European Parliament ratifies EU-UK trade agreement
European Parliament ratifies EU-UK trade agreement

The agreement on trade and cooperation was necessary for regulating relations between the UK and the bloc after the end of the post-Brexit transition period, which expired on January 1.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has welcomed the ratification of the deal.

“I warmly welcome the @Europarl_EN [EU Parliament] vote in favour of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. The TCA marks the foundation of a strong and close partnership with the UK. Faithful implementation is essential,” von der Leyen tweeted.

She was joined by European Council President Charles Michel, who pledged further “constructive” cooperation between Brussels and London.

“I warmly welcome the results of the vote by the @Europarl_EN on the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. It marks a major step forward in #EU-#UK relations and opens a new era. The #EU will continue to work constructively with the #UK as an important friend and partner,” he wrote on Twitter.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has also expressed satisfaction over the approval of the document.

“Great news that the European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly in favour of our zero tariffs, zero quotas Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Now is the time to look forward to a new relationship with the EU and a more Global Britain,” Johnson said in Twitter.

The United Kingdom officially left the European Union on January 31, 2020, entering a transition period that lasted until December 31 the same year to give both parties time to negotiate further arrangements and tackle several sensitive topics in bilateral relations. After months of tough talks, London and Brussels managed to reach a serviceable arrangement in the nick of time, on December 24.

In the wake of the separation, the bloc immediately imposed full border controls for goods crossing the English Channel to the continent, with the UK manufacturing and fishing industries complaining that the paperwork and the delays are costing money and potential clients.

Source: ANI / Sputnik

European Parliament Launches Space Program Based in Prague
European Parliament Launches Space Program Based in Prague

The European Parliament has approved the creation of the EU Space Program (EUSPA) whose agency will be headquartered in Prague.

The goal of the project, which will run a budget of EUR 14.8 billion, will be the construction of a series of satellite systems that will provide data and services to public and private sectors. It will be an expansion of the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency (GNSS) which has its headquarters in Holešovice and has been managing the EU’s Galileo satellite system for the past 9 years.

Ondřej Šváb, Head of the Department of Space Technologies and Applications at the Ministry of Transport said the approval of the project was an “opportunity for Czech companies, innovators and research institutes”

“Satellite navigation and Earth observation are used in a wide range of fields, such as transport, logistics, agriculture, natural resource management, environmental monitoring and smart cities. Autonomous systems will also largely depend on satellite services,” Šváb stated.

The program will be overseen by the European Commission in Brussels, and in addition to the EUSPA, will be in close collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA). The ESA will be heading up the construction of the satellite systems as well as researching new technologies.

Last year, the Czech Republic invested more than 1.2 billion CZK into the development of space technologies, including flexible solar panels for satellites, rocket parts, and satellite data processing.

Following further negotiations, the official launch of the EU Space Program is set for June 22 in Brussels.

The European Union paid and trained the military thugs in Myanmar
The European Union paid and trained the military thugs in Myanmar

            <div class="image-caption-wrapper">&#13;
Democracy protesters in Myanmar face cops equipped by the EU



Democracy protesters in Myanmar face cops equipped by the EU (Pic: SOPA Images/SIPA USA/PA Images)




The European Union (EU) trained and equipped paramilitary police in Myanmar who track and kill democracy protesters.


That’s the shocking conclusion of a report published this week in the respected French newspaper, Liberation.


The EU provided more than 40 million euros—approximately £35 million—to the Myanmar police between 2016 and 2021 to help then prime minister Aung San Suu Kyi keep control of the population.


Now that money is being used by the military regime brutally to suppress the movement for democracy in which hundreds of people have died.


The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners reports that, as of Tuesday this week, the regime has killed some 753 people and that 3,441 people are being detained.


All the major powers in the West, including the EU, have rushed to condemn the military which took power in a coup in February.


Abuses


They have been particularly vocal about the human rights abuses reported by the United Nations special rapporteur based in the country.


But no European power has wanted to discuss the EU’s Mypol (Myanmar Police) programme. It reportedly trained some 4,500 police officers in techniques, including “crowd management”.


It has also been revealed that arms deals were also part of the arrangement.


Thousands of helmets, shields, and body armour were sold to the Burmese security forces during the pilot phase of Mypol. Now that kit is being used to attack protesters and strikers.


The EU’s excuse for the exercise is that in 2015 Suu Kyi’s new government replaced military rule, and its police needed retraining for civilian rule.


But in 2018 the Suu Kyi government and the military conspired to launch a genocidal attack on the Rohingya Muslim minority—raping, killing and burning its opponents, and driving them into exile.




The government and the military were as one in their defence of the operation.


Despite this, the Mypol programme continued.


The truth behind the programme was that Western powers wanted the Suu Kyi regime to fall under its protection, rather than China’s. Only when the scale of the massacre of Rohingya people became public did the fawning over her government come to a halt.


These revelations should send a message to all those who hope that Western intervention in Myanmar is the key to the victory of the country’s democracy movement.


The continuing strikes, protests and barricades have spread fear through the military regime, which now faces a renewed offensive from a number of ethnic separatist groups.


The power to liberate Myanmar lies with those on the streets, not those powers who helped arm the regime.

Concerns over UK ‘good faith’ as European Parliament ratifies Brexit deal
Concerns over UK ‘good faith’ as European Parliament ratifies Brexit deal

The European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly to approve the post-Brexit trade deal between the European Union and UK, bringing to a conclusion years of negotiations to re-establish a new relationship between London and Brussels.

                                                    <p class="no_name">The parliament gave its consent to the deal in vote of 660 votes in favour, five against and 32 abstentions, a necessary final step in order for the deal to come into force permanently. </p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">British prime minister <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Boris+Johnson" rel="nofollow">Boris Johnson</a> welcomed the ratification as providing a more stable foundation for the relationship.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“This week is the final step in a long journey, providing stability to our new relationship with the EU as vital trading partners, close allies and sovereign equals,” Mr Johnson said in a statement.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“Now is the time to look forward to the future and to building a more global Britain.”</p>
                                                                                                                                                                                        <p class="no_name">But several MEPs expressed concerns over whether the British government would stick to the agreement. Alongside the vote to approve the deal, the parliament passed a resolution condemning the UK’s “recent unilateral actions, in breach of the Withdrawal Agreement, to extend grace periods”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">It also called “on the UK government to act in good faith and fully implement the agreements which it has signed”.</p>
                                                    <h4 class="crosshead">Checks in North</h4><p class="no_name">The British government’s decision to continue not to enforce some checks on goods between Britain and Northern Ireland triggered legal action by the <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=European+Commission" rel="nofollow">European Commission</a>, in a rocky start for the North’s new arrangements.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name"><a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Christophe+Hansen" rel="nofollow">Christophe Hansen</a>, a Luxembourg MEP in the centre-right group of <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=Fine+Gael" rel="nofollow">Fine Gael</a> who is rapporteur for the Committee on International Trade, said the deal would help hold Britain to its commitments.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“Ratification of the agreement is not a vote of blind confidence in the UK Government’s intention to implement our agreements in good faith,” Mr Hansen said in a statement. “Rather, it is an EU insurance policy against further unilateral deviations from what was jointly agreed.”</p>

                                                    <p class="no_name">During the debate, chief negotiator of the deal on the EU side <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Michel+Barnier" rel="nofollow">Michel Barnier</a> described Brexit as a “historic mistake”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“Any agreement on trade is better than no agreement,” said Ireland South MEP <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Deirdre+Clune" rel="nofollow">Deirdre Clune</a>. “It will be a different relationship particularly for business but I believe that we will continue to have a strong and friendly relationship with the UK.”</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">The deal had been provisionally applied until now and was due to lapse on April 30th, and some formalities will be fulfilled over the coming days before the process is finally concluded. </p>
EU lawmakers approve post-Brexit trade treaty between European Union and United Kingdom
EU lawmakers approve post-Brexit trade treaty between European Union and United Kingdom

By PTI
BURSSELS: European lawmakers have approved the final ratification of the post-Brexit trade deal between the European Union and the United Kingdom, nearly five years after Britain decided to leave the bloc.

The deal, which was finalized on Christmas Eve, had already been ratified by the U.K.

Parliament and conditionally came into force pending the European Parliament’s approval, which marks the final legal hurdle.

Lawmakers at the European Parliament endorsed the free trade agreement by 660 votes in favor, 5 against, and 32 abstentions.

The vote took place Tuesday but results were not announced until Wednesday morning.

The U.K. had joined the the bloc in 1973.

In a debate ahead of the vote, many legislators rued Britain’s departure but insisted ratifying the text was the best option to avoid economic disruptions and ensure the EU’s single market integrity.

Amid ongoing tensions between London and Brussels over Northern Ireland trade rules, the EU Parliament also said that the agreement will provide extra legal tools to “prevent and protect against unilateral divergence from the obligations to which both parties signed up.”

Earlier this year, the European Union accused Britain of breaching international law after the U.K. government unilaterally extended until October a grace period for not conducting checks on goods moving between Northern Ireland and the rest of the U.K. The move led the EU to start legal action against its former member nation.

Northern Ireland is part of the U.K. but remained part of the EU’s single market for goods after Brexit to avoid customs checks at the territory’s border with EU member Ireland.

An open Irish border helped underpin the peace process that ended decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland.

But tensions and violence have escalated in recent weeks, with unionists saying the arrangement the British government and the EU worked out has amounted to the creation of a border between the territory and the rest of the U.K.

The sensitivity of Northern Ireland’s status also was seen in September when the U.K.

Parliament considered legislation that would have given Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government the power to override part of the Brexit withdrawal agreement relating to Northern Ireland.

The tension increased in January when the EU threatened to ban shipments of coronavirus vaccines to Northern Ireland as part of moves to shore up the bloc’s supply.

That would have drawn a hard border on the island of Ireland — exactly the scenario the Brexit deal was crafted to avoid.

Relations between the EU and the U.K.

have been strained since a Brexit transition period ended on Jan.1.

The two sides have argued so far this year over issues ranging from COVID-19 vaccine supplies to the full diplomatic recognition of the EU in Britain.

European Parliament FINALLY backs post-Brexit trade deal
European Parliament FINALLY backs post-Brexit trade deal

Boris Johnson today hailed the European Parliament’s approval of the post-Brexit trade deal as the ‘final step’ towards a new relationship.

The PM said it is ‘time to look to the future’ after the result of the vote was announced in Brussels this morning, with 660 MEPs in favour and just five opposed.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen also welcomed the green light – but delivered a warning shot that it must be ‘faithfully implemented’. 

The ballot took place yesterday, but coronavirus working restrictions meant the result was not immediately declared.

The trade agreement has been provisionally in force since being agreed by Boris Johnson and Ursula von der Leyen before Christmas.

Both sides will hope it can draw a line under four years of acrimonious negotiations and debate.

Mr Johnson said: ‘This week is the final step in a long journey, providing stability to our new relationship with the EU as vital trading partners, close allies and sovereign equals.

‘Now is the time to look forward to the future and to building a more Global Britain.’

The result of the vote was announced in Brussels this morning, with 660 MEPs in favour and just five opposed

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the vote and said the Trade and Co-operation Agreement ‘marks the foundation of a strong and close partnership with the UK’

There had been fears that the European Parliament was withholding approval as a pressure tactic in the row over the Northern Ireland protocol. 

Ms von der Leyen welcomed the vote and said the Trade and Co-operation Agreement ‘marks the foundation of a strong and close partnership with the UK’.

But in an acknowledgement of EU concerns about the Prime Minister’s approach to deals with Brussels, she warned that ‘faithful implementation is essential’.

Leading MEP Guy Verhofstadt tweeted: ‘The @Europarl_EN approves the EU – UK trade & cooperation agreement! The first trade deal in history to put up barriers & remove freedoms? A failure for both sides, but better than nothing.’ 

In a speech during the debate yesterday, Ms von der Leyen warned Mr Johnson the European Union ‘will not hesitate’ to take action against the UK if it breaches the terms of the trade deal. 

She warned that the pact has ‘real teeth’ and ‘unilateral remedial measures’ will be deployed ‘where necessary’. 

Ursula von der Leyen, pictured today addressing the European Parliament in Brussels, warned Boris Johnson the EU ‘will not hesitate’ to take action against the UK if it breaches the terms of the Brexit trade deal

MEPS will today finally vote for the Trade and Cooperation Agreement which the EU agreed with Mr Johnson on Christmas Eve last year. The PM is pictured in Llandudno yesterday

Her warning shot came amid a rumbling row between the UK and the EU over the Northern Ireland Protocol which was agreed as part of the original Brexit divorce deal. 

Addressing the European Parliament, Mrs von der Leyen said: ‘This agreement comes with real teeth. With a binding dispute settlement mechanism and the possibility for unilateral remedial measures where necessary. 

‘Let me be very clear: We do not want to have to use these tools. But we will not hesitate to use them if necessary. 

‘They are essential to ensure full compliance with the TCA and with the Withdrawal Agreement.’  

Mrs von der Leyen noted concerns in the EU that the UK had not yet fully complied with the terms of the Brexit divorce deal and stressed that ‘vigilance’ would be required in future when it comes to sticking to the terms of the trade deal. 

Relations between the UK and EU have been strained over the application of the Northern Ireland Protocol which governs the post-Brexit arrangements aimed at preventing a hard border with Ireland. 

Much of the disruption and controversy created by the protocol relates to the fact that Great Britain has left the Single Market for goods, while Northern Ireland remains in the EU regulatory zone.

That necessitates a significant number of documentary checks and physical inspections on agri-food goods arriving into Northern Ireland from Great Britain.

The UK has unilaterally extended grace periods covering areas of the economy including supermarket supplies and parcel deliveries to Northern Ireland from Great Britain, meaning post-Brexit checks are not yet fully applied – which has triggered a legal dispute with Brussels.

Mrs von der Leyen said there was a need for ‘joint solutions’ as ‘unilateral decisions will get us nowhere’.

She said there had been ‘some progress’ in talks on improving the protocol between commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic and the UK’s Brexit Minister Lord Frost.

Post-Brexit trade deal backed by European Parliament
Post-Brexit trade deal backed by European Parliament

Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit trade deal has cleared its final hurdle after the European Parliament overwhelmingly voted to back it.

MEPs in Brussels gave their consent to the deal by 660 votes to five, with 32 abstentions.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the vote and said the Trade and Co-operation Agreement “marks the foundation of a strong and close partnership with the UK”.

But in an acknowledgement of EU concerns about the Prime Minister’s approach to deals with Brussels, she warned that “faithful implementation is essential”.

Advertisement

The UK and EU are at odds over the way the earlier Brexit divorce deal is being implemented in Northern Ireland.

There are a few remaining formalities which need to be completed before the deal struck by Mr Johnson and the EU on Christmas Eve last year is finally ratified.

The UK Prime Minister said: “This week is the final step in a long journey, providing stability to our new relationship with the EU as vital trading partners, close allies and sovereign equals.

“Now is the time to look forward to the future and to building a more global Britain.”

Brexit Minister David Frost said the vote was an “important moment”.

“Today’s vote brings certainty and allows us to focus on the future,” Lord Frost said.

“There will be much for us and the EU to work on together through the new partnership council and we are committed to working to find solutions that work for both of us.

Advertisement

“We will always aim to act in that positive spirit but we will also always stand up for our interests when we must – as a sovereign country in full control of our own destiny.”

Meanwhile, European Council president Charles Michel said the approval of the deal “marks a major step forward” in UK-EU relations and “opens a new era”.

He said Brussels will work constructively with the UK as an “important friend and partner”.

European Parliament ends Brexit saga, ratifies trade deal
European Parliament ends Brexit saga, ratifies trade deal
The vote ends five years of a Brexit saga during which Britain and Europe sealed a divorce deal that bitterly divided the UK.
                                                                            BRUSSELS: The European Parliament on Wednesday overwhelmingly ratified the EU's post-Brexit trade deal with Britain, but promised to keep a close eye on London with cross-channel tensions still high.

The vote approved the bare bones trade deal with the bloc’s third-biggest trading partner that was sealed on Christmas Eve after nine months of tough negotiations.

The agreement provides the framework for London’s new relationship with the 27-member union, five years after British voters shocked the world by voting to end its 47-year membership.

In the final tally, 660 MEPs voted in favour of the trade deal, five against with 32 abstentions, results released Wednesday showed.

“The European Parliament voted on the most far reaching agreement the EU has ever reached with a third country,” the president of the assembly, David Sassoli, said.

“This can form the foundation on which we build a new forward-looking EU-UK relationship,” he said, warning that MEPs would monitor the implementation of the deal and “not accept any backsliding from the UK government.”

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson hailed the “final step in a long journey” that brought “stability to our new relationship with the EU as vital trading partners, close allies and sovereign equals.”

“Now is the time to look forward to the future and to building a more Global Britain,” he added.

The vote comes amid multiple feuds over the UK’s implementation of Brexit agreements and angry finger-pointing about the supply of the Covid-19 vaccine from AstraZeneca.

Deepening tensions further, France has threatened to block UK financial firms doing business in the EU if the London does not respect its commitments on fishing, a key part of the deal.

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen “warmly welcomed” the greenlight, but in a final debate in parliament on Tuesday, assured MEPs that the agreement had “real teeth” and had ways to keep the UK in check.

“Let me be very clear: We do not want to have to use these tools, but we will not hesitate to use them if necessary.”

Britain’s Brexit minister David Frost said he “hugely” welcomed the vote to approve the deal he helped negotiate during months of fraught talks with EU counterpart Michel Barnier.

“Hope we can now begin a new chapter together as Europeans, characterised by friendly cooperation between sovereign equals,” Frost wrote on Twitter.

  • Zero tariffs

The vote ends five years of a Brexit saga in which Britain and Europe also sealed a divorce deal that bitterly divided the UK and saw the future of peace on the island of Ireland thrust into doubt.

A recent wave of rioting in the British province of Northern Ireland has been blamed on the consequences of Brexit arrangements with talks underway in Brussels and London to find a long-term solutions.

Britain left the EU on January 30 2020, but its new life with Europe only really began after a transition period ended on December 31, when London was no longer bound by the bloc’s laws and rules.

Officially called a trade and cooperation agreement (TCA), the deal has been provisionally applied since January 1 and provides for zero tariffs and zero quotas on goods traded between the EU and UK.

But it is less ambitious than many Europeans had hoped for, with nothing on foreign policy and defence nor any commitment to close alignment on environment, health and other regulations.

Britain pointedly refused deeper harmonisation with the EU, saying that UK must defend and embrace its newly found sovereignty.

Cross-Channel trade volumes have plummeted this year, with EU imports from the UK down by half in the first two months of the deal’s application.

European Parliament Ratifies Post-Brexit Trade Deal With UK
European Parliament Ratifies Post-Brexit Trade Deal With UK

The European Parliament backed the post-Brexit trade agreement with the United Kingdom in an overwhelming “yes” vote on 27 April the results of which were announced on Wednesday.

Officials told AFP that 660 MEPs voted to ratify the trade arrangement while five voted against, with 32 abstentions.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has “warmly” welcomed this decision, saying on Twitter that “faithful implementation” of the deal was “essential”.

“The TCA (Trade and Cooperation Agreement) marks the foundation of a strong and close partnership with the UK,” the official wrote. 

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has called the voting results “the final step in a long journey”.

​According to European Council President Charles Michel, the UK remains the European Union’s “important friend and partner”.

Following the vote, Michel said that it had marked “a major step forward” in EU-UK relations, effectively opening “a new era”.

All the Drama Behind the Brexit Deal

The deal, that has already been ratified by the UK parliament, was a result of almost five years of negotiations after Britain voted to leave the European Union in the summer 2016. It did so only on 31 January 2020, while entering an 11-month transition period to agree upon economic arrangement that would be mutually beneficial for both sides, but disagreements prevailed.

Biggest issues at stake were Northern Ireland’s status – which has remained part of the EU customs union to avoid a hard border with the Republic of Ireland – as well as level playing field conditions, fishing rights in the British voters and legal framework for UK operators in the union. 

In December 2020, the UK finally agreed upon a trade deal with the European Union despite fears that there will be none and the two trade partners will plunge into a gloomy turmoil after the transition period ends.

But even with the newly-reached arrangement, the two sides have remained fairly dissatisfied with each other over a number of issues: Brussels accused the British government of “breaching” the Northern Ireland Protocol laid out in the Brexit agreement after the UK had moved on to unilaterally extend a grace period in the country until October, meaning no checks will be conducted on goods moving between the country and Great Britain as agreed to in the deal. 


©
REUTERS / CLODAGH KILCOYNE
Signs reading ‘No Irish Sea border’ and ‘Ulster is British, no internal UK Border’ are seen affixed to a lamp post at the Port of Larne, Northern Ireland, March 6, 2021. Picture taken March 6, 2021

The UK believes this will prevent any supply disruptions or food shortages, such as those witnessed in Northern Ireland this winter after the Brexit deal came into force.

Brussels, however, sees this decision as a “violation” of the Northern Ireland Protocol and has now taken legal action against London. 

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has been outraged by the EU’s short-lived attempt to place export controls in Northern Ireland on the movement of vaccines in February amid its ongoing row with producer AstraZeneca. Brussels wanted to prevent Northern Ireland from being used as a back door for the “leakage” of jabs to the United Kingdom but has provoked anger in London, Dublin and Belfast with the move. 

The two trading partners also continue to quarrel about fishing rights in British waters, an issue which has remained particularly sensitive for France. 

Before the Brexit deal vote took place in the European Parliament on Tuesday evening, the incumbent secretary of state for European affairs in the French government, Clement Beaune, told the media that the EU could take “reprisals” against Britain if it fails to take its post-Brexit obligations “seriously”.

European Parliament ratifies EU-UK trade deal
European Parliament ratifies EU-UK trade deal

MEPs in the European Parliament have voted to ratify the EU-UK trade deal nearly four months after the Brexit deal came into effect.

The lawmakers voted overwhelmingly in favour of formally approving the deal with 660 votes in favour, 5 against, and 32 abstentions.

While the move is largely symbolic with few real-world ramifications, it marks the end of the road.

The vote concludes the years-long Brexit process and opens a new era where close collaboration between Brussels and London is expected to coexist with constant wrangling and disagreements.

The deal, which has already been ratified by the UK, conditionally came into force on December 31, 2020, but has technically still been open to debate since then.

EU leaders lauded the move on Twitter, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen saying she “warmly welcomed” the decision and President of the European Council, Charles Michel, echoing her words, adding: “It marks a major step forward in #EU-#UK relations and opens a new era.”

The UK’s chief Brexit negotiator, David Frost, said he “hugely welcome the overwhelming vote” and hoped “we can now begin a new chapter together as Europeans, characterised by friendly cooperation between sovereign equals”.

The Briton also thanked the European Commission and his EU counterpart, Michel Barnier, for “helping get us here”.

Brexit was a ‘failure of the European Union’

Michel Barnier, who until earlier this year was the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, addressed the parliament before it voted on Tuesday, calling Brexit a “failure of the European Union” and urged both the EU institutions in Brussels and the national governments across the continent to draw lessons from the UK’s departure.

“This is a divorce, it’s a warning,” he said. “Why did 52 (per cent) of the British (population) vote against Europe? There are reasons for that: social anger and tension which existed in many regions in the UK but also in many regions of the EU.”

During his speech, the Frenchman reflected candidly on the more than four years of work that led to the landmark agreement in December. Calling the UK a “great country, neighbour, partner and friend”, Barnier asked to preserve the spirit of cooperation across the English Channel.

“We are far more united and have far more in common than that which divides us,” he said, quoting the words of Jo Cox, the British Labour MP who was murdered in the lead-up to the 2016 Brexit referendum.

Barnier praised the new UK-EU agreement for protecting the rights of EU citizens, the integrity of the single market and peace on both sides of the Irish border. He also thanked the 27 member states and European lawmakers for maintaining unity throughout the “very difficult negotiations”.

‘Unilateral decisions will get us nowhere’

Also speaking before MEPs was von der Leyen, who thanked Barnier for “guiding us through this task”.

Von der Leyen said the EU-UK partnership was “forged together over decades” and will serve to contribute “towards the prosperity, security and global power of our continent”.

But her speech came with a number of caveats related to the “sheer scale of the task ahead” and the potential setbacks and controversies that might occur.

Von der Leyen said the new EU-UK trade deal “comes with real teeth”, referring to the dispute settlement mechanism and the provisions that would allow the EU to take “unilateral remedial measures where necessary”.

“Let me be clear: We do not want to have to use these tools. But we will not hesitate to use them if necessary. They are essential to ensure full compliance with the TCA and the Withdrawal Agreement, which were both negotiated in such fine detail and agreed by both sides,” she told MEPs.

Disagreements have already taken place: earlier this year, the UK accused the EU of undermining the Northern Ireland Protocol when the Commission increased scrutiny over EU-produced coronavirus vaccines. Weeks later, the Commission accused London of breaching the protocol when London decided to extend a grace period on exports certificates.

This led the European Parliament to postpone the final ratification on the EU-UK trade deal, which will now take place four months before its conclusion in December.

“We have obviously seen a number of issues arise since then. Some were to be expected, others are teething issues and many are the consequence of the type of Brexit the UK chose. But regardless of the reasons, we need to focus on joint solutions. Unilateral decisions will get us nowhere,” von der Leyen said.

The Commission President ended her intervention on a positive note, saying the trade deal will allow the EU to move forward: “We know it will not always be easy and there is a lot of vigilance, diligence and hard work ahead but while today’s vote is obviously an end, it is also the beginning of a new chapter.

“The choice is now whether today’s vote will be the high watermark for EU-UK relations for the next decades or whether we see this as the foundation of a strong and close partnership based on our shared interests and values.”

European Union lawmakers approve post-Brexit trade treaty
European Union lawmakers approve post-Brexit trade treaty

BRUSSELS >> European lawmakers have approved the final ratification of the post-Brexit trade deal between the European Union and the United Kingdom, nearly five years after Britain decided to leave the bloc.

The deal, which was finalized on Christmas Eve, had already been ratified by the U.K. Parliament and conditionally came into force pending the European Parliament’s approval, which marks the final legal hurdle.

Lawmakers at the European Parliament endorsed the free trade agreement by 660 votes in favor, 5 against, and 32 abstentions. The vote took place Tuesday but results were not announced until Wednesday morning.

The U.K. had joined the the bloc in 1973.

In a debate ahead of the vote, many legislators rued Britain’s departure but insisted ratifying the text was the best option to avoid economic disruptions and ensure the EU’s single market integrity.

Amid ongoing tensions between London and Brussels over Northern Ireland trade rules, the EU Parliament also said that the agreement will provide extra legal tools to “prevent and protect against unilateral divergence from the obligations to which both parties signed up.”

Earlier this year, the European Union accused Britain of breaching international law after the U.K. government unilaterally extended until October a grace period for not conducting checks on goods moving between Northern Ireland and the rest of the U.K. The move led the EU to start legal action against its former member nation.

Northern Ireland is part of the U.K. but remained part of the EU’s single market for goods after Brexit to avoid customs checks at the territory’s border with EU member Ireland. An open Irish border helped underpin the peace process that ended decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland.

But tensions and violence have escalated in recent weeks, with unionists saying the arrangement the British government and the EU worked out has amounted to the creation of a border between the territory and the rest of the U.K.

The sensitivity of Northern Ireland’s status also was seen in September when the U.K. Parliament considered legislation that would have given Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government the power to override part of the Brexit withdrawal agreement relating to Northern Ireland.

The tension increased in January when the EU threatened to ban shipments of coronavirus vaccines to Northern Ireland as part of moves to shore up the bloc’s supply. That would have drawn a hard border on the island of Ireland — exactly the scenario the Brexit deal was crafted to avoid.

Relations between the EU and the U.K. have been strained since a Brexit transition period ended on Jan. 1. The two sides have argued so far this year over issues ranging from COVID-19 vaccine supplies to the full diplomatic recognition of the EU in Britain.

European Union Tries to Clarify Data Behind Sustainable Investing
European Union Tries to Clarify Data Behind Sustainable Investing

The European Union is pushing toward greater clarity in the unreliable data available around sustainable investing, which has been one of the biggest hurdles in the expansion of the ESG space.

EU regulators has proposed that companies should for the first time report standardized information about their impact on the environment, along with social metrics, like their treatment of employees, the Wall Street Journal reports.

“One of the biggest missing pieces when we look at requirements heading our way is the data available to us,” Elizabeth Gillam, head of EU government relations and public policy at investment firm Invesco Ltd., told the WSJ.

The EU regulatory body wants the rules to apply to publicly-listed firms in Europe and large private companies, which combined total almost 50,000 entities. Credit institutions, like large U.S. banks that have subsidiaries in the EU, would also have to comply to these new standardized rules.

Furthermore, the bloc revealed its own classification system that will better-outline green investments. The new taxonomy will apply starting next year.

If the new measure passes, EU companies would have to disclose sustainability metrics, similarly to how they are currently reporting financial statements. The new classification system is expected to help crack down on “greenwashing,” a term that some critics point to as an exaggeration of sustainability claims.

Anne Finucane, vice chairman of Bank of America and leader of its ESG efforts, argued that U.S. regulators could take cues from the EU and also standardize ESG standards.

“Data is an issue,” Finucane told the WSJ. “There is no consistency, it’s challenging.”

For more news, information, and strategy, visit the ESG Channel.

After Brexit: Outcomes on cooperation in the Council of the European Union
After Brexit: Outcomes on cooperation in the Council of the European Union
brexit
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

In the Council of the European Union, member states mostly cooperate with other countries in their geographical proximity. However, once it became clear that the United Kingdom was going to leave the EU, the member states also started cooperating to a greater extent with ideologically like-minded members. Research from the University of Gothenburg shows that Brexit may, in part, have changed the logic behind how cooperation in the Council of the European Union is structured.

                                              <section class="article-banner first-banner ads-336x280">
     <!-- /4988204/Phys_Story_InText_Box -->

  </section>

The Council of the European Union is one of the most important EU decision-makers. Government ministers from the 27 EU member states participate in the Council meetings to negotiate and make decisions on the European Commission’s proposals for EU laws. Which ministers meet depends on the topics to be discussed. It is well-established in the research that member states prefer to cooperate in the Council with their neighboring countries, which has led researchers to interpret these patterns as relatively stable. However, it is only now that researchers are able to explain what underlies this stability.

Political scientist Markus Johansson has researched the consequences of Brexit on EU cooperation. He studied how the cooperation patterns in the Council of the European Union have changed from the period before the British referendum on Brexit in 2016 compared to the period after.

Given that the cooperation patterns are stable over time, he tested a structural explanation for cooperation which assumes that member states with similar economic and political systems at national level also ought to have more similar interests in EU negotiations. In the study, this is tested against an explanatory model of ideological differences between the governing parties of the member states. This is a more volatile factor as the ideological orientations of governments are affected by national elections and potential changes of government.

“The results indicate that member states with more similar economic and political systems also have stronger partnering relationships and that the effect of this is as significant before as after the Brexit referendum. This provides a first indication that these similarities could be an underlying cause of the stability of partnerships between member states over time, and that they follow geographical patterns.”

The ideological differences between the governments were measured on three dimensions: economic left-right, GAL-TAN (green, alternative, libertarian and traditional, authoritarian, nationalist), and attitude to European integration.

“Before the Brexit referendum, none of these ideological dimensions had any effect on relationships between member states. But after the referendum, both the GAL-TAN dimension and attitude to European integration have had an impact on cooperation. Member states that are ideologically similar on these dimensions have cooperated more closely in the period after it became clear that the United Kingdom was going to leave the EU.”

The study does not clarify the cause of the change that has taken place. However, it is clear that the remaining member states have had to adapt their relationships to a new political landscape which no longer includes the United Kingdom.

“With the United Kingdom’s withdrawal process in progress, EU cooperation has also landed in the political spotlight more generally. This could be a contributor to a more ideological logic behind the new relationships that are established when a member state disappears,” says Markus Johansson.

                                                                            </p><hr/>                                       
                                    <div class="article-main__explore my-4 d-print-none">
                                        <div class="d-flex align-items-center">
                                            <svg>
                                                <use href="https://phys.b-cdn.net/tmpl/v6/img/svg/sprite.svg#plus" x="0" y="0"/>
                                            </svg>
                                            <p class="text-bold mb-0 ml-2">Explore further
                                        </div>
                                        <a class="text-medium text-info mt-2 d-inline-block" href="https://phys.org/news/2020-01-brexit-referendum-radical-euroskepticism.html">Study: Brexit referendum did not lead to more radical Euroskepticism elsewhere</a>
                                    </div>                                      
                                    <hr class="mb-4"/>


                                                                                <div class="d-inline-block text-medium my-4">
                                            Provided by
                                                                                                <a href="https://phys.org/partners/university-of-gothenburg/">University of Gothenburg</a>
                                                                                                    <a class="icon_open" href="http://www.gu.se/english/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">
                                                    <svg>
                                                        <use href="https://phys.b-cdn.net/tmpl/v6/img/svg/sprite.svg#icon_open" x="0" y="0"/>
                                                    </svg>
                                                </a>

                                        </div>

                                    <!-- print only -->
                                    <div class="d-none d-print-block" readability="15">

                                             <strong>Citation</strong>:
                                             After Brexit: Outcomes on cooperation in the Council of the European Union (2021, April 27)
                                             retrieved 27 April 2021
                                             from https://phys.org/news/2021-04-brexit-outcomes-cooperation-council-european.html


                                        This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
                                        part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

                                    </div>
European Union planning to admit US travelers again
European Union planning to admit US travelers again

Officials with the European Union say they're completing plans to welcome Americans tourists to the continent this summer.


More than a year ago, the EU restricted travel to the 27-nation bloc to a bare minimum to stop the spread of COVID-19.

Details are still up in the air, including whether American tourists will be required to show proof of vaccination to enter the bloc.

The EU Commission will make a proposal soon to its member states, but didn’t say when exactly leisure travel could resume — or whether the U.S. will similarly reopen to European tourists.

Additional reporting by The Associated Press.


Trending stories at Newsy.com

Ioannis Lagos, Greek Neo-Nazi Lawmaker, Stripped of Immunity by European Parliament
Ioannis Lagos, Greek Neo-Nazi Lawmaker, Stripped of Immunity by European Parliament

BRUSSELS — The convicted Greek neo-Nazi Ioannis Lagos was stripped of his immunity as a member of the European Parliament on Tuesday, clearing the way for his extradition to Greece months after he was sentenced in a landmark trial.

Mr. Lagos was a leading member of the criminal organization Golden Dawn. The group is now defunct, but in its heyday, it formed a political party that was the third-largest in the Greek Parliament.

He told The New York Times in written comments this year that he was planning to flee to a “European country” where his rights would be protected, but on Tuesday, the Brussels public prosecutor’s office said that Mr. Lagos “was deprived of his liberty today at midday.”

The office gave no further comment.

The decision by the European Parliament, announced Tuesday morning after a secret ballot held a day earlier, comes after months of delays over protocol procedures and because of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Mr. Lagos was elected to the European Parliament as an independent candidate while his trial for forming and running a gang was continuing in 2019.

He was found guilty alongside dozens of other leading members of Golden Dawn and was sentenced to 13 years in prison for running a criminal organization, but he was protected until now by immunity afforded to members of the European Parliament.

Golden Dawn rose to prominence a decade ago, systematically targeting the European Union and migrants, especially Muslims, during the financial crisis that devastated Greece’s economy and society.

The trial in Greece lasted more than five years and is widely regarded as one of the most important cases against neo-Nazis in contemporary Europe, where forces of the far right became empowered during the financial crisis and further emboldened after the refugee crisis of 2015-16, in some cases penetrating the mainstream political spectrum.

One of the leading members of the party, Christos Pappas, remains on the run after his conviction.

Mr. Lagos has been fighting to hold on to his immunity and avoid extradition to Greece to serve his sentence, while also claiming that the case against him is political and that he’s being prosecuted for his political thoughts, not his deeds.

The decision by the European Parliament was welcomed by left-wing Greek politicians. “The neo-Nazi Lagos no longer has immunity at the European Parliament,” Nasos Iliopoulos, the spokesman for Syriza, the main opposition party in Greece, wrote on Twitter. “The Greek authorities should act quickly so that we don’t experience the fiasco with Christos Pappas.”

The European Parliament has come under criticism for taking months to deliberate on the waiver of Mr. Lagos’s immunity and for refusing to prioritize his case over other pending immunity cases of European lawmakers wanted in their home countries over smaller legal matters.

The parliamentary committee overseeing the process defended the pace and prioritization of cases as partly a matter of slowed-down deliberations because of the coronavirus outbreak and partly an effort to meticulously follow protocol to avoid any charges of bias.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament waive Mr. Lagos’s immunity last week, in an anonymous vote of 22 to 2, and the full Parliament supported that decision in a vote by 658 to 25, with 10 abstentions.

David Sassoli, the president of the European Parliament, told The New York Times that he was “satisfied” with the decision taken by “an overwhelming majority” of the lawmakers.

“It is now up to competent national authorities in Greece to conclude the criminal proceedings and bring to justice every member of this neo-fascist and criminal group that has shaken Greek society for far too long,” he added.

Theodoros Chronopoulos, a spokesman for the Greek police, said that, once returned to Greece, Mr. Lagos would be sent to prison immediately to serve his sentence.

Because Mr. Lagos was detained in Belgium, where the Parliament is based most of the time and where he is a resident, it is now up to a national court there to rule on Greece’s request to extradite him.

The judicial proceedings in Belgium could take months. Should the Belgians block a request, Mr. Lagos could continue to sit in the European Parliament without the immunity rights, but that seems highly unlikely.

Niki Kitsantonis contributed reporting from Athens.

European Parliament to take final Brexit trade deal vote
European Parliament to take final Brexit trade deal vote

The European Parliament was set to hold a vote on a post-Brexit trade deal between the EU and the UK on Tuesday.

The parliament is expected to ratify the pact, which has been provisionally in effect since the beginning of the year pending the EU’s final confirmation. The final Brexit seal has been accompanied by bitter warnings from some European quarters.

The Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) was the result of nine long months of negotiations and set up a relationship of zero tariffs and zero quotas on goods traded between the EU and UK.

What does the EU think of the deal?

A lack of agreement over joint health, environment and other regulations has muddied attempts to avoid a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen took an optimistic view during Tuesday’s parliamentary session, saying that although the EU is facing “a lot of vigilance, diligence and hard work,” the vote is not just an end, “it is also the beginning of a new chapter.”

Relations have also soured between London and Brussels following a row over the supply of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine doses.

What has been the impact of Brexit so far?

Trade between the two sides has plummeted since the break came into effect on January 1, with EU imports from the UK down almost 50% and exports to the UK down 20% during the first two months.

“Brexit is a historic mistake. It was pushed through by irresponsible nationalism, based on false promises and shortsightedness,” said Austrian MEP Andreas Schieder, who helped prepare the vote.

“Brexit is bad for Britain and Brexit is bad for Europe,” he said.

What is the dispute over the border in Ireland?

The EU also launched a legal dispute against the UK after Westminster unilaterally extended a grace period for not conducting checks on goods being transported between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

The two sides have yet to find common ground on how to implement the so-called Northern Ireland protocol which aims to protect the single market while avoiding a hard border with EU member Ireland.

“This deal is not good because Brexit is not good. The situation is also complicated because we cannot be sure how trustworthy the UK government really is,” said Terry Reintke, the vice-president of the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament.

“Still, this agreement can be a starting point reconstructing what we lost due to Brexit,” she said.

The European Parliament will vote on Tuesday evening, after several hours of debate, and the result will be announced on Wednesday.

ab/nm (AFP, AP)

European Union could allow US tourists back this summer
European Union could allow US tourists back this summer

BRUSSELS — American tourists could soon be visiting continental Europe again, more than a year after the European Union restricted travel to the 27-nation bloc to a bare minimum to contain the coronavirus.

EU officials said Monday they are completing plans to allow Americans back this summer, depending on the course of the outbreak on both sides of the Atlantic.

The EU Commission, the EU’s executive arm, will make a proposal soon to its member states but didn’t say when exactly leisure travel could resume or whether a reciprocal approach will apply to Europeans wanting to visit the U.S., which has closed its doors to tourists from the continent.

Also, it was not immediately clear whether all U.S. tourists would have to produce proof of vaccination for entry, or whether a negative test for the coronavirus or proof of recent recovery from COVID-19 would be acceptable instead.

“These are among the questions we’ll still need to figure out,” European Commission spokesman Adalbert Jahnz said. Jahnz said the EU’s executive body is hoping to restore trans-Atlantic leisure travel “as soon as it is safe to do so.”

On Sunday, The New York Times quoted Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as saying that fully vaccinated Americans will able to visit EU countries this summer since all coronavirus vaccines used in the U.S. have also been approved by the EU’s regulator, the European Medicines Agency.

“This will enable free movement and the travel to the European Union,” she said. “Because one thing is clear: All 27 member states will accept, unconditionally, all those who are vaccinated with vaccines that are approved by EMA.”

With more than 15 million Americans a year visiting Europe before the crisis, the prospect of U.S. travelers once more flocking to such attractions as the Eiffel Tower, the canals of Venice or Germany’s Brandenburg Gate is welcome news for the continent’s hard-hit tourism industry.

EF Go Ahead Tours, a Boston-based company that offers small group tours to Europe and elsewhere, said it expects demand to be extremely high once Americans can visit Europe again.

When Iceland reopened its borders earlier this month, bookings surged, and most summer tour dates are now sold out, the company said. Over the last month, as more Americans got vaccinated, the company also saw double-digit growth in European tour reservations for dates in 2022 and 2023.

The International Air Transport Association, a trade group that represents 290 airlines in 120 countries, applauded the news.

“This is a step in the right direction,” IATA General Director Willie Walsh said in a statement. “It gives hope to people for so many reasons — to travel, to reunite with loved ones, to develop business opportunities or get back to work.”

The group said people who test negative for COVID-19, not just those who get vaccinated, should be allowed to travel freely. IATA also said it is critical to develop globally recognized standards for vaccine certification. IATA is among groups testing a vaccine passport system.

Last week, the U.S. State Department urged Americans to reconsider any international travel they may have planned. It issued specific warnings not to visit roughly 80% of the world’s countries due to risks from the coronavirus pandemic, including many European countries.

Rick Steves, who has written guidebooks and television shows about European travel, said he is glad European countries are working together and are eager to rekindle tourism. But he doesn’t expect his company, Rick Steves’ Europe, will offer its popular bus tours through Europe until late 2021 at the earliest to make sure travel restarts safely. Last March, Steves had to cancel and refund 20,000 tours.

“To avoid repeating that disappointment, I plan to be very conservative about restarting our tours,” Steves said. “We will do so only when we believe it is safe, when Europe is able to provide the kind of experiential travel that is fundamental to our tour program and when we are reasonably confident that things will remain stable and open.”

Jahnz said the EU has been following closely the vaccination drive in the U.S, where more than 94 million people 18 or older, or about 36.5% of the adult population, have been fully vaccinated.

The slow rollout of vaccines in the EU has left the bloc lagging well behind the U.S. But Von der Leyen said Monday that the region, home to around 450 million people, has already passed 123 million vaccinations and is on track to have vaccinated 70% of all adults by July.

The EU is putting the finishing touches to a system of certificates that would allow EU residents to travel freely across the region by the summer as long as they have been vaccinated, tested negative or recovered from the disease.

Under the plan discussed with their U.S. counterparts, certificates issued in the United States could be integrated into the program.

As for Britain, no longer an EU member, Americans visiting the United Kingdom have to isolate for 10 days and take coronavirus tests before and after travel.

Travel to the EU is extremely limited, confined mostly to a few countries with low infection rates, such as Australia and New Zealand. But Greece, which is heavily reliant on tourism, has already lifted quarantine restrictions for the U.S., Britain, the United Arab Emirates, Serbia, Israel, and non-EU members Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland that are part of a European travel pact.

“Uniliteral approaches, from our perspective should be avoided,” Jahnz said. “The objective is to continue to have a coordinated approach on the European level.”

Meanwhile, the EU said Monday it has launched legal action against AstraZeneca, accusing it of failing to meet its vaccine delivery commitments under its contract with the bloc. The slow pace of the EU vaccination campaign has been blamed in part on the delays.

The British-Swedish drugmaker had hoped to deliver 80 million doses in the first quarter of 2021, but only 30 million were sent. According to the EU, the company is set to provide 70 million in the second quarter, rather than the 180 million it had promised.

AstraZeneca said in a statement that it will “strongly defend” itself in court.

European Union set to allow American tourists to travel this summer
European Union set to allow American tourists to travel this summer

BRUSSELLS (AP) – Officials say the European Union is completing plans to allow American tourists to travel to the 27-nation bloc this summer.

More than a year after the EU restricted travel to the region to a bare minimum in a bid to contain the pandemic, the European Commission said Monday it would make a recommendation to member states to allow American travelers back.

The commission didn’t say when exactly tourists will be allowed back inside the bloc, and if a reciprocal approach will apply to European tourists willing to travel to the U.S.

Read: More travel coverage

Virtual Tibet Lobby Day urges European Parliament for action on Tibet
Virtual Tibet Lobby Day urges European Parliament for action on Tibet

A screengrab from the virtual European Tibet Lobby Day event.

On April 19, 2021, a virtual European Tibet Lobby Day was co-organized by the International Campaign for Tibet and the European Parliament’s Tibet Interest Group. Participants from six countries in Europe suggested concrete ways in which the European Parliament could further increase its support for the Tibetan people.

The participants were six Tibetans living in six European countries: Ms. Kunsel Rinchen Dorjee from the Netherlands, Ms. Tenzin Dhazay from Ireland, Ms. Yeshey Paden from Sweden, Mr. Tenzin Khentse from Poland, Mr. Kelsang Gonnot from France and Mr. Lobsang Wangpo from Belgium.

The event started in the morning with a briefing session during which participants were given an update on the human rights situation in Tibet, EU-China relations and the state of Tibetan advocacy and activism, and agreed on the main topics and messages they wanted to share with European parliamentarians.

Participants then reconvened in late afternoon for a special online meeting of the European Parliament’s Tibet Interest Group hosted by its chair MEP Mikuláš Peksa (Czech Republic, Greens/EFA). MEPs Hannes Heide (Austria, S&D), Aušra Maldeikienė (Lithuania, EPP), and Carles Puigdemont, Clara Ponsati and Antoni Comin (Catalonia, NA) also took part or were represented.

After briefly introducing themselves, the 6 lobbyists of the day each gave a brief overview on a specific Tibet-related issue – namely freedom of religion and the succession of the Dalai Lama, access to Tibet, education and language, environmental issues, self-immolations and Chinese influence in Europe. They also suggested concrete ways in which the European Parliament could further increase its support for the Tibetan people- including passing a resolution condemning Chinese interferences in the succession of the Dalai Lama or calling for the release of Tibetan arbitrarily detained for their environmental activism, such as Anya Sengdra. “We talked about the fact that there is no freedom of religion, no freedom to learn your own language, that nomads are not able to have their grassland, that the environment in Tibet is being harmed… In short, the whole lives of Tibetans are affected (…) Tibet is suffering (…) 157 people have put themselves on fire just with this hope that we people who live outside in the free world would do something about it; I think we should not let their hope down and we should do something about it.” Yeshey Paden appealed.

MEPs welcome this opportunity to exchange directly with Tibetans: “Sometimes you read about things, and it’s not the same than listening to you; you are Tibetans, you know what it’s like to fight for your nation, to fight for your culture, to fight for your freedoms, and to do it from abroad”, the parliamentary assistant to the three Catalonian MEPs Aleix Sarri i Camargo noted. “I think it’s very positive that there is a new and young generation of Tibetans in exile dealing passionately with Tibetan issues, and I wish you all your best for your work for the Tibetan cause” Hannes Heide added.

They also positively to the ideas raised; on the issue of the succession of the Dalai Lama for example, Mikuláš Peksa for example said “No state should define who should be the successor of the Dalai Lama (…) how could the EU state anything else?”, Mikuláš Peksa said, adding that the adoption of a European Parliament resolution condemning Chinese interferences in the process was something realistic in the near future.

The meeting was concluded by Tashi Phuntsok, Head of the Office of Tibet in Brussels, who thanked the Tibetans participants for their commitment to continue the Tibetan struggle for justice and freedom in exile.

The Lobby Day was organized entirely online this year, as the ongoing pandemic and sanitary restrictions made it impossible for participants to travel to Brussels for in-person meetings with Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) as is usually the case.

ICT Quote by Vincent Metten, EU Policy Director

“Tibet Lobby days create a unique opportunity for young Tibetans from different European countries to directly share their personal experience and stories with members of the European parliament and to provide concrete recommendations for the EU on Tibet. The motivation and commitment of this young group of Tibetans show that a new generation of Tibetans born in exile is ready to continue the struggle for freedoms and fundamental rights for the six million brothers and sisters that live in Tibet.”

Watch the video recording of the Lobby Day meeting with Members of the European Parliament here.