetoric is seasoning the pot that unionism is stirring.’”

A government official said these suggestions were “just not true. We have always wanted to ensure that changes and any mitigations were made precisely to take the sting out of growing loyalist agitation and anger, rather than for any selfish or narrow political gain”.

The official added: “We are definitely of the view that that has undermined broader support for the Good Friday Agreement. The Irish government has talked up the prospect of violence for a very long time and we are now left to deal with the consequences of that.”

The official added that there was “still a lot of anger across Northern Ireland but particularly in unionist and loyalist communities” about the way Irish ministers had suggested border posts on the island of Ireland would raise tensions.

In 2018, at the height of the Brexit talks, then-Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar warned EU leaders that a return to a hard border would threaten a return to violence in Northern Ireland.

The EU will focus the plane on renewing the fossil fuel tax

The EU is getting closer and closer to agreeing on an aircraft tax, as part of a comprehensive renewal of fossil fuel taxes, to help meet high-emission targets.

EU finance ministers held a wide-ranging meeting in Lisbon on Saturday for proposals to come across Europe for the tax on kerosene fuel used in aircraft, officials told the Financial Times.

Brussels has struggled in previous years to extend fuel tax rules to areas such as air and sea, but the cause has resurfaced with the bloc pledging to reduce EU carbon emissions by 55% over the next decade and a net zero by 2050.

The pandemic aviation industry has previously expressed concern over EU tax plans on kerosene.

In July, the European Commission will propose a complete overhaul of the Energy Tax Directive, which sets minimum tax rates for fossil fuels and has been out of date for almost two decades. The agreement on the changes was hampered by the need to reach a unanimous agreement in the 27 member states.

Brussels has said it will extend the control rules to aircraft and maritime sectors that were exempt from the system. However, European Union finance ministers have expressed less support for extending the directive to maritime transport, with countries on the geographical periphery of Europe expressing concern about the plans, officials said.

The renewal of the Energy Tax Directive will be one of the most politically sensitive sections of the Brussels Green Agreement agenda, as all countries have a veto on tax policy. EU Vice President of Economy Valdis Dombrovskis said the directive was “outdated” and that ministers had indicated “the right political moment to make changes”.

João Leão, Portugal’s finance minister, who chaired the meeting, said he was in favor of expanding his country to the maritime and aircraft sectors to help meet the EU’s ambitious environmental goals.

Some EU countries have run for office to end fuel tax exemptions, and the Netherlands has promised to introduce a national aircraft tax in the absence of an EU-wide agreement.

The renewal of Brussels will also aim to eliminate the exemptions that many Member States offer to sectors such as agriculture, the coal industry and diesel. The commission is also looking at a more stringent system, where taxes on minimum fuels will increase within 10 years, an official said.

Energy taxes are one of the main regulatory tools that Brussels can use to help reduce emissions, making higher-emission technologies more expensive for consumers and businesses. Another significant carbon pricing initiative that the Commission wants to renew is the European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which is also considering transporting Brussels to cover shipments, aircraft and cars.

During the discussion, some finance ministers expressed concerns about the imposition of double charges on ships and airlines, included in the ETS and renewed rules for energy control, said diplomats familiar with the debate.

The Commission presented an initial plan to ministers to introduce a carbon tax that will tax imports to the EU based on their carbon footprint. The measure, which will be published in July, has raised alarm in countries such as Russia and Ukraine. Brussels has argued that the tax is necessary to protect the competitiveness of EU industry and prevent foreign companies from failing to meet their emissions targets.

Dombrovskis said the border tax will only be introduced “gradually,” as the initial scope will be limited to high-emission imports, such as cement, steel and fertilizers. “We are confident that we will have a consensus on the proposal to gradually adjust the carbon limit over time,” he said.

@mehreenkhn

Member of the European Parliament Maximilian Krah congratulates the Tibet Autonomous Region on its 70th anniversary

Member of the European Parliament Maximilian Krah congratulated the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Tibet Autonomous Region and praised its development and achievements.

/EIN News/ — Berlin, Germany, May 22, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Maximilian Krah, a member of the German Alternative für Deutschland in the European Parliament and vice chairman of the China-EU Friendship Group, recently announced his views on Tibet through a video on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Tibet Autonomous Region. Maximilian Krah has played an increasingly important role in the European Parliament as a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, a member of the International Trade Committee of the European Parliament and a member of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament.

Maximilian Krah talks about Tibet experience and expresses blessings

https://youtu.be/oD0rDcYmsgo

Maximilian Krah revealed that he went to Tibet in China as a tourist for the first time in 2002 and was very shocked by the local development. Maximilian Krah said: “It is difficult for ordinary people to understand Tibet objectively outside of China. so it is important to go there to experience local development and achievements. For example, to protect Tibetan cultural heritage, the human rights of monks have been effectively protected by the state, new temples have been built, and at the same time The old temple was repaired. A large part of this comes from the support of Beijing and Shanghai, including the construction of new schools. The whole of China has participated in the construction of Tibet, which has enabled Tibet to enter the modern life of the new world while preserving its history and culture.”

Maximilian Krah also revealed that he hopes to further strengthen the exchanges between Germany and China and strengthen economic and trade relations. Tibet can also play an important role through tourism and manufacturing, and cooperate with the luxury goods industry in Europe. Maximilian Krah believes that Tibet is an inherent territory of China. During the 70 years since the establishment of the autonomous region, human rights have been effectively protected, culture has been inherited and carried forward, and the economy and living standards have been continuously improved. They have any reason to be proud of their achievements.

In addition, Maximilian Krah expressed his congratulations on the 70th anniversary of the founding of China’s Tibet Autonomous Region, and hoped that the Tibet Autonomous Region can make more achievements in ecological environmental protection and cultural heritage protection. As China develops, Tibet will develop better. Maximilian Krah also expressed regret that he did not have the opportunity to visit Tibet because of the epidemic. Maximilian Krah said, “I hope that after the epidemic, we can go to Tibet to see in person what development achievements have been made from 2002 to the present. I heard that the world’s highest high-speed railway to Lhasa has been completed.

They combine history with the future. ”

Maximilian Krah’s sincere words also revealed the importance of establishing cultural exchanges to promote economic and trade development in the context of increasing global uncertainties in 2021. The Tibet Autonomous Region has also celebrated its 70th anniversary. Maximilian Krah said at the end of the video to enjoy this celebration and wish for better achievements in the future.

Overview of the Development of Tibet Autonomous Region

The Tibet Autonomous Region is approaching the 70th anniversary of its founding. The Chinese government’s management of the Tibet Autonomous Region has ensured the equality, unity, mutual assistance, and common prosperity and development of local residents. At the same time, residents in Tibet have the right to participate in the management of state affairs and independently manage the affairs of the region. The Tibet Autonomous Region, like other regions in China, has institutional guarantees and policy preferences.

Since the establishment of the Tibet Autonomous Region 70 years ago, the Central Government of China has formulated many special preferential policies for Tibet to help the region develop better. The policies cover various fields such as finance, taxation and finance, infrastructure, industrial development, education and health, cultural protection, and ecological civilization. The support for Tibet is constantly increasing, which has greatly improved the production and living conditions of the residents in Tibet, and the residents’ sense of happiness and security is constantly increasing and rising. This is a major achievement.

In 2020, the per capita disposable income of urban and rural residents in the Tibet Autonomous Region will double that in 2010. The per capita disposable income of rural residents was 14,598 yuan, an increase of 12.7% over the previous year. It has maintained double-digit growth for 18 consecutive years. The growth rate has remained at about 13% in the past five years. This is a shocking growth rate that even exceeds The region with the strongest economy in China. The per capita disposable income of urban residents was 41156 yuan, an increase of 10% over 2019.

In addition, the Chinese government has also invested huge manpower, financial resources, and material resources, using various methods such as law, economy, and administration to effectively protect and develop the excellent traditional culture of Tibet. While maintaining the traditional methods and styles of clothing, food, and housing, the residents of the Tibet Autonomous Region have also absorbed many new modern cultural customs. This is a perfect fusion of tradition and modernity. At the same time, religious freedom is also greatly guaranteed in Tibet. In the Tibet Autonomous Region, all religions and sects are equal, and religious believers and non-believers are treated equally. There are more than 1,700 places for religious activities in Tibetan Buddhism, with approximately 46,000 monks and nuns. In just a few decades, as if spanning thousands of years, the Tibet Autonomous Region has gone from mysterious and backward to bright and prosperous. With the stability and continuous progress of the region, we also look forward to greater achievements in the future, which deserves any recognition and applause in the world.

Contact:

Maximilian Krah

maximilian.krah@europarl.europa.eu

Startseite

Content Disclaimer: 

The above review statements are those of the sponsor (Source of content) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position or views of the content publisher. The content distribution company is therefore not responsible for the content and its authenticity and legal standing of the above subject matter. Each individual is required to exercise its content when making a purchase from the above offer. The information does not constitute advice or an offer to buy. Any purchase made from the above press release is made at your own risk. Editorial merit of this content is subject to news publisher and its downstream partners. Consult an expert advisor/health and professional advisor before any such purchase. Any purchase made from this link is subject to the final terms and conditions of the website’s selling as mentioned in the above as source. The content publisher and its downstream distribution partners do not take any responsibility directly or indirectly. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the company this news is about.  

DISCLAIMER of Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL OUR PR COMPANY BE LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE TO YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOST OPPORTUNITIES, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES IN ADVANCE AND REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION UPON WHICH ANY SUCH CLAIM IS BASED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OF THE CONTENT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, AUDIO, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND VIDEOS, OR OF THE ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR LEGALITY OF ANY STATEMENT MADE IN OR OMITTED FROM ANY advertisement, sponsorship, endorsement, testimonial, opinion, or other product-related or service-related statement or review appearing in the Websites or in ANY post or article distributed via the Websites. 

EU’s unjustified sanctions strain China-EU relations: FM spokesperson

BEIJING, May 21 (Xinhua) — China is unwilling to see the current difficulties in China-European Union (EU) relations caused by EU’s unjustified sanctions and the responsibility does not lie with China, a foreign ministry spokesperson said Friday, adding it is hoped that the EU side will make serious reflections.

Spokesperson Zhao Lijian made the remarks at a press briefing in response to a query on the European Parliament’s resolution demanding China lifts sanctions on European lawmakers before the China-Europe investment deal can move forward.

Despite China’s solemn position and strong opposition, the EU disregarded facts, twisted right and wrong, and stubbornly made a wrong decision of unilateral sanctions based on lies and disinformation, Zhao said, adding what the EU has done constitutes a gross interference in China’s internal affairs, brazenly violates international laws and the basic norms of international relations, and severely undermines China-EU relations.

“China’s decision to sanction relevant EU entities and individuals who maliciously spread Xinjiang-related lies and disinformation and severely harmed China’s sovereignty and interests, is out of the need to safeguard its own interests. This is a necessary and legitimate reaction to the EU’s moves of imposing sanctions and seeking confrontation,” the spokesperson added.

China has the sincerity to advance China-EU relations, but will staunchly safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, Zhao said, adding that sanction and confrontation will not be conducive to solving problems, and is not the way how comprehensive strategic partners should treat each other. “Dialogue and cooperation is the right way forward.”

He said the EU side should immediately stop interfering in China’s internal affairs, abandon confrontational actions, properly manage differences through dialogue and communication, to overcome current difficulties and promote China-EU relations back to the right path of dialogue and cooperation.

Stressing the China-EU investment agreement is a balanced and win-win deal, rather than a “gift” bestowed by one side to the other, Zhao said China is sincere about advancing bilateral relations.

“We hope the EU side will work toward the same direction as China, and make the right decision that conforms to its own interests by relying more on rational thinking, rather than emotion,” he added.

In a brief response to media query regarding the issue, China’s Ministry of Commerce said the EU’s “freezing” of the ratification of the agreement does not conform to the common interests of both parties.

European Parliament votes to ‘freeze’ investment deal with

By European Parliament Votes To ‘Freeze’ China Investment DealBrussels [Belgium], May 21 (ANI): Members of the European Parliament on Thursday voted to freeze the legislative process for ratifying the EU’s investment pact with China, until Beijing lifts sanctions against EU lawmakers, in retaliation for the condemnation of human rights abuses in Xinjiang province.

The motion was passed by 599 MEPs, with 30 votes against and 58 abstentions, hurting the prospect of the major economic pact, officially known as the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), Politico reported.

“The European Parliament has adopted the resolution on the Chinese sanctions with 599 yes, 30 no, 58 abstentions. Very substantial. CAI is definitely in the freezer. China miscalculated and shot themselves in the foot,” Reinhard Butikofer, chair of the Parliament’s delegation for relations with China, said on Twitter.

According to the motion, “any consideration of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, as well as any discussion on ratification by the European Parliament, has justifiably been frozen because the Chinese sanctions are in place.”The motion also demands that “China lift the sanctions before dealing with CAI, without prejudice to the final outcome of the CAI ratification process.” It also says that MEPs expect the European Commission “to consult with Parliament before taking any steps towards the conclusion and signature of the CAI.”The sanctions imposed by the EU on China in March marked the EU’s first punitive measures on Beijing since it imposed an arms embargo after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.

In retaliation to the bloc’s sanctions, China introduced sanctions against ten European Union officials and four European organizations after accusing them of spreading lies and false information about the Xinjiang region.

Since the signing of the deal by Chinese Premier Xi Jinping, there is growing concern in Europe over China’s human rights record on issues, including alleged forced labour camps and a crackdown in Hong Kong against anti-government protestors. (ANI)

China slams EU’s confrontational approach after European Parliament’s decision

China has criticized the European Union’s confrontational approach after the European Parliament voted to block the investment deal due to Beijing’s sanctions against EU lawmakers, AFP reported.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said Beijing’s sanctions were a necessary and justified response to previous EU measures against Chinese officials over human rights concerns in Xinjiang.

The European Union and China at the end of December approved a major investment pact that ended seven years of painstaking negotiations.

But the European Parliament overwhelmingly voted to refuse to consider the investment agreement between the EU and China, while China’s sanctions against MEPs and scientists are in effect. Beijing says the sanctions were imposed to protect China’s interests.

China has imposed sanctions on relevant EU institutions and staff who are spreading lies and misinformation related to Xinjiang and which have seriously damaged China’s sovereignty and interests, Lijian said.

He called on the EU to immediately stop interfering in China’s internal affairs, abandon the confrontational approach and return relations between the EU and China to the correct path of dialogue and cooperation.

According to the European Commission, the investment deal aims to open up the Chinese market and eliminate discriminatory laws and practices that impede equal competition for European companies.

EU foreign direct investment in China since 2000, excluding the UK, has been $ 181 billion. The corresponding amount from China is $ 138 billion.

Haiti – Politic : The European Parliament adopts a resolution on the situation in Haiti

Haiti – Politic : The European Parliament adopts a resolution on the situation in Haiti
21/05/2021 11:01:02

Thursday, May 20, 2021, the European Parliament adopted a resolution (639 votes in favor, 23 against and 31 abstentions) which urges the Haitian authorities to organize free, fair, transparent and credible legislative, local and presidential elections, and to guarantee effective security during these electoral processes.The resolution emphasizes that the failure of the elections in October 2020 brought about a regime of government by decree, and that rumors of failed coups d’etat reflect growing political and social instability in the country. Political opposition and civil society groups claim that President Jovenel Moïse’s term ended on February 7, 2021, in accordance with the position of Haiti’s Supreme Judicial Council, and insist on the appointment of a President provisional. However, President Moïse has so far refused to resign.

The deputies also reaffirm their deep concern at the deterioration of the humanitarian, political and security situation in Haiti. They strongly condemn all human rights violations and acts of violence, in particular the increase in kidnappings, trafficking of children to the Dominican Republic, killings and rapes.

Download the European Parliament resolution :

HL / HaitiLibre

    </td>
</tr>   
<tr>
    <td>
        <img src="/images/tr.gif" height="0"/>
    </td>
</tr>