Caritas Greece calls for support for Lesbos refugees and for locals - Vatican News
Caritas Greece calls for support for Lesbos refugees and for locals – Vatican News

By Linda Bordoni 

Tension is high on the Greek island of Lesbos with thousands of migrants sleeping rough after last week’s refugee centre fires and local residents worried about coronavirus fears and social strife. 

Authorities are building a temporary camp to shelter the men, women and children left without a roof over their heads. The migrants, however, are demonstrating as they fear the untenable situation in the overcrowded and unsanitary Moria camp that held four times the numbers it was supposed to will be repeated.

Pope Francis travelled to Lesbos in April 2016 to express his closeness to the men, women and children escaping conflict and poverty and urged European nations to agree on a common relocation policy that protects people and respects their dignity.

During the Angelus on Sunday, he recalled that visit and voiced his solidarity with the migrants.

Maria Alverti, Director of Caritas Hellas – the Greek office of the Catholic Church’s global confederation of relief, development and humanitarian agencies– told Vatican Radio that Moria camp is almost completely destroyed leaving 11 to 12000 homeless and camped along the roads.

Listen to the interview with Maria Alverti

Alverti said the army has taken control of food distribution and is engaged in dealing with tension caused by some groups of local residents on the island who do not want the migrants in the towns.

“We believe these are minorities,” she said, but the tension is tangible and humanitarian workers have been instructed not to take autonomous action and the government is coordinating all relief efforts.

Providing relief

She said they have decided to create a new structure close to another camp on the island and are currently erecting camps and working on infrastructure in order to be able to host about 1,000 people.

“They have already transferred some vulnerable families to stay there, all of them are waiting to be tested for COVID-19 before entering the new structure,” she said.

Meanwhile, Alverti said, Caritas has started distributing water and has about 1,000 sleeping bags that will be given to the new structure for the refugee population.

Most urgent need

Obviously, Caritas Hellas’ prime concern at the moment is the provision of aid where needed. But, Alverti said she agrees that the incident has really highlighted the need for a common European policy for the relocation and integration of refugees and migrants.

“I am sorry to say that Moria was a ticking bomb for many years. It has been years that we were warning that accident or arson could happen there. So Moria should not have existed in the first place,” she said.

The relocation of people and the sharing of responsibility should definitely start taking place, Alverti explains. She added that it is understandable that  Greek authorities will not be relocating anyone to the mainland in the near future.

“It’s not easy to say you can transfer 12,000 people overnight to the mainland. I really believe that Europe should help in coming up with a common migration policy which would protect the rights of the people,” she said.

Recalling Pope Francis’s visit

Maria Alverti recalled Pope Francis’s visit to Lesbos in 2016 saying it was hugely encouraging for the people on the island.

She said that for Caritas greece “it was important not only at a spiritual level but also knowing we are doing the right thing gives us strength.” Alverti went on to reveal that the Holy See and the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Dignity “have been supportive of our work for many years: so it is very encouraging and very inspiring to know we are in the right position and doing the right thing.”

“The Holy Father’s words are always an inspiration and guidance,” she said.

Hopes for the near future

Regarding her hopes for the hours and days to come, Alverti underscored the fact that as Caritas Greece, her people are standing by ready to help in coordination with the Ministry covering the basic needs.

“Maybe it would be wishful thinking not to have new Morias to come,” she said, expressing her hope that this alarm will have an impact on the consciences of European leaders and on the mentality of politicians who should realise that the current system is not working.

It is also important, she pointed out, to take into consideration the challenges faced by some local communities: “that’s when you get some extremist elements of society coming forward and finding room and space in which to share hate-speech”.

In her final thoughts, Alverti noted that is up to political leaders to stop giving them grounds to fuel fear and antagonism. Recalling the amazing solidarity the people of Lesbos demonstrated in 2015 at the peak of the arrivals of migrants, she noted that the mentality is not the same anymore and said it is important to “See how the local communities can be supported in this solidarity.”

UN backs new eco-label to help consumers choose sustainable rice - Vatican News
UN backs new eco-label to help consumers choose sustainable rice – Vatican News

By Vatican News

The Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) is a grouping of over 100 public, private, research, financial institutions and civil society organizations, which through sustainable production standards and outreach mechanisms contributes to increasing the global supply of affordable rice, improves livelihoods for rice producers and reduces environmental impact of rice production.

Led by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), SRP has developed the “SRP-Verified” Label to reduce the environmental impact of one of the largest food crops in the world.

Environmental impact of rice production

Rice, wheat, and maize are the world’s three leading food crops; together they directly supply more than 42% of all calories consumed by the entire human population.   Of these, rice is the daily staple of over 3.5 billion people, accounting for 19 percent of dietary energy globally. 

Yet, the crop has an undeniable environmental impact. Rice farming consumes up to one-third of the world’s developed freshwater resources and generates up to 20% of global anthropogenic emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas.

This life-giving crop will also be the victim of rising global temperatures, with production expected to fall by 15% by 2050 due to climate change, according to the International Food Policy Research Institute.

New environment-friendly label

The SRP launched a new SRP Assurance Scheme together with its own eco-label to help consumers and global rice stakeholders choose sustainable rice.  The Scheme is based on the SRP Standard for Sustainable Rice Cultivation, the world’s first voluntary sustainability standard for rice.

Employing best practices in rice farming can reduce water use by some 20% and methane emissions from flooded rice fields by up to 50%.

“The Assurance Scheme offers supply chain actors a robust, cost-effective and transparent path to sustainable procurement. Consumers are increasingly demanding that food is produced sustainably, and now they have a reliable way to choose environmentally friendly rice,” said Wyn Ellis, SRP Executive Director. 

With the new label, consumers will be able to trace the rice back to the country of origin. The scheme will also benefit an entire industry. By stocking SRP-verified rice, retailers can make significant and measurable contributions to sustainability commitments and climate change targets.  Industry actors will also be able to de-risk their supply chains and ensure stability by sourcing through SRP-verified suppliers.

Switching over to SRP practices can help farmers boost their net income by 10-20%.  With 90% of the world’s 144 million rice producers living on or near the poverty line, this can make the difference between a secure livelihood and a family going hungry.  (Source: UNEP)

Ministers back 5-year plan to put health in Europe on track
Ministers back 5-year plan to put health in Europe on track

Today, ministers of health and public health leaders from the 53 Member States of the WHO European Region endorsed a new 5-year vision, the European Programme of Work (EPW) 2020–2025, that sets down how WHO/Europe and its Member States will work together to meet citizens’ expectations for health.

“People rightly demand quality, accessible health care; they expect health authorities to protect their health during emergencies; and they want to be able to thrive in healthy communities. The EPW, approved today, offers the blueprint to deliver this,” said Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge, WHO Regional Director for Europe.

“It is very encouraging to see Member States adopt this vision for health in our Region with such enthusiasm. I am gratified by their commitment to regional solidarity in the face of growing public health challenges, and their strong willingness to tackle pervasive inequalities,” he added.

The EPW, also known as “United Action for Better Health in Europe”, was discussed and agreed at the 70th session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe, the European Region’s health assembly, held virtually this year on 14–15 September 2020.

Under the EPW, European Member States will implement 3 core priorities:

  • guaranteeing the right to universal access to quality care without fear of financial hardship;
  • protecting against health emergencies; and
  • building healthy communities, where public health actions and appropriate public policies secure a better life in an economy of well-being.

These core priorities are anchored in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, and are aligned with the global vision set out in WHO’s General Programme of Work 2019–2023.

“COVID-19 has brought to light the weaknesses and strengths of European society. It has bluntly revealed the reality of our health systems. The most vulnerable, such as older people and people with mental health needs, often carry the heaviest burden in health emergencies; solidarity and trust between people and health authorities are under pressure; and the voices of health leaders and scientists need to be heard by politicians because health and the economy are inextricably linked. The pandemic has forced us to address these issues very quickly, but the EPW shows us how to address them in a way that generates trust, better health and ultimately builds back better societies,” concluded Dr Kluge.

Lessons learned from COVID-19

At the Regional Committee session, Dr Kluge also outlined worrying interruptions to health services in the Region during the COVID-19 pandemic:

  • 68% of Member States have reported a disruption to services for noncommunicable diseases, including monitoring of diabetes, hypertension and cancer screening;
  • countries are reporting and projecting a 10% increase in breast cancer mortality and a 15% increase in colon cancer mortality;
  • 6 countries in the Region, representing 22% of the infant population, have disrupted routine immunization schedules; and
  • in May, 28 countries reported a 50% decrease in case notifications for tuberculosis.

The following 3 key lessons are highlighted in the intra-action review of the COVID-19 response and detailed in the report of the Regional Director.

  • We need solidarity to succeed in health emergencies. Solidarity among individuals and communities and among countries involves sharing supplies, hosting patients in hospitals, sending health professionals, providing logistics support, and contributing to global initiatives such as the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator to speed research, development, production, and fair allocation of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines.
  • We need stronger health systems for stronger health security. Stronger health systems can respond effectively to the pandemic by ensuring sufficient supplies of personal protective equipment, test kits, intensive care beds, and tools to track and trace COVID-19 cases; by taking full advantage of innovative and integrated ways to deliver care with a well-trained workforce, strong links to social services and digital health solutions; and by maintaining the delivery of essential health services through dual-track service delivery.
  • We need to acknowledge health and economic prosperity as 2 sides of the same coin. Controlling virus transmission is a prerequisite for reopening businesses and trade, and the move from response to recovery offers an opportunity to put people and their health at the centre of policy, recognizing that public health is a driver of economic development, security and peace.
WHO/Europe and the European Commission agree future common action in 5 key areas
WHO/Europe and the European Commission agree future common action in 5 key areas

Press note

Copenhagen, Denmark, 14 September 2020

WHO/Europe and the European Commission have issued a joint statement to boost their already strong partnership and adapt it to new health priorities and emerging challenges. The statement was presented today at the annual session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe to representatives from the 53 Member States of the WHO European Region.

The document calls for closer partnership between WHO/Europe and the European Commission in 5 priority areas of shared interest:

  • health security against health emergencies and other threats
  • effective, accessible, resilient and innovative health systems
  • a comprehensive response to noncommunicable diseases with a focus on cancer
  • sustainable food systems and health
  • health cooperation with non-European Union countries in the WHO European Region.

A more concrete plan outlining projects and steps of cooperation will be developed in the coming months. Overall, the agreement aims at:

  • fostering technical, policy and geographical synergies
  • strengthening citizens’ voices and trust in health and food authorities
  • maximizing support to countries.
European Union condemns execution of Iranian champion wrestler
European Union condemns execution of Iranian champion wrestler
Afkari was executed in Iran on Saturday, according to Iran’s state-run news agency IRNA, despite a high-profile international campaign calling for the sentence not to be carried out.
The 27-year-old was executed at a prison in Shiraz, according to IRNA. He had been sentenced to death in relation to the murder of the Iranian government’s water and sewage department’s security agent Hasan Turkman during the August 2018 protests in Shiraz, according to Iran’s state media Mizan.
“Human rights remain a central feature of our engagement with Iran,” said a statement by the EU’s spokesperson, issued on Monday.
“We will continue to engage with Iranian authorities on this issue including through the local EU representation in Tehran and also on individual cases such as this recent execution.
“The European Union is opposed to the death penalty under all circumstances and cases with no exception. It is a cruel and inhumane punishment, which fails to act as a deterrent and represents an unacceptable denial of human dignity and integrity.”
Iran under pressure to halt executions for three protesters
The International Olympic Committee said it was “shocked” by the announcement.
“In letters, Thomas Bach, the IOC President, had made direct personal appeals to the Supreme Leader and to the President of Iran this week and asked for mercy for Navid Afkari, while respecting the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” a statement said.
“It is deeply upsetting that the pleas of athletes from around the world and all the behind-the-scenes work of the IOC, together with the NOC of Iran, United World Wrestling and the National Iranian Wrestling Federation, did not achieve our goal.”
Iran’s judiciary spokesperson Gholam Hossein Esmaeili was quoted by the Tehran Municipality’s daily newspaper Hamshari as saying on Wednesday that Afkari had been sentenced to the Islamic verdict of ghesas [qisas] or “retribution-in-kind.”
According to Hamshari, Esmaeili said Afkari was required to appease the victim’s family by paying a restitution. If he was unable to do so, the judiciary would be required to carry out the death sentence, because the case had already been reviewed by the Supreme Court and because the courts said he had already confessed to killing Hassan Turkman.
IRNA reported on Saturday that Afkari was executed after the victim’s family refused to forgive him and allow him to pay restitutions.
Afkari’s lawyer Hassan Younesi told CNN that philanthropists had gone to the city of Shiraz and were trying to raise money to pay the restitution, but it was too late — the Shiraz judiciary informed Afkari’s family the sentence was already carried out and they didn’t get to say goodbye.
Iranian champion wrestler Navid Afkari executed despite international campaign
The World Players Association, an international body that represents professional athletes, had protested the sentence and called for Iran to be threatened with expulsion from international sport, including from the Olympic movement, if the execution was carried out.
“Navid was one of thousands of Iranian citizens who took part in spontaneous demonstrations that year against economic hardship and political repression in Iran,” said a statement from the WPA. “However, he has been unjustly targeted by the Iranian authorities who want to make an example out of a popular, high-profile athlete and intimidate others who might dare exercise their human right to participate in peaceful protest.”
WPA said in the statement that Afkari was “sentenced to death twice after being tortured into making a false confession.”
Addressing the protests, Esmaeili said, according to the Tehran newspaper, that the campaign aimed at stopping the execution led the judiciary to provide a videotaped confession and re-enactments carried out by Afkari himself to Iranian State TV IRIB.
Afkari’s case sparked interest beyond the sports circles. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch called for an international intervention and a new trial.
US President Donald Trump got involved last week, asking the Iranian leaders last to spare Afkari’s life. “Hearing that Iran is looking to execute a great and popular wrestling star, 27-year-old Navid Afkari, whose sole act was an anti-government demonstration on the streets. They were protesting the ‘country’s worsening economic situation and inflation,'” Trump tweeted.
“To the leaders of Iran, I would greatly appreciate if you would spare this young man’s life, and not execute him. Thank you!,” he added.
Protests must be nonviolent; governments must respect rights, pope says
Protests must be nonviolent; governments must respect rights, pope says

Vatican City — Expressing his concern about demonstrations taking place in many countries around the world, Pope Francis appealed for nonviolence, dialogue and the guarantee of civil rights.

“In these weeks, we are witnessing numerous popular protests all over the world — in many places — expressing the increasing unrest of civil society in the face of particularly critical political and social situations,” the pope said Sept. 13 after reciting the Angelus prayer.

“While I urge the demonstrators to present their demands peacefully, without giving in to the temptation of aggression and violence,” he said, “I appeal to all those with public and governmental responsibilities to listen to the voice of their fellow citizens and to meet their just aspirations, ensuring full respect for human rights and civil liberties.”

The pope did not mention any specific city or country. However, two days earlier he had dispatched his foreign minister, Archbishop Paul Gallagher, to Minsk, Belarus, to show his closeness to the people and his support of the local church.

Thousands of people have been demonstrating daily since President Alexander Lukashenko, in power already for 26 years, claimed Aug. 9 that he had won reelection again. Hundreds of people have been arrested, and the country’s main opposition leaders have been forced into exile.

Pope Francis also may have had in mind the ongoing protests in the United States over police brutality and in support of the Black Lives Matter movement, and more than a year of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

In areas where there are protests, the pope asked Catholic communities, and especially their pastors, “to work for dialogue — always in favor of dialogue — and in favor of reconciliation.”

Also after his recitation of the Angelus, the pope spoke to visitors in St. Peter’s Square about the fires Sept. 9 that destroyed the Moria refugee camp on the Greek island of Lesbos, displacing some 12,000 asylum-seekers and, as the pope said, leaving them “without a shelter, even a precarious one.”

“I still remember my visit there” in 2016, he said, and the appeal he, Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople and Orthodox Archbishop Ieronymos II of Athens made to other European governments and citizens “to do our part toward giving migrants, refugees and asylum seekers a humane and dignified welcome in Europe.”

Researchers Quantify Worldwide Phosphorus Loss Due to Soil Erosion
Researchers Quantify Worldwide Phosphorus Loss Due to Soil Erosion

Phosphorus is essential for agriculture, yet this important plant nutrient is increasingly being lost from soils around the world. The primary cause is soil erosion, reports an international research team led by the University of Basel. The study in the journal Nature Communications shows which continents and regions are most strongly affected.

The world’s food production depends directly on phosphorus. However, this plant nutrient is not unlimited, but comes from finite geological reserves. How soon these reserves might be exhausted is the subject of scholarly debate. Just as controversial is the question which states own the remaining reserves and the political dependencies this creates.

Quantification using high-resolution data

An international research team led by Professor Christine Alewell has investigated which continents and regions worldwide are suffering the greatest loss of phosphorus. The researchers combined high-resolution spatially discrete global data on the phosphorus content of soils with local erosion rates. Based on this, they calculated how much phosphorus is lost through erosion in different countries.

An important conclusion of the study is that more than 50% of global phosphorus loss in agriculture is attributable to soil erosion. “That erosion plays a role was already known. The extent of that role has never before been quantified with this level of spatial resolution,” Alewell explains. Previously, experts reported losses primarily due to lack of recycling, food and feed waste, and general mismanagement of phosphorus resources.

Too little in the field, too much in the water

Erosion flushes mineral bound phosphorus out of agricultural soils into wetlands and water bodies, where the excess of nutrients (called eutrophication) harms the aquatic plant and animal communities. The researchers were able to validate their calculations using globally published measurement data on phosphorus content in rivers: the elevated phosphorus content in waters mirrors the calculated loss of phosphorus in the soil in the respective region.

Mineral fertilizers can replace the lost phosphorus in the fields, but not all countries are equally able to use them. Although countries such as Switzerland can develop solutions thanks to organic fertilizers and potentially relatively closed phosphorus cycles (see box) in agriculture, Africa, Eastern Europe and South America register the greatest phosphorus losses – with limited options for solving the problem. “It’s paradoxical, especially as Africa possesses the largest geological phosphorus deposits,” says Alewell. “But the mined phosphorus is exported and costs many times more for most farmers in African countries than, for example, European farmers.” In Eastern Europe economic constraints are also the most crucial factor of phosphorous deficiency.

South America could potentially mitigate the problem with efficient use of organic fertilizer and/or better recycling of plant residues. On the other hand, farmers in Africa do not have this option: Africa has too little green fodder and too little animal husbandry to replace mineral fertilizers with manure and slurry, says Alewell.

Who will control reserves in the future?

It is still unclear when exactly phosphorus for global agriculture will run out. New large deposits were discovered a few years ago in Western Sahara and Morocco, although how accessible they are is questionable. In addition, China, Russia, and the US are increasingly expanding their influence in these regions, which suggest that they might also control this important resource for global future food production. Europe has practically no phosphorus deposits of its own.

“95% of our food is directly or indirectly produced as a result of plants growing in the soil. The creeping loss of the plant nutrient phosphorus should be of concern to all people and societies,” says Alewell. If countries want to secure their independence from those states that possess the remaining large deposits, they must seek to minimize phosphorus losses in soils.

A drastic reduction in soil erosion is a major and important step in the right direction. Land managers can reduce erosion by ensuring ground cover for as long as possible; for example, through mulching, green manure and intercropping, and through topography-adapted cultivation – tilling fields transversely to the slope or terracing.

Source: http://www.unibas.ch/

Vegan Food Market Size is Witnessing at a CAGR of 10.5% from 2019 to 2026
Vegan Food Market Size is Witnessing at a CAGR of 10.5% from 2019 to 2026

Vegan Food Market Size is Witnessing at a CAGR of 10.5% from 2019 to 2026 – Organic Food News Today – EIN News

  <div class="eh-ribbon">

      Trusted News Since 1995

    <span class="prof not-if-mobile-w820">A service for food industry professionals</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w820">·</span>
    <span class="date">Tuesday, September 15, 2020</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w430">
      ·
      <a class="article_live_counter" href="/live_feed">526,258,178</a>
      Articles
    </span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w550">
      ·
      3+ Million Readers
    </span>
  </div>
</header>
<footer><div class="sitemap">
    <h2 class="subheading-osc g_roboto">News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools</h2>
    <div class="row-fluid">
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>News Topics</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Newsletters</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>Press Releases</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Events &amp; Conferences</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>RSS Feeds</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Other Services</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>Questions?</h3>
          </section><br/><section/></div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>



<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="/js/excanvas.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<![endif]--><!-- Start Alexa Certify Javascript --><noscript/>
<!-- End Alexa Certify Javascript -->
<!--[if IE 7]>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/json2.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

Merkel leads EU talks with China looking to ease tensions
Merkel leads EU talks with China looking to ease tensions

BRUSSELS (AP) — German Chancellor Angela Merkel, top European Union officials, and Chinese President Xi Jinping are holding talks Monday focused on trade, giving impetus to slow-moving talks on an investment agreement and building trust to tackle thorny political issues that are harming their ties.

Merkel, whose country currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency, will be joined by Council President Charles Michel, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the bloc’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, for the videoconference, due to start at 1200 GMT.

The talks between two of the three largest economies and traders in the world will allow them to take stock of their ties, with the Europeans wanting to focus on economic issues, reform of the World Trade Organization, climate change, and the coronavirus pandemic.

The EU sees China as a “systemic rival” offering great opportunities but also presenting many challenges, and the pandemic has created new obstacles, notably what Brussels sees as a China-orchestrated campaign of disinformation about the disease that could put lives at risk.


China has been accused of trying to influence European officials, and Borrell has twice denied this year that the External Action Service — a kind of EU foreign office that he leads — has bowed to Beijing’s pressure to alter documents.

While the 27-nation EU — China’s biggest trading partner — is often divided in its approach to Beijing, the security law recently imposed on Hong Kong has galvanized the bloc, and member countries insist it is undermining the territory’s autonomy guaranteed in the “one country, two systems” framework.

The Europeans are expected to underline their concerns about Hong Kong and tensions in the South China Sea during Monday’s talks, and renew their call for having a human rights dialogue with Chinese officials later this year.

Copyright © 2020 . All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Taiwan: EU to hold ‘milestone’ investment forum in Taipei
Taiwan: EU to hold ‘milestone’ investment forum in Taipei

 

TAIPEI (TCA) — Member countries of the European Union (EU) are set to hold their first forum in Taipei to pitch investment opportunities directly to Taiwanese companies, according to the top EU envoy to Taiwan, Focus Taiwan reported.

It is in the interest of Taiwanese businesses to increase their presence in Europe, especially at a time when global supply chains are being restructured due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Filip Grzegorzewski, the head of the European Economic and Trade Office (EETO) in Taiwan, said in an exclusive interview with CNA (Focus Taiwan) on September 11.

Taiwan has the potential to become one of the EU’s top partners, especially in the ICT, automobile, mobility, health and biotech sectors, which Taiwan champions, Grzegorzewski said.

In view of this, EETO will host the first ever EU Investment Forum (EIF) on September 22 at the Taipei International Convention Center, with 15 EU member states participating, he said.

Participants will include all EU members that have a presence in Taiwan, he said, including Poland, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy and Slovakia.

The forum will use video links to connect investment agencies from those countries to potential investors in Taiwan, enabling them to interact on various topics, including business incentives, Grzegorzewski said, describing the forum as an important milestone to Taiwan-EU relations.

According to EETO data, the EU was the biggest investor in Taiwan in 2019, accounting for about 25 percent of Taiwan’s foreign direct investment. However, only 1.7 percent of Taiwanese investments abroad goes to the EU.

Considering Taiwan’s economic strength, it has the potential to be a global presence and the European market presents untapped potential for it, Grzegorzewski said.

“We have 41 trade agreements across the globe that cover 72 countries. So, once you put an investment in Europe, you get access to not only the whole market of the EU, you can reach out to the rest of the world easily,” he said.

Although it is easier for Taiwanese investors to go to Southeast Asia or China due to their geographical proximity, Grzegorzewski said investing in Europe is not particularly difficult and brings with it a lot of benefits.

“By getting closer to consumers, by getting access to a highly educated workforce, and by getting access to a market with the same standards, you cut costs,” he said, adding that Taiwan does not have to rely on cheap labor in neighboring countries because Taiwan’s industries are no longer labor-intensive.

Migrants moved to new Lesbos camp as Mitsotakis demands more EU help
Migrants moved to new Lesbos camp as Mitsotakis demands more EU help

Around 300 refugees and migrants had by Sunday evening moved into a new camp facility being built by the Greek army in a former military shooting range in Kara Tepe, on the island of Lesbos.

Soldiers have set up between 300 and 350 tents and continued working into the night.

But many of the refugees and migrants are reluctant to move into a new camp that will be manned by police. They fear it will be a prison.

Meanwhile, almost 10,000 prepared to sleep rough another night in the stretch of the road between Kara Tepe and the outskirts of Mytilene, the capital of Lesbos.

Greece’s prime minister demanded on Sunday that the European Union take a greater responsibility for managing migration into the bloc, as Greek authorities promised that 12,000 migrants and asylum-seekers left homeless after fire gutted an overcrowded camp would be moved shortly to a new tent city.

Kyriakos Mitsotakis blamed some residents at the Moria camp on Lesbos for trying to blackmail his government by deliberately setting the fires that destroyed the camp last week. But he said this could be an opportunity to improve how the EU handles a key challenge.

“It (the burning of Moria) was a tragedy. These images were bad. It was a warning bell to all to become sensitized. Europe cannot afford a second failure on the migration issue,” Mitsotakis said Sunday at a press conference in the northern city of Thessaloniki.

Human rights activists have long deplored the squalor at the Moria refugee camp, which was built to house 2,750 but was filled with some 12,500 people who fled across the sea from Turkey.

Since the fires, which came after the camp faced a coronavirus lockdown, thousands of people have camped out in the open on highway near Moria under police guard. Many have protested the Greek government for refusing to allow the homeless migrants to leave Lesbos for the Greek mainland. Greek residents are also unhappy that their island is being used as a dumping ground for migrants.

Mitsotakis said he has been in touch with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel over the reallocation of at least some migrants from Moria, but he said there will be a new, permanent refugee camp on Lesbos.

The Greek army has been setting up tents at a former artillery range, about 4 kilometers (2.5 miles) from the old camp.

Migration Minister Notis Mitarakis said an estimated 1,000 Moria residents would be relocated to the army-built tent city late Sunday and that getting everyone housed at the new site would take several days.

“At the moment, it’s happening on a voluntary basis,” Mitarakis told Greek TV station Open TV.

Mitarakis said those entering the new camp would undergo rapid testing for coronavirus and that five new cases have been found so far.

At the Vatican, Pope Francis expressed solidarity Sunday with the migrants on Lesbos and called for “dignified” welcome for them. Francis had visited the Moria camp in 2016, bringing back to Rome with him 12 Syrian refugees.

Victory Square Technologies Portfolio Company Receives Approval for Sale and Use of Safetest Covid-19 Antibody Test for the European Union
Victory Square Technologies Portfolio Company Receives Approval for Sale and Use of Safetest Covid-19 Antibody Test for the European Union

Victory Square Technologies Portfolio Company Receives Approval for Sale and Use of Safetest Covid-19 Antibody Test for the European Union – EU Politics Today – EIN News

  <div class="eh-ribbon">

      Trusted News Since 1995

    <span class="prof not-if-mobile-w820">A service for political professionals</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w820">·</span>
    <span class="date">Monday, September 14, 2020</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w430">
      ·
      <a class="article_live_counter" href="/live_feed">526,178,364</a>
      Articles
    </span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w550">
      ·
      3+ Million Readers
    </span>
  </div>
</header>
<footer><div class="sitemap">
    <h2 class="subheading-osc g_roboto">News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools</h2>
    <div class="row-fluid">
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>News Topics</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Newsletters</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>Press Releases</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Events &amp; Conferences</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>RSS Feeds</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Other Services</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>Questions?</h3>
          </section><br/><section/></div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>



<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="/js/excanvas.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<![endif]--><!-- Start Alexa Certify Javascript --><noscript/>
<!-- End Alexa Certify Javascript -->
<!--[if IE 7]>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/json2.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

Commentary: Food Bullying as Trade Policy
Commentary: Food Bullying as Trade Policy

By Gary Truitt

Food Bullying, as defined by Michele Payn, author of a groundbreaking book by the same name, “literally takes food out of someone’s hand – by removing choice, creating emotion, or forcing an individual into groupthink mentality.” It has typically been applied to efforts by activist groups and social media bloggers who berate and intimidate people for their food choices and actively work to influence food policy and food choices on menus and store shelves. Now, Food Bullying is being used as trade policy by the E.U.

The Farm to Fork program in Europe is designed to regulate food production in the E.U. as well as promote the organic movement to European consumers. It requires farmers to use farming practices from the dark ages and limits consumer food choices to only what is “organic.” This has led to higher food prices, fewer food choices, and upwards of a 25% crop loss rate in some countries.  The real danger, however, is that they are actively exporting this policy to the rest of the world and using Food Bullying techniques to restrict trade in other countries.

This is being done in two ways. The first is restricting imports of food products that, while safe, do not match their production method restrictions which center primarily around biotechnology. The second is by withholding aid or other economic incentives to countries who use and accept biotechnology. This is being done in several regions of Africa and is the case in several developing countries who desperately need the productivity and health benefits of biotechnology.

The E.U. claims their system is more “sustainable” and has less environmental impact. “They would have you believe they just sprinkle organic fairy dust on the crops,” said John Entine, with the Genetic Literacy Project. According to Entine, when it comes to the use of toxic chemicals in food production, the US. ranks 59th in the world. “Every E.U. country uses more chemical per hectare than the U.S. This is because biotechnology has allowed the U.S. to significantly reduce the level of toxic chemicals used in food production.” In the last 50 years, U.S. agriculture has increased food production while using 78% less land and 41% less water.

This movement is alive and growing here in the U.S. States including California and Vermont with strong organic movements set  local restrictions on what food can be sold as well as how it must be labeled and produced. Over time, these standards are adopted by companies nationwide, forcing the rest of us to accept these standards even if we think they are a bunch of hooey. So we end up with GMO-free water, non-GMO salt, and organic shampoo.

It is important that this trend be confronted and addressed by all of U.S. agriculture. “In the farming world, it’s having choices removed in proven products or practices. It’s also farmers bullying each other when one chooses to farm differently than their neighbor, and is ostracized. It’s also activists on college campuses evangelizing or the mom who knows all on your Facebook wall shaming people,” said Payn. Trade tariffs have been the focus the past few years but food bullying as a trade barrier needs to be strongly addressed.

EU rejects Johnson’s claim about plot to destabilise UK
EU rejects Johnson’s claim about plot to destabilise UK

LONDON: The European Union on Sunday rejected an incendiary claim by Prime Minister Boris Johnson that the bloc is plotting to destabilise the UK as another week of Brexit high drama beckoned, headlined by a stormy parliamentary debate in London.

The war of words escalated over a new British government bill that London admits is in violation of its EU divorce treaty — legislation that has sparked a furious response from former prime ministers Tony Blair and John Major, as well as sitting MPs.

Johnson’s claim that the 27-nation EU is plotting to choke off food supplies via crippling new trade barriers between Britain and Northern Ireland is “spin and not the truth”, Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney told BBC television.

“There is no blockade proposed,” he added, calling it “inflammatory language coming from Number 10 (Downing Street)”.

Former British PMs say government’s actions are ‘embarrassing our nation’

Charles Michel, who heads the EU Council of government chiefs, said Britain’s “international credibility” is at stake as both sides battle to unwind nearly 50 years of economic integration, following a deeply divisive referendum in the UK.

EU trade negotiator Michel Barnier insisted that a Northern Irish protocol in the EU treaty “is not a threat to the integrity of the UK”, as claimed by Johnson in Saturday’s Daily Telegraph newspaper.

Major and Blair, who led Britain through Northern Ireland’s historic peace talks in the 1990s, wrote in the Sunday Times that the government’s actions were “shaming itself and embarrassing our nation”.

Backed by the EU, Ireland stresses the provisions for Northern Ireland were agreed by both sides to ensure fair competition after Brexit, and to comply with a 1998 peace pact that ended three decades of unrest in the province. Johnson had accused the EU of threatening to tear the UK apart by imposing a food “blockade” between Britain and Northern Ireland, which is meant to enjoy a special status with the EU after Brexit.

Johnson said the EU’s stance justified his government’s introduction of the new legislation to regulate the UK’s internal market and maintain access to Northern Ireland, after a post-Brexit transition period expires at the end of this year.

The food dispute centres on the EU’s reluctance to grant Britain “third country” status, which acknowledges that nations meet basic requirements to export their foodstuffs to Europe. The EU is worried that post-Brexit Britain could undercut its own food standards, as well as rules on state aid for companies, and infiltrate its single market via Northern Ireland.

Published in Dawn, September 14th, 2020

Commentary: Post-pandemic era calls for greater China-EU contributions
Commentary: Post-pandemic era calls for greater China-EU contributions

by Xinhua writer Wang Lei

Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold a virtual meeting with German and European Union (EU) leaders on Monday, a timely and critical gathering to steer the China-EU partnership toward a more stable and mature future in a world where uncertainties abound.

It is the second China-EU leaders’ meeting in three months, and the latest episode of frequent high-level exchanges between the two sides, demonstrating an earnest hope from Beijing and Brussels to boost all-round cooperation, and build a more open and prosperous world.

Cooperation between China and the EU, following the establishment of their diplomatic ties 45 years ago, continues to gain momentum with bilateral trade and mutual investment thriving and people-to-people exchanges flourishing. The two sides have also been working closely on global matters.

Humanity is struggling to cope with an unprecedented public health crisis rarely seen in a century, while the global economy is absorbing the impact of perhaps the worst economic recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Unfortunately, in an age where cooperation and solidarity are much-needed, the specter of isolationism and protectionism is rearing its ugly head.

At this drastic moment, China and the EU, which account for about a quarter of the world’s population and one third of gross global product, need to step up efforts to advance cooperation and strengthen coordination to better handle challenges in a post-pandemic era.

The most urgent task for China and the EU is to build an anti-pandemic partnership to beat the deadly virus and to steer the world economy toward recovery as soon as possible.

As governments around the world are seeking to reopen their countries, the two sides need to focus on how to step up their collective and coordinated response to facilitate cross-border movements of people and goods while doing their best to reduce the risk of new trans-border cases to a minimum. A multinational information-sharing network for both people and commercial goods is among the must-dos.

China and the EU should also give full play to their respective advantages and work even closer to fast-track the development, production and distribution of effective treatments and vaccines, and make sure those live-saving tools are accessible and affordable.

In the field of the economy and trade, the cornerstone of China-EU relations, Beijing and Brussels share a promising future. In 2019, the two-way trade reached roughly 710 billion U.S. dollars, growing at 8 percent year on year. Germany, the EU’s rotating presidency in the second half of 2020, has long been China’s largest trading partner in Europe.

Despite the pandemic, economic and trade cooperation between the two sides remain robust in 2020. In the first eight months, a total of 7,601 China-Europe freight train trips were made, up by 44 percent over the same period in 2019.

Looking into the future, it is also important for the two sides to make the pie of their shared interests bigger. Thus China and the EU must join their efforts in the investment treaty negotiations and search for solutions to remaining issues so as to ensure a timely conclusion of a comprehensive deal. On this basis, a joint feasibility study for a China-EU free trade agreement could be put on the table.

Furthermore, the two sides should work together to crack open new areas for cooperation, as Xi proposed at the 22nd China-EU leaders’ meeting in June, to forge a green and digital partnership between China and the EU by fostering cooperation in clean energy, sustainable finance, e-commerce and cloud computing.

The latest bit of good news for EU investors came at the China International Fair for Trade in Services earlier this month, when Beijing announced more practical steps to further open its market, including developing a negative-list system to better manage cross-border services trade, further easing market access for the services sector, and expanding imports of quality services.

In the international arena, China and the EU are playing a major role in maintaining world peace and stability, and improving global governance, including jointly fending off unilateralism and protectionism, supporting the guiding roles of the United Nations and the World Health Organization, and tackling the world’s most pressing issues such as the raging pandemic, terrorism and climate change.

To do that, communication and coordination is indispensable. China and the EU need to build a bridge of mutual understanding to overcome their social and political differences and reject xenophobia.

The 45-year-old China-EU relationship shows that the two sides share far more in common than their differences would suggest. It is believed that China and the EU can further their own interests by respecting one another’s legitimate and core concerns.

As the pandemic continues to rage and the global economic crisis remains far from over, the world is crying for more contributions by China and the EU. Together, they should fight tooth and nail for the common future of all. Enditem

Pro-EU Former UK Parliament Speaker Reportedly Earns Over £500K for Speeches and Punditry
Pro-EU Former UK Parliament Speaker Reportedly Earns Over £500K for Speeches and Punditry

Former UK Parliamentary speaker John Bercow has made more than £500,000 in fees for public speeches and pundit appearances.

Bercow’s company Fedhead Ltd made £547,664 in its first year, although it owes £157,647 in tax and social security payments, the Daily Mail reported

The controversial former speaker, known for his booming voice and allegations of bullying his staff – which he denies – owns 76 per cent of the firm with the rest in the hands of his wife Sally. 

Bercow reportedly earned over £60,000 for his one-night-stand as an election pundit for Sky News in December 2019.

He has also joined elite agency JLA Speaker Bureau, whose clients including former Labour Party spokesman Alastair Campbell and ex-government minister Ed Balls earn up to £25,000 per speech.

“After stepping down from Westminster John shares his insights on the future of our politics and the lessons learned about driving change,” reads Bercow’s blurb on the Fedhead website. “He is also a seasoned raconteur with countless stories from the corridors of power and an eye out for anyone ‘chuntering from a sedentary position’.”

In 2019 Bercow disregarded the century-old Erskine May rules of Parliamentary procedure to allow a series of indicative votes with multiple options. They were part of unsuccessful moves by opposition parties and Tory rebels to prevent Britain leaving the European Union (EU) in line with the 2016 referendum vote.

He stepped down as speaker in October 2019 as the Westminster wrangling to break the deadlock reached its endgame, with Tory Brexiteers openly accusing him of undermining the impartiality of the ‘Woolsack’ or speaker’s chair.

The following month he told a Foreign Press Association event in London: “I think that Brexit is the biggest foreign policy mistake in the post-war period,” after declaring “I don’t have to remain impartial now.”

Bercow was notably denied the seat in the House of Lords normally awarded to retired speakers by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, despite Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn nominating the former Conservative MP.

September 14 — promulgation of the Gregorian calendar
September 14 — promulgation of the Gregorian calendar

Currently, most of the civilized world is using the Gregorian calendar, named after Pope Gregory XIII. Prior to this, the Julian calendar was in use, which was proposed by Julius Caesar in 46 BC, as a reform of the Roman calendar. It was designed with the aid of Greek mathematician and astronomer Sosigenes of Alexandria. The calendar was predominant in the Roman world, most of Europe, and in European settlements in the Americas and elsewhere, until it was replaced by the Gregorian calendar, promulgated in 1582 by Pope Gregory XIII. The Julian calendar has two types of year: a normal year of 365 days and a leap year of 366 days. It followed a simple cycle of three normal years and one leap year, based on an average year that is 365.25 days long. In effect, it is erroneous because that is more than the actual solar year value of 365.24219 days, which means the Julian calendar gains a day every 128 years.

Although, the Gregorian calendar was decreed in 1582, Great Britain and its colonies promulgated the Gregorian calendar in 1752, by which time it was necessary to correct by 11 days. Wednesday, September 2, 1752, was followed by Thursday, September 14, 1752. Since the year 1752 was a leap year, so that it consisted of 355 days (366 days less 11 omitted).

Many Protestant countries initially objected to adopting the Catholic innovation, fearing that the new calendar was part of a plot to return them to the Catholic fold. In England, Queen Elizabeth I and her privy council had looked favourably to a Gregorian-like royal commission recommendation to drop 10 days from the calendar but the virulent disagreement of the Anglican bishops, who opposed the Pope, led the Queen to let the matter be quietly dropped. In the Czech Republics, Protestants resisted the calendar imposed by the Habsburg Monarchy.

Remonstrations and furor prevailed in some misinformed quarters as the rioters demanded “Give us our eleven days”. Daily wages workers assumed that they had been robbed of eleven days of wages. This misconception grew out of a misinterpretation of a painting by William Hogarth. In 1755, William Hogarth produced a painting entitled An Election Entertainment, which shows a placard carrying the slogan “Give us our Eleven Days”. The issue was debated hotly in the British Parliament till the misconception was resolved. Ronald Paulson, author of Hogarth, His Life, Art and Times, wrote that “the Oxfordshire people … specifically rioted, as historically the London crowd did, to preserve the ‘Eleven Days’ the government stole from them in September 1752 by changing the calendar”.

There were, however, legitimate concerns regarding tax and other payments under the new calendar due to the shortened period. Consequently, Provision 6 (Times of Payment of Rents, Annuities) of the Act was introduced, which stipulated that monthly or yearly payments would not become due until the dates that they originally would have done had the Julian calendar continued.

This provision applied to defer payment of Window Tax, which was a permanent tax. It did not apply to Land Tax which was re-enacted each year.

The Land Tax Act for the year from 25 March 1752 became law after the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 and therefore over-rode the provision governing the time of payment.

In Russia, the Gregorian calendar was accepted after the October Revolution. On 24 January 1918, the Council of People’s Commissars issued a decree that Wednesday, 31 January 1918, was to be followed by Thursday, 14 February 1918, thus dropping 13 days from the calendar. With the change, the October Revolution itself, once converted, took place on 7 November. Articles about the October Revolution which mention this date difference tend to do a full conversion to the dates from Julian to the Gregorian calendar.

In Pakistan, we use the Gregorian calendar for formal purposes but all religious events are based on the Islamic calendar which is a lunar one, so that there are 12 lunar months in a year of 354 or 355 days, being 11 days shorter than a solar year. Consequently, holy days in Islam migrate around the solar year on a 32-year cycle. Some other countries in the Islamic world too use the Gregorian calendar for civil purposes, while retaining the Islamic calendar for religious purposes. For example, Saudi Arabia adopted the Gregorian calendar for the purpose of paying public sector staff effective 1 October 2016; private sector employers had already adopted the Gregorian calendar for pay purposes.

Today, the vast majority of countries use the Gregorian calendar as their sole civil calendar. Countries which have not adopted the Gregorian calendar are Ethiopia, which uses the Ethiopian calendar, Nepal follows the Vikram Samvat, Iran and Afghanistan use the Solar Hijri calendar.

Israel follows the Hebrew calendar and Myanmar the Burmese calendar, while some countries use a modified version of the Gregorian calendar, including Thailand (Thai solar calendar), Japan (Japanese calendar), North Korea (North Korean) and China uses the Chinese calendar, which is lunisolar. It is based on exact astronomical observations of the sun’s longitude and the Moon’s phases. It attempts to have its years coincide with the tropical year.

September 14 is commemorated as the promulgation of the Gregorian Calendar, now widely in use.

EU and China talk trade despite rifts
EU and China talk trade despite rifts

EU leaders will talk to Chinese President Xi Jinping seeking trade and investment Monday, despite tensions over Hong Kong’s freedoms and Beijing’s treatment of its Uighur minority.

Chinese officials, EU chiefs Charles Michel and Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will hold a video-conference to replace a full summit with all 27 EU leaders cancelled because of coronavirus.

China says an investment deal — already seven years in the making — can be agreed this year, but EU officials warn obstacles remain and insist they will not swallow unfavourable terms simply to cut a deal.

“Even if there is a political objective to accelerate negotiations and conclude them by the end of the year, we will have this only if it is something worth having,” an EU official said.

Brussels says “significant progress” has been made in talks since a similar video summit in June, and officials hope to agree a roadmap to a deal by the end of the year — they also want Beijing to improve market access for European companies.

“The EU must define its own interests, and must be strong and independent of both China and the United States,” French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire told the German weekly Welt am Sonntag.

Brussels wants to reinforce respect for intellectual property, to end obligations to transfer technology and to reduce subsidies for Chinese public enterprises.

  • China-US tensions –

No major breakthrough is expected on Monday but the EU side hopes to persuade Xi to give fresh political impetus to the talks — and to allow his negotiators more room to compromise.

The meeting comes as ties between China and the US deteriorate, with both sides locked in fierce recriminations over trade disputes, human rights and the origins of the coronavirus pandemic.

Washington and Beijing have imposed curbs on each other’s diplomats, after another tit-for-tat move in July when the two governments ordered the closure of consulates in Houston and Chengdu.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi (pictured in Berlin) has been touring European capitals over the su...

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi (pictured in Berlin) has been touring European capitals over the summer seeking to drum up support in Beijing’s spat with Washington

Michael Sohn, POOL/AFP/File

Both sides have sought to enlist the EU in their spat and, during a visit to Brussels by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in June, EU diplomatic chief Josep Borrell mooted talks to forge a common transatlantic front against China.

But little progress has been made on this initiative and broadly Brussels has preferred a middle path, treating Beijing as both a potential partner and a “systemic rival”.

“The EU stands firm on its interests and values but also wants to cooperate with China,” a senior EU official said.

  • Hong Kong –

The EU will press Xi on Hong Kong, where Beijing has imposed a controversial new security law — a move denounced by the West as an assault on the city’s freedoms.

After the June summit, von der Leyen warned China would face “very negative consequences” if it pressed ahead with the law and the EU would limit exports to Hong Kong of equipment that could be used for surveillance and repression.

European concerns about Beijing’s rights record are growing. During a visit by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to Berlin earlier this month, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called China out over Hong Kong and its treatment of minority Uighurs.

A polluted day in Beijing in January 2020. Brussels hopes to press China to be more ambitious in its...

A polluted day in Beijing in January 2020. Brussels hopes to press China to be more ambitious in its efforts to cut emissions

NICOLAS ASFOURI, AFP/File

But the European Union is far from united on how to deal with China, with some member states urging a tougher stance on rights and the environment, and others wanting to boost trade.

But China as its own concerns.

China announced Saturday it was banning imports of pork products from Germany after the European country confirmed its first case of African swine fever.

Germany is Europe‘s biggest pork producer and recently saw a surge in demand from China after it suffered an outbreak of the same disease.

Meanwhile, Beijing has used its mammoth “Belt and Road” infrastructure scheme to effectively pick off investment-hungry EU member states such as Greece, Portugal and Italy.

Blair, Major chide UK over ‘shocking’ EU plan
Blair, Major chide UK over ‘shocking’ EU plan

The Herald

herald logo

LONDON. Former prime ministers Tony Blair and John Major said yesterday Britain must drop a “shocking” plan to pass legislation that breaks its divorce treaty with the European Union, in a breach of international law.

The British government said explicitly last week that it plans to break international law by breaching parts of the Withdrawal Agreement treaty that it signed in January, when it formally left the EU.

“What is being proposed now is shocking,” Major and Blair, who were adversaries in the 1990s as Conservative and Labour leaders, wrote in a joint letter published by The Sunday Times.

“How can it be compatible with the codes of conduct that bind ministers, law officers and civil servants deliberately to break treaty obligations?”

Theresa May, the predecessor of Prime Minister Boris Johnson, has also questioned whether international partners would be able to trust Britain in future.

Johnson’s Internal Market Bill is aimed at ensuring Britain’s four constituent nations can trade freely with one another after leaving the EU, but the government says that requires overriding part of the withdrawal treaty it signed with Brussels.

British ministers say the bill is a “safety net” in the event there is no trade deal reached with the bloc, but top EU officials say it undermines both the withdrawal treaty and trust in future talks.

EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier said yesterday that the Withdrawal Agreement on Northern Ireland “is not a threat to the integrity of the UK”, and had been agreed by the two sides to protect peace on the island of Ireland.

“We could not have been clearer about the consequences of Brexit,” Barnier said on Twitter.

His British counterpart David Frost responded by saying London had to reserve powers in the new bill in order to keep the peace in Ireland.

Keir Starmer, leader of the opposition Labour Party, described the legislation as wrong yesterday.

“We have broken the trust of our international partners,” Starmer wrote in the Sunday Telegraph newspaper, adding that his party would oppose the bill in parliament unless changes were made.

European lawmakers have warned they would not approve any new trade deal unless the withdrawal agreement was fully implemented, while there is also talk of possible legal action.

“The reputation of the UK . . . as a trusted negotiating partner on important issues like this is being damaged in a very serious way,” Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney told the BBC yesterday.

Meet the 54-year-old new Vogue editor who says it's time fashion embraced the older woman
Meet the 54-year-old new Vogue editor who says it’s time fashion embraced the older woman

Part way through our interview, Martina Bonnier starts chatting about the menopause. ‘It’s easier to discuss in Scandinavia than in other countries,’ says the 54-year-old.

People are more accepting. They will take a subject like this and ‘lift it up to the light; make it an issue that is important to discuss’.

It’s not something I expected to be covered by the new editor of a new Vogue — Vogue Scandinavia — which launches not just digitally, but in old-fashioned paper form, in spring 2021.

Nordic people are practical, unabashed, open, she says. They will happily talk about the menopause, sex, ageing and equality.

Martina Bonnier, 54, is the new editor of the new Vogue Scandinavia and is unafraid to talk about the menopause

Her admission says two things about Martina: that she is bold — very bold indeed — and that she is not afraid of controversy.

The decision to launch a fashion magazine in these uncertain times, is, arguably, both brave and controversial.

Not only has Covid all but wiped out luxury goods advertising, it has killed some small designer firms, wounded bigger retail outlets and given haute couture a nervous breakdown.

Last month the New York Times published an article entitled Sweatpants Forever, which predicted the end of fashion weeks and rigid fashion cycles.

But has Scandinavian fashion bucked that trend? Even before Covid (or ‘BC’ as it is now known), the region’s designers had caught the attention of fastidious fashion buyers.

In evidence everywhere — from Net-a-Porter to your local high street — was Scandinavia’s strong unhysterical aesthetic in clothes.

The value of Sweden’s fashion exports alone was £18 billion in 2015. Since then, fashion’s interest in Scandanavia has only grown.

Chances are, you already know many Scandinavian fashion brands. H&M is the most obvious (the High Street giant also owns Cos, & Other Stories and Arket), but there are also the highly successful labels Ganni, Acne Studios, Stine Goya and Malene Birger among others.

Perhaps Vogue’s parent company Conde Nast is onto something. Perhaps now is the obvious moment for the world’s eyes to turn to Scandinavia, with its emphasis on practicality and nature, as we cope with the fallout from Covid.

So, what should we expect from Martina’s new Vogue?

It will be published in English, Martina says, to give it the widest possible market, and sell across Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland and Iceland.

And it will be very different from all other Vogues (there are 28).

She insists that women should not be invisible when they are a certain age. And to exemplify her point, she’s wearing no visible make-up, no nail varnish, no earrings in her unpierced ears today

For a start: ‘It will not be elitist,’ she says. It will be real, it will be ‘natural’ and — she references fashion’s current preoccupation — ‘it will be sustainable’.

Nature is her muse, she says. ‘In Scandinavia, nature is more or less a religion.’

The stress on natural extends to Martina’s personal view of cosmetic surgery (no), tweakments (no), tattoos (no), piercings (no) and filters on social media (no).

This ‘authenticity of the filter-less’ will be very Vogue Scandinavia, she says. Retouching is bland.

‘It’s OK to age,’ is her mantra. Martina doesn’t flinch from saying she’s 54.

In the past, there has been a tendency for women to be erased from view at this age.

Last week Fiona Bruce, BBC news anchor and presenter of Question Time, said she was surprised to have a job at 56 for this reason.

Although still in situ at 70, Anna Wintour became editor of British Vogue aged 36 and American Vogue aged 39.

Alexandra Shulman was 34 when she took over British Vogue and retired from the chair at 59.

Martina believes women should make a virtue of their age. Her mantra is: ‘Dare to be more yourself.’

This does not mean she doesn’t dress up, of course. Her social media is a dizzying carousel of couture, often against sumptuous backgrounds — her house in Stockholm, her Manhattan apartment, boats, planes, beaches, ski slopes and (pre-pandemic) galas galore.

As well as big floaty numbers pictured against dramatic Nordic scenery, she’s in bikinis and gym kit.

‘Women should not be invisible when they are a certain age,’ she says.

As if to exemplify her point, she’s wearing no visible make-up, no nail varnish, no earrings in her unpierced ears today.

Martina is married to Sverker Thufvesson, 61, the CEO of a private bank. She has two children with him, Mildred, 20, and Bolder, 23

She’s wearing a unisex shirt and a pair of — sharp gasp! — shorts.

They are unisex sky-blue. Like her shirt, they are made by Swedish designer Hope, and have both men and women’s sizes on the label.

At the end of her long, shiny, naked leg (teeny black dots suggesting a shaver, not a waxer) is a kitten heel.

When I mention that Anna Wintour has a blow dry at the crack of dawn every day, Martina says that in Scandinavia ‘you do it yourself’.

She is sitting at a slight angle, her knees pointing away from me, her hands scrunched in her lap, and speaks in a light feathery way although her eyes are dark and flinty as they take me in.

Martina has worked in fashion for 30 years. She’s edited magazines and is a frequent pundit on television.

She has written five books: mostly on fashion history, but also a novel, Obsession (about a Swedish fashion dynasty which has a crisis when the founder throws everything away to become an eco-farmer). It has sold out online.

In Stockholm, she’s called Sweden’s Anna Wintour, a description she encourages.

Other labels she likes are ‘fashionista’ and ‘influencer’ (‘You should always be photographed,’ Martina told one journalist).

She sees herself as a brand, she says. She once even put herself on the cover of her own magazine.

We meet during Copenhagen fashion week in August.

The city is (unusually) unbearably hot, as everyone from the hotel receptionist to the man in the coffee shop to Martina herself keeps saying.

Women are flushed and fanning themselves, sweat pasting their middle-parted hair to their clear-skinned foreheads, dampening their utilitarian black smocks, making their feet slide in their neutral-coloured Birkenstocks.

‘Scandinavian fashion is influenced by its history; it is functional and unfussy,’ Martina tells me.

‘That’s why we are so big on jeans, for example, because it’s workwear and everyday.

And outerwear, of course, because of the cold winters. We have a saying in Sweden: there’s no bad weather just bad clothes.’

‘It’s OK to age’ is Martha’s mantra. Pictured: The mother with Mildred when she was younger

Swedes tend to be the ‘groomed and well-dressed’ of the region, she continues; Danes ‘a little more relaxed, a little more eclectic, more bohemian’.

Finnish fashion is influenced by its border with Russia, ‘so a little bolder, more folkloristic’; Norwegians like sports gear.

‘We have a joke in Sweden: Norwegians never work, they go hiking.’

Jewellery designers are also big news, she says, showing me the chunky twist of thousands of pin-head diamonds on her wrist.

‘This is a Swedish designer, Engelbert.’ The crystals around her throat are ‘by another Swede, Marta Larsson.

‘These are healing crystals. They give you more energy. Well, at least I hope they do.’

It was while living in New York last year (with her husband Sverker Thufvesson, 61, CEO of a private bank, with whom she has two children, Mildred, 20, and Bolder, 23) that she first received a call from Conde Nast about licensing Vogue for Scandinavia.

Has she met the other Vogue editors, such as Wintour and Edward Enninful (editor-in-chief of British Vogue)? ‘Yes.

‘They have been so sweet and everybody has welcomed me to the Vogue family. It seems very family-like.’

Earlier this year Wintour apologised for the lack of diversity in the pages of American Vogue, and following this, Martina was sent the new rules on diversity and ethnicity by Conde Nast.

She says these are more relevant to the U.S.: ‘I mean there’s still things to work on here — always — but in terms of equality and diversity, we do very well compared to everywhere else.

‘I am used to working with different minorities, different age groups, it’s very much in the system.’

Sweden and Denmark are well known for their gender equality.

Women find it easier to work because childcare is free, and men are encouraged to pitch in 50:50.

‘In a young family it would be normal to share parental leave,’ says Martina.

‘You see all these trendy dads walking around Stockholm on leave for several months. We don’t have that macho rejection thing, no.’

In keeping with this contemporary attitude, Martina is approaching her Vogue project like a start-up, focusing on tech and sustainability.

‘I want to work on reaching a new audience; on finding new ways to see, listen and communicate fashion. We will test and risk a little.’

Martina has acknowledged the magazine format is ‘pretty old-fashioned’. She says she will produce only six issues of her Vogue a year, with a view that ‘they will be something you save for a long time’.

 Well-connected Maria says she comes from ‘one of the largest media families in Northern Europe‘. Pictured: The journalist with supermodel Cindy Crawford

She won’t shy away from, say, putting teenage climate change activist Greta Thunberg on the cover.

‘For us, she is an example of how far we are at the front of the environmental conversation’ — but the cover ‘doesn’t have to be a known person’.

She jokes that her obsession with fashion was the fault of her father, Dan, who straitjacketed her into jeans and T-shirts as a child, while her desire fluttered over the gowns and tailoring in the varnished pages of American and British Vogue, the magazines she spent all her pocket money on.

When she was 16, she was sent to school in Newport, Rhode Island, 3,796 miles from her Swedish family.

Cut off, alone, worried about her parents’ failing marriage and starved of letters and phone calls from home because her parents thought it too expensive to call the U.S. ‘and never did’, she did two things: she excelled at school, driving herself hard to achieve straight As; and she stopped eating.

Those around her thought her obsession with fashion was to blame for what developed into anorexia.

‘But it wasn’t so much that, it was something in myself,’ she says. ‘It’s classic: high-achieving, ambitious, needing to feel in control.’

By the time she returned home to Sweden, she was ‘in turmoil’ and ‘very sick’. Her parents, who had divorced, were ‘so shocked’ when they saw her.

‘They had no idea,’ she recalls. ‘I can’t remember how much I weighed — not much.’

Her plan had been to study at an American university, but ‘I was still sick and I didn’t feel supported by my [immediate] family’.

A word about the Bonnier family: they are eye-wateringly rich.

‘I come from one of the largest media families in Northern Europe, and it’s a 100 per cent family-owned company with more than 250 years of history,’ she says.

‘I’ve felt the tradition of publishing since I was born.’

But that did not translate into a stable childhood. Both Martina and her brother David, two years younger, had a peripatetic upbringing.

‘It shapes lives,’ she has said. ‘It’s been tough. But who doesn’t have a burden?’

By the age of 25 she had moved 23 times, living in Copenhagen, Paris, Toronto and New York, among other places, as her mother Vera trailed her father, trying to keep the family together.

‘My mother always tried to normalise the family. But they were young when they married, and it was a lot to deal with.’

The experience, she has said, has made her resilient: ‘I’m used to life turning upside down at times. I’m not particularly afraid of deep crises. I know they enrich life in some strange way.’

In interviews in Sweden, Martina has defended her privilege, claiming that her surname has meant she has had to work doubly hard.

She started as a junior on the newsdesk of Goteborgs-Posten, the second largest newspaper in Sweden and part of the Bonnier empire, and was despatched with her notepad to cover strikes, small exhibitions and school events.

‘I learned to write,’ she says. ‘I learned the style and the importance of good language. I’ve always been able to fall back on that.’

Martina is called Sweden’s Anna Wintour in Stockholm and it is a description she encourages. Pictured: Wintour on an outing in New York last month

At 24, she switched to another family-owned magazine, VeckoRevyn.

‘As a fashion person, I wanted to move back to Stockholm and work for the most trendy, young, pop-culture magazine in the early 90s.’

Like The Face and i-D, I ask? ‘Yes, like that.’

It was there that she decided to write about anorexia, a subject not much talked about in Sweden in the late 1980s.

‘No one had wanted to talk about it much. But I wrote a whole series on it, including my personal experience. And it became a news story.’

Despite this success with writing, her obsession with fashion prevailed. ‘I was peeking into the fashion department and asking: ‘Do you need help?’

‘One day I found the courage to see my editor-in-chief. I said: ‘You know, I really would like to start as a fashion assistant, from the bottom again.’

She looked at me and said I was crazy. Why would I change from a writing position to being pushed around by a fashion editor? But I wanted that job.’

Once there, Martina was in her element describing the clothes like friends. ‘I got to be near the clothes, to hang out with them,’ she told one interviewer.

She saw them as a way of expressing herself, as ‘theatre’.

In 2008 she flung open the doors of her eight wardrobes to a weekend magazine, inviting them to inspect her 30 designer handbags (including a crocodile bag from Zagliani: ‘They are best on exotic skins, and even have a dermatologist who Botoxes the skin to make it extra-soft,’ she said at the time).

She declared women should have no fewer than six ‘in a functioning wardrobe’, and dismissed those who thought £6,000 was a ‘completely disgusting’ amount to spend on a single bag because, ‘Men buy cars for hundreds of thousands of kronor, no one shouts about it’. She had a point.

In 2011 Martina took the helm at Damernas Värld (Women’s World), a large circulation fashion magazine also owned by her family.

Her experience with anorexia meant, ‘that throughout my career, I always have felt that I can support other women when I see it, and I can see it early.

‘I’ve always said: “OK, come here. I’ll talk to you. We’ll help you.” So I helped a lot of young girls in the industry.’

This mothering streak is less Wintouresque, perhaps, than her reputation for being ‘tough’ and ‘uncompromising’.

After leaving Damernas Värld in 2016, she moved to New York with her husband, attending, often in a vast gown, key social events: the Met Gala, the Tribeca Film festival; New York Fashion Week and Ralph Lauren’s ’50 years as a designer’ show in 2018.

Low-key her life was not. Mornings began with a Soul Cycle spin class. She holidayed in ‘my beloved Hamptons’.

But despite the glitz, Martina says she would like to be played, in a film of her life, not by Meryl Streep, but by Winona Ryder because ‘she’s feminine in a low-key way’.

No doubt this apparent internal contradiction — the Scandi warmth, the Manhattan granite — will make for a bold and controversial Vogue.

Who will be on the cover? She won’t say. What Anna Wintour will make of it? We shall find out in spring 2021.