European Union food import rules may cause shortages at US bases
European Union food import rules may cause shortages at US bases

European Union food import rules may cause shortages at US bases


Thousands of items sold in commissaries and exchange stores at U.S. military bases in Europe could soon be missing from shelves because of previously unenforced European Union rules on food imports, military and industry officials said.


The issue arose unexpectedly after 17 shipping containers destined for U.S. facilities were held up last week in Germany for not having the proper EU health certificates, said Stephen Rossetti, president of the American Logistics Association, which represents product manufacturers and distributors.


The EU requires imports with animal byproducts to meet its own standards, but in the past has allowed U.S. items for consumption on American military bases in Europe to pass through without the certificates, Rossetti said. The containers were released “but with a warning – ‘no more,’” he said.


Commissary and Exchange officials said this week their stores haven’t yet experienced product shortages from port delays in Europe. They are working with federal agencies to resolve the issue with the EU and continue to monitor the flow of products, they said. Military Times first reported on the potential shortages.


The restrictions apply to dry food items that contain animal components, “shipped via ocean carriers solely for U.S. service members and their families while they perform national security missions in Europe,” Defense Commissary Agency spokesman Kevin Robinson said.


The agency will “work with our military resale partners and industry suppliers to ensure our customers in Europe are supported,” he said.


Some 2,000 items sold by the commissary could be affected if more shipments are held up, ranging from baby food and canned meats to powdered milk and pet food, officials said.


But it would not affect U.S.-shipped products kept at the Kaiserslautern cold storage facility near Ramstein Air Base, because frozen or chilled products and fresh meat already have health certificates.


“If they impose this across the board, it would be catastrophic for military families who are still coping with concerns about product shortages during the pandemic,” Rossetti said. “It could cause empty shelves; it could cause some facilities to shut down.”


The Exchange carries about 5,700 U.S.-origin food items with animal byproducts, such as honey, creamer, frosting, lunch meat and pork rinds, said Chris Ward, an Army and Air Force Exchange Service spokesman.


A million cases of food in more than 400 shipping containers in various stages of transit could be immediately affected, Rossetti said. There’s up to a six-week pipeline to get products to Europe and many items have expiration dates, so border delays could pose problems, he said.


The new enforcement actions could also affect base restaurants, the school lunch program and dining halls, officials said.


The Defense Logistics Agency’s prime food services vendor has experienced issues with health certificates in Germany and Poland due to new local inspection policies, said Patrick Mackin, a DLA spokesman.


“We are continuing to keep a close watch on the situation, but at this time there hasn’t been a major impact on customer support,” he said.


The American Logistics Association contends that the certificates, which show conformity with EU health requirements, shouldn’t apply to its members “because they never have and it’s U.S. to U.S., so why now?” Rossetti said. “It’s sudden, it appears arbitrary … and sporadic.”


The logistics association, which is working with federal agencies, would like to see a waiver or a statement from the EU that they’re not going to require the certifications, he said.


“At the very least we need time … a delay on this so it can be sorted it out,” he said.


An official at the German Central Customs Authority referred Stars and Stripes to Germany’s veterinary and import office in Hamburg, saying entrance documents are reviewed by border veterinarians who decide whether to let in a product.


A spokesman at the Hamburg office said he could not immediately comment on the issue.


DeCA is coordinating with the Foreign Agricultural Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture on current and future EU requirements, Robinson said.


If the requirements stand, DeCA could acquire the health certificates but the process could take months, he added.


Ward said the Exchange was reviewing all options, which could include acquiring more products locally.


svan.jennifer@stripes.com

Twitter:@stripesktown


kloeckner.marcus@stripes.com

The entrance to the commissary at Ramstein Air Base, Germany. Newly enforced European Union restrictions on food imports could cause shortages of some items sold in commissaries and exchange stores.

STARS AND STRIPES

European Parliament to sue the European Commission over US visas
European Parliament to sue the European Commission over US visas

The President of the European Parliament, David Sassoli, has signed a decision of the Legal Affairs Committee, which brings before the Court of Justice of the European Union the European Commission for not acting against the United States for not respecting visa reciprocity. This was announced for BNR Horizon from the office of the MEP Sophie in’t Veld. 
US visas still apply to citizens of Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and Cyprus
MEP Sofia in’t Veld described the Commission’s actions as “absolutely unacceptable“. These four countries must be treated like everyone else. The Americans do not follow the rules and this means that visa reciprocity must be abolished, the MEP from Renew Europe group stressed, BNR’s correspondent in Brussels Angelina Piskova reported.

European Parliament delays vote on Brexit deal after UK 'violation'
European Parliament delays vote on Brexit deal after UK ‘violation’

The European Parliament has delayed deciding a date for the vote to approve the Brexit trade deal with the UK after London “violated” the terms of the agreement.

The Conference of Presidents – a body consisting of the Parliament’s president and the chairs of its political groupings – agreed to postpone the decision until they meet next week, a source at the European Parliament told Euronews.

Parliamentary leaders were due to agree Thursday on a date for a final vote on the Brexit agreement, which is only provisionally in force until it is ratified by MEPs, but instead decided to hold back after Brussels accused the UK of violating the terms on Wednesday.

The UK unilaterally announced a grace period on border checks on agri-food products entering Northern Ireland, a move which has angered Brussels.

The EU argues that constitutes a “violation” of the Northern Ireland Protocol, a term of the Brexit agreement designed to maintain an open border on the island of Ireland.

Under the terms of the protocol, Northern Ireland would still be subject to some EU laws, which means that customs declarations and some checks on goods entering Northern Ireland from mainland Britain are required.

The protocol, agreed between the UK and the EU during the Brexit deal negotiations, has angered unionists in Northern Ireland and caused delays in supplies reaching supermarkets and shops in the country.

German MEP Bernd Lange, who sits on the UK Coordination Group in charge of relations with the UK, told Euronews after the Conference of Presidents’ meeting on Thursday, that MEPs are finding it consistently hard to trust the British government.

“We as a European Parliament have a long history of mistrust towards the UK government really sticking to their obligations. This, of course, leads to the situation that we are not really sure if we can under this condition ratify the trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union and therefore we postponed the decision to set a date for the ratification.”

Speaking on Thursday, Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney said the EU was now “negotiating with a partner it simply can’t trust”.

In an interview with Irish broadcaster RTE’s Morning Ireland programme, he said progress was being made on the Northern Ireland Protocol but the timing of the UK’s actions couldn’t have been worse.

“That is why the EU is now looking at legal options and legal action which means a much more formalised and rigid negotiation process as opposed to a process of partnership where you try to solve the problems together,” Coveney said.

Northern Ireland’s first minister Arlene Foster, whose party the DUP has launched legal action against the protocol, insisted on Thursday the decision to delay border controls was about helping local businesses rather than breaching international law.

“I believe in the rule of law, and therefore we will pursue every legal and political means to try and get through that this is not working for Northern Ireland and is causing real damage,” she said.

“I mean, I’m so disappointed to hear the reaction of the Irish government this morning. They say that they had no difficulty with extending grace periods, but yet they’re out saying that the UK government has broken international law which is simply not the case”.

Speaking on a visit to Middlesbrough on Thursday, UK prime minister Boris Johnson said: “We are taking some temporary and technical measures to ensure that there are no barriers in the Irish Sea, to make sure things flow freely between GB and NI and that’s what you would expect”.

“Obviously these are matters for continuing intensive discussions with our friends.

“I’m sure with a bit of goodwill and common sense all these technical problems are eminently solvable”.

‘Clumsy’ resolution risks alienating EU from Kazakhstan, MEP says
‘Clumsy’ resolution risks alienating EU from Kazakhstan, MEP says

The European Parliament’s recent resolution on Kazakhstan is “clumsy” and detrimental both for the bilateral relations and the credibility of the EU, Bulgarian MEP Ivo Hristov (S&D) told EURACTIV on Wednesday (3 March).

Last month the EU assembly passed with 598 votes in favour, 43 against and 52 abstentions a resolution that is highly critical of the human rights situation in Kazakhstan and of the way the recent parliamentary elections were held there.

EURACTIV understands that a fugitive former banker from Kazakhstan, Mukhtar Ablyazov, who lives in France, has used its wealth to influence MEPs to bash the authorities of his home country. Ablyazov is the leader of the DVK party, highly critical of the Kazakh government, which was labelled extremist by the authorities and banned in 2018.

EU-Kazakhstan relations have successfully developed over the years. In its EU agenda, Kazakhstan, a country rich in natural minerals, seeks to have an “EU anchor” to counterbalance its powerful neighbours, China and Russia, as well as to develop economic relations with EU countries, which together constitute its number one investor.

Hristov, who is a member of the EP Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan, EU-Uzbekistan and EU-Tajikistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, voiced his regret at the “clumsy” resolution.

“The resolution on Kazakhstan is a clumsy attempt to force processes in a country that is following its own pace of modernisation,” Hristov stressed.

“The EP devotes much of its time to resolutions on democracy issues in third countries. This useless zeal erodes its authority, especially in combination with the EU’s forgiving view of democracy issues within the Union,” he underlined.

Hristov, a journalist by background, mentioned Hungary and Poland as the best-known examples of EU member countries where democracy is constantly eroded and added that is taking place in other countries as well.

Asked how the EU should better use its influence to positively impact countries in its neighbourhood, he said:

“We should leave behind the delusion that we are a universal model and we should uphold democratic values ​​with economic instruments, without preaching pathos. This is how we will preserve our credibility.”

[Edited by Zoran Radosavljevic]

Fidesz quits Fine Gael's EPP group in European Parliament showdown
Fidesz quits Fine Gael’s EPP group in European Parliament showdown

Right-wing Hungarian leader Viktor Orban has pulled his Fidesz party out of the European People’s Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament, the culmination of years of mounting unhappiness among MEPs over the authoritarian turn of the Budapest leadership.

                                                    <p class="no_name">All five <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=Fine+Gael" rel="nofollow">Fine Gael</a> MEPs were among the 81 per cent of the pan-European EPP group that voted in favour of new rules that would have allowed it to suspend or expel party colleagues, a change seen as making the suspension of Fidesz MEPs only a matter of time.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">As soon as the change was approved, Mr Orban announced the party’s MEPs were quitting the group, effectively opting to leave rather than be expelled.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">“The amendments to the rules of the EPP group are clearly a hostile move against Fidesz and our voters,” Orban wrote in a letter to the EPP leadership. “The governing body of Fidesz has decided to leave the EPP group immediately.”</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Some Fine Gael MEPs expressed relief at their Hungarian colleagues’ departure. “Finally,” tweeted Midlands–North-West MEP <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Maria+Walsh" rel="nofollow">Maria Walsh</a>, while <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_person=Frances+Fitzgerald" rel="nofollow">Frances Fitzgerald</a> described it as “a welcome development”.</p>
                                                                                                                                                                                        <p class="no_name">Mr Orban’s strongman leadership, which has combined the erosion of the rule of law with the curtailment of civil society, minority and media freedoms has long rankled with the EPP’s more liberal members. However, the Hungarian leader retains allies among its more conservative and radical wing, and the issue of how to deal with Fidesz has been a perennial problem that has split the group for years.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">The departure of Fidesz from the EPP group in the European Parliament is not the final conclusion to the affair as the party remains within the overall EPP structure for now, albeit as a suspended member with no voting rights. </p>
                                                    <h4 class="crosshead">Autocratic rule</h4><p class="no_name">The EPP’s political assembly suspended Fidesz in 2019 due to Mr Orban’s increasingly autocratic rule in <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_location=Hungary" rel="nofollow">Hungary</a>, which has seen NGO Freedom House assess the country to be no longer a democracy.</p>

                                                    <p class="no_name">Yet moves to expel Fidesz outright have been delayed by the Covid-19 pandemic and bridge-building attempts to try to rein in the party while keeping it as an ally, an approach championed by members of German chancellor Angela Merkel’s <a class="search" href="/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=Christian+Democratic+Union" rel="nofollow">Christian Democratic Union</a>, an influential force in the EPP.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">However, the exit of the MEPs from the EPP’s group in the European Parliament means a vote on expulsion will be held as soon as Covid-19 conditions allow.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">Under its statutes parliamentarians of member parties must adhere to EPP groups in all assemblies, the party said in a statement, meaning that “Fidesz is now facing an exclusion procedure from the party”.</p>
                                                    <p class="no_name">This requires an in-person political assembly “which will meet when it is safe to do so given the current pandemic situation”, the statement read.</p>
European Council President announces adoption of 'important decisions' regarding Russia after visiting Ukraine
European Council President announces adoption of ‘important decisions’ regarding Russia after visiting Ukraine

15:23
03.03.2021

President of the European Council Charles Michel has said that his trip to Ukraine is important for making important decisions regarding the Russian Federation at the level of the European Union.

Michel said at a press conference after talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv on Wednesday that last week on Monday, for the first time, they decided to apply sanctions in connection with the situation with Navalny (Russian oppositionist Alexei Navalny). This means that they are fully committed and united in Europe to be very tough, decisive, to promote their values and protect their interests.

The President of the European Council also said that at the end of March they would again have a strategic debate at the European level with all heads of state, with all heads of government, to assess the situation and take clear measures. When it comes to their common interest, they want to play a stronger role for greater stability, security and predictability.

He also answered the question of whether the EU will impose sanctions against the Russian Federation for violation of human rights in the occupied territories of Ukraine. He said that this is why meetings today with the president and yesterday with president’s team were very important for him: to try to cooperate, to have the same understanding, level of information, and to make some important decisions. Michel said that we are in the same boat, we share the same values, and the same interests. Today and yesterday was an important moment,” he said.

Hungary PM Orban’s party quits largest group in European Parliament
Hungary PM Orban’s party quits largest group in European Parliament

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Fidesz party has quit the centre-right European People’s Party in the European Parliament amid a suspension row with fellow MEPs.

Orban announced the decision in a letter to the chairman of the EPP, Manfred Weber, on Wednesday, making good on his threat to leave the grouping over changes to its internal rules.

The changes, which were voted in by the EPP on Wednesday, allow it to suspend entire political parties rather than just individual MEPs.

Orban said that the reforms “are clearly a hostile move against Fidesz”, which had been sanctioned by the EPP since March 2019 for its anti-Brussels stance.

In his letter on Wednesday, the leader said that the rules were “undemocratic, unjust and unacceptable” at a time when “hundreds of thousands of Europeans are hospitalised and our doctors are saving lives.”

It was shared by Fidesz vice-president Katalin Novak on Twitter, who said the party “will not let our MEPs be silenced or limited in their capacity to represent our voters”.

The EPP said in a statement it “respects and welcomes the majority vote on the adoption of the new rules of procedure” in the European Parliament.

On the Hungarian party’s departure from the group, it added that Fidesz “is now facing an exclusion procedure from the party, under Article 3 of the EPP Statutes” and “this must be decided by the EPP Political Assembly, which will meet when it is safe to do so given the current pandemic situation”.

Orban’s move will have little consequence for Fidesz or for the EPP, which will retain its status as the largest political grouping in the European Parliament even without the 12 Hungarian MEPs.

One Hungarian MEP, with the Christian Democratic People’s Party (KDNP), which is a coalition partner of Fidesz, will remain part of the EPP.

The rule changes were voted into force by 82% of members of the EPP. In response to the Orban letter, Esther de Lange, of the Dutch CDA, said that Fidesz’s departure was “inevitable.”

“Mentally, we had already said goodbye to him,” she said.

“Our door is open to all parties who agree with the core values ​​of the EPP. In recent years, Orban has unfortunately drifted miles away from these core values, crossing a moral boundary time and time again.”

Since becoming prime minister a decade ago, Orban has regularly clashed with the European Union over issues of judicial reform, media freedom and the rule of law.

In 2015, his hardline reactions to the migrant crisis saw Hungary’s response sanctioned by the European Court of Justice.

EU supports open, fair, rules-based trade: EU official
EU supports open, fair, rules-based trade: EU official

BRUSSELS, March 3 (Xinhua) — Trade ministers of the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) are broadly positive about the EU’s new trade strategy and the European Commission’s commitment to open, fair and rules-based trade, European Commission Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis said on Tuesday.

Addressing the media following a virtual meeting of the ministers, Dombrovskis stressed how the EU planned to rely on exports “more than ever” to help it bounce back from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We are reaffirming our commitment to open, fair and rules-based trade. It is not just EU idealism. It is an economic and political necessity,” he said.

Focusing on strengthening multilateralism and reforming global trade rules, the commission’s strategy unveiled last month highlights the need for reforming the World Trade Organization and advocates the promotion of responsible and sustainable supply chains.

Hungary's Ruling Party Pulls Out Of European Parliament Bloc
Hungary’s Ruling Party Pulls Out Of European Parliament Bloc

BUDAPEST — Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party has quit the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament after the conservative grouping approved new internal rules.

Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced the move in a letter to EPP parliamentary group leader Manfred Weber on March 3 that was posted on Twitter by one of his ministers.

The decision comes a day after the EPP changed its internal rules to allow entire parties to be thrown out, rather than just individual members — a change that was billed as a way to expel Fidesz from the largest faction in the EU legislature.

‘The amendments to the rules of the EPP Group are clearly a hostile move against Fidesz and our voters…This is anti-democratic, unjust, and unacceptable,’ Orban wrote in his letter.

The EPP group, which includes German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives, has been squabbling with Fidesz for years.

The right-wing party, which has held a two-thirds majority in Hungary’s parliament almost uninterrupted since 2010, has been suspended from the EPP since 2018, but it still had 12 lawmakers in the parliamentary faction.

The EU has long accused Orban of undermining democratic freedoms, media, nongovernmental organizations, and the rule of law.

Copyright (c) 2018. RFE/RL, Inc. Republished with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave NW, Ste 400, Washington DC 20036

Charles Michel, President of European Council and EIB President Werner Hoyer on key Team Europe mission to Moldova and Georgia
Charles Michel, President of European Council and EIB President Werner Hoyer on key Team Europe mission to Moldova and Georgia
>@EIB
©EIB

On 28 February and 1 March President Hoyer joined EU President Charles Michel on a mission to Moldova and Georgia, underlining the important role the EU Bank plays in Team Europe’s effort to support the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood. 

In Tblisi President Michel said, “The European Union remains committed to its partnership with all countries in the region, and that it stands firmly alongside Georgia.” He added, “I am delighted to be accompanied on this visit by Werner Hoyer, President of the European Investment Bank. A significant part of EU support is delivered through the European Investment Bank, the EU Bank. The European Investment Bank has provided around €1.8 billion to the local economy since 2007, of which €170 million recently in connection with COVID-19.”

This visit went hand in hand with the opening of a new office building for the EU institutions in Tbilisi. President Hoyer and President Michel were both present at the opening. The Bank’s Tblisi Regional Office is housed within the EU Delegation’s building.

President Hoyer signed a new operation in the presence of President Michel, extending EIB support to Georgian micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The €2.5 million operation will allow Liberty Bank to expand an existing credit line to a total of €17.5 million – a much needed lifeline in the face of the pandemic .

The EU bank has been supporting the economic and social development of Georgia since 2007, providing some €1.85 billion to the local economy to date. The EU bank’s activities in the country have supported key infrastructure projects (€1 billion), MSMEs and mid-caps (€290 million), municipal infrastructure (€280 million) and green energy generation projects (€23.5 million). EIB Group supported COVID-19 recovery activities, as part of Team Europe, in 2020 totalled €170 million.

Georgia is among a few non-EU countries eligible to benefit from European Investment Fund (EIF) operations, designed to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with risk-sharing instruments. Today, the EIB Group portfolio of guarantees in Georgia covers €382.9 million of SME loans.

In Moldova, the two presidents met Moldovan President Maia Sandu to reaffirm Team Europe’s commitment to Moldova and EU support for President Sandu`s planned reforms, which aim to strengthen the rule of law and tackle corruption.

Speaking after the visit, President Hoyer said, “The EU Bank is playing a major role in Team Europe’s efforts in the Eastern Neighborhood: in bolstering recovery, building resilience and encouraging investment. We’re committed to supporting the kinds of initiatives and projects that make the EU a trusted and reliable partner for the region.”

The EU is Moldova’s largest trading partner and principal market for Moldovan exports. During the last ten years, the Union has provided over one billion euros in grants. The European Investment Bank has financed key projects in the energy sector and for SMEs. The European Investment Bank has around €847 million invested around 847 million in Moldova since the beginning of our operations in the country in 2007, supporting all key sectors of the local economy, and SMEs in particular. In 2020 alone the Bank provided € 20 million to aid the faster recovery of Moldovan SMEs from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read the press release to find out more about our support to Georgia

Hungary's Fidesz party to leave European parliament centre-right group
Hungary’s Fidesz party to leave European parliament centre-right group

Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, has pulled his rightwing Fidesz party out of the main centre-right political group in the European parliament after the European People’s party (EPP) moved towards excluding it by changing its rules.

The EPP’s 180 MEPs, some of whom have campaigned for years for the expulsion of Fidesz, which they accuse of weakening the judiciary and curbing media, academic and other freedoms, backed the change by 148 votes to 28 with four abstentions.

Orbán, the party’s chairman, said in a letter posted on Twitter soon after the vote that it was “disappointing” that in the midst of a pandemic the EPP was busying itself with curtailing the rights of its own representatives.

He accused the EPP of “trying to mute and disable our democratically elected MEPs”. The vote was “a hostile move against Fidesz and our voters”, he said, as well as “anti-democratic, unjust and unacceptable … Therefore, the governing body of Fidesz has decided to leave the EPP Group immediately.”

A spokesman for the EPP parliamentary group, Pedro Lopez de Pablo, said the Hungarian prime minister’s response to the vote on Wednesday was “his own personal decision” and that the group would not comment.

Dacian Ciolos, president of the centrist Renew Europe Group in the parliament, welcomed what he described as the “long overdue departure of Fidesz and Viktor Orbán from mainstream European politics”.

Under Orbán, Fidesz had “eroded democracy in Hungary and vandalised European values”, Ciolos said. “It is regrettable that the EPP have harboured the slide to authoritarianism in Hungary for so long. There is no space for the toxic populism of Fidesz in European politics.”

Orbán’s decision to walk away from the biggest single voting bloc in the parliament ends years of wrangling between EPP parties over whether or not to kick his rightwing, populist party out of the group or keep its MEPs onboard.

In a letter to the EPP’s leader, Manfred Weber, on Sunday, Orbán had threatened to leave the group, saying the proposed rule changes – to allow entire member parties, rather than just individual MEPs, to be expelled with a simple majority – were “tailor-made to punish Fidesz”.

The EPP suspended Fidesz’s membership in 2019 over growing concerns that the rule of law was being eroded in Hungary and that the party was engaging in anti-Brussels rhetoric and attacking the EPP leadership. The party currently has 12 MEPs.

A Hungarian government poster campaign in 2019 accused the then European commission head, Jean-Claude Juncker, and the liberal US billionaire George Soros – Orbán’s bête noire – of plotting to flood Europe with migrants.

The EPP subsequently sent a delegation to produce an internal report assessing the future membership of Fidesz – a move that drew a highly critical response from Orbán who said the party would make its own decision on its future.

More recently, the EPP suspended Tamás Deutsch, the head of the Fidesz delegation in the European parliament, stripping him of his rights to speaking time in plenary sessions and removing him from his positions in the group, after he compared comments by Weber to the slogans of the Gestapo and Hungary’s communist-era secret police.

Many of the more moderate national delegations in the EPP, which welcomed Orbán’s party in the early 2000s, have pushed for Fidesz to be expelled, arguing that it no longer represents the group’s values.

National delegations from Scandinavia, Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands have long campaigned for Orbán’s exclusion, while the Christian Democrat CDU/CSU of Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel, has consistently been reluctant.

Othmar Karas, an Austrian EPP member and vice president of the European parliament, said the vote was “a clear sign of our ability to act and our credibility”, as well as “a rejection of a blackmail attempt by Viktor Orbán.”

Petri Sarvamaa, a Finnish EPP MEP, called Fidesz’s departure “a great relief and a historic day”, saying that the party had “trampled on democratic values” ​​and built a system in which “EU funds have been channelled into the leadership’s pockets”.

Orbán’s decision to take Fidesz out of his own volition represents a welcome resolution of a long-standing and increasingly damaging problem for the EPP, as tensions with Hungary and Poland over the rule of law are likely to build further in months to come.

Fidesz’s MEPs could now join either the socially conservative and Eurosceptic European Conservatives & Reformists (ECR) group dominated by Poland’s Law & Justice (PiS) party, or the far-right, nationalist Identity & Democracy group founded in 2019 by France’s Marine Le Pen and Italy’s Matteo Salvini.

Beside Merkel’s CDU, the EPP faction includes Poland’s opposition Civic Platform, Belgian Christian Democrats, France’s Les Republicains and others. It will remain the largest group in the 705-strong chamber even after the Fidesz MEPs’ departure.

President of European Council calls on Russia to ensure full access of OSCE SMM to uncontrolled territories
President of European Council calls on Russia to ensure full access of OSCE SMM to uncontrolled territories

17:26
02.03.2021

Russia must ensure full access of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) to all territories of Ukraine that are not controlled by the government, and return to the Joint Control and Coordination Center (JCCC), President of the European Council Charles Michel said during his visit to Ukraine.

“We expect Russia to provide full access to the OSCE SMM to all territories of Ukraine that are not controlled by the government. The COVID-19 pandemic should not be used as an excuse to further separation of these regions from Ukraine. We also urge Russia to return to the Joint Control and Coordination Center,” Michel said at a press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Luhansk region on Tuesday.

The President of the European Council said that the full implementation of the Minsk Agreements is a path to peace and welcomed important steps that Ukraine has taken in this regard under the leadership of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“A complete ceasefire, more checkpoints and further demining will improve the lives of people on both sides of the contact line, and the EU is ready to support these efforts. Unfortunately, Russia has not demonstrated the same positive steps that Ukraine has taken to implement the Minsk agreements. That is why our economic sanctions against Russia will remain in place. Russia is a part of this conflict, not a mediator,” Michel said.

He said that in 2021, the war continues on the European continent, and this is a “shameful reality,” people continue to die in this conflict and live in extremely difficult circumstances.

“I wanted to come here to once again emphasize how unacceptable this situation is and to meet with those who are doing their job in extremely difficult circumstances. And I also wanted to reiterate the EU’s unwavering support for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. We provide strong support in all possible ways to efforts in the Normandy format and the Trilateral Contact Group to bring peace to the people of Donbas,” Michel said.

U.S., European Union to sanction Russia for poisoning Putin foe Alexei Navalny
U.S., European Union to sanction Russia for poisoning Putin foe Alexei Navalny

The United States and the European Union are jointly imposing sanctions to punish Russia for the poisoning of Alexei Navalny, an opposition leader who was recently jailed, according to senior Biden administration officials.

Navalny was poisoned with a nerve agent Aug. 20, then spent months recovering in Germany. When he returned to Russia on Jan. 17, he was detained and sentenced to prison on what U.S. officials described as spurious charges.

“We’re sending a clear signal to Russia,” said one of the officials, who requested anonymity. “There are consequences for the use of chemical weapons.”

Administration officials also warned that they believe Russia is “moving toward authoritarianism” under President Vladimir Putin.

Advertisement

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, told reporters that U.S. intelligence officials have assessed “with high confidence” that Russian government operatives poisoned Navalny. Moscow has denied any role.

The sanctions target seven senior Russian officials, including Alexander Bortnikov, the head of the country’s main intelligence agency, the FSB. Other officials include two deputy ministers of defense and the head of the federal prison system.

Former President Trump had previously declined to join European countries in punishing Russia for its targeting of Navalny. An official said Biden’s approach would be “very different than what you saw in the previous administration.”

The sanctions for Navalny’s poisoning are the first of several actions that the Biden administration is considering. Officials are also debating how to respond to the SolarWinds cyberattack, election interference and Russian bounties for the death of American soldiers in Afghanistan.

Advertisement

“We expect this to be a challenging relationship,” the official said. “We’re prepared for it to be a challenging relationship.”

Chief European Union diplomat in Venezuela leaves country
Chief European Union diplomat in Venezuela leaves country

CARACAS, Venezuela — The chief European Union diplomat in Venezuela left the country on Tuesday, a week after the government of Nicolás Maduro ordered her expulsion following the EU’s decision to impose sanctions on several Venezuelan officials accused of undermining democracy or violating human rights.

Isabel Brilhante Pedrosa tweeted a photograph of Caracas showing the mountain range that flanks the Venezuelan capital to the north and the message “infinite thanks to all Venezuelans for their affection.”

“I carry you all in so many beautiful memories. My heart stays here,” she wrote without giving details.

The Venezuelan government’s action against Brilhante Pedrosa came after the European Union’s foreign ministers sanctioned 19 Venezuelan officials, freezing their assets and banning them from travelling to the bloc, citing the deteriorating situation Venezuela faces after December 2020 elections. The main opposition parties boycotted those elections.

The move marked the second time in almost eight months that Brilhante Pedrosa was declared persona non grata and ordered to leave Venezuela. Both cases were related to the European Union sanctions against officials and allies of Maduro.

Last June, Brilhante Pedrosa was able to remain in Venezuela after the European Union high representative for foreign affairs, Josep Borrell, and Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza agreed on the need to maintain diplomatic relations.

Arreaza last week lamented that the sanctions were imposed again, saying Maduro had been “generous” to allow European diplomats to remain after many nations formally recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the country’s rightful leader.

Guaidó, former president of the National Assembly, declared himself interim president in 2019 and was recognized by 60 countries as the legitimate leader of Venezuela, arguing that Maduro’s reelection in 2018 was fraudulent. However, Maduro has held power with the support of the military and Guaidó’s movement has lost momentum.

The Associated Press

We can’t let China rule artificial intelligence, US congresswoman tells European Parliament
We can’t let China rule artificial intelligence, US congresswoman tells European Parliament

US Representative Robin Kelly has called on Brussels to work closely with the new Biden administration to outflank China on artificial intelligence (AI), amid fears that the Asian superpower has gained a lead in the rapidly-developing technology.

Speaking to members of the European Parliament’s special AI committee on Monday, the Illinois Democrat warned that China could dominate the technology, telling MEPs, “We cannot let this happen. It is vital democratic nations are the ones who shape this technology.”

Policymakers and the public are concerned about applications including autonomous weapons and government social scoring systems such as those under development in China. The Chinese government has controversially used AI tools to identify pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong, and for racial profiling and control of Uighur Muslims. Face scans in China are used to pick out and fine jaywalkers, and citizens in Shanghai will soon have to verify their identity in pharmacies by scanning their faces.

The US and China account for almost all private AI investment in the world, according to Stanford University’s AI index report, but in Kelly’s view, not even the US can compete with China, “based on the raw number of computer science graduates and the amount of data they collect on their citizens.”

Last December, Kelly’s resolution to boost AI in the US, with actions including more technology education funding and a national computing and data resource, passed a vote in the House of Representatives.

Kelly’s plea for the EU to work more closely with the US on AI rules predictably went down well with MEPs who had written off the Trump administration as uncooperative and even hostile to the EU. It also served as a pointed reminder to the EU to consult with President Biden’s team before presenting new AI rules this spring.

Last year, the European Commission published its thinking on AI in a white paper, which states that new technologies in critical sectors should be subject to legislation. It likened the current situation to “the Wild West” and said it would focus on “high-risk” cases.

EU policymakers want to work with Biden on these issues, said Kristin de Peyron, deputy managing director for human rights, global and multilateral issues at the European External Action Service, the EU’s foreign affairs wing.

“We share common cause against authoritarian regimes,” said Luxembourgish MEP Isabel Wiseler-Lima. Setting clear limits for AI is in step with Brussels’ more hands-on approach of recent years to the digital world. The Commission is also setting red lines on privacy, antitrust and harmful internet content, which has inspired tougher rules elsewhere in the world.

Kelly’s warnings on China, meanwhile, are typical of the developing bipartisan view in America that Beijing poses a strong economic – and perhaps even a distant military – threat. Biden wasted little time in reversing many Trump-era decisions, but he didn’t undo his predecessor’s decision to join the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), an international panel for setting ethical guidelines on the technology.

The Trump administration was initially hesitant to join the group, but later decided it was a way of mitigating Chinese influence in AI. Trump’s chief technology officer, Michael Kratsios, spoke of unease at attempts by Chinese technology companies to shape international standards for facial recognition and surveillance at the UN’s International Telecommunication Union.

With Trump gone, figures on both sides of the Atlantic see a window of opportunity for the EU and US to work together after four years of strained relations. “I think we have to promote academic exchanges between the US and Europe on AI,” Bruno Sportisse, CEO of the GPAI Centre of Expertise in Paris, told the committee.

EU warning

Despite a pledge of greater cooperation, Kelly also sounded a note of caution on EU legislation, warning the bloc not to take its own path on the technology without consulting its allies. “Increases in data localisation or digital sovereignty will not benefit the US or the EU. We must be able to share data while respecting civil liberties, privacy, and human rights,” she said.

“There’s a real danger of over-prescriptive policies,” Kelly added, echoing the fear of the big American tech companies like Google and Microsoft, which have made large investments in new AI applications, and are wary of the EU’s plans to regulate. Kelly called on MEPs to seek American input during the drafting of AI regulations.

An area that is especially sensitive for the US is defence, said Kelly. NATO should to be involved in discussions to ensure evolving autonomous weapon systems developed in Europe and the US could “talk to each other without friction.”

Kelly insisted that there are genuine concerns around AI. “Tech companies cannot hide behind the shield of stifling innovation to avoid all regulation,” she said. “Companies must be reminded that if things are illegal in the real world, then they are also illegal in an algorithm. “

Some incidents with AI have highlighted the potential for racial bias. If a system is trained primarily on white male faces, and fewer women and people of colour, it will be less accurate for the latter groups, said Kelly, who is African-American.

“From an AI bias perspective, people who look like me have the most to lose,” she said.

EU court: Poland’s judicial rules could violate EU law
EU court: Poland’s judicial rules could violate EU law

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — The European Union’s top court ruled Tuesday that Poland’s new regulations for appointing judges to the Supreme Court could violate EU law.

The ruling obliges Poland’s right-wing government to discontinue these regulations and observe the principles of judicial independence and the right to judicial protection.

The EU has been strongly criticizing Poland’s conservative government for the changes it has introduced to the judiciary since it won power in 2015, saying they undermine the country’s rule of law.

In a decision that could have a powerful effect on future court verdicts regarding judicial appointments, the ruling also allows Poland’s courts to refrain from applying the government regulations introduced in 2018 and 2019.

The legislation in Poland strengthened political influence over a top judicial body, the National Council of the Judiciary, and the body’s procedure of appointments to the Supreme Court. It also curbed the right to appeal the council’s decisions.

The regulations “which have the effect of removing effective judicial review of that council’s decisions … (proposing) candidates for the office of judge at the Supreme Court — are liable to infringe EU law,” the European Court of Justice said in its ruling.

Many members of Poland’s judiciary welcomed the decision.

“The (EU) court has put limits on political power,” said attorney Marcjanna Debska. “It refers not only to the regulations but also to the political situation and that means that the court can clearly see what is going on in Poland.”

But a member of the ruling Law and Justice party, lawyer Krystyna Pawlowicz, criticized the verdict, saying it has “no legal basis and goes against Poland’s legal system.”

The ruling was in response to a query by Poland’s top administrative court to the European court regarding a complaint by some judges. The Polish judges said the new regulations stripped them of the right to appeal a decision rejecting them as candidates for the Supreme Court.

Based on Tuesday’s ruling, Poland’s Supreme Administrative Court can now review the appeals by the five judges, who are not government loyalists. In the process, it is likely to rule that the entire appointment procedure was flawed and ineffective.

Some said the court’s decision backed up several previous warnings from EU bodies to Poland about following the bloc’s rule of law.

The ruling on the Polish government’s “political interference in the judiciary is concrete evidence that the government is blatantly flouting the rule of law, despite multiple warnings. It is also destroying Europe’s trust in the legal system there,” said Jeroen Lenaers, a European Parliament member.

___

This story has been corrected to say Poland’s top administrative court turned to the ECJ, not the judges themselves.

European Union drug regulator audits manufacturing site of Serum Institute
European Union drug regulator audits manufacturing site of Serum Institute



After the UK drug regulator, it is learnt that the (EU) drug regulator is also auditing the manufacturing site of (SII), which is making the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine.


A person in the know has told Business Standard that if the audit goes well, it can lead to SII supplying the vaccine to the UK as well as to the EU.



AstraZeneca has to deliver 180 million doses to the EU in the second quarter of the year and production constraints have cut down deliveries to the European countries. Recently, AstraZeneca Chief Executive (CEO) Pascal Soriot has indicated that the company may look at factories outside of the EU to meet the supply commitments.


Currently, SII is set to supply Covishield, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine, to around 70 countries. Already shipments for the World Health Organization (WHO)-led Covax have left from India. However, SII is mostly committed to supply to the low- and medium-income countries and supplies to the EU was not part of the original contract.


SII, however, declined to comment on the matter.


According to Reuters, a senior EU official involved in talks with AstraZeneca has told the agency that SII could be a potential supplier. However, at present SII is prioritising the huge demand that India has for its own vaccination programme. Last week, Adar Poonawalla, CEO of SII, had tweeted, “Dear countries & governments, as you await #COVISHIELD supplies, I humbly request you to please be patient, @SerumInstIndia has been directed to prioritise the huge needs of India and along with that balance the needs of the rest of the world. We are trying our best.”


Last month, a team from the British drug regulator’s office visited SII’s Pune facility for an audit. If the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approves the manufacturing process of SII, it could also open doors for the vaccine to be shipped to countries other than the UK (those that recognise the MHRA approval).


The world’s largest vaccine maker, SII, meanwhile, got the emergency use license from WHO for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.


According to the interim distribution forecast released by Covax earlier this month, India will get around 97 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine made by SII. As of now, Covax has not allotted the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for India.


The document highlights that India is in line to receive around 97,164,000 doses of AstraZeneca vaccine licensed to SII in the first and second quarter of 2021. Covax plan states how the 240 million doses of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine would be distributed across countries as well as the 1.2 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.


As for the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine, which is licensed to SII delivery, is estimated to begin in late February. It was subject to WHO approval that has now come through. Around 40 per cent of the doses would be available in Q1, while the rest would be available in the second quarter.



With inputs from Reuters

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

European parliamentarians warn against de facto West Bank annexation
European parliamentarians warn against de facto West Bank annexation

A group of 442 parliamentarians from 22 European countries have urged the European Union to take action to prevent de facto Israeli annexation of the West Bank.“The recent regional normalization agreements with Israel have led to the suspension of plans to formally annex West Bank territory,” the European parliamentarians said in a letter to EU foreign policy chief Joseph Borrell and the EU’s 27 foreign ministers.

“However, developments on the ground clearly point to a reality of rapidly progressing de facto annexation, especially through accelerated settlement expansion and demolition of Palestinian structures.”The parliamentarians asked the EU to take advantage of the Biden administration’s disapproval of settlement activity, and its desire to reengage with Palestinians, by working with the US to “renew efforts” to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“Europe must work with the Biden administration, countries in the region and the parties on the ground to prevent unilateral action from undermining the possibility of peace,” they wrote.

The EU’s member countries should make use of available diplomatic tools such as the 2016 UNSC Resolution 2334 that requires nations not to recognize the settlements as part of Israel, the parliamentarians said. That means “diplomatic, legal and financial support for Palestinian communities at risk of demolition and forcible transfer should be increased,” they explained.“Active European support for Palestinian reconciliation and elections across all the Palestinian territory is vital,” also for ending the isolation of Gaza,” they added.

The letter was the initiative of four Israelis; former attorney-general Michael Ben-Yair, former Labor MK Avraham Burg, former New Israel Fund president Naomi Chazan and former Meretz Party head Zahava Gal-On.

The parliamentarians who signed onto the letter were from: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

The European Union has already called on Israel to halt the demolition of illegal Palestinian structures in Area C of the West Bank and to stop settlement activity.

Last Friday seven European countries with current and past membership in the United Nations Security Council stated their opposition to demolitions and settlement activity.

“We recall our firm opposition to Israel’s settlement policy and actions taken in that context, such as forced transfers, evictions, demolitions and confiscations of homes and humanitarian assets, which are illegal under international law…  and are an impediment to a viable two-state solution.

”The seven ambassadors who signed onto the statement were from Estonia, France, Ireland, Belgium, Germany, Norway and the United Kingdom.

World: COVID-19 Mobility Tracking Impact
World: COVID-19 Mobility Tracking Impact

Points of Entry Analysis: January 27, 2021 – IOM Regional Office for the European Economic Area, the European Union and NATO

The outbreak of the COVID-19 virus has affected global and regional human mobility in the form of various travel disruptions and restrictions.

The total number of COVID-19 cases reached 22,765,857 in the European Economic Area region (EEA) as of 31 January 2021 according to the World Health Organization (WHO). To better understand how the pandemic affects mobility at the Points of Entry (PoEs), the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has developed an online tool and database which tracks changes in mobility at Points of Entry (airports, land and blue border crossing points). This includes preparedness and response measures to prevent, protect against, control and assist in line with the International Health Regulations (IHR). Among the mobility changes tracked by IOM are: 1) Movement restrictions on entry and/or exit, 2)

Changes in visa requirements, 3) Restrictions applied to certain nationalities to disembark at this location, 4) Changes in identification documents needed to disembark, 5) Medical measures in place such as Health Staffing/Medical Personnel, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE), Infection prevention and control (IPC) and Surveillance and Referral.

As of 27 January 2021, data was collected on 809 PoEs in 30 countries/territories/areas across the EEA region. These locations include: 480 land border crossings points, 190 airports, and 139 blue border crossing points (including sea, river and lake ports). This work is based on the information collected by or available to IOM Country Offices in the region. This PoEs brief analysis provides an overview of the changes of the operational status and mobility restrictions over the past year, between April 2020 and January 2021. Not all data on PoEs have been updated every month, meaning that the displayed trend does not necessarily represent the situation of all PoEs at any given month. A total of 809 PoEs have been assessed as of January 2021, which is 45 more than the 764 PoEs assessed in April last year when the global data collection exercise was rolled out

Iran Dismisses Idea of Talks With EU and US to Revive 2015 Nuclear Deal
Iran Dismisses Idea of Talks With EU and US to Revive 2015 Nuclear Deal

U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and the head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Ali Akbar Salehi and the Iranian delegation (L-R) meet during a plenary session at the United Nations building in Vienna, Austria, on July 14, 2015. (Joe Klamar/Reuters)

DUBAI—Iran on Sunday ruled out holding an informal meeting with the United States and European powers to discuss ways to revive its 2015 nuclear deal with major powers, insisting that Washington must lift all its unilateral sanctions.

“Considering the recent actions and statements by the United States and three European powers, Iran does not consider this the time to hold an informal meeting with these countries, which was proposed by the EU foreign policy chief,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said, according to Iranian media.

Iranian officials had said Tehran was studying a proposal by European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell to hold an informal meeting with other parties to the nuclear pact and the United States, which reimposed sanctions on Iran after then-president Donald Trump quit the deal in 2018.

Iran and the new U.S. administration of President Joe Biden have been at odds over who should take the first step to revive the accord. Iran insists the United States must first lift sanctions while Washington says Tehran must first return to compliance with the deal, which it has been progressively breaching.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif sketched out a potential choreography on Feb. 1 to overcome the impasse.