Amid political chaos in Nepal, China is sending a vice-minister of the Chinese Communist Party to Kathmandu to “assess the ground situation”.
The Kathmandu Post quoted two Nepal Communist Party (NCP) leaders confirming that Guo Yezhou, vice-minister of the International Department of the Communist Party of China, is arriving in Kathmandu on Sunday for a four-day visit.
During the visit, Guo will meet the senior leaders of both the factions of the NCP, according to sources.
Sources in both the factions of the NCP confirmed that Guo, along with his four-member team, will land in Kathmandu on Sunday morning.
Bishnu Rijal, Deputy Head of Department of Foreign Affairs of the NCP (Dahal-Nepal faction), while confirming that the Chinese side communicated about Guo’s visit to Kathmandu, denied divulging details “at this point of time”.
Nepal President Bidya Devi Bhandari had dissolved the Lower House on Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli’s recommendation. The move has invited 12 petitions in the country’s apex court, claiming it to be “unconstitutional”, including one by former prime minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal who filed the plea on Tuesday.
After dissolving the Parliament, Oli also proposed elections on April 30 and May 10, 2021, nearly two years ahead of the schedule.
Seven cabinet ministers had submitted their resignations after the Parliament dissolution was ratified by the President.
Oli has been facing pressure from the rival factions of the NCP, led by former prime minister Dahal and Madhav Nepal.
In particular, the Chinese envoy in Nepal has been hyperactive in recent weeks, meeting the President as well as Prachanda under the garb of mundane official agendas. It is thought the Chinese Communist Party is attempting to play a big brother role in keeping the Nepal Communist Party together. India has refused to be drawn into the Nepal turmoil, with the MEA terming it as Nepal’s internal matter, though it has expressed it is keeping a watch on developments.
Following the standoff in eastern Ladakh including the clash in Galwan which marked the most precipitous decline in India-China bilateral relations in the last 40 years, India has not been able to develop a strategy to offset Beijing’s periodic coercion along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
India has taken tentative steps with the United States and other allies to balance China, but these have not generated dissuasion or deterrence.
India’s Foreign Minister Dr S Jaishankar says that China has reneged on agreements and protocols to unilaterally alter LAC, and given five differing explanations for deploying troops on the border.
If this is not sufficient reason for India to reciprocally renege on its recognition of Tibet as an Autonomous Region of China — early warning on which New Delhi had begun signalling in 2010 when it stopped mentioning the ‘One China’ policy in official documents and joint statements — there is more.
Is Tibet Issue A ‘Usable’ Card?
India’s blow hot blow cold policy has angered young Tibetans and Indians alike. It is time for India to stop being deferential to China as it has gained little by doing so, and show the Tibet card though it will amount to crossing the Rubicon.
So, is Tibet a usable card — and is India able and willing to face a Chinese riposte given the disputed border and acute power asymmetry?
India’s boundary dispute is intrinsically linked to Tibet. New Delhi’s recognition of Chinese sovereignty over Tibet was contingent upon China’s acceptance of Tibetan autonomy. The Dalai Lama gave up the quest for independence in exchange for genuine autonomy within China. Beijing has squashed autonomy and not kept its side of the bargain with Tibet and China.
India Did Nothing When China Invaded Tibet
India’s original sin was its failure to prevent occupation of Tibet in 1950 despite a military appreciation of Tibet as a Vital Area done as early as 1946 by Eastern Army Commander Lt Gen Francis Tuker. He warned that it was China, not Russia, that was the main threat — and called for preventing the annexation of the Tibetan plateau.
He said India should be prepared to occupy the plateau and keep friendship and cooperation of the people of the frontier from Nepal to Naga Hills, especially Nepal.
Not only did India do nothing when China invaded Tibet but in 1954 agreed to designate Tibet as an autonomous region of China.
The Panchsheel Treaty ushered in short-lived era of Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai and New Delhi unilaterally, and without any quid pro quo removed its political and commercial rights over Tibet, vacating the Counsel General at Lhasa and trading marts at Gyantse, Yatung and Gartok along with their military detachments. A Sino-Tibet conflict was by default turned into Sino-Indian.
Recalling this strategic blunder is crying over spilled milk.
Can damage be mitigated at this late stage when possession is nine-tenths of the law and claim? Dutch scholar and historian, Michael van Walt, who is backed by a team of 100 researchers who have been studying Tibet for decades, says it is worth giving it a shot.
Walt is legal advisor to the Central Tibet Administration in Dharamsala and author of a seminal book ‘Tibet Was Never Part of China But The Middle Way Approach Remains a Viable Solution’ and his latest, ‘Freedom Brief 2020’.
India Must Completely Stop Saying That Tibet Is A Part Of China
For starters, New Delhi should say it has reviewed the Tibet issue, admitting some mistakes were made initially but fresh facts had emerged. These are:
a) Tibet was never part of imperial China or the Mongol empire
b) Illegal occupation through invasion, misrepresentation of facts and altering narrative do not provide legitimacy
c) Indo-Tibetan border was resolved in 1914 by the MacMahon Line and ratified by Tibet
d) Tibet was a buffer state between India and China
e) Tibetans are not a minority of the Chinese
f) China enjoyed suzerainty, never sovereignty over Tibet
g) The Dalai Lama had traded suzerainty for autonomy
h) Tibetans can call for self-determination after China ends its occupation of Tibet
Step two is for India to completely stop saying that Tibet is part of China. Late Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj would say it is China’s turn to articulate a ‘One India’ policy that is inclusive of Arunachal Pradesh. The fact is, ‘One China’ policy applies to Taiwan not Tibet.
In 2017, Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu said that his state has a border with Tibet, not China. In Step Three, India should formally recognise the Dalai Lama as a proud son of India and award him the Bharat Ratna. He should be extended all State privileges and courtesies and be free to travel all across India including Arunachal Pradesh.
Beijing should be advised to restart dialogue with the Dalai Lama and not interfere with the selection of his successor, which is entirely the Dalai Lama’s prerogative.
Former PM Shastri Had Said That India Would Recognise Tibet Govt In Exile
India has advised Beijing to resolve the issue while he is alive. US has said that China has no theological basis for picking the next Dalai Lama. India should recognise and support the Central Tibet Administration as the Government in Exile in achieving its political objectives through peaceful means, and advise China to resume dialogue which was suspended in 2010 after nine rounds of talks.
In 1965, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri had said India would recognise the Tibet Government in Exile (now CTA) but he died prematurely — a historical fact that should be made public.
Panchsheel Marg in front of the Chinese Embassy in New Delhi should be renamed the Dalai Lama Marg.
Why Tibet Issue Must Be Internationalised
The Tibet issue can be internationalised – introduced in the UNSC in the two years of India’s chairmanship of it starting 2021. The Tibet issue can join the Draft Convention on Terrorism in the UN, which has become India’s signature tune.
India can also take up Tibet at UNHRC over suppression of religious and cultural freedoms and violation of human rights. Discussions on Tibet that are held behind closed doors and almost sinfully, should be open to public and media.
Track I and Track 1.5 dialogues on Tibet can start in collaboration with CTA, Tibetan institutes abroad and Friends of Tibet worldwide. Studies on Tibetan Buddhism and culture should be introduced in the syllabi of universities and think tanks. China’s perfidy in instigating the 1962 border war needs to be exposed.
Steps 1 to 3 can be calibrated by government and non-government institutions. These measures should be coordinated with Friends of Tibet in Europe and US who have been accusing China of grave human rights violations in Tibet. The US Administration under Trump has been most active in targeting China over its omissions and commissions in Tibet with legislative acts like the US Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act 2018. It recently appointed its special envoy on Tibet, Robert Destro, and the State Department invited head of CTA, Lobsang Sangay, to meet Mr Destro — for the first time in six decades, which infuriated Beijing.
A ‘New Wall’ India Needs To ‘Breach’
While US has said it could soon start talks with CTA, Ambassador at large for International Religious Freedom, Samuel D Brownback told reporters after a visit to Dharamsala in October that Tibetans have picked their spiritual leaders for thousands of years. US accuses China of religious persecution and cultural genocide in Tibet. The Tibet Policy and Support Act was passed by Congress this month advocating genuine autonomy in Tibet and for Dalai Lama to choose his successor. One should hope President Biden will intensify the campaign for full freedom and autonomy in Tibet and that on this one issue India can form an active alliance with US, without forfeiting its strategic autonomy. Meanwhile, it is reported that US Congress and EU Parliament have both recognised Tibet is an occupied country.
No wonder President Xi Jinping is taking special interest in the controlling and monitoring of Tibet, saying China should build an impregnable fortress in Tibet and dig out facts that link Tibet to China for their impact on the boundary dispute with India.
It is this new Great Wall that India must start to ‘breach’. India has to take the lead in Tibet’s cause and the time to act is now.
Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to the EU market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism.
Social media algorithms, artificial intelligence, and our own genetics are among the factors influencing us beyond our awareness. This raises an ancient question: do we have control over our own lives? This article is part of The Conversation’s series on the science of free will.
Many of us believe we are masters of own destiny, but new research is revealing the extent to which our behavior is influenced by our genes.
It’s now possible to decipher our individual genetic code, the sequence of 3.2 billion DNA “letters” unique to each of us, that forms a blueprint for our brains and bodies.
This sequence reveals how much of our behavior has a hefty biological predisposition, meaning we might be skewed towards developing a particular attribute or characteristic. Research has shown genes may predispose not only our height, eye colour or weight, but also our vulnerability to mental ill-health, longevity, intelligence and impulsivity. Such traits are, to varying degrees, written into our genes — sometimes thousands of genes working in concert.
Most of these genes instruct how our brain circuitry is laid down in the womb, and how it functions. We can now view a baby’s brain as it is built, even 20 weeks before birth. Circuitry changes exist in their brains that strongly correlate with genes that predispose for autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). They even predispose for conditions that might not emerge for decades: bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.
There are also other ways our life stories can be passed down through generations, besides being inscribed in our DNA.
“Epigenetics” is a relatively new area of science that can reveal how intertwined nature and nurture can be. It looks not at changes to genes themselves, but instead at the “tags” that are put on genes from life experience, which alter how our genes are expressed.
One 2014 study looked at epigenetic changes in mice. Mice love the sweet smell of cherries, so when a waft reaches their nose, a pleasure zone in the brain lights up, motivating them to scurry around and hunt out the treat. The researchers decided to pair this smell with a mild electric shock, and the mice quickly learned to freeze in anticipation.
The study found this new memory was transmitted across the generations. The mice’s grandchildren were fearful of cherries, despite not having experienced the electric shocks themselves. The grandfather’s sperm DNA changed its shape, leaving a blueprint of the experience entwined in the genes.
This is ongoing research and novel science, so questions remain about how these mechanisms might apply to humans. But preliminary results indicate epigenetic changes can influence descendants of extremely traumatic events.
One study showed the sons of US Civil War prisoners had an 11% higher death rate by their mid-40s. Another small study showed survivors of the Holocaust, and their children, carried epigenetic changes in a gene that was linked to their levels of cortisol, a hormone involved in the stress response. It’s a complicated picture, but the results suggest descendants have a higher net cortisol level and are therefore more susceptible to anxiety disorders.
Of course, it’s not simply the case that our lives are set in stone by the brain we’re born with, the DNA given to us by our parents, and the memories passed down from our grandparents.
There is, thankfully, still scope for change. As we learn, new connections form between nerve cells. As the new skill is practiced, or the learning relived, the connections strengthen and the learning is consolidated into a memory. If the memory is repeatedly visited, it will become the default route for electrical signals in the brain, meaning learned behavior becomes habit.
Take riding a bike, for example. We don’t know how to ride one when we are born, but through trial and error, and a few small crashes along the way, we can learn to do it.
Similar principles create the basis for both perception and navigation. We make and strengthen neural connections as we move around our environment and conjure our perception of the space that surrounds us.
But there’s a catch: sometimes our past learnings blind us to future truths. Watch the video below — we’re all biased towards seeing faces in our environment. This preference causes us to ignore the shadow cues telling us it is the back end of a mask. Instead, we rely on tried and tested routes within our brains, generating the image of another face.
This illusion illustrates how difficult it can be to change our minds. Our identity and expectations are based on past experiences. It can take too much cognitive energy to break down the frameworks in our minds.
Elegant machinery
As I explore in my latest book published last year, The Science of Fate, this research touches on one of life’s biggest mysteries: our individual capacity for choice.
For me, there’s something beautiful about viewing ourselves as elegant machinery. Input from the world is processed in our unique brains to produce the output that is our behavior.
However, many of us may not wish to relinquish the idea of being free agents. Biological determinism, the idea that human behavior is entirely innate, rightly makes people nervous. It’s abhorrent to think that appalling acts in our history were perpetrated by people who were powerless to stop them, because that raises the specter that they might happen again.
Perhaps instead, we could think of ourselves as not being restricted by our genes. Acknowledging the biology that influences our individuality may then empower us to better pool our strengths and harness our collective cognitive capacity to shape the world for the better.
Solid Rock Baptist Church, 1337 E. Fifth St., will feature their Happy Hour Bible Study at 9:30 a.m. Sunday. The teacher and expositor will be Vanilla Marie Chillow. The menu will come from the subject: “Jesus Calls Phillip and Nathaniel” taken from John 1:43-51. For more information, call 409-983-7654.
Solid Rock Baptist Church, 1337 E. Fifth St., will sponsor an Usher’s Workshop and Conference Worship Service during the 11 a.m. Sunday morning worship service. The presenters will be the members of Usher Board No. 3.
The church is practicing the social distance recommendations given by Gov. Greg Abbott n his minimum standard health protocols checklist for churches and places of worship. For more information, call 409-983-7654.
Solid Rock Baptist Church, 1337 E. Fifth St., will present their New Year’s Eve Worship Service at 10 a.m. Dec. 31. The New Year’s Eve Message will be delivered by the Rev. Richard Keaton Nash.
The church is practicing the social distance recommendations given by Gov. Greg Abbott in his minimum standard health protocols checklist for churches and places of worship. For more information, call 409-983-7654.
Solid Rock Baptist Church, 1337 E. Fifth St., will present their New Year’s Day First Fruits Worship Service at 6 p.m. Friday, Jan. 1.
The New Year’s Day Message will be delivered by the Rev. Robert Earl Collins of Road Way To Glory Ministries in Groves.
The church is practicing the social distance recommendations given by Gov. Greg Abbott in his minimum standard health protocols checklist for churches and places of worship. For more information, call 409-983-7654.
Religion announcements must be submitted by 5 p.m. Thursday to appear in the Saturday publication. Announcements may be emailed to panews@panews.com or sent to Port Arthur News, 2349 Memorial Blvd. Please provide a contact number to The News in case questions arise.
Los Angeles, CA—December 10, 2020—In commemoration of Universal Human Rights Month, observed each December, Scientology Network’s Documentary Showcase is proud to announce its airing of the award-winning documentary Mully. It is the unforgettable story of a man born into poverty who went on to become one of the most celebrated humanitarians in world, airing on December 11 at 8 p.m. ET/PT.
Set in Kenya, Mully is the incredible and inspiring life story of Charles Mutua Mully, who was abandoned by his parents at the age of six and went from begging in the streets to becoming a self-made multimillionaire entrepreneur. At the pinnacle of his success, he shocks friends and family alike by using all his wealth to rescue, feed, adopt and educate over 20,000 homeless children who were living in the streets.
Mully captures the emotionally charged, turbulent twists and turns of Charles Mully’s life. It includes dramatic reenactments of his youth and candid interviews with his wife and children, who were initially opposed to Charles’s determination to turn their lives upside down for the sake of helping strangers. At times, the film plays like a scripted Hollywood feature, simply because this extraordinary man follows no other path but the one his heart tells him to follow.
Mully received numerous honors and awards, including the Austin Film Festival’s Audience Award and a 2016 Hot Docs Top Ten Audience Favorite.
Executive produced by Paul Blavin and directed by filmmaker Scott Haze, Mully is one of the great stories of human rights in action.
Watch the documentary on Scientology Network, DIRECTV Channel 320 or watch live on scientology.tv.
ABOUT DOCUMENTARY SHOWCASE
Fundamental to Scientology is a humanitarian mission that extends to some 200 nations with programs for human rights, human decency, literacy, morality, drug prevention and disaster relief. For this reason, the Scientology Network provides a platform for Independent filmmakers who embrace a vision of building a better world.
DOCUMENTARY SHOWCASE debuts films weekly from award-winning Independent filmmakers whose goal is to improve society by raising awareness of social, cultural and environmental issues.
For more information, visit scientology.tv/docs.
The Scientology Network debuted on March 12, 2018. Since launching, the Scientology Network has been viewed in 240 countries and territories worldwide in 17 languages. Satisfying the curiosity of people about Scientology, the network takes viewers across six continents, spotlighting the everyday lives of Scientologists; showing the Church as a global organization; and presenting its social betterment programs that have touched the lives of millions worldwide. The network also showcases documentaries by Independent filmmakers who represent a cross section of cultures and faiths, but share a common purpose of uplifting communities.
Broadcast from Scientology Media Productions, the Church’s global media center in Los Angeles, the Scientology Network is available on DIRECTV Channel 320 and live streaming on scientology.tv, mobile apps and via the Roku, Amazon Fire and Apple TV platforms.
Religious worship is “an antibody against despair” during a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on Newsmax TV.
“I am absolutely adamant that religion is most essential now,” Boteach told co-hosts Rachel Rollar and Joel Pinion on Friday’s ”American Agenda.” “I don’t only want to turn on the TV and hear how, ‘We’re all gonna die. We’re all gonna get infected.’ It’s not scientific to even bring this type of pessimism. There are endless scientific studies that show how essential prayer is to our psychological well-being.
“My God, there were even studies that show that when someone is being prayed for and they don’t even have knowledge they’re being prayed for, there is probably a positive outcome. It’s amazing.”
Boteach and the Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life, joined ”American Agenda” to discuss religion after a federal court denied a San Diego church the right to hold an indoor Christmas service amid the state’s COVID-19-related restrictions.
Boteach, who made a failed bid for Congress in 2012 when he lost to Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., added, “prayer is a vaccine to hopelessness and worship is an antibody against despair.”
Pavone credited President Donald Trump for fighting against secular forces.
“There’s a terrible ignorance about our history and I’m very grateful for President Trump taking such a strong stand against the effort to minimize religion, cancel religion, cancel Christmas and also revise our history,” Pavone said.
“If people understand the history of the United States of America, they understand it was founded on religious freedom. And that’s why the president has taken specific efforts to make sure our children understand that history very, very well.”
Important: See Newsmax TV now carried in 70 million cable homes, on DirecTV Ch. 349, Dish Network Ch. 216, Xfinity Ch. 1115, Spectrum, U-verse Ch. 1220, FiOS Ch. 615, Optimum Ch. 102, Cox cable, Suddenlink Ch. 102, CenturyLink 1209, Mediacom Ch. 277, Frontier 615 orFind More Cable Systems – Click Here.
Judging by the diversity of holidays observed this time of year, humans seem to have a need for a communal celebration in early winter. As the days grow shorter and cold weather grips much of the northern hemisphere, it’s comforting to be reminded that sunlight and warmth (and the crops they nourish) will return. Thus, many of these festivals, from the Saturnalia of pre-Christian Rome to today’s Christmas, often feature use of evergreens and lights and encourage merriment and gift-giving.
Winter festivals have evolved over time, and as the centuries passed, the way people celebrate them has also changed. In previous ages, government sought to compel people to behave in certain ways when it came to religion. Theocratic European states of the Middle Ages believed there was only one “correct” expression of Christianity and forced everyone to follow the national or local model. But the right of conscience could not be squelched forever. Dissent was inevitable, and it came with righteous fury and, unfortunately, a similar spirit of religious intolerance. America’s early Puritans made it illegal to celebrate Christmas, considering it “popish.”
After America’s revolution, our Founders decided to chart a different course: They disentangled religion and government, putting each on its own path to secure its own destiny and success. In doing so, they gave each of us a great gift: the power to decide for ourselves what faith, if any, we will follow and how we will practice it.
Today, there are some people who, like those old theocrats in Europe, are convinced that only their mode of worship is right and true. At this time of year, we often hear them complain about an alleged “war on Christmas.” What these people are really saying is that they are angry that not everyone chooses to celebrate the same way they do.
For millions of Americans, Christmas is a deeply religious holiday that marks the birth of Jesus. They attend religious services, pray, sing hymns and listen to scripture readings. For others, the holiday is primarily secular, with figures like Santa Claus, Frosty the Snowman and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer taking front and center. And many Americans mix the secular with the sacred and embrace elements of both.
But there are other choices. Some Americans celebrate holidays such as Hanukkah, Kwanzaa or Diwali, and others don’t celebrate at all. It’s a wonderful time of the year, really, because we have the right to choose.
The Christian nationalists among us who enjoy playing the role of the “Christmas Police” would love nothing better than to compel the rest of us to celebrate the holiday in just one way — theirs. They press government officials to display Christmas symbols in public places. They seek to infuse our public schools with pageants and events that elevate the spiritual elements of Christmas — something better done in a church. They even complain when they fail to hear “Merry Christmas” from a clerk in a big-box store or their coffee cup doesn’t look Christmas-y enough.
These people seem to think that unless the government, culture and even big business are actively endorsing their faith, then it’s under attack. In fact, religion does best when left to prosper on its own; it does not need the interference of the state. America’s tradition of separation of church and state has gifted us a vibrant, diverse religious life marked by thousands of Christian and non-Christian faiths. You are free to choose one. You are free to create your own, highly personal spiritual experience. You are free to reject them all. You are also free to change your mind, to argue, to debate and to contend for your ideas. What you’re not permitted to do is employ the power of the government as your theological enforcer.
During this time of year, let’s reflect on one of the greatest gifts we, as a people, enjoy: complete religious freedom secured by our constitutional promise of separation between church and state. That freedom gives you the right to worship or not as you see fit, as long as your actions don’t harm others or take away their rights.
This means that Dec. 25 can be a deeply moving and profoundly spiritual experience — if that’s what you want. Or it can be a day to watch silly holiday movies and open presents. Or it can be just another day on the calendar.
Freedom of conscience gives us the right to make that choice. What a wonderful gift it is. Let’s be thankful for it all year ’round.
Rob Boston is editor of Church & State magazine, published by Americans United for Separation of Church and State in Washington. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.
(RNS) — On Christmas Eve, members of Holy Comforter Episcopal Church in Tallahassee, Florida, will gather in the parking lot for a service that’s part tailgate, part worship and part family reunion.
Holy Comforter has been hosting indoor worship with strict limits on attendance since the beginning of the pandemic. But at this time in the liturgical calendar and this time in the pandemic, said the Rev. Jerry Smith, rector of Holy Comforter, people need to be together.
“We’re now Zoomed out. That’s part of the problem,” said Smith. “We don’t want to sit in front of the TV screen anymore. It’s not the same as being in each other’s presence.”
While many Christian congregations have moved services online and found new ways to build virtual communities, faith remains a tangible, in-person experience at its core for many.
For some churches, that’s meant going to court to challenge restrictions on in-person gatherings. For others, it means doing the best they can and keeping the faith till they can all be together again.
Holy Comforter’s leaders have followed advice from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and local medical professionals to create services that are safe. Early in the pandemic, only 10 people were allowed in the church for one service a week. More recently, the church moved to three services, with a 25-person limit. The church also livestreams services.
The Rev. Jerry Smith. Photo courtesy of Holy Comforter Episcopal Church
Having a few more people in person gives people a taste for what they have been missing, said Smith.
“They can’t pass the peace, but we have this time in the liturgy where people are waving and smiling at each other,” he said. “There’s a need to do that. I think the danger is that people get so frustrated that they throw caution to the wind. And we can’t let them do that.”
The pandemic has been particularly difficult for immigrant churches, said the Rev. Dieufort Fleurissaint of the Haitian Evangelical Pastors Association. Already facing economic challenges, a lack of resources and sometimes issues relating to their citizenship status, many immigrants regard church as one place where they can gather to share their burdens while rejoicing as well. They rely on singing and prayer, as well as hugs and embraces from each other, to keep their faith strong.
Just holding hands to pray can be powerful, he said.
“We are a community of fellowship,” he said. “It brings great spiritual benefit when we can gather together.”
The Rev. Laura Everett, executive director of the Massachusetts Council of Churches, has been reminded in the pandemic that Christianity is not just a set of ideas, but a set of practices and relationships that have been muted or changed by the pandemic.
The past nine months have been the longest that Everett has been absent from a church since she had a conversion experience as an eighth-grader. She misses the chaos and the mess of worship services but particularly the common, small acts of grace that come from in-person connection: putting her hand on someone, for instance, who has been sick, and praying for their healing.
The Rev. Laura Everett. Courtesy photo
“I have missed that echo of voices when we say the Lord’s Prayer, those well-worn words where my voice will drop out sometimes because I am so tired or so sad and other people carry the prayer for me,” she said.
“I know that can happen on Zoom and it does. But I miss sitting next to them. I miss the smell of old lady perfume and the sound of cough drops being unwrapped, the smell of incense, the call and response and talk back.”
Kevin Singer attends and helps lead worship at a campus of Vintage Church in Raleigh, North Carolina. The church, made up of mostly younger families and young professionals, has a contemporary worship style and meets in the gymnasium of a Christian school.
The church has been meeting in person, with chairs set up in clusters, Singer said, and people conscientiously keep their distance.
That makes the longing for community and connection even deeper, he said. “There is always that feeling of, I wish I could take this mask off and give you a hug,” he said.
People dart out of the building after services, instead of hanging around for what he called “the mingling of souls,” which happens in more normal times. And during the service, he feels as if they are all passive observers rather than participants. He likens it to “Christian karaoke.”
Singer also said that COVID-19 has made people suspicious of each other as a potential threat to their health. That makes the intimacy and vulnerability among friends in a congregation difficult.
“You can’t be vulnerable without the sense that I should not be this close to you,” he said.
The Rev. Constance Cherry, professor emeritus of worship and pastoral ministry at Indiana Wesleyan University, said many worship leaders and pastors are concerned about the long-term effects of moving from in-person worship to online services. Will people return, she wonders, when bans are lifted? Or will they prefer to take part online?
Worship in many Protestant churches, especially evangelical churches, Cherry said, has become a spectator experience, something “leaders do for the congregation.”
“What you have ended up with, in hundreds of churches and across denominations, are people up front, on a stage, producing worship for the pleasure of the people,” she said. “To me, this has put an exclamation point on a problem we already had.”
Vanessa White, associate professor of spirituality and ministry at Catholic Theological Union in Chicago, said online worship has separated people not only from each other but from the rhythms of worship — of getting dressed, leaving the house and going to a sacred space at a specific time with a specific group of people.
She goes to her parish to serve as a lector one week out of the month, reading some of the Bible texts for Mass. The other weeks, she watches online — but not in casual clothes from her couch. Instead, she tries to set up a sacred space at home, as she does when leading virtual retreats.
Before Mass starts, she clears off her living room table and puts a cloth on it, then a candle and cross. She dresses up and picks up a book of Bible readings, so she’s ready to take part. White said that worship involves signs and symbols, along with prayers and other actions.
That’s something she wants other worshipers to remember.
“We are people of sign and symbol,” she said. “Just because you are in this virtual time frame, it’s like we are throwing out the signs and symbols. We don’t have to do that.”
In October, with “Chromatica” having registered as a modest hit, Grande’s own new album, “Positions,” leaked online before its official release. Cordero, who liked Grande well enough but found her new music to be lacking, shared a link to the unreleased songs, much to the consternation of Grande fans, who worried that the bootlegged versions would damage the singer’s commercial prospects.
Taking on the role of volunteer internet detectives, Grande fans proceeded to spend days playing Whac-a-Mole by flagging links to the unauthorized album as they proliferated across the internet. But Cordero, bored and sensing their agita, decided to bait them even further by tweeting — falsely — that he’d subsequently been fined $150,000 by Grande’s label for his role in spreading the leak. “is there any way I can get out of this,” he wrote. “I’m so scared.” He even shared a picture of himself crying.
“They were rejoicing,” Cordero recalled giddily of the Grande fans he’d fooled, who spread the word far and wide that the leaker — a Gaga lover, no less — was being punished. “Sorry but I feel no sympathy,” one Grande supporter wrote on Reddit. “Charge him, put him in jail. you can’t leak an album by the world’s biggest pop star and expect no consequences.”
This was pop fandom in 2020: competitive, arcane, sales-obsessed, sometimes pointless, chaotic, adversarial, amusing and a little frightening — all happening almost entirely online. While music has long been intertwined with internet communities and the rise of social networks, a growing faction of the most vocal and dedicated pop enthusiasts have embraced the term “stan” — taken from the 20-year-old Eminem song about a superfan turned homicidal stalker — and are redefining what it means to love an artist.
On what is known as Stan Twitter — and its offshoots on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Tumblr and various message boards — these devotees compare No. 1s and streaming statistics like sports fans do batting averages, championship wins and shooting percentages. They pledge allegiance to their favorites like the most rabid political partisans or religious followers. They organize to win awards show polls, boost sales and raise money like grass roots activists. And they band together to pester — or harass, and even dox — those who may dare to slight the stars they have chosen to align themselves with.
… According to journalists who cover religion, this was the year’s … language: ‘Yeah, freedom of religion means freedom of worship, that … showdown was the most important religion-news story of 2020. … Hillsong pastor Carl Lentz.
As religion newsmakers of the year, …
ABC/Craig Sjodin(LOS ANGELES) — Following The Bachelorette‘s season 16 finale on Tuesday, Ivan Hall shed some light on his conversation with Tayshia Adams about religion that led to his shocking elimination.
Adams, whose Bachelorette journey ended with an engagement to Zac Clark, an addiction specialist from Haddonfield, New Jersey, cited differences differences in religious beliefs as the reason for sending the 28-year-old aeronautical engineer home.
“She only wants to date a Christian and I’m not religious,” Hall claimed in response to a message from Bachelor alum Caila Quinn after his elimination, according to the New York Post.
“I’m open to and have dated any religion,” he continued.
“I feel like we started off really strong, and we found that trust,” Adams explained in a conversation with Ivan before letting him go.
“But also, this past week, we talked about some important subjects that I feel like we both needed to have, but there are some things kinda posed concern,” she added.
“I wish I could say that there were a lot of red flags prior to this week, and there haven’t been,” Tayshia continued. At the end of the day, religion is part of my morals, my beliefs.”
Adams has the Bible verse Psalm 46:5 posted in her Instagram bio, which reads: “God is within her, she will not fall; God will help her at break of day.”
A 2,000-year-old ritual bath dating to the time of Jesus has been discovered by Israeli archaeologists at Gethsemane, where Jesus prayed just before his crucifixion.
The archaeological excavations by the Israel Antiquities Authority ahead of a pending construction unearthed the bath near the modern church at Gethsemane, together with the remains of a church from the Byzantine period around 1,500 years ago, The Jerusalem Post reported.
“The discovery of the ritual bath may therefore hint at the origin of the place’s ancient name, Gethsemane (Gat Shemanim, ‘oil press’), a place where ritually pure oil was produced near the city.”
The evidence suggests the ancient church was founded at the end of the Byzantine period in the sixth century and continued to be used during the Umayyad period in the eighth century.
The finds were uncovered with the assistance of scholars from the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum.
They were presented on Dec. 21 with the participation of the Custos of the Holy Land, Fr. Francesco Patton.
The Church of Gethsemane is also known as the Church of the Agony or Church of All Nations and is at the foot of the famous Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.
It is one of Christianity’s most important churches and is visited by thousands of pilgrims each year.
PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS BETRAYED
The modern church was built on the spot where Christian tradition holds that Jesus was betrayed on the night before his crucifixion.
Christian belief says that Jesus used to pray on the Mount of Olives according to the Gospel of Like (22:39) and prayed here on the night before the crucifixion (Mattew. 26:36).
Amit Re ’em, Jerusalem District Archaeologist for the Israel Antiquities Authority, said the discovery of the ritual bath “probably confirms the place’s ancient name, Gethsemane.”
“Most ritual baths from the Second Temple period have been found in private homes and public buildings, but some have been discovered near agricultural installations and tombs, in which case the ritual bath is located in the open,” he said.
Workers building a new visitor center and foot tunnel linking the modern church to the Kidron Valley found the remains.
“The discovery of the ritual bath may therefore hint at the origin of the place’s ancient name, Gethsemane (Gat Shemanim, ‘oil press’), a place where ritually pure oil was produced near the city.”
The finds from the excavations are to be put on display at the visitor center when it opens.
“The discovery of this bath, unaccompanied by buildings, probably attests to the existence of an agricultural industry here 2,000 years ago – possibly producing oil or wine,” said Re ’em.
OIL AND WINE PRODUCTION
“The Jewish laws of purification obliged workers involved in oil and wine production to purify themselves.”
Custos of the Holy Land, a senior friar, Fr. Francesco Patton, said it was an “important” discovery.
“Gethsemane is one of the most important sanctuaries in the Holy Land, because in this place the tradition remembers the confident prayer of Jesus and his betrayal and because every year millions of pilgrims visit and pray in this place,” he said.
“Even the latest excavations conducted on this site have confirmed the antiquity of the Christian memory and tradition linked to the place, and this is very important for us and for the spiritual meaning connected with the archeological findings.
“I greet with great pleasure this fruitful cooperation between the Custody of the Holy Land, the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, and the Israel Antiquities Authority, and I hope that we will be able to join our scientific competences for further future collaborations.”
Tayshia Adams just wasn’t down for an interfaith relationship. At least, that’s what Ivan Hall claims was the reason the pair didn’t work out on The Bachelorette.
During Tuesday night’s season finale, fans were surprised when the Bachelorette suddenly revealed that “morals and my beliefs” came between them, as she instead accepted Zac Clark‘s proposal.
Ivan told Tayshia onscreen, “All the girls I have dated in the past, it never ended because of religion or anything, but I know that’s something that’s important to you.”
Viewers hadn’t seen the duo explicitly talk about their religious views before. So when they simply mentioned it was the deal breaker that ultimately swayed her decision, we needed to know what really went down.
Fortunately for fans, Ivan is now spilling the tea on what happened during their off-screen conversation and how he learned that religion was the major barrier between the ABC stars.
On PodcastOne’s Off The Vine podcast on Wednesday, Dec. 23, Ivan explained that the fantasy suites were their one opportunity to have hours of uninterrupted time to discuss raising kids and other life priorities. It turns out, religion got brought up then, as well.
The Texan revealed, “I knew we were going to have to talk about it eventually, because I could tell she was at least, that she was Christian, but we hadn’t talked about it in the past. But she said maybe once to me that she relied on her faith a lot.”
Ivan went on, “That’s how it came up, Tayshia was like, ‘So what do you think about raising kids with religion and what not?’ And that’s when we dove into it. And I kind of explained to Tayshia, ‘Listen, I’m agnostic. A lot of people confuse it for being atheist. Atheist is not what I am.'”
He views atheism as “taking a hard stance that there is not God,” which is not his belief. “Agnostic is strictly saying ‘I don’t know,’ basically. And that’s just how I feel,” he explained.
The aeronautical engineer continued, “When she starts asking me my beliefs like, ‘Is there heaven or is there a hell?’ that kind of stuff, I’m going to be like, ‘Yeah, my answer is going to be different than yours because I’m going to tell our kids I don’t know what there is.'”
Ivan told his date he was “completely fine” with her telling their potential children about her views and taking them to church.
“In my past, I’ve dated women who are Christian, I’ve dated women who are Muslim. I’m completely open to it, it is what it is,” Ivan added. “You can have whatever religion you want, my main focus are the values and morals you have.”
It appears that’s where things may have differed between him and the 30-year-old former phlebotomist. He said on the podcast, “She wanted to date someone who is Christian. And that’s completely fine and that’s how a lot of people are.”
However, he hinted that it would have been easier for everyone involved if she would have been more upfront about it. Ivan dished, “It does suck or whatever that you probably could’ve just eliminated X amount of people in the beginning for that.”
The 28-year-old went on to say that when he brought up the term “interfaith relationship” when discussing their future, the Bachelor in Paradise alum didn’t understand what he meant. “I don’t think Tayshia even knew what that was or ever really thought about the idea of dating a non-Christian,” he explained.
Though he thinks interfaith relationships bring a lot of “value” to a dynamic, he feels that Tayshia was just “not into” it.
Furthermore, he wasn’t down to be with a life partner that didn’t “accept me for just who I am,” because he never wants to change himself for someone else. “I don’t really want to be with that person anyways. So that’s kind of how I rationalized it in my head,” he said.
It seems like it’s all water under the bridge now. As the science whiz put it, “The chapter is closed. It just is what it is. I still care for Tayshia, she’s cool, all that stuff. We had a good time.”
In the end, he’s happy she ended up with Zac. “He’s a great guy, I really do like him. I really appreciated the guys in the house that I considered to be real and didn’t do stuff for the camera,” Ivan continued. “He’s a class act. He’s a man, I respect the guy to death.”
The Filipino hunk said that Zac and Tayshia “had a ton of chemistry going on, and I didn’t realize that.”
He admitted that from the outside looking in on their relationship, “I guess one would question their lifestyles are on opposite coasts.” As Ivan pointed out, “He’s sober, it seemed like Tayshia honestly liked to drink… I don’t know how that plays into it.”
But he also gave Zac some credit, saying, “I know for certain, I could tell, that Zac was in love with Tayshia. Like, before all of us he was there first and he’s a great guy and he’s going to treat her right.” Ivan added, “I wish them the best though.”
Editor’s note: For many years, Maryknoll Fr. Bob McCahill has been sending an annual letter to friends at Christmastime, chronicling his experience living among the people of Bangladesh. Since 1984, NCR has published his annual letter in the Christmas issue. The following is an edited version of his 2020 letter.
Dear Friends,
Last year, my first year in Chandpur District, I expected (due to previous experiences) to be held in suspicion by many Muslims who supposed l had come to convert them to my Christian faith. Thus, they merely tolerated my presence among them. Now has begun my second year amidst them. Trust is growing, being built. Many are cooperating with me in my efforts to heal and make better the lives of children. In all the 13 districts I have lived since coming to Bangladesh 45 years ago, the first two years are characterized by a movement of peoples’ suspicion of me to trust in me and from toleration of me, to cooperation with me.
Jahangir, a poultry raiser (just 100 fowls; not quite on the scale of Iowa-Indiana) is glad to let me use his cell phone to make contact with parents of disabled children in his area. He sometimes helps me during my conversations on his phone because, frequently, I cannot understand what Bengali villagers say because they speak excitedly and so rapidly. Jahangir also recommends that I visit kids he knows are in need of hospital treatment, the very benefit I wish to provide.
When rain forced pedestrians on Chandpur town’s narrow sidewalk to seek dry refuge under shop awnings, I was invited into a store and given a stool to sit on. My benefactor was Shohidul Islam, a devout, prayer-cap wearing young man. As we conversed about religion, I emphasized the part played by prayer in the lives of both Muslims and Christians. Moreover, I pointed out that service to other persons is the fruit of true religion. I explained: “Shohidul, just as you have served me by giving me this stool to sit on, that too can be called a religious act.” His act of charity to me illustrated a Bengali maxim: “Service is the best religion.”
In a shoes store the red-bearded owner, Shams, was curious to learn why I work for children’s better health. He listened carefully, but skeptically, while I explained the God-given inspiration (when I was 19 years old) to spend my life as a missionary — a lifestyle not restricted to preaching, but rather, freed to serve persons in need. Jesus, a prophet in Islam, is Jesus, my model in life.
After I had spent much time to reach an island in the Meghna River, I still had to walk a bit to find Quddus, an incapacitated child. Sahel, a fast-pacing teenager, led the way. A dozen men and women gathered to hear me. Ayub Ali, the group’s spokesman, questioned me, and the group listened respectfully to my answers. The parents of Quddus feared going to the distant hospital I offered them. They know, however, they can call on me at any time if they decide to dare trusting in me. Was there any benefit in my visiting them? Perhaps they got a new idea about Christians and a bit more of trust in strangers.
We had agreed to meet by 9 a.m. at Block E of a hospital in Dhaka. They would come from a village six hours distant. After I had waited an extra hour for them, I was nervous. Farhad, a man unknown to me at that time, sensed my anxiety and volunteered to help me look for the absent ones. Without his help we may never have found one another. God blesses those who go out of their way to relieve others’ anxiety.
Although not much happens when I go there, I enjoy traveling an hour by bus to Shahrasti sub-district once a month. The government health complex personnel are attentive and supportive of what I am hoping to do for children. They cooperate whenever they can and steer me to needy children. One morning, I spent an hour searching for Fahim, age 5, whom I knew lived near the health complex, but I had forgotten the path to his home, so I lost some time. Correction: The time was not really lost. For people always notice when a stranger is genuinely solicitous for one of their own.
For several weeks, I had been unable to visit Shahebganj, the largest bazar on the “island” encircled by the Meghna River. A trawler delivered 30 of us there by 10 a.m. I walked to the homes of several children whom I had seen in previous months but found only one of them: Sumon. A teacher at the village school, Omar Farook, loaned us his loongi (sarong) so that Sumon could easily expose his crippled knees for a photograph. A generous man may give you the shirt off his back. Farook loaned us the loongi tied around his waist.
Two helpful teenagers, Ratool and Noori, helped me hunt for a home near village Dhali. Ratool is a recent high school graduate, and he was attracted to observe my dealing with a child’s mother. He likes to practice his English, called me an “ideal man,” and told me, “I want to follow you.” Then he questioned me: “What are you, a Muslim?” My single word reply: “Christian.” After a pause, Ratool admitted sadly: “But I thought you are a Muslim because you spoke the word. ‘Allah.’ ” Slowly, Ratool began to smile at his own narrow reasoning that only a person who calls the Creator “Allah” should be called ideal. How odd it is for us to allow people’s religious affiliation to influence our opinion of them.
I try to write about Bangladeshi Muslims (approximately 90% of the population) and Hindus ( around 10%) in a manner that stresses their good traits and the values they live by — for example: hospitality, and the love they have for their children. An optimistic view of them is generally true, so I refrain most of the time from describing irritants. Perhaps describing simple events and my thoughts about them will lead me to greater appreciation of people and of life. When I acknowledge the goodness of the people God places me among, gratitude becomes even more deeply rooted in my heart.
Mohkam Singh, a 65-year-old farmer from the Khalsa warrior community of Ludhiana, radiates a quiet conviction.
“What you see here is a Sachh Yug,” says Singh just outside a tent at the Singhu border. “Outside, there’s a Kal Yug where people are fighting to prove which religion is greater.”
Protesting farmers such as Mohkam are not only against the Centre’s new farm laws but are also against the erosion of the spiritual identity of agricultural communities across India. At both Singhu and Tikri borders, we witnessed a cry from farmers for recognition of their sacred relationship with the soil. For them, execution of the laws will not only play into the hands of private merchants but also disrupt their identity as “toilers and givers of grain.”
Not only that, the farming communities believe they are humanity’s call to conscience in the fight against climate change. Undermining them could shrink the scope of a collective movement towards a greener and more spiritually conscious planet.
While demonstrations, poetry readings, film screenings and ladles of generosity at langars have been highlighted as the means to surcharge the community spirit at these protest sites, it’s also important to understand the religious underpinnings of the farmers’ protests.
In the expansive demonstration spaces we visited last week, we saw the critical role of religion in informing this grassroots movement. The Nihang Sikhs, for instance, with their ornamental attires and displays of martial skills are here to set a different tone from a purely ceremonial one. Part-farmers, part-religious leaders, they believe the protests are a reassertion of the rights of the underclasses—farmers, women and religious minorities—while they are there to merely provide the spiritual impetus in this “holy land.”
The Nihangs asserted that the political leadership has undermined the solidity of the movement shaped by eclectic traditions from Punjab and Haryana, along with interfaith work.
Muslims from Punjab’s Malerkotla district, who have been helping the farmers since the inception of these protests, have now set up community kitchens on the borders. In return, Sikh farmers are rallying around their Muslim brethren during prayer rituals. A Muslim man from Malerkotla told me the only religion at these protests is the urge to stand together.
Around these sites, Christian trusts and philanthropists are doling out free medicines to ailing farmers and their families. Trolleys and vans with banners announcing interfaith work by Christian charitable organizations suggest this isn’t a one-dimensional movement.
At the community kitchens, Sikh women can be found flipping rotis beside Hindu woman sorting vegetables for the day’s langar. A few steps ahead, Muslims are preparing Biryani.
While the memories of the resilience of anti-CAA protestors across religious lines have invigorated the protests this year, the farmers want to keep their movement exclusive.
“The farm laws will tear apart the entire country,” said Mata Singh, a Sikh farmer. “Farming is fertility, and these laws will disrupt the cycle of life if they’re allowed to pass.”
Even the women have joined the chorus. They believe the protests are not just against the laws, but also against the upturning of the social and spiritual identities of farming women.
“Discrediting our value in the ecosystem is like discrediting the importance of tribal and agricultural deities across spiritual traditions,” they noted.
The farming women were especially critical of the inaction over the deaths at these protests, including that of Haryana-based Sikh priest Baba Ram Singh, who shot himself near Singhu “to express anger and pain against the government’s injustice.”
As the protests surge and the crackdowns escalate, more interfaith and community support groups will join to free the movement of the idea that it’s pandering to specific groups or communities. More religious leaders from different parts of India are already on their way to set up camp here.
It’s clear this isn’t just a reaction to the anti-farmer farm laws. This is a moment in time when political, social and spiritual forces have converged under unprecedented circumstances.
(Priyadarshini Sen is an Independent Journalist based in Delhi. She writes for Indian and US-based media. Views expressed are personal and do not necessarily reflect those of Outlook Magazine.)
<div><hr/>
<b><i>For in-depth, objective and more importantly balanced journalism, <a href="https://magazine.outlookindia.com/subscription?utm_source=story_page" rel="nofollow">Click here</a> to subscribe to Outlook Magazine </i></b>
<hr/>
</div>
There is an explanation for everything.If there really was an Exodus from Egypt, why don’t we possess any archaeological evidence of this event, in the form of garments or vessels buried in the sands of Sinai?That’s easy. God said to the Israelites: “Your clothing did not wear out… these 40 years” (Ex. 8:4) and “I will rain down food from the sky for you” (Ex. 16: 4). Our ancestors trekking to the Promised Land never discarded their vestments or cooked a single meal! Ergo: no pants or pottery for the archaeologists to dig up.How about that annoying little chronological discrepancy between the 14 billion years it took the universe to emerge according to science and the six days of Creation depicted by the Bible?Come, now: the expansion of the cosmos from the infinitesimal mass-energy point following the Big Bang occurred at lightning speed, and Einstein proved that at such velocities time slows down. Billions of years shrank to exactly six days!I never met a “rational” defense of the truth or value of Judaism that didn’t make me want to laugh like a hyena or take a second look at lunch. I did meet a fellow once who had been raised a strict Maimonidean. He believed that every bit of the theology purveyed, and ordinances prescribed, by the Torah made logical sense. He got into Harvard Medical School, opened up his first cadaver, doffed his yarmulke and left the fold.The writer of these lines, on the other hand, was taught by his parents to love the Jews with a passion as his family. No matter how much nonsense I may descry in aspects of Judeo-classical literature or quotidian Jewish praxis, I’m staying put.
But it can’t all come down to the heart, if for no other reason than that ahavat Yisrael, that visceral affection for, and devotion to, the Jewish people that was imbibed cum lacte by so many previous generations, is no longer a given for millions of Jews in the Diaspora and even in Israel. The Archimedean fulcrum upon which to leverage the continued and – God willing – enhanced loyalty of those segments of our nation that are fast falling away must involve a powerful appeal to the head: a painstaking, empirical, cost-benefit analysis of why identifying and acting as a committed Jew is the most sensible choice for modern members of our tribe.FINALLY, SOMEONE has taken up the gauntlet, and without making me want to snigger or regurgitate. In Judaism Straight Up: Why Real Religion Endures, computer science professor Moshe Koppel does not insult our intelligence; he challenges it, and on a level that requires a cerebrum functioning at maximum capacity. Employing (like a good Jew) complex business models, as well as game theory, futurism studies and a host of other disciplines, Koppel undertakes to demonstrate to the thinking person that he/she has it all wrong. In the book’s introduction he writes:“Between Heidi of Princeton [representing the secular, liberal, cosmopolitan Jew] and Shimen of the Polish shtetl [representing the traditional, observant, insulated Jew], one is narrow and Orthodox and the other is worldly and realistic. I will argue… that most people are confused about which one is which…. Then I’ll explain why every long-lived society that we know about is more like Shimen’s than like Heidi’s.”As theses go, this is one of the more counterintuitive, not to say quixotic. Koppel is asserting that Jewish custom and communalism constitute a more effective and sustainable mode of living than that practiced by today’s unfettered and unaffiliated children of utilitarianism. He pits old-time religion against the purportedly inexorable juggernaut of modern “scientific” existence, the Yiddishkeit of yore against the creeping nihilism, pulverizing individualism and entropic universalism of the contemporary West.Koppel’s eggheaded pugilism is a delight: think Platonic dialogue meets advanced Gemara class meets The Moscow Puzzles – all rendered accessible. The author’s prose is crisp and confident, and laced with subtle and not-so-subtle humor (don’t trust any guy who can go two hundred and fifty pages without cracking a joke). His characters – because, for all its scientific method, this is a book about people – are colorfully drawn and easy to identify with. His insights into the underlying mega-trends transforming contemporary human (not just Jewish) society are not only fascinating; they have the added advantage of being dead-on.Perhaps the book’s only drawback is an occupational hazard. Koppel is a scientist, and his guarded optimism about the trajectory of Judaism in Israel (as opposed to America) gives off a slight whiff of Marxian determinism: things are moving in the direction of an organic, synthetic, national-religious culture that will know how to maintain its vitality and independence while interacting positively with the wider world. From where I’m sitting (in Hod Hasharon – Koppel lives in Efrat) we’re going to need a little more Lenin with our Marx. Those of us who share Koppel’s dream of a strong, cross-denominational, nondoctrinaire and unselfconscious Judaism still have an uphill battle to fight. Judaism Straight Up is the blueprint for where we should be headed. The writer is a professor of Arabic literature and Islamic history and the author of John Lennon and the Jews: A Philosophical Rampage. JUDAISM STRAIGHT UP WHY REAL RELIGION ENDURES By Moshe Koppel Maggid 161 pages; $24.95
Spilling the tea. Tayshia Adams shocked Bachelor Nation when she sent Ivan Hallpacking during the season 16 finale — and now the fan-favorite is speaking out.
After a season filled with twists and turns, the former phlebotomist, 30, accepted Zac Clark‘s proposal during the Tuesday, December 22, episode of The Bachelorette. Earlier in the night, some viewers were heartbroken when Adams said goodbye to Hall, 28, after briefly discussing their differences in religion. While the conversation was cut short on air, the Texas native stopped by Kaitlyn Bristowe‘s “Off the Vine” podcast to detail the dramatic end to his relationship with Adams.
“In this short amount of time, you have to have deep talks and talk about a lot of different things,” the aeronautical engineer said on the podcast episode, available on Thursday, December 24. “I was always trying to kind of calculate when I could talk about certain things with Tayshia. … In fantasy suites, I knew that would be our one opportunity to have hours and hours of uninterrupted time.”
The pair spent an overnight date in an old-school Airstream trailer and got to talking about how they hoped to raise their kids should they end up together at the end of the show. Hall admitted that he “knew” the topic of religion would come up “eventually” — and that they might not see eye-to-eye. While Adams is Christian, Hall identifies as agnostic.
“We hadn’t talked about it in the past but she said maybe once to me that she relied on her faith a lot,” Hall explained. “In the fantasy suite, that was really the first opportunity I felt like we could really have a good amount of time to talk about it. For some people who aren’t familiar with people who aren’t religious … it’s a lot to take in, honestly.”
As the Bachelor in Paradise alum parted ways with Hall, she informed him that religion was a big part of her life and that she couldn’t quite find a way to compromise on her beliefs. The goodbye came as a shock to viewers, who didn’t get to see inside the pair’s deep discussion. While many speculated on social media that Hall had revealed he’s an atheist, he emphasized that there’s a big difference between atheism and agnostic beliefs.
“[Being] atheist is taking a hard stance that there is no God and that’s not what I believe at all,” Hall said on the podcast. “Agnostic is strictly saying, ‘I don’t know,’ basically. That’s just how I feel. I feel like I don’t know and I honestly feel like no one really knows.”
Though he doesn’t consider himself a religious person, Hall noted that he doesn’t have a problem with anyone else’s beliefs. “My main focus are the moral and values that you have,” he said. “That’s what’s most important to me. And for Tayshia it’s something different, where she, I guess, wanted to date someone who is Christian. … It is what it is and I don’t blame her for it.”
“We utilized fantasy suites for what they’re really meant for. Yes, you know, there’s a stigma behind it. But also, it’s an opportunity to have conversations that you might not want to have on camera,” she told Us Weekly exclusively of her final moments with Hall. “And we had a lot of conversations about what we thought our future would look like, what it looked like raising kids and our beliefs and everything like that. So, religion is one thing that we did talk about, but we talked about many other things. And I feel like there were reasons why we both felt like, you know, it might not align.” Listen to Here For the Right Reasons to get inside scoop about the Bachelor franchise and exclusive interviews from contestants
There were no major blow-ups in the latest episode of “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City,” but there were major developments and/or revelations for five of the six women.
• Meredith eats at Toscano with Heather Gay and Jen Shah, and they press her for information. She’s vague about whether she’s seeing (or has seen) anyone else, and makes vague references to how she and her husband have to work things out and learn to communicate with each other.
“When the [expletive] hits the fan between Seth and I, and I start to think about us not being together, that’s when you start to realize how fortunate you are to be together,” Meredith says — and the thought of him not being in her life is “a pivotal point” for her.
“I do know we genuinely do love each other,” she says, “and I think that counts for a lot.”
Jen isn’t buying it, she says, because she “knows Meredith isn’t telling me everything.”
• As Jen and Whitney Rose talk about Meredith and Seth, Jen offers this opinion: “If you’re not getting it from home, you’re going to go somewhere else.”
Whitney says she doesn’t know what Jen is talking about. “Maybe you don’t know, but some people might know,” Jen says, adding, “You have to ask Meredith.”
But in a confessional later, Jen says, “People know and Meredith knows and I think Seth knows.” A producer asks — know what?
Jen says that, several months earlier, she was in New York with Meredith and she met a man who said Meredith is “the love of my life. I’m going to marry her.’ Which left her “so confused.”
“The guy says, ‘I’ll make sure Meredith gets upstairs,’” Jen says, adding, “Clearly, there was something going on.”
Heather comes clean
On a trip to Heather’s Beauty Lab + Laser for a facial and “tons of Botox,” Whitney says she’s “starting to believe” her father is serious about battling his drug addiction this time. And both Whitney and Heather talk about how hard it can be to live in a state dominated by the LDS Church.
“If you’re an addict and you’re religious here, like, it’s not that you have a disease,” Whitney says. “You’re a sinner.”
Heather agrees. “We look at it as an absolute choice … and this is the consequence of your bad choices. And that’s how my family felt after my divorce.”
In a confessional, Heather adds: “In my experience, if you get divorced in the Mormon Church and you’re a man, it’s much easier.” Her ex-husband can remarry and “still have full church status,” but she feels she’s been marked as unworthy. And she doesn’t want to remarry and try to blend a family for fear that it might not work out and cause her daughters further trauma.
“I just want to put my head down and not screw their lives up any more than we already have,” Heather says. “And then I’ll just, like, implode. That’s my plan.”
Whitney says that “one of the things” she “hates so badly” about living in Utah is, “there’s a thumb over you that you’re not good enough. You will never be good enough because of what you are born into and the fact that you’re a woman.”
Heather agrees that she’s “absolutely under the Mormon culture thumb — a hundred percent,” and that she’s been trying to “straddle the fence” between being in or out of the church.
But, with Whitney’s encouragement, she makes a big decision. She tells her three teenage daughters about her “double life” and her desire to break with the LDS Church.
“I want to date and I want to go out and I want to drink and I want to do all these things,” she tells them. “And there’s so much shame and so much fear.”
“There shouldn’t be, though,” says 16-year-old Ashley, “Because we, like, support you. It hurts me to see what you’ve had to go through.” All three girls offer their support.
“I have been wrestling with this for so long, and I should have just come out to them in the beginning. … It feels like a huge weight is off my chest,” Heather says, adding, “I can now be the mom that I really want to be. And not be the mom that the church wants me to be.”
Whitney is worried
Whitney’s optimism about her father’s future takes a hit when he says his therapist feels he’s ready to get an apartment and go back to work. Whitney is not pleased — he’s been in sober living for 21 days, and the program is designed to last 90 days.
“It’s a “huge red flag for me,” she says. “I’m really worried that if my dad leaves the program now, he’s not going to recover.”
Jen deals with depression
Jen says that the death of her father a year earlier, combined with her husband, Sharrieff, “being gone all the time” for his job as an assistant football coach for the University of Utah, left her “very depressed,” and she “had to go on medication for anxiety and depression.”
“Sharrieff was, like, ‘No, you don’t need medication. You pray, and you just get your mind right.’ … “Well, guess what, that didn’t really work for me.”
She admits she was “lashing out at everybody” and that it “almost cost me my marriage.” Sharrieff “was done with me acting out,” and told her he was leaving. “That was, like, my rock bottom.” But, she adds, she was “scared” to go on medication, fearing it was “a sign of weakness.”
Her family staged an intervention, and her son, Sharrieff Jr., “told me … ‘You need to take the medication, and I don’t think any less of you and I love you.’”
That helped her accept the need for the medication, because she was “ashamed … I want to be Wonder Woman and super mom to them. I don’t want them to think that they have to take care of me.”
Workaholic Lisa
Things got a bit tense at the Barlow house when the family spent an evening writing down their goals — and Lisa’s were almost exclusively related to her business interests.
When a producer asks her husband, John, what percentage of his time with Lisa is work-related, he hesitates. “I’m trying to think the best way to answer that. It’s probably 90%,” he says, chuckling a bit. “I’d love for her to slow down. I think it will happen. It just might be 40 years from now.”
And later, John says, “I think we need to figure out a way for us to, like, spend time just being together. And not on our phones.”
Lisa is already engrossed in her phone, sending business texts. ”I enjoy working,” Lisa says. “And, right now, like, my five-year goal is to have a billion-dollar brand. And I don’t see why that’s not attainable. … Warren Buffet didn’t stop buying and building companies, why should I? I don’t think it’s a problem, do you?”
“Kind of,” John says.
“That irritates me so much,” Lisa says, “You know what? I don’t want someone telling me I need to say no. I know when I need to say no.”
They both look irritated.
Simmering feud
For the first time in weeks, there’s no fighting between Mary Cosby and Jen. But the animosity remains. Mary isn’t happy when she sees Jen at the Sundance-adjacent fashion show.
“I just want to enjoy the fashion,” Mary says. “I don’t care where she sits. She can sit on my lap.”
It seems more than a bit contrived, however, when Mary sits right next to Jen. And when Mary tells Jen she looks “pretty,” Jen does not reply, staring at her with a blank — perhaps annoyed — face.
Simmering feud, part 2?
For weeks, we’ve been wondering if Jen and Brooks Marks — Meredith’s 21-year-old son — would come into open conflict over the women’s relationship. But if it happens, maybe Meredith won’t have anything to do with it.
When Seth and five models walk the runway wearing his designs, Jen comments that they are “all the same. … I mean, does one tracksuit make a collection? I don’t know.”
(Brooks appears to be wearing a tracksuit that’s different from the five that follow him down the runway — although those five do appear to be the same.)
Jen does say that she’s been “rockin’” one of Brooks’ tracksuits “for months. … Hopefully, he makes a second one soon and then I can wear that one.”
Father and son
Brooks Facetimes his father, Seth, and lays on some additional guilt because Seth had to work in Ohio and couldn’t be at the fashion show. “I am your child asking you to come be a father in my life and you won’t. I feel a little bit hurt,” Brooks says.
“I’m getting anxiety from this conversation,” Seth says.
Memorable moments
• Meredith makes it clear that she has no intention of moving back east to be with Seth. “I really don’t want to live in Ohio. Nothing against Ohio, I just don’t want to live there.”
• Jen goes to Whitney’s house to work out on Whitney’s infamous stripper pole. Whitney offers this helpful advice — she wears latex because “helps you stick to the pole.” And the two Housewives have a fairly frank talk about sex, after Whitney asks Jen how she deals with Sharrieff being away so much.
• Mary makes it clear what she thinks of fashion and shopping in Utah. An offscreen producer asks her to compare shopping in Salt Lake City to other places she’s been. “The pits,” she says, and then acts as if she’s shocked that she said it. “Am I ‘posed to say that?”
• Whitney is a model in the fashion show, and jokes that there are a couple of things holding her back from modeling full time: “If I could only give up cheeseburgers and add 6 inches to my legs, I think I could have a career in this.”
• Brooks named his fashion line after himself. “Honestly, off the top of my head, I can’t think of a better name for a fashion label than Brooks Marks,” he says, adding, “The double K’s is just killer.”
• What happened with Curtis, the guy Heather went home with in last week’s episode? “It was a very short-lived love affair,” she says, because Curtis lives in Atlanta and L.A.
• Lisa’s 15-year-old son, Jack, says his goals include getting his driver license, getting “shredded” and becoming a “lady slayer.” Henry, who’s 8, wants to meet Post Malone, get his first kiss when he’s 15, and become the father of triplets. “That’s a long, long-term goal,” his father says.
The Utah Crisis Line, at 1-800-273-TALK, provides compassionate support for anyone in need of mental health or emotional wellbeing services. There is no cost and interpreters are available.
Episode 8 debuts Wednesday on Bravo — 8 p.m. on Dish and DirecTV; 11 p.m. on Comcast.
(RNS) — Our reading list this year, like the rest of our lives, was colored by the triple whammy of 2020: the pandemic, the racial justice protests and the presidential election. But given the unpredictability of these 12 jam-packed, crisis-filled months, how did the thinkers, researchers, preachers and their publishers of the books we clung to know to furnish us with such timely analyses? As several of the authors of the most interesting books have noted, the answer is all too grim: In many cases, we only reaped in 2020 what we had long sown.
But among our favorite histories, travelogues and memoirs below, there are as many solutions as there are jeremiads, and books as fun as they are enlightening.
Intimate Alien: The Hidden Story of the UFO By David J. Halperin A retired professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Halperin has been fascinated with the heavens at least since he wrote his Ph.D. dissertation on the biblical prophet Ezekiel’s vision of a chariot blazing across the sky. In this exploration of UFOs as myths, Halperin discusses the profound implications of our beliefs in a wide swath of UFO phenomena. Read more about this book.
<style type="text/css"><![CDATA[
#gallery-8 {
margin: auto;
}
#gallery-8 .gallery-item {
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
}
#gallery-8 img {
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
}
#gallery-8 .gallery-caption {
margin-left: 0;
}
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
]]></style>
<div id="gallery-8" class="gallery galleryid-3869095 gallery-columns-2 gallery-size-thumbnail"><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/04/17/david-j-halperin-explores-the-mythical-reality-of-ufos-in-new-book/webrns-ufo-halperin1-041720/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-8-3821586">
“Intimate Alien: The Hidden Story of the UFO” by David J. Halperin. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/10/30/author-kristen-j-sollee-on-the-magic-of-place-and-why-its-important-to-remember-historical-witch-hunts/webrns-witch-hunt1-103020/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-8-3859685">
“Witch Hunt: A Traveler’s Guide to the Power and Persecution of the Witch” by Kristen J. Sollée. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><br/></div>
Witch Hunt: A Traveler’s Guide to the Power and Persecution of the Witch By Kristen J. Sollée Sollée, a second-generation witch, chronicles her travels to the sites of the most infamous witch hunts in Europe and the United States, exploring not so much the history of witchery as that of how the archetype of the witch has been depicted in culture — pop and otherwise. Sollée offered her book as a timely meditation on “the magic of place” when most of us could not travel. Read more about this book.
White Christian Privilege: The Illusion of Religious Equality in America By Khyati Joshi A professor of education at Fairleigh Dickinson University, Joshi upends our usual approach to race questions by focusing not on marginalized communities’ troubles, but how white Americans have preserved their advantage over centuries. Joshi shows how even our idea of religion as an island of racial equality is an “optical illusion.” Read more about this book here and here.
<style type="text/css"><![CDATA[
#gallery-9 {
margin: auto;
}
#gallery-9 .gallery-item {
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
}
#gallery-9 img {
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
}
#gallery-9 .gallery-caption {
margin-left: 0;
}
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
]]></style>
<div id="gallery-9" class="gallery galleryid-3869095 gallery-columns-2 gallery-size-thumbnail"><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/07/16/khyati-y-joshi-argues-religious-freedom-equality-in-america-is-an-optical-illusion/webrns-khyati-joshi2-071520/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-9-3838425">
“White Christian Privilege: The Illusion of Religious Equality in America” by Khyati Y. Joshi. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/10/09/sex-and-church-ladies-author-reveals-true-to-life-secrets-beyond-black-church-pews/webrns-deesha-philyaw2-100820/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-9-3855079">
“The Secret Lives of Church Ladies” by Deesha Philyaw. Image courtesy of West Virginia University Press
</dd></dl><br/></div>
The Secret Lives of Church Ladies By Deesha Philyaw These nine short stories consist not of the chatter you might hear in the pew of a Black church, but a mixture of religion, sex, love and grief that crosses generations and families. The Pittsburgh writer and editor’s finely crafted stories were shortlisted for a 2020 National Book Award. Read more about this book.
Human(Kind): How Reclaiming Human Worth and Embracing Radical Kindness Will Bring Us Back Together By Ashlee Eiland The Mars Hill preaching pastor’s argument that kindness can bridge the nation’s divides was published just as a polarizing election and a polarizing pandemic was sweeping the U.S. Shortly afterward, racial justice protests broke out over the death of George Floyd. While cynicism about what can bring Americans together has only seemed to deepen, no one has come up with a more tenable solution than Eiland’s, which shouldn’t be dismissed, she said, as a call to “meet each other in the middle … and this will all be OK.” Read more about this book.
<style type="text/css"><![CDATA[
#gallery-10 {
margin: auto;
}
#gallery-10 .gallery-item {
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
}
#gallery-10 img {
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
}
#gallery-10 .gallery-caption {
margin-left: 0;
}
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
]]></style>
<div id="gallery-10" class="gallery galleryid-3869095 gallery-columns-2 gallery-size-thumbnail"><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/07/21/can-kindness-heal-a-world-divided-by-pandemic-protests-and-politics-pastor-ashlee-eiland-thinks-so/webrns-ashlee-eiland1-071720/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-10-3839096">
“Human(Kind): How Reclaiming Human Worth and Embracing Radical Kindness Will Bring Us Back Together” by Ashlee Eiland. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/07/14/sarsour-memoir-shows-how-all-activism-is-personal/we-are-not-here-to-be-bystanders-by-linda-sarsour-courtesy-image-2/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-10-3837982">
We Are Not Here to Be Bystanders” by Linda Sarsour. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><br/></div>
We Are Not Here to Be Bystanders By Linda Sarsour This memoir by one of the country’s most outspoken Muslim activists and an organizer of the Women’s March is a surprisingly quiet account of the sometimes desperate moments in her personal life that remind her and inform the reader about what grounds her commitment to religious liberty. Read more about this book.
See No Stranger: A Memoir and Manifesto of Revolutionary Love By Valarie Kaur The Sikh filmmaker, lawyer and civil rights activist, known for her popular TED Talk, is at her most vulnerable in this book as she shares the stories of being sexually assaulted and attacked for race and how these experiences led to her activism. It also includes a manifesto for her Revolutionary Love Project, a pragmatic plan drawn from Sikh wisdom for making love the motivating principle of our own lives. Read more about this book.
Native: Identity, Belonging and Rediscovering God By Kaitlin B. Curtice Curtice, a Native American and a Christian, describes her journey of finding herself and finding God, and connecting with her Potawatomi identity. Along the way she reckons with the church’s historic treatment of Indigenous people and other marginalized groups and the impact that has had on her Christian faith as a former worship leader. Read more about this book.
Can Robots Be Jewish? And Other Pressing Questions of Modern Life Edited by Amy E. Schwartz This collection of 30 provocative questions, each answered in 200 words or less by 10 different rabbis from different quarters of the Jewish world, is drawn from Moment magazine’s “Ask the Rabbis” columns. The book addresses, besides the title question, addiction, transgender people, and the gene editing process CRISPR, and it operates as “a model of civil disagreement for our time,” according to its editor. Read more about this book.
<style type="text/css"><![CDATA[
#gallery-12 {
margin: auto;
}
#gallery-12 .gallery-item {
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
}
#gallery-12 img {
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
}
#gallery-12 .gallery-caption {
margin-left: 0;
}
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
]]></style>
<div id="gallery-12" class="gallery galleryid-3869095 gallery-columns-2 gallery-size-thumbnail"><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/12/16/in-can-robots-be-jewish-rabbis-weigh-in-a-jewish-pastime-disagreement/webrns-jewish-robots1-121620/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-12-3868359">
“Can Robots Be Jewish? And Other Pressing Questions of Modern Life” Courtesy image
</dd></dl><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/04/24/jen-hatmaker-on-her-new-book-fierce-free-and-full-of-fire-and-no-regrets/webrns-jen-hatmaker1-042420/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-12-3822986">
“Fierce, Free and Full of Fire: The Guide to Being Glorious You” by Jen Hatmaker. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><br/></div>
Fierce, Free and Full of Fire: The Guide to Being Glorious You By Jen Hatmaker Once a “darling” of evangelical Christianity, Hatmaker saw her books pulled from Christian bookstores’ shelves in 2016 after she expressed support for the LGBTQ community. In this book, Hatmaker encourages her readers to experience the same freedom she has found by living into their authentic selves, no matter what the cost. Read more about this book.
Outsiders at Home: The Politics of American Islamophobia By Nazita Lajevardi Lajevardi, who grew up in Southern California’s Iranian American community, is well versed in how Islamophobia manifests itself in American life, and how it affects those touched by it. Now a professor of political science at Michigan State University, Lajevardi shares her experiences of a world unfamiliar and foreign to most Americans. Read more about this book.
<style type="text/css"><![CDATA[
#gallery-13 {
margin: auto;
}
#gallery-13 .gallery-item {
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
}
#gallery-13 img {
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
}
#gallery-13 .gallery-caption {
margin-left: 0;
}
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
]]></style>
<div id="gallery-13" class="gallery galleryid-3869095 gallery-columns-2 gallery-size-thumbnail"><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/04/23/how-islamophobia-changed-politics-for-muslim-america/webrns-nazita-lajevardi4-042320/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-13-3822686">
“Outsiders at Home: The Politics of American Islamophobia” by Nazita Lajevardi. Courtesy image
</dd></dl><dl class="gallery-item">
<dt class="gallery-icon portrait">
<a href="https://religionnews.com/2020/09/15/good-guy-with-gun-god-sheepdog-evangelical-kyle-rittenhouse-god-bullets-bible/webrns-jesus-john-wayne/" rel="nofollow"> </a>
</dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-text gallery-caption" id="gallery-13-3849731">
“Jesus and John Wayne: How Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation” by Kristin Kobes Du Mez. Image courtesy of Liveright Publishing Corporation
</dd></dl><br/></div>
Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation By Kristin Kobes Du Mez The Calvin College historian argues evangelicals’ seduction by Donald Trump has been decades in the making. As Du Mez connects the dots of militant patriarchy and what she calls “family values evangelicalism,” she tells the story of the religious right’s beginnings as a partisan political force in the 1970s as they fought the rise of feminism and mourned the loss of the Vietnam War. Read more about this book.
By Robert Putnam and Shaylyn Romney Garrett Best known for his groundbreaking communitarian treatise “Bowling Alone,” Putnam and his co-author note today’s income inequality, racial tensions and threats to democracy are a replay of the similarly polarized Gilded Age of late 19th-century America. As then, they argue, the country must look to religion and its moral crusaders to reform our economy and our politics and restore balance. Read more about this book.
Sacred Rites: New Religions for a Godless World By Tara Isabella Burton The undeniable fact that organized religion is losing its influence and followers in the U.S. doesn’t mean Americans are abandoning the higher planes altogether. Our Religion Remixed columnist chronicles the spiritual traditions, rituals, and subcultures — from astrology and witchcraft to the alt-right to Soul Cycle — that are filling the spiritual void. Read more about this book.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.