EU to send aid to India as it struggles with coronavirus
EU to send aid to India as it struggles with coronavirus

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – The European Commission has activated its EU Civil Protection Mechanism and is seeking to send oxygen and medicine to virus-hit India after receiving a request from Delhi.

India has seen a massive surge in COVID-19 cases in recent days, with hospitals in the capital and across the country turning away patients after running out of medical oxygen and beds.

“Alarmed by the epidemiological situation in India. We are ready to support,” Commission President Ursula von der Leyen wrote on Twitter on Sunday.

“The EU executive is already coordinating with EU countries that are ready to provide urgently needed oxygen & medicine rapidly,” European Commission for humanitarian aid Janez Lenarcic wrote on Twitter.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

Nicola Sturgeon admits an independent Scotland in the EU WOULD mean a hard border with England
Nicola Sturgeon admits an independent Scotland in the EU WOULD mean a hard border with England

Nicola Sturgeon was under fire today after admitting today that an independent Scotland would have to have a hard border with England if it rejoins the EU.

But the First Minister claimed that cross-border businesses and trade would not ‘suffer’ because of it, as she appeared on the BBC‘s Andrew Marr programme.

The SNP leader said Scotland would try to negotiate arrangements to ‘keep trade flowing easily across the border’ if it becomes independent and is successful at taking the country back into the EU.

Her comments sparked fury from unionists, who accused her of  planning to oversea actions that would be a ‘hammer blow’ for Scottish businesses.

Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross said: ‘By Nicola Sturgeon’s own admission, the SNP are clueless about the economic impact of independence.

The SNP leader said Scotland would try to negotiate arrangements to ‘keep trade flowing easily across the border’ if it becomes independent and is successful at taking the country back into the EU.

The First Minister claimed that cross-border businesses and trade would not ‘suffer’ because of it, as she appeared on the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme

Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross said: ‘By Nicola Sturgeon’s own admission, the SNP are clueless about the economic impact of independence.

Sturgeon accuses Boris of acting like Trump 

Nicola Sturgeon accused Boris Johnson of acting like Donald Trump over Scottish independence today. 

The SNP First Minister likened the Prime Minister’s refusal to countenance a new vote on splitting up the UK to the former US president’s refusal to accept he had lost to Joe Biden last year.

She warned it would be ‘unsustainable’ for the UK Government to block a second referendum if a majority at Holyrood backs it after the May election.

Scotland’s First Minister said that the country must have the chance to put the recovery into its own hands and that ‘Scotland’s future must, and will, be decided by the people of Scotland’.

She also said that taking legal action over the situation would be an ‘appalling’ look for any Prime Minister. 

Writing in the Observer, Ms Sturgeon said that once the Covid crisis has passed, people in Scotland must have the right to choose their future.

She wrote: ‘Tackling the pandemic and getting the recovery under way come first. However, if there is a majority in the Scottish parliament after this election for an independence referendum, then Scotland must have the chance to put the recovery into Scotland’s hands.

‘For the UK Government to seek to block it would be unsustainable. For it to try to take legal action, as has been suggested, would be asking a court to effectively overturn the result of a free and fair democratic election.

‘That would be an appalling look for any prime minister. More to the point, it didn’t work for Donald Trump, and it wouldn’t work for Boris Johnson.’

Advertisement

‘They’ve done no analysis on how many jobs it would put at risk or how much damage would be done to Scotland’s economy.

‘She floundered and didn’t have a single convincing answer to dispel the overwhelming evidence that separating Scotland from the rest of the UK would be devastating for jobs and businesses.’ 

Ms Sturgeon’s comments have echoes of those made by Boris Johnson while attempting to downplay the impact of his Brexit deal on trade with Northern Ireland.

The First Minister said an independent Scotland would ‘comply with all of the requirements of EU membership’ when asked about European Union regulations, customs checks and inspections of goods entering the single market.

She said: ‘We will put in place arrangements and we will negotiate those arrangements for the UK that means that businesses do not, in a practical sense, suffer from any of that.’

Under EU rules, consignments of animals and goods need to be physically inspected before entering the EU’s single market, including 30% of poultry, eggs, milk and fish, and all live animals.

Ms Sturgeon added: ‘I’m not denying that because of the absurdity of Brexit and the Tory Brexit obsession, then all sorts of issues are raised for Scotland completely against our democratic will.

‘What I’m saying is we will work as a country to make sure that for our businesses there is no difficulties in terms of their day-to-day experience in trading.’

She defended the absence of any analysis on the financial impact of independence and said it would be ‘to put the cart rather before the horse’ ahead of another vote.

‘Before we get to a point where we’re asking people to choose whether or not they want Scotland to become independent – which is the choice of the Scottish people – just as we did in 2014, we will set out all of the implications of independence, all of the advantages of independence, and all the practical issues that people have to consider so that people make an informed choice,’ she added. 

Following Ms Sturgeon’s interview, Labour’s shadow Scotland secretary Ian Murray said: ‘With economists warning Scotland is headed for a jobs crisis it is reckless beyond imagining to call for a referendum during our recovery.

‘Hearing the casual way with which Nicola Sturgeon dismisses those independent experts that she is so fond of quoting when they agree with her and her failure to answer any of the tough questions on separation – from effects on income to the border – is playing fast and loose with people’s futures.

EU says will 'respond rapidly' to assist Covid-hit India
EU says will ‘respond rapidly’ to assist Covid-hit India

The EU is preparing rapid assistance for India as it copes with a growing Covid-19 crisis that has seen infections and deaths hit record highs, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said Sunday.

“Alarmed by the epidemiological situation in India. We are ready to support,” von der Leyen said on Twitter.

“The EU is pooling resources to respond rapidly to India’s request for assistance via the EU civil protection mechanism.”

The mechanism allows European Union countries to coordinate their aid in cases of emergency.

EU commissioner for humanitarian aid Janez Lenarcic said oxygen and medicine contributions were already being coordinated from member states.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said earlier Sunday her government was preparing emergency aid for India.

There were no immediate details on what would be offered by Germany, the EU’s biggest economy, but Der Spiegel weekly has reported that the country’s armed forces had received a request to help organise oxygen supplies.

India’s healthcare system has struggled to cope with the huge surge in infections, with reports of severe oxygen and medicine shortages and patients’ families pleading for help on social media.

The vast nation of 1.3 billion people recorded 349,691 fresh cases and 2,767 deaths in the last 24 hours — the highest since the start of the pandemic.

This story has been published from a wire agency feed without modifications to the text. Only the headline has been changed.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Chinese Premier Meets With Business Leaders in Chengdu Seeking Support for Imperiled EU-China Trade Deal
Chinese Premier Meets With Business Leaders in Chengdu Seeking Support for Imperiled EU-China Trade Deal

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang has met with 14 foreign business representatives already doing business in China in an attempt to convince investors that the country continues to be a good environment to do business as China continues to open up to international trade.

The meeting with representatives from Germany, France, the Netherlands, Hungary, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and other countries on April 20 comes after the EU parliament refused last month to ratify a EU-China investment deal.

The downward spiral in EU-China relations followed the EU’s decision to boycott Xinjiang cotton in March, triggering counter sanctions from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which have further imperiled the likelihood of any trade deal.

During the meeting at the China-European Center in Chengdu, which has attracted more than 170 foreign institutions and enterprises to invest and settle in Sichuan province, Li praised the business leaders for their contributions to China’s “modernization” and the “recovery of the global economy” following the CCP virus pandemic.

Li emphasized, “China will continue opening to the outside world, and the door will open wider and wider.” He promised that China “will continue to build a business environment that is market-oriented, legalized, and internationalized.”

“Companies from all countries are treated equally and fair competition is guaranteed,” he said.

Li’s visit came just days after Chinese leader Xi Jinping held a video conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron on April 16.

The video meeting was a regular preparatory session ahead of the Earth Day world leaders’ summit on climate issues. During the meeting, Xi urged the European Union to ratify as soon as possible the EU-China investment deal—Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI)—which was agreed to last December after seven years of negotiations. The CAI needs to be ratified by EU Parliament to take effect.

However, neither Merkel or Macron have responded to Xi’s call for ratification.

In March, the EU passed sanctions on several Chinese communist officials involved in the genocide and human rights abuses against Uyghur minorities in Xinjiang. The Chinese regime quickly retaliated by imposing sanctions on 10 European politicians and scholars—including five leading EU Parliament members whose votes are needed to ratify the EU-China investment deal—and four entities, including the EU Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights.

Raphael Glucksmann, a French MEP and longtime French human rights advocate, told Voice of America that the CCP’s sanction on the human rights subcommittee represents “a sanction on the democratic institution of the Parliament.”

Beijing also said it was sanctioning the EU’s Political and Security Committee, which has 27 EU ambassadors.

Experts call for suspension of EU-China investment deal. (Getty Images)

The sanctions angered many EU lawmakers. The EU Parliament then canceled a meeting to discuss the ratification of the CAI as prominent parliamentarians threatened not to ratify the EU-China investment deal.

Three of the four biggest parties of the EU said that they cannot discuss the deal until the CCP’s sanctions are lifted.

“It seems unthinkable that our Parliament would even entertain the idea of ratifying an agreement while its members and one of its committees are under sanctions,” said Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, parliament member representing France and point-woman on the EU-China deal from the Libertarian group Renew Europe.

Critics say a deal with China will grant China-based state-owned companies, which may receive government subsidies, preferential access to European markets while the Chinese communist regime continues to crack down on Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement and Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

French President Emmanuel Macron, Chinese leader Xi Jinping, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker hold a news conference at the Elysee presidential palace in Paris on March 26, 2019. (Thibault Camus/Pool via Reuters)

Merkel and Macron have been among the EU’s main backers for an investment deal with China, despite opposition from other EU members, such as Italy, Belgium, Spain, and Poland.

However, Merkel, who is concerned about car dealers’ China exposure, is stepping down in September, and her SPD has plumped in recent election polls with the opposition Greens party enjoying a polling lead. The Greens’ chancellor candidate Annalena Baerbock has vowed to take a tough stance on China’s human rights violations.

The Greens recently argued against the CAI in a written statement: “Trade is a powerful lever to defend and strengthen human rights and fundamental democratic values. Unfortunately, the EU-China investment agreement, hastily concluded by the German government at the end of last year, contradicts this very goal.”

Macron is also facing public criticism and strong oppositions against the CAI domestically ahead of next year’s presidential election.

EU blames China for endangering peace in South China Sea
EU blames China for endangering peace in South China Sea

By Yew Lun Tian

BEIJING (Reuters) – The European Union called out China on Saturday for endangering peace in the South China Sea and urged all parties to abide by a 2016 tribunal ruling which rejected most of China’s claim to sovereignty in the sea, but which Beijing has rejected.

The EU last week released a new policy aimed at stepping up its influence in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s rising power.

The Philippines on Friday protested to China over its failure to withdraw what it called as “threatening” boats believed to be manned by maritime militia around the disputed Whitsun Reef, which Manila calls the Julian Felipe Reef.

“Tensions in the South China Sea, including the recent presence of large Chinese vessels at Whitsun Reef, endanger peace and stability in the region,” a EU spokesperson said in a statement on Saturday.

EU reiterated its strong opposition to “unilateral actions that could undermine regional stability and international rules-based order”.

It urged all parties to resolve disputes peacefully in accordance with international law, and highlighted a 2016 international arbitration that had ruled in favor of the Philippines while invalidating most of China’s claims in the South China Sea.

China rejected EU’s accusation that its ships at Whitsun Reef, which China calls Niu’E Jiao, had endangered peace and security.

The Chinese Mission to the EU in a statement on Saturday reiterated that the reef is part of China’s Nansha Islands, or Spratly Islands, and that it was “reasonable and lawful” for Chinese fishing boats to operate there and shelter from the wind.

The Chinese statement also insisted that China’s sovereignty, rights and interests in the South China Sea were formed in the “long course of history and consistent with international law” and rejected the 2016 tribunal ruling as “null and void”.

“The South China Sea should not become a tool for certain countries to contain and suppress China, much less a wrestling ground for major-power rivalry,” the Chinese statement said.

China is increasingly worried that Europe and other countries are heeding U.S. President Joe Biden’s call for a “coordinated approach” towards China, which had so far materialised in the form of sanctions over its security crackdown in Hong Kong and treatment of Uyghur Muslims.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken last month said Washington “stands by its ally, the Philippines,” in the face of China’s massing maritime militia at Whitsun Reef.

(Reporting by Yew Lun Tian; Editing by Michael Perry)

UK Remains Popular Destination for EU Company Founders Reveals by London based Fintech Tide
UK Remains Popular Destination for EU Company Founders Reveals by London based Fintech Tide
The United Kingdom remains a popular destination for EU-based company founders, according to a blog post recently published by UK-based challenger bank Tide.

Brexit might have “severed” the UK’s political ties to the continent, however, it does not appear to have negatively impacted the UK’s “appeal as a place to live and work,” the blog post from Tide noted.

The Tide team pointed out that instead of a contraction in the numbers of EU natives launching new ventures in the UK, there has actually been a steady increase every year since the country voted to leave the European Union.

Tide also mentioned that as of the end of last year, the UK is home to over 1.5 million company founders born outside the UK. They further revealed that in total numbers, over a fifth of these enterpreneurs of UK-registered businesses are immigrants.

As noted by Tide, people moving to the UK to start a business are establishing firms in many different industries. The most popular industries for EU-based entrepreneurs include office administration (93,285 founders), land transport (52,685 founders), retail (50,585 founders), computer programming (47,261 founders), and construction (44,156 founders). The blog post also mentioned that “the most popular industries are likely to relate to areas where the UK has a skills shortage.”

The blog added:

“In raw numbers, the top ten nationalities of non-UK founders (as of April 2021) are Irish, Romanian, Polish, German, French, Italian, Bulgarian, Dutch, Spanish, and Swedish. This broadly matches population sizes, except that Spanish representation is relatively low and Romanian particularly high.”

The blog post further noted:

“The sharp rise in Romanian business founders in the last few years is significant. With average Romanian wages approximately a third of UK salaries, it’s clear that many Romanians stand a good chance of increasing their income by moving to the UK. While some people visit the UK on a temporary basis to work, plenty of Romanians also move with their families and put down roots.”

The blog added that after years of increasing migration from Poland, a fast-evolving Polish economy, along with initiatives such as the “Wracaj do Polski” (‘Come Back to Poland’) campaign, there has been a decline in the “pace” of Polish immigration to the United Kingdom. However, the UK is still a popular destination for Polish business owners.

The Tide team pointed out that many people are actually leaving Germany to launch companies in the UK, however, their company founder data “mirrors research from Germany’s Federal Statistics Office, which reported that the UK is the second most popular destination for German migrants.” According to their official statistics, there were 156,000 Germans “residing in the UK in 2018, with more than 8,000 moving in the year to 2018 alone.”

As noted by Tide:

“The forces driving migration and job hunting are clearly complex, influenced by diverse factors such as skills shortages, wage disparity, and economic opportunity. For every immigrant sending money to families back home, there are many migrants who settle in the UK, not simply for their job, but for a new way of life. It’s important to remember that there are millions of different migrant stories, and it’s difficult to characterise the actions and motivations of such a diverse group.”

Justin Fitzpatrick, CEO at DueDil, remarked:

“Brexit has been an all-encompassing and powerfully divisive issue ever since the announcement of the referendum. The business community has grappled with mixed forecasts about Brexit’s impact from think tanks on both sides. …The data is clear… We see strong and consistent increases in the numbers of EU nationals resident in the UK who are starting businesses here. We are immensely proud to be partnering with Tide to make it easier for these founders and entrepreneurs to open a business account as seamlessly as possible and keep the SME economy thriving.”

Tide also mentioned in their blog that setting up your business with Tide is “fast, easy and free.” Tide offers a free business current account, which the Fintech firm claims is “the best way to ensure you’re keeping your finances in order from day one.”

As covered in February 2021, Tide Charity awarded £175,000 to small businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Tide had also announced its India expansion plans earlier this year.

European Parliament EPP group leader: We call on Turkey to fully recognize reality of Genocide (VIDEO)
European Parliament EPP group leader: We call on Turkey to fully recognize reality of Genocide (VIDEO)

German politician Manfred Weber, who heads the Group of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament, has issued a video message on the occasion of the 106th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

“Today we commemorate the Armenian Genocide and pay tribute to the victims of this tragedy. In 1915, 1.5 million of Armenians lost their lives in the massacres perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire. We call on Turkey to fully recognise the reality of the Genocide,” Weber added on Twitter.

European Parliament Vice President calls on all EU countries to recognize Armenian Genocide
European Parliament Vice President calls on all EU countries to recognize Armenian Genocide

YEREVAN, APRIL 24, ARMENPRESS. The Vice President of the European Parliament Fabio Massimo Castaldo says the recognition of the Armenian Genocide is significant also in terms of preventing the attempts of autocratic regimes to mystify the truth and fuel polarization in societies.

“There are days when more than others remind us of the horrible depths of which human nature is capable, and yet it is exactly in those days that we have the important task to look for a spark of hope, a deeper meaning to learn a lesson that will help us shape the future and ensure that certain events never happen again. Today is one of those days and I am honored, humbled, and deeply touched for the opportunity to address you directly. On April 24 we observe the genocide memorial day to remember the atrocities suffered by the Armenian people and to commemorate the victims of the Armenian Genocide perpetrated with barbarian efficacy by Ottoman Empire starting in 1915,” Castaldo said in a video message for ARMENPRESS on the occasion of the 106th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

“In this spirit I stand in solidarity with you all and I appeal to my European brothers and sisters and to the whole humanity to join with the Armenian people in remembering and commemorating the victims of this horrible genocide and all other genocides in our planet. It is an important opportunity to deeply reflect on the necessity of historical knowledge and remembrance.

Days like this are indeed precious, as they are reminding us the need to fight with all our strength any form of discrimination and hatred , past and present, and the need to actively and timely oppose any genocidal policy, be it in the bud or already manifested. The path towards justice and reconciliation, towards healing of the wounds that events like genocides leave in the history of communities, in the history of whole humankind, requires first and foremost as a first step the unequivocal recognition of the crimes that have been committed.  For this reason I strongly call on all the European member states, all the members of the European Union to adopt a specific legislation that officially recognizes the Armenian Genocide.

Turkey, still strongly nowadays denies the genocide, denies this tragedy, and to date only the governments of 30 countries have recognized the events of 1915 for what they really were. We have to do better, we have to do more. Recognition is not merely a formal act, but rather something of exceptional importance and significance. Silence, hesitation and hypocrisy undermine the collective use of memory to the detriment of the livelihood of liberal democracies, which are increasingly under siege. Taking  a clear stance on this and other similar tragedies is essential to prevent totalitarian and autocratic states from attempting to mystify the truth and fuel polarization in our societies, ultimately changing our perception of reality and the actions of our governments. In this context education is a fundamental tool to ensure that such tragedies never happen again. The horrors of humanity must not only be remembered, they must be studied in depth. I firmly believe that events such as the Armenian Genocide must be compulsorily introduced into school curriculums along with programs aimed at preventing hatred and violence, which in recent years are increasingly and relentlessly spreading in all our societies and could only be contained by tolerance, by knowledge, by education.”

Castaldo expressed hope that next year he’d be able to join Armenians in Yerevan and visit the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial to lay flowers and the Eternal Flame.

“…but today, as you let me  participate I such an important and touching ceremony, I want to once again assure you of my unwavering friendship, my strong solidarity and my total engagement and commitment, and I join you all in metaphorically shouting to the sky that we do not forget, that we will never forget, that we will always remember.”

Britain’s exit from the European Union: Fishermen in France block supplies from the United Kingdom
Britain’s exit from the European Union: Fishermen in France block supplies from the United Kingdom



Deep sea fishing was a controversial point in Brexit negotiations until recently – and the conflict is not over to this day. French fishermen are currently very angry about access to British waters. French media reported that more than a hundred fishermen intercepted trucks loaded with fish from Great Britain in Boulogne-sur-Mer Thursday evening. The protest is mainly directed against the slow-moving issue of fishing licenses in London. Boulogne is France’s main fishing port.
“They have been waiting for the promised licenses since January 1. They must now be issued, and fishermen unable to work must be compensated,” Xavier Bertrand, president of the National Council, tweeted after a meeting with several fishermen. Regional fisheries, shifting speed if nothing happens at the European level.

Request to the European Union Commission

Previously, the French Minister of the Sea, Annick Girardin, and the Minister of State for Europe, Clément Boone, joined the dispute. “The full granting of licenses to enter British waters and the swift resolution of the core issues … must be secured as quickly as possible,” she said in a statement. And they called on the European Union Commission to act decisively to ensure the full implementation of the fishing agreement with Great Britain.



After the British left the European Union, there was a complex dispute over the total catch and its distribution. At times, negotiations on a trade pact on Brexit threatened to fail over the fish issue. In December, European Union countries agreed to temporary fishing quotas until the end of July. But even on the British side, thousands of Hunters are fighting for their livelihood. On Friday, the European Union Commission gave the green light to provide 100 million euros in government support to fishing companies in France. Specifically, it is about helping fixed costs due to ships not leaving port and making up for lost income.



The pushback against China: Now, the European Union has released its own Indo-Pacific strategy too
The pushback against China: Now, the European Union has released its own Indo-Pacific strategy too

                Till a few months back, China’s rise was taken as a given. It still is in many ways. China is a rising economic and political power and it’s pointless to talk about preventing that from happening. But how China rises can certainly be managed so that it causes least disruption in the global order.

The disorder ushered in by Covid-19 has underlined to the world the costs of giving China a free pass. And in response, the world has galvanised. Pushback against China has been manifesting itself in multiple ways. In particular, regional players have been pursuing more coordinated actions so as to create a more stable balance of power.

This pushback has also emerged in the context of the BRI, the signature vanity project of Chinese President Xi Jinping. This week saw the federal government of Australia using new powers to cancel two deals made between the state of Victoria and China related to the BRI. While Canberra argued that the move was essential to protect Australia’s national interest, Beijing made it clear that the action by Canberra was “bound to bring further damage to bilateral relations, and will only end up hurting itself”.

Illustration: Uday Deb

A new front has been added to an already strained Australia-China relationship ever since Australia demanded an investigation into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic last year. At the other end of the spectrum, China was targeted in a different way when a bomb explosion at a luxury hotel in the Pakistani city of Quetta, the capital of Balochistan province, ended up killing five people and wounding several others.

China’s ambassador who was visiting the region was ostensibly the target of this attack by the Pakistani Taliban, who claimed responsibility. Tensions have been rising in Balochistan, where China and Pakistani government are viewed as culprits for exploiting one of the country’s poorest regions for its natural resources.

The BRI is facing challenges at a time when the Indo-Pacific narrative is getting well-established across the world. The EU released its Indo-Pacific strategy which aims for “regional stability, security, prosperity, and sustainable development” at a time of great regional flux and turmoil.

Arguing that its approach and engagement will look to foster a rules-based international order, a level playing field as well as an open and fair environment for trade and investment, reciprocity, the strengthening of resilience and tackling climate change, the EU strategy calls upon the 27 nation grouping “to work together with its partners in the Indo-Pacific on these issues of common interest”.

After ignoring the Indo-Pacific construct for years, the EU seems to have finally realised the need to imbibe it within its own strategic framework as it seeks a new global role for itself as a geopolitical actor. Individual member states such as France, Germany and even the Netherlands have already taken the plunge and so the EU had to respond to the evolving geopolitical realities.

From Europe and the US all the way to the Asean and Oceania, Indo-Pacific is the new geostrategic reality which cannot be ignored. China employed its entire might in trying to discredit the narrative, and yet it has turned out to be one of most significant diplomatic failures of Beijing that it could not prevent the ideational rise and operational establishment of the new maritime geography.

Today, China is left with only Russian support on this issue while much of the rest of the world has moved on. And India’s role has been central in making the idea of Indo-Pacific a reality. Much as New Delhi’s reservations on BRI are now the standard template for responding to the project around the world, without New Delhi’s persistence and active engagement in shoring up the viability of the Indo-Pacific, the idea would have found it difficult to move beyond academic discourse.

And this effort continues with the external affairs minister S Jaishankar recently again underlining that the Indo-Pacific refers to a seamless world which was historically present in the form of Indian-Arab economic-trading ties and cultural influences from Asean nations like Vietnam and the east coast of China. In this context, “the Indo-Pacific is a return to history” and “is actually the overcoming of the Cold War and not reinforcing it”.

The more China has pushed its belligerent agenda on regional states, the more pushback it has begun to face. The BRI is confronted with multiple fault lines; the Indo-Pacific geography is now more well-established than ever; the Quad has been resurrected; and various regional players are beginning to engage with each other much more cohesively.

Power is as much about a nation’s innate capabilities as it is about its ability to make others accept its leadership. China has certainly risen in the last decade but it has not succeeded in making others accept its claim for even regional – forget global – leadership.

And India’s ability to stand steadfast vis-à-vis China across multiple fronts has given other nations greater confidence in their ability to shape Chinese behaviour. It may or may not work in the end in rationalising China’s role. But it will certainly force the Chinese Communist Party to rethink some of the assumptions underlying their policy preferences.



Linkedin


Disclaimer

Views expressed above are the author’s own.



            <h6><span>END OF ARTICLE</span></h6>

        <!-- Blog End -->
        <!-- opinions -->
                            <!-- /opinions -->
Lithuania sacrifices old people for the sake of the European Union
Lithuania sacrifices old people for the sake of the European Union

It is well known that Lithuania became a full-fledged member of
the European Union on 1 May 2004. Lithuania in every possible way
demonstrates his satisfaction to be part of a unique economic and
political union.

The EU acts in a huge variety of policy areas, from consumer
protection to security and defence. It is proclaimed that human dignity,
freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human
rights are the core values of the EU.

It should be said that the European Union has been very generous to
Lithuania for 17 years. The country annually get huge amount of money
for its development.

But apparently, the time has come to pay debts. Though Lithuania has
not yet changed into a prosperous European state, the EU does not want
to wait anymore. It suggests a roadmap how to revive a dying Lithuanian
economy.

Thus, European Commission considers the only way out for the country
to survive is to increase maximum working age for Lithuanians. The
country’s government will have to increase maximum working age to 72 if
it wants to maintain its current age dependency ratio – the ratio
between the number of working-age people and the population of seniors
they need to support – a recent European Commission paper shows.

It is expected that in four years there will be 50 retirees per 100
working people and this it will have crucial implications for public
finances and may require raising taxes. At the moment, 35% of the
country’s population are aged over 55.

And such decision will definitely be taken by the Lithuanian
authorities, like all other recommendations of the European Union
despite its almost criminal consequences for the old people. Blind and
unconditional adherence to the recommendations of this organization has
already become a distinguishing feature of the current Lithuanian
government.

According to former health minister and current WHO representative
for Europe, Vytenis Andriukaitis, before prolonging its working age,
Lithuania should address the relatively poor health and low life
expectancy of its population.

“Before they even reach retirement age, many people in Lithuania are
unable to work due to high prevalence of chronic, non-infectious
conditions,” Andriukaitis told LRT TV, adding that “in Lithuania, the
rates of cardiovascular, lung, muscle and bone diseases are huge.” But
the authorities do not care.

It looks like a cruel mockery of all those who once believed in the
tale of European unity. Life expectancy of Lithuanian men is currently
71.5 years of age!

The change changes are presented as pursuing policies that would
encourage people to work longer and retire later. Though according to
some observers, Lithuania’s elderly would not be healthy enough to stay
on the labour market for a longer period than they already do.

Against this background, the statements of some politicians look
especially cynical. “This suggestion by the European Commission is not
strictly about raising the retirement age, but rather about creating
conditions for people who are willing and able to work to stay in
employment until this age [72],” MP and chairman of the parliamentary
social affairs committee Mindaugas Lingė told LRT TV.

The situation in the country is critical but authorities have no
right to sacrifice old people for the sake of the European Union.

EU blasts Turkey about provocations against Greece and Cyprus in report
EU blasts Turkey about provocations against Greece and Cyprus in report


In a report adopted yesterday by the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, MEPs called on Turkey to credibly prove the sincerity of its commitment to closer relations with the European Union.

The sand provocative statements against the EU and its Member States, as well as its hostile foreign policy, especially towards Greece and Cyprus, have brought EU-Turkey relations to a historic low, the report said.

Despite the fact that Turkey is a candidate country for EU membership, in recent years the Turkish government has moved away from European values ​​and standards, it is noted.

The report calls on Turkey to credibly demonstrate the sincerity of its commitment to closer relations with the EU. If the current negative trend is not reversed urgently and consistently, the Commission should recommend a formal suspension of accession negotiations, MEPs insist.

At the same time, MEPs are concerned about the ongoing mass imprisonment of civilians, including journalists, human rights defenders, and political opponents, while acknowledging the EU’s ongoing diplomatic efforts for a genuine and effective dialogue with Turkey on a stable basis.

The report also states that Turkey has played and continues to play an important role in migration, hosting almost 4 million refugees, of whom about 3.6 million are Syrians, noting that the challenges in dealing with this crisis have increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

It welcomes these efforts and encourages the EU to continue to provide the necessary support to Syrian refugees and host communities in Turkey.

The report was approved yesterday Thursday with 49 votes in favor, 4 against, and 14 abstentions.

The report will be submitted to the plenary for a vote by Parliament as a whole. Once adopted in plenary, this text will be Parliament’s official position on the EU’s relations with Turkey.

also read

Milo Yiannopoulos abandons homosexual lifestyle

Albania's EU dream is on hold. Its leaders may like it that way
Albania’s EU dream is on hold. Its leaders may like it that way

It is fair to say that there is little love lost between Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama and his main opponent in this Sunday’s election, Lulzim Basha.

Basha has long called for Rama to resign over corruption claims while his MPs even withdrew from parliament in 2019 over allegations of vote-rigging. Meanwhile, opposition demonstrations got so out of control that at one point protesters tried to break into Rama’s office.

Polls see the two men neck-and-neck ahead of the election on Sunday, although Rama is confident that his Socialist Party will secure a landslide win. That would see Rama, a former painter and basketball player, serve an unprecedented third term as leader of Albania.

But if there is one thing that Basha and Rama agree on – at least in public – it is Europe and forging ahead with Albania’s much-stalled negotiations to join the European bloc. Albania’s European future has been a key election issue in 2021, as it has been at every other national poll in recent years.

It is a no-brainer, politically, to put Europe at the forefront of debate in a country where a February 2020 poll found as many as 97% of Albanians in favour of EU accession.

“We might be the only country where you cannot find any political force, be it local or even in the margins of the political spectrum to be against the EU,” Gledis Gjipali, executive director of the European Movement in Albania, told Euronews.

But like elsewhere in the Western Balkans, Albania’s road to Europe has been long, winding, and studded with potholes. Achingly slow, it has been frustrated at every turn by both changing political realities in the region and, more recently, changes of heart in Brussels.

France’s Emmanuel Macron and the Netherlands’ Mark Rutte have epitomised Europe’s reluctance to open the books in recent years. In 2019, Macron blocked Albania and North Macedonia from moving forward with their membership bids.

Macron has his eye on his own re-election in 2022, and the challenge from the anti-EU extreme right under Marine Le Pen. He said reforming the EU was more important than enlarging it, and complained about the number of asylum seekers coming from Albania to France.

“How do I explain to my constituents that the country where most asylum seekers are coming from is Albania, yet many EU ministers believe that Albania is improving and that we should launch EU accession talks?” Macron said.

Albania’s message to Europe: Send more carrots

The French president’s argument is that Europe needs to reform itself before admitting new members, and despite the singling out of Albania there are those in the country that agree. Not least, the EU needs to figure out how to deal with member states that ticked the democratic boxes when they joined only to gradually backslide once they were in, Gjipali said.

But backtracking by the EU when it comes to Albania and the wider Western Balkans is not a solution, Gjipali added. For all its failings and its slow pace, the path towards European integration has often been the sole driving force behind reform in the Western Balkans.

Without the EU carrot, political elites and authoritarian forces would only be emboldened.

“Unfinished business would not bring the so crucial stability and strong democratic values for the country. The EU power of attraction is the greatest driving force behind the reforms pursued in Albania and motivation to bear the costs of this process,” he said.

Indeed, politically the current malaise in Brussels has already benefited political elites, allowing them to blame Europe for Albania’s problems rather than the failure of successive governments in Tirana to pass sufficient reforms to tackle corruption, crime and the rule of law, analysts say.

Rama, speaking to Euronews Albania this week, that the country had fulfilled its duty when it comes to readiness for European Union membership and blamed the European Council and European Commission for the fact that it hasn’t been achieved during his eight years in power.

Privately, critics say, Albanian politicians may prefer the situation as it is. Opening negotiations would involve detailed, public inspection of every facet of Albania’s economy, government and institutions and could reveal skeletons that many would prefer remain hidden.

“Hiding behind the political issues and blockages keeping enlargement on hold takes the pressure off the government to deliver on reforms,” said Donika Emini, PhD candidate at the University of Westminster and a member of the Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group.

The result of this has been that Albanians – and particularly the youth – have grown increasingly despondent about Europe and apathetic about politics in general, Alfonc Rakaj, an analyst, told Euronews. As elsewhere in the Western Balkans, it is Albania’s youth that – sick of waiting for life to improve at home – flock overseas to seek opportunity in Europe and beyond.

One of the reasons that the election on Sunday is still too close to call, he added, is because so many voters are tired of the same old faces: Rama has been in politics since 1998, Basha since 2005, and neither are considered to have brought the change that voters want to see, he said.

Meanwhile, Albanians look to their neighbours and see faster progress towards integration in increasingly anti-democratic countries like Serbia, while the prospects of Kosovo, Bosnia and Albania remain at a stalemate. It has not gone unnoticed that it is the countries of the Western Balkans with Muslim majorities – or at least sizable minorities – that have languished, he said.

“For some, the EU’s inability to absorb the region has anti-Islamic undertones […], Rakaj said, “Albania has done more than Serbia, but is not even allowed to open negotiation talks.”

Is it because we’re Muslims, Albania wonders

That has been particularly acute as far-right forces in countries such as France, the Netherlands and Germany have directly linked opposition to Albania joining the EU to fears of an influx of Muslim immigrants to European countries, as well as suggestions that Albania – being a Muslim-majority nation – has links to Turkey or other Muslim states.

“The main fear of the public elite in Tirana is the identification of Albania with the religious belief of the majority of its population, and, consequently, of being prejudiced as a bearer of Turkish influence or something similar,” Afrim Krasniqi, a former MP and executive director of the Institute for Political Studies, told Euronews.

“We do not see ourselves as an extension of whomever. We do not feel as such and we do not want to identify as such.”

As full membership of the European Union looks increasingly remote, at least in the short term, some have suggested that France and other nations opposed to enlargement could suggest a two-tier EU, with select countries given some of the benefits of membership and not others. This would not be a first choice, Krasniqi said, but it would be better than nothing.

“In essence, citizens see integration as access to free movement, to study, to work, to trade, and to the same standard of living and democracy – and if these are achieved in alternative formulas, it would be an acceptable solution for us,” he said.

Others believe that for the European Union to go back on what was promised as far back as 2003, when Albania was first identified as a potential candidate, and negate all the work that has been done in the country since could be another nail in the coffin for the EU.

Even if it takes several years, full membership is the only way forward for Albania.

“The EU backtracking on a promise and commitment made to Western Balkan countries – where most of them have made painful compromises even because of the prospect of joining EU – is damaging for our countries and for EU in itself,” said Gjipali, at the European Movement.

“In an every day more globalised world, the EU needs to be stronger, decided and less ambiguous to face the increasingly known and unknown challenges.”

EU chief, Hungary's Orban discuss COVID-19 recovery spending
EU chief, Hungary’s Orban discuss COVID-19 recovery spending

By Gabriela Baczynska and Marton Dunai

BRUSSELS/BUDAPEST (Reuters) – European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban will discuss on Friday Budapest’s plans for spending its share of the EU’s post-COVID-19 economic stimulus – for which Hungary has yet to give final consent.

Hungary is among 10 European Union countries that have not yet approved the plan for the EU executive to borrow an unprecedented 750 billion euros and then disburse money to the 27 member states to help them revive economic growth.

Orban, who has long been at loggerheads with the EU over squeezing out independent media, academics, courts and NGOs, as well as his restrictive approach to migration, has passed the decision whether to approve onto Hungary’s parliament.

Under the EU plan, national capitals must submit for approval by the Commission and other member states their programmes for spending the recovery aid, about 8.2 billion euros of which should go to Hungary.

Opposition politicians have criticised Orban for having planned spending they say will enrich his allies rather than hitting the bloc’s prescribed targets for green and digital investment. Hungary is due to hold national elections next year.

“I am fighting for European decision-makers to accept only a plan that serves the future of Hungarian society, not the power-plays of Orban and his oligarchs,” said Istvan Ujhelyi, a Hungarian socialist member of the European Parliament.

The Commission wants Hungary to reform its public procurement laws to improve transparency, competition between bidders and accountability, to curb “systemic irregularities”, overpricing and avoid mis-spending of aid.

Brussels has also called on national government to cooperate closely with local authorities when designing and implementing their recovery plans.

But Budapest’s opposition mayor Gergely Karacsony, who is widely tipped to challenge Orban in 2022, has said the government failed to consult with municipalities.

With no green light yet from Budapest for the Commission to borrow, Orban could hold the entire EU plan hostage.

Budapest has offered Brussels an apparent olive branch this month, however, by proposing to scrap a contentious NGO law and amending higher education regulations. The bloc’s top court had ruled that both violate EU norms.

Orban rejects criticism from the EU, rights groups and democracy watchdogs over his track record on the rule of law, and says Hungary is no more corrupt than other countries.

(Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski, Writing by Gabriela Baczynska; Editing by Catherine Evans)

EU imposes sanctions 10 individuals and two military-controlled companies in Myanmar
EU imposes sanctions 10 individuals and two military-controlled companies in Myanmar

19 April 2021 The EU approves sanctions targeting individuals and military-controlled entities, announced in the European Council’s press statement.

The EU Council on 19 April 2021 decided to sanction 10 individuals and two military-controlled companies in Myanmar in relation to the military coup staged in Myanmar/Burma on 1 February 2021, and the ensuing military and police repression against peaceful demonstrators. The decision was taken by written procedure.

The individuals targeted by sanctions are all responsible for undermining democracy and the rule of law in Myanmar/Burma, and for repressive decisions and serious human rights violations. The two sanctioned entities are large conglomerates that operate in many sectors of Myanmar’s economy and are owned and controlled by the Myanmar Armed Forces (Tatmadaw), and provide revenue for it. The adopted sanctions specifically target the economic interests of Myanmar’s military regime, which is responsible for the overthrow of Burma’s democratically elected government. Sanctions are crafted in such a way to avoid undue harm to the people of Myanmar.

Today’s decision is a sign of the EU’s unity and determination in condemning the brutal actions of the military junta, and aims at effecting change in the junta’s leadership. Today’s decision also sends a clear message to the military leadership: continuing on the current path will only bring further suffering and will never grant any legitimacy.

Restrictive measures, which now apply to a total of 35 individuals and two companies, include a travel ban and an asset freeze. In addition, EU citizens and companies are forbidden from making funds available to the listed individuals and entities.

Pre-existing EU restrictive measures also remain in place. These include an embargo on arms and equipment that can be used for internal repression, an export ban on dual-use goods for use by the military and border guard police, export restrictions on equipment for monitoring communications that could be used for internal repression, and a prohibition on military training for and military cooperation with the Tatmadaw.

EU restrictive measures add to the withholding of financial assistance directly going to the government and the freezing of all assistance to government bodies that may be seen as legitimising the junta.

The EU remains a steadfast supporter of Myanmar/Burma’s people and of the country’s democratic transition. As a tangible sign of this support, the European Commission has recently allocated a further EUR 9 million in emergency humanitarian aid to assist those in need. Since 1994, the EU has provided €287 million in humanitarian aid to Myanmar, with €20.5 million allocated in 2021 so far. The EU works with trusted and independent humanitarian partners to address the protection, food, nutrition and health needs of the most vulnerable people, particularly in Rakhine, Chin, Kachin and Shan states.

The relevant legal acts, including the names of the persons and entities concerned, have been published in the Official Journal.

  • Council decision and implementing regulation implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma
  • Myanmar/Burma: EU sanctions 11 people over the recent military coup and ensuing repression (press release, 22 March 2021)
  • Myanmar/Burma: Council adopts conclusions (press release, 22 February 2021)
  • Myanmar: Declaration by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union, 2 February 2021

Related Posts

EU cross-border healthcare
EU cross-border healthcare

One truth is certain for all rare diseases, but especially for severe genetic ones: the faster patients get the right treatment, the better their chances of living a full life or potentially even being cured.

Time can be a precious luxury to someone diagnosed with a rare genetic disease, so getting timely access to new innovative therapies is critical.

Rare Disease Day, an annual event that is marked each year on the last day in February, is a unique occasion to increase awareness of rare diseases that affect an estimated 30 million people in the EU. But it is also an occasion to shine a light on the transformative scientific achievements of gene and cell therapies that are bringing new hope to patients who previously had few, if any, treatment options.

However, although the EU’s approach to cross- border healthcare is a critical patient access pathway for patients with rare and ultra-rare genetic diseases, it is not fit for purpose, and this is becoming increasingly clear as more and more gene therapies come to market.

Cross-border healthcare – a vital path for rare and ultra-rare disease patients

The reality for many patients and their families is sobering. Gene therapies and other Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) require specialist treatment processes. They cannot be administered in an average hospital setting. Instead, highly specialised, accredited treatment centres are needed, staffed by specialist doctors and nurses who need dedicated training.

Furthermore, the disease expertise and specialist skills that are required may not be widely available in every European country. This makes a functioning cross-border healthcare framework at the EU level essential to provide patients with access to life-saving therapies. The European Commission’s evaluation of the Directive provides an opportunity to examine the current and future needs of patients in cross- border healthcare with both pathways in mind.

A complex and little-known framework that fails to address the specificities of gene and cell therapies

Patients whose very survival depends on therapies that can only be delivered abroad must face a flurry of challenges to access the treatment that will hopefully change their lives forever. The current EU framework is composed of two pieces of legislation which each lay out a different, but equally complex, patient journey: The ‘Directive on Patients’ Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare’ and the ‘Regulation on the Coordination of Social Security Systems’.

In addition to the limited awareness among clinicians and patients of these two pathways, and of the Regulation especially, the journey from diagnosis to treatment is marked by a labyrinth of burdensome and time-consuming processes. These negatively affect patient mobility and could ultimately affect their outcomes.

Furthermore, both pathways are impacted by several challenges that systematically prevent patient access to treatment. The current design of the Directive requires upfront payment by the patient, an unrealistic expectation highlighted by the European Court of Auditors, which is exacerbated in the case of high value, one-time gene therapies.

In effect, this has made the so-called ‘S2 pathway’, provided by the Regulation, the only viable route for patients seeking access to gene and cell therapies in another EU member state.

However, the S2 pathway is not without flaws. Patients using it to seek planned treatment abroad will face a complex approval process with several hurdles to overcome. Moreover, approval timelines vary by country, ranging from a few weeks to several months, presenting an obstacle to accessing urgent, potentially life-saving treatment.

The approval process if the treatment is not directly covered in the patient’s home country is discretionary and extremely opaque. This leads to unequal patient access across the EU. In addition, innovative payment and risk-share models are challenging to implement in a cross- border healthcare context.

What can be done?

In the short- to medium-term, to increase awareness among patients and healthcare professionals, it is critical that a unified single source of reliable, user-friendly and accessible information is established, to navigate the cross- border healthcare framework for all stakeholders (ie, a dedicated EU website).

The current challenges patients face when seeking access to an approved gene therapy or other ATMP could be partially addressed by a
set of practical changes to improve the current framework. This includes removing the burden of upfront payment from patients by enabling direct billing between health institutions.

The development of Commission guidelines that set harmonised review and approval timelines that will expedite time-to-treatment in the EU
will help address, in part, the shortcomings of the S2 pathway. Furthermore, to make more rapid and transparent approval decisions around this, national health authorities could draw on existing joint Health Technology Assessment initiatives, such as EUnetHTA.

It’s time for action

Rare Disease Day gives us the opportunity to look at the achievements of science, but it’s also important to look at what still needs to be done to help patients get access to new and innovative treatments.

There’s a real opportunity for the European Union to act as a ‘one-stop shop’ to increase process transparency and help patients, clinicians and national health decision-makers navigate the current complexity of the cross-border healthcare system.

In the last few years, the promise of gene and cell therapies has finally become tangible for certain patients and their families with a severe genetic and rare disease. But this promise will only become a reality if patients can gain rapid access before their disease progresses to a point of no return.

The clock is ticking for all stakeholders, from patient associations and clinicians to policymakers and industry, to work together to overcome today’s hurdles of cross-border access for rare and ultra-rare diseases. Only then can we ensure that rare disease patients in Europe can benefit – regardless of where they live.

Longer term, the EU should consider new, more ambitious policies, such as the establishment of a pan-EU solidarity fund from which member states could draw to fund access to gene therapies for rare and ultra-rare disease patients. This would be in keeping with the vision of the European Commission to create a healthier EU as announced in the EU4Health plans in May 2020.

EU urges 'flexibility' to seal Swiss deal
EU urges ‘flexibility’ to seal Swiss deal

European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen called for “flexibility” as Switzerland’s president visited Brussels Friday for talks aimed at breaking the logjam over a long-delayed cooperation agreement.

Brussels has made no secret of its growing impatience to nail down a “framework agreement” to unify a patchwork of accords with Bern, 13 years in the making.

“In a negotiation, the final metres are the most difficult,” European Commission president von der Leyen said at the start of the meeting.

“I do, however, think that it should be possible to find compromises and conclude our institutional framework agreement. We just need some flexibility on both sides.”

For the EU, negotiations on the deal concluded in 2018 — but the Swiss have continued to press for changes and have so far balked at signing.

The agreement would rejig five major agreements within 120 bilateral accords that govern non-EU member Switzerland’s relations with the bloc.

Among other points, they touch on access to the single market and fine-tuning applicable Swiss and EU laws.

“Over the past months, our chief negotiators have conducted very intense negotiations on the items which remain outstanding,” Swiss President Guy Parmelin said.

“These discussions have been far from easy, however, but I think I can say that both sides have shown their commitment to make a success of these negotiations today.”

Fears abound that failing to secure the framework deal could jeopardise Switzerland’s relationship with its largest trading partner at a time when more than half of all Swiss exports go to the bloc, which all but surrounds the landlocked country.

  • ‘Prerequisite’ –

Declarations that the deal was nearly dead have multiplied in recent months.

Some hope of a comeback was restored with a report in Switzerland’s Blick newspaper this week suggesting Bern would offer easier access to Swiss residence permits for people from newer EU member states in eastern Europe in exchange for a fresh revision of the deal.

While not really comparable to Brexit, Switzerland would face significant consequences if the framework agreement falls through.

Since 2008, the EU has insisted Switzerland must sign the agreement before concluding any new bilateral deals.

Brussels reiterated that position last week, with European Commission spokesman Eric Mamer insisting the agreement was “necessary to develop good relations between the European Union and Switzerland”.

“It is a prerequisite for these relations to continue,” he said.

Switzerland’s leader meets von der Leyen with this warning in mind, while facing pressure from the economic and financial sectors to save the deal — and demands from opponents to not cave in to the EU.

Parmelin is from the populist right-wing Swiss People’s Party. Switzerland’s largest political party has for years led efforts to resist closer ties with the EU, and has described the framework agreement as a “Diktat from Brussels”.

There are also calls for the agreement to be put to a referendum, in keeping with the direct democracy system in the small, Alpine country.

The overarching accord would require revising five existing bilateral agreements on free movement, industrial standards, agriculture, air and land transport — and the creation of a joint arbitration court that could enable compensation for breaches.

It would also require the creation of an arbitration court to settle differences between the two sides.

Bern has continued to ask for clarifications on three points: Swiss wage protection, state subsidies and a directive that would give EU citizens in Switzerland the same right to social security as Swiss citizens.

So far, Brussels has said it is willing to provide clarifications on certain points, but has ruled out any renegotiations.

no-interest loans from EU to support country
no-interest loans from EU to support country
                                (ANSAmed) - TUNIS, APRIL 23 - European Union ambassador to

Tunisia, Marcus Cornaro, has expressed the EU’s full support to
efforts made by the Tunisian government with its national
program of economic reform.During a meeting with Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi at the
government palace, Cornaro added that the EU has mechanisms of
support and cooperation that will be made available to the
Tunisian government, according to a statement released by
Tunisia’s cabinet. The EU – Cornaro also said – “will be the
first to defend Tunisia with member countries through ambitious
programs in the field of investments and employment”.

The Union will give Tunisia loans and subsidies without
interests in 2021, with the objective of supporting efforts by
the country to mobilize financial resources and will work to
coordinate and further unify efforts with Tunisia on European
programs for the reconstruction of Libya, in particular in the
sectors of transport, trade, logistics and immigration.

For his part, the Tunisian prime minister said that Tunisia
is working to strengthen cooperation with the EU, especially
because relations between the two sides are strategic and
constructive. Mechichi added that Tunisia, now experiencing a
difficult financial situation, will conduct negotiations with
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) through a consensual
economic program with all national organizations and stressed
the Union’s efforts and continued support to the success of the
democratic process in Tunisia.

Mechichi’s government plans to start negotiations with the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) at the start of May in
Washington to obtain a new funding plan. (ANSAmed)