Is Christianity an idealism? (2)
Is Christianity an idealism? (2)

It is true that the spirit is the first and basic principle of Christianity, but at the same time we must add that it perceives this spirit in a completely different way from idealism. We emphasized from the beginning that the content of Christianity is the fruit of revelation, which means that its teaching on the spirit has the same character. Unlike idealism, revelation does not speak of a spirit at all, but of the Holy Spirit. To avoid some misunderstandings, here is his place to make a clarification. When we speak of the Holy Spirit, we do not mean specifically the theological distinction in the very existence of God, expressed in the idea of the trinity. By the Holy Spirit we understand the essence of God as a Spirit in general, opposite to the idealistic spirit, and in order to express this opposition more clearly and emphatically, we use the adjective holy, which in its sense is most appropriate for this purpose. The adjective saint reproduces in Bulgarian the Greek word ἅγιος, which is a translation of the Hebrew qadosh. The word qadosh in the Bible denotes difference, division, ie in general something that is radically different from this world, something that is beyond the world and completely opposite to the earthly or profane. The sacred manifests empirically in the temporal-spatial world as a fire that burns everything in contact with it, or as a light that blinds. Characteristic in this respect are the experiences of Moses at the burning bush on Mount Horeb (Ex. 3: 1-5) and ap. Paul at his meeting with Christ at the gates of Damascus (Acts 9: 3-9). From the concept of light originates the Slavic adjective “shines”, which means inaccessibility, absolute extraterrestrialism and transcendence not as an abstract idea, but as a dynamic manifestation. In holiness we therefore have the self-distinction of God from everything outside of Him. The awareness of the sacred was especially strong in the biblical prophets: Isaiah experienced the holiness of God as the mortal opposite of his own created nature. [2] The most subtle analysis of the sacred was given by the German scientist Rudolf Otto. [3] According to him, it represents a specific religious category, which can be expressed by the scientific Latin terms “mysterium tremendum et fascinans”. The word mysterium characterizes the sacred as an objective reality that does not belong to this world. It is something mysterious because it cannot be clarified as a world-immanent phenomenon. In order to make a clear distinction, we must emphasize that here secret is not understood as something unknown, vague and as yet unexplored, which with the progress of science will be known and mastered. Positivism builds its theory on such a notion of mystery. According to him, religion is a primitive and naive notion that rests on the first man’s fear of the mystery of natural phenomena, because he did not yet know their true causes. With the advent of scientific knowledge, this mystery gradually diminishes, and with it, religion will disappear. However, Rudolf Otto uses the word secret not as ambiguity and unfamiliarity with the natural phenomena that take place in this world. It does not mean a lack of knowledge that can be filled over time. A secret for him is that which has nothing to do with this world and is beyond its borders. It is something extraterrestrial, transcendent, which does not go beyond scientific research and therefore can never be overcome by it. It is true that primitive man first mixed the sacred he experienced with natural phenomena themselves due to insufficient knowledge of their causes. This does not mean that once he has scientifically clarified these reasons, the sacred has ceased to exist for him. Science has only corrected the error of primitive man in interpreting the sacred, but it has not destroyed the latter. Therefore, religion as an encounter with the sacred is not a temporary period in the development of mankind, but is a quantity parallel to science. One is focused on the extraterrestrial and the other on the immanent, with the two only clarifying their boundaries over time. For clarity, Rudolf Otto translates the word mysterium with something completely different (das ganz Andere), which shines in this world, but in its essence remains outside it. The other two Latin terms “tremendum et fascinans” express the effect that the sacred has on the human consciousness when it meets it. “Tremendum” comes from the verb tremor, which means to tremble, I’m afraid. The first reaction, therefore, which the sacred provokes in man, is trembling or fear. Man feels that he has come into contact with something mysterious, unearthly, radically different from the reality around him, something completely foreign to him, which fundamentally shakes his existence and threatens his security in the world. As before, so now we have to make another distinction. The fear or awe of the sacred is completely different from the similar states we experience in ordinary life. Other cultural languages have a large enough vocabulary to express this subtle difference; in Bulgarian, however, we do not have this opportunity and therefore we will be satisfied only with comparisons and explanations.

N.B. For the first time this text by KONSTANTIN TSITSELKOV was published in the magazine Spiritual Culture, vol. 6, 1949, pp. 12-23.

Is Christianity an idealism? (3)
Is Christianity an idealism? (3)

However, God and the world, spirit and flesh are not only in opposition, but also in contradiction, because sin has entered between them. Therefore, secondly, the flesh as a unity of spirit and matter is an ethical concept with a negative meaning. Then carnal life will mean living according to the law of sin, and carnal man will be the sinful man. This means that the spirit that directs itself to sin is also flesh. On the other hand, spiritual life will mean living according to the law of the Holy Spirit or according to the will of God, and a spiritual person will be the sinless, good person. Then the body of such a person, who is directed to the good, is also a spirit.

The best commentary on the correct understanding of the opposition between spirit and flesh is the Pauline notions of the old and the new man. From this the essence of Christian morality becomes clear to us. It does not consist in torturing the flesh to give supremacy to the spirit in man, as any idealistic ethic teaches, but in directing the whole person, revived and renewed by the power of the Holy Spirit, to fulfill the requirements of God’s will. These considerations are confirmed by the authoritative research of one of the most demanding and unprejudiced historians of Christianity, Hans von Soden. It is he who concludes that the biblical concept of the spirit is completely different from that of idealism, because the Bible speaks of the divine spirit, while idealism seeks the spirit only in man. [6] For the Christian consciousness, therefore, spirit and matter as immanent quantities are equivalent. Both are absolutely necessary and mutually conditioned in their existence. Above them stands the Holy Spirit as their Creator. In contrast to idealism, for Christianity matter is a creation of God. It makes possible human existence in time and space or in history in general. It is the place where the ideal or spiritual values are realized. Therefore, the app. Paul says that the body is a temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 3:16; 6:19). The positive meaning of matter stands out best in the resurrection of Jesus. It is her apotheosis, because in it she receives her spiritualization and perpetuation. No religion has raised matter to such a height that it borders on God’s nearness as Christianity.

In the light of the Pauline-Ioanist doctrine of the spirit, we can also gain a correct understanding of the basic biblical idea of ​​the creation of the world. As is well known, the greatest suspicion of idealism comes from the claim of Christianity that the world is a creative act of the spirit. However, such a statement is, according to some, impossible, just as it is impossible for a cause to produce an action contrary to its essence. There is a law that says the action must be equal to the cause. Spirit, therefore, according to him, cannot create matter or reality at all. We do not observe such an act anywhere in the world and it cannot be reproduced experimentally. The objection is really serious, however, within the limits of a premise that cannot be valid for the biblical teaching of the creation of the world. The latter cannot be expressed primarily by the cause-and-effect scheme, which has a purely naturalistic character. According to her, if there is a reason, action must necessarily follow. Both are mutually conditioned and cannot exist separately. According to this scheme, the world is an iron necessity, without which the root cause cannot be imagined. The notions of the absolute, the idea, the immovable engine, which philosophy and metaphysics form through abstract thinking, have the same meaning. They all have nothing to do with the biblical teaching of creation from nothing (creatio ex nihilo), which is purely personal. According to him, the world was created by the free and sovereign decision of a personal Spirit. The latter could exist without the world, which represents no need for Him. God is an absolute master who does not depend on anything. That there is something else besides Him due to His free will. The world depends on this will at all times. That is why man’s natural reactions to the world are gratitude or protest. [8] If the world existed by necessity, we would come to terms with it. For some, however, the world is a precious gift that rips out their gratitude, and for others it is the embodiment of disorder, suffering and chaos, and so they protest that it exists in such a form. The world came into being in the same way as the manifestations of the human will. However, the Spirit who created the world is neither Plato’s idea of ​​good nor Hegel’s absolute reason, but the Holy Spirit, ie the One Who includes matter in His possibilities. For the Spirit as Creator of visible reality, we really have no analogy in experience. The human spirit is capable of creativity, but not in the proper sense of the word. He can realize his ideas only with the help of the available matter. The sculptor, for example, realizes the conceived image with the help of stone, wood, clay, etc. Therefore, according to the Bible, the human spirit is not something completely independent and autonomous, but a reflection of the Holy Spirit. Only the latter creates in the absolute and own sense of the word, realizing His ideas directly, without the help of any intermediary. – However, not only for the Spirit-Creator of the world we have no analogy in the experience, but also for the creative act itself, because it is unique and unrepeatable. We cannot imagine it visually, because we ourselves, together with everything that exists, are included in it. [9] In order to reproduce the creation of the world, we must stand outside it so that it can emerge before our consciousness in its entirety. This means that we have to find the Archimedean point and from there take a worldview, which unfortunately we are not able to do. Such an attempt would be doomed to the same failure as man’s desire to jump over his shadow. The magic circle in which we are closed is broken only at one point in history. This is the person of Jesus Christ, whose work bears the character of a second or new creation (recreatio). It is here that, as we saw earlier, the Holy Spirit manifested itself as a creative, world-renewing force. Only in the person and work of Jesus Christ do we have a revelation of the spirit in the true and proper sense of the word. Jesus Christ did not come to bring any new philosophy or morality, as many think. Whoever seeks in Him only the philosopher or the moral preacher, he would do better to go to Socrates, Goethe or Kant. The work of Jesus Christ is of the rank of creation, because He creates a new reality, embodied in the new man. All moral systems, no matter how lofty and strict their requirements, suffer from one major drawback: from the time of Socrates to Kant, the principle has been that once a person has realized his duty to good, he has the necessary strength and can do so.

However, Christ rejects this moral optimism and claims that there is a tragic contradiction between the requirements of good and the possibility of their fulfillment, from which one can never get rid of oneself. According to Him, this contradiction is a dangerous disease that leads to death. It is here, where every morality, even the highest, is powerless, that the work of Jesus Christ begins. It consists in recreating and renewing human nature through the creative, life-giving power of the Holy Spirit.

He who has experienced with particular force this revival and renewal process in himself and has built his philosophy of Christian existence on it, is ap. Paul. In tracing the highlights of his life, we can reproduce this process most plastically. Paul’s youth passes under the sign of the above-mentioned tragic contradiction, which he experiences with the energy of his boisterous and expansive temperament. This is evidenced by the following words of his: “I have a desire for good, but I do not find the strength to do it. For it is not the good that I do that I do, but the evil that I do not want, that I do. : 18, 19, 21, 24). At the moment when his will to fulfill the Old Testament law reaches the greatest tension and in this state he declares a life and death struggle against Christians as opponents of this law and of obsolete morality in general, ap. Paul meets the risen Jesus at the gates of Damascus. Here he experienced an inner revolution under the influence of the Spirit manifested in Jesus. This unusual event the biographer of the app. Paul, Luke, describes it this way: “But when Saul was on his way and approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven shone on him. And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art thou, sir? The Lord said, I am Jesus whom you persecute. It’s hard for you to kick against rye. He spoke tremblingly and terribly: Lord, what do you want me to do? And the LORD said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou shalt do. The Lord Jesus, Who appeared to you on the way, sent me to see and be filled with the Holy Spirit… And suddenly it was as if scales fell from his eyes and he immediately saw and when he got up, he was baptized and immediately began to preach in the synagogue of Jesus, that he is the Son of God ”(Acts 9: 3-6, 17, 18, 20). The app itself. Paul gives the following commentary on the event: “But their minds (that is, the Jews to whom Paul belonged in the pre-Christian period of his life) were dulled, because to this day, when the Old Testament is read, the same remains. a veil that is removed through Christ. To this day, when Moses is read, a veil rests on their hearts. But when they turn to the Lord, the veil is removed. And the Lord is the Spirit. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. All of us with open faces, as in a mirror, looking at the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory as from the Spirit of the Lord ”(2 Cor. 3: 14-18). The fruit of this inner spiritual revolution, caused by the encounter with Jesus as Spirit, is the new man. “So then he that is in Christ is a new creature; the ancient passed; behold, all things are become new ”(2 Cor. 5:17). The tragic contradiction between the strict requirements of the moral law and the impossibility of fulfilling them disappears. The new man acquires graceful strength to carry out God’s will, even in the most difficult conditions, with joy and a pure heart. “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me” (Phil. 4:13). Here is the work of Jesus Christ, expressed not in abducted formulas, but in several facts of the life of one of His most zealous disciples, charged with explosive energy. On these directly experienced facts this disciple builds his doctrine of the Spirit as a creative force capable of recreating human nature. It is this Spirit that Christianity considers to be the Creator of the world.

N.B. For the first time this text by KONSTANTIN TSITSELKOV was published in the magazine Spiritual Culture, vol. 6, 1949, pp. 12-23.

India, China to Hold 12th Round of Talks Tomorrow
India, China to Hold 12th Round of Talks Tomorrow

By   —  Shyamal Sinha

The 12th round of Corps Commander level talks between India and China will be held in Moldo on the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) around 10:30 am on Saturday. India and China expected to discuss disengagement from the Hot Springs and Gogra Heights areas.

India and China held a virtual meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on border affairs last month as part of the dialogue process to resolve the standoff.

In the meeting, the two sides agreed to hold the next round of military talks at an early date to achieve the objective of complete disengagement in the remaining friction points in eastern Ladakh. “You would recall that the 22nd meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on the border was held on June 25. The two sides also agreed to hold the 12th round of senior commanders meeting at an early date. We will certainly share any update once we have that,” Bagchi said. The 11th round of Corps Commander-level talks between the two sides on the border row was held on April 9. India and China were locked in a military standoff at multiple friction points in eastern Ladakh since early May last year. However, the two sides completed the withdrawal of troops and weapons from the North and South banks of Pangong lake in February following a series of military and diplomatic talks.

The two countries have been engaged in a military standoff for almost a year. However, the two sides disengaged from the most contentious Pangong Lake area last month after extensive talks at the military and political levels.

The two sides are now engaged in talks to extend the disengagement process to the remaining friction points. There was no visible forward movement in disengagement of troops in the remaining friction points as the Chinese side did not show flexibility in their approach on it at the 11th round of military talks.

Last month, Army Chief Gen MM Naravane said that there can be no de-escalation without complete disengagement at all friction points in eastern Ladakh and that the Indian Army is prepared for all contingencies in the region. Gen Naravane also said that India is dealing with China in a “firm” and “non-escalatory” manner to ensure the sanctity of its claims in eastern Ladakh and that it was even open to initiating confidence-building measures.

China has been enhancing military infrastructure across the LAC for some time now. Looking at it, India has changed its posture towards China, and unlike its previous defensive approach that placed a premium on fending on Chinese aggression, India is now catering military options to strike back and has reoriented its forces accordingly.

India has reoriented around 50,000 troops whose main focus is on the disputed borders with China.

The reorientation comes at a time when China is refurbishing its existing air-fields in the Tibetan Plateau that will allow twin-engine fighter aircraft to be stationed, sources said.

In addition, China has also also brought troops from the Tibet military region to the Xinjiang region.

Blinken’s meeting with Dalai Lama representatives riles China
Blinken’s meeting with Dalai Lama representatives riles China

Antony John Blinken is an American government official and diplomat serving as the 71st United States secretary of state since January 26, 2021. He previously served as deputy national security advisor from 2013 to 2015 and deputy secretary of state from 2015 to 2017 under President Barack Obama.

China on Thursday reacted angrily to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s meeting with a senior representative of the Tibetan spiritual leader Dalai Lama in New Delhi, saying it is a violation of Washington’s commitment acknowledging Tibet as part of China and not to support Tibetan independence.

Blinken on Wednesday met Ngodup Dongchung, an official in the Tibetan government-in-exile and representative of the Dalai Lama, in a clear signal to China about the Biden administration’s continued support to the Tibetan cause.

In the meeting, Dongchung thanked Blinken for the continued support by the US to the Tibetan movement.

When asked, a spokesperson of the US State Department told PTI, ‘Secretary Blinken had an opportunity to meet briefly this morning in New Delhi with a representative of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Central Tibetan Administration Representative Ngodup Dongchung.’ Separately, another Tibetan representative, Geshe Dorjee Damdul, attended a roundtable Blinken held with around seven civil society members.

Asked for his reaction by the official media here at a press briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said, ‘Tibetan affairs are purely China’s internal affairs that allow no foreign interference”.

‘The 14th Dalai Lama is by no means just a religious person but rather a political exile who has long been engaged in anti-China separatist activities attempting to split Tibet from China,’ he said.

China firmly opposes all forms of contacts between foreign officials and the Dalai Lama, he said.

‘Any formal contact between the US and the Dalai clique is a violation of the US commitment to acknowledge Tibet as part of China”, not to support Tibetan independence and attempts to separate it from China, he said.

‘We urge the US to honour its commitment to stop meddling in China’s internal affairs under the pretext of Tibetan affairs, and offer no support to Tibet independence forces to engage in anti-China separatist activities. China will take all necessary measures to defend its own interests,” he said.

China comes up with such routine reactions whenever foreign dignitaries and officials meet the Dalai Lama or his representatives.

The 14th Dalai Lama has made India his home since fleeing his Tibetan homeland in 1959.

The Chinese government officials and the Dalai Lama or his representatives have not met in formal negotiations since 2010.

Beijing has in the past accused the 86-year-old Dalai Lama of indulging in ‘separatist’ activities and trying to split Tibet and considers him as a divisive figure.

Another US official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, said: “The Dalai Lama obviously is a globally revered spiritual leader and so the gesture was gratefully received and appreciated.”

The people cited above said the meeting was being seen as a strong signal of support for the Dalai Lama and was also significant as it was held in India at a time when New Delhi and Beijing are locked in a standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

However, the Tibetan spiritual leader has insisted that he is not seeking independence but ‘genuine autonomy for all Tibetans living in the three traditional provinces of Tibet’ under the ‘Middle-Way approach’.

Blinken arrived in India on Tuesday on a maiden two-day visit with an extensive agenda featuring the rapidly evolving security situation in Afghanistan, boosting Indo-Pacific engagement and ways to enhance COVID-19 response efforts among others.

According to the US State Department, Antony Blinken’s trip to New Delhi is meant to reaffirm the United States’ commitment to strengthening bilateral ties with India.

Indian Embassy marks the first sermon of Lord Buddha
Indian Embassy marks the first sermon of Lord Buddha

Thinley Namgay

To celebrate the first sermon of Lord Buddha, the Indian Embassy in Thimphu organised a dialogue on the “relevance of the teachings of Lord Buddha in the age of technology” on July 24.

Her Royal Highness Princess Kesang Wangmo Wangchuck graced the event.

President of Centre for Bhutan Studies and Gross National Happiness Research, Dasho Karma Ura and the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Bhutan, Lyonpo Sonam Tobgye shared their views on the subject. The discussion was moderated by the Executive Director of the Bhutan Nuns Foundation, Dr Tashi Zangmo.

Dasho Karma Ura said that the whole essence of the Buddha’s teachings were consciousness, ethics, and bodhicitta, which were still applicable in the age of technology. He said that a calm and contented state of mind was critical.

The four noble truths of the Buddha during the first sermon are the truth of suffering, the truth of the cause of suffering, the truth of the end of suffering, and the truth of the path that leads to the end of suffering.

Lyonpo Sonam Tobgye said that some of the essential teachings of Buddha were four noble truths, the law of Dharma and Dharma chakra (wheel of the dharma of truth), which are relevant in all walks of life.

Lyonpo also said that he used to refer kanjur (collection of sacred texts) while enacting laws.  Quoting Albert Einstein, Lyonpo said that if any religion could survive in the age of science and technology, it is Buddhism.

With support from the Ministry of Culture, Government of India, the International Buddhist Confederation organised the Asadha Poornima – Dharma Chakra global celebrations on July 24 to commemorate the Dharma Chakra Parvattana, the first sermon of Lord Buddha.

Prime Minister Dr Lotay Tshering also took part in the event, virtually. Lyonchhen said that the life and teachings of Lord Buddha have always given a great source of inspiration. “Celebrating the first ceremony of Buddha amid the pandemic gives us the spiritual reinforcement and to remember those who lost their beloved ones to the pandemic.”

The Prime Minister said: “Material wealth as we know has taken a central stage in most of the globalisation efforts. Is it in line with Lord Buddha’s timeless teaching on contentment and loving-kindness?”

Lyonchhen said that Bhutan was fortunate to have a Dharma King who considers well-being as his secret duty and regards problems and sufferings as his.

“Putin needs to think.” What future did the Dalai Lama predict for Russia?
“Putin needs to think.” What future did the Dalai Lama predict for Russia?

One of the main rulers of the planet’s thoughts, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, the XIV Dalai Lama celebrates his 86th birthday. Religious people expect from him teachings about the soul and faith, and secular people – allusions to the fate of the planet and its inhabitants. RIA Novosti publishes the brightest quotes about the prospects for Russia and the world.

About the pandemic:

The coronavirus pandemic in general is the result of bad karma that we have accumulated in previous lives. This is quite obvious, and in the Abhidharma (Buddhist doctrine of the world order. – Ed. Approx.) It is said that there will be a kalpa (a long time period. – Ed. Approx.) Weapons, a kalpa of disease and a kalpa of hunger. The Kalpa of weapons is what happened in previous years – World War I, World War II – and now weapons are still used, and they bring a lot of trouble. The next kalpa, hunger, is when people face financial difficulties. And the coronavirus pandemic, I think, is the beginning of a calpa of disease.

On the main problem of modern education:

The fact is that modern education is too obviously materialistic. People who have gone through such a training system build their lives around material values, create a materialistic culture. Because of this, when faced with difficulties in their own inner life, with emotional difficulties, they do not know what to do. So the problem is in the modern education system. I think it needs to include lessons on working with emotions. Just as we teach children about body hygiene, we need to teach about the hygiene of the mind and senses.

On the relationship between Russia and the United States:

Russia needs the Western world and America, it needs their technologies, and the West needs Russia, because it possesses enormous natural resources. Russia’s future depends on the Western world, and its future is closely linked with the fate of the Eastern world, including Russia. It is imperative for all of humanity that the countries of the East and West live in mutual respect. Russia has a unique geographical position – it plays a very important role as a bridge between East and West.

Also, the southern world (Africa, Latin America) is experiencing big problems, its fate depends on the northern world, and the future of the northern world depends on the southern one.

If we want to build a happy life on earth, then differences in nationality, religion and other grounds must recede into the background. In the 21st century, we must realize that all seven billion people on the planet are one big family … And in this respect, the Russian Federation is a great country, you have enormous potential to build a happy world.

On the future of Russia:

Russia is a great nation with great potential: new ideas, respect for each other, the joy of being human. I think Russia will be able to correctly distribute the opportunities. It has everything to become the leading nation in the world.

About Vladimir Putin:

Russia is a great country with power. Recent events have shown that Putin, as a leader, pays great attention to what is happening in different parts of the world, and this is good (the Dalai Lama said these words in an interview with RIA Novosti in May 2019. – Ed.). But Putin’s colleague, President Trump … (makes a hand gesture, indicating his hopelessness.) Like Putin, he runs a huge country, bears a great burden of responsibility. The leader of such a state must see the big picture. And think about what will be beneficial for the country in the long term. It is very important. He should not only think about getting short-term results. Of course, I have no right to criticize the activities of President Trump. But think about it: he sold billions of weapons to Saudi Arabia. In my opinion, this is wrong. He also withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement. This is very unfortunate.

The world is in a critical situation today. And Putin needs to think very carefully about his actions, take into account the big picture and understand what will be beneficial in the long run.

His Holiness to engage in dialogue on “Creating a Happier World” with London School of Economics Professor
His Holiness to engage in dialogue on “Creating a Happier World” with London School of Economics Professor
His Holiness the Dalai Lama to engage in dialogue with London School of Economics' Professor on "Creating a Happier World".

His Holiness the Dalai Lama to engage in dialogue with London School of Economics’ Professor on “Creating a Happier World”.

By –  BT Newsdesk

Dharamshala: His Holiness the Dalai Lama will engage in a dialogue on the theme “Creating a Happier World” with Prof. Lord Richard Layard, Chair, Action for Happiness and Co-Director, Community Well-Being Program at the London School of Economics online from his residence in Dharamsala, HP, India on July 28, 2021. This will be followed by a question and answer session. Viewers are requested to please follow their local social distancing rules while viewing the live webcast. Webcasts are also available in Tibetan, Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, Russian, Italian, Hindi, Korean and Mongolian.

All times Indian Standard Time (IST=GMT+5:30)

July 28th: Dialogue
Time: 9:00am – 10:00am IST

For times in your area, 9:00 am IST on July 28th in Dharamsala, India is the same as 4:30 am BST on July 28th in London, UK; and 8:30 pm PDT on July 27th in Los Angeles, California, USA. Other times can be found using Time Zone Converter (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html).

Sourced from dalailama.com

Religious persecution worldwide addressed at bipartisan multi-faith  summit in Washington, DC
Religious persecution worldwide addressed at bipartisan multi-faith summit in Washington, DC

Ambassador Brownback (right) Katrina Lantos Swett, and David Curry, Open Doors USA (left)

Voices of persecuted, both believers and non-believers, cry out “Don’t forget me” – religious freedom multi-faith and bipartisan leaders meet in Washington, DC.

WASHINGTON, DC, USA, July 22, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ — Over a thousand multi-faith leaders from 30 diverse religious traditions and bipartisan US and foreign government leaders joined together in Washington, DC, at the Omni Shoreham Hotel to attend the inaugural International Religious Freedom Summit. The Summit highlighted abuse cases and persecution to let those who are being persecuted for their beliefs know that “they have not been forgotten.” The Summit was the first in-person large event held at the Omni Shoreham Hotel since the pandemic started.Those meeting are concerned about religious freedom issues internationally and egregious violations of human rights, such as the confinement of Muslim Uyghurs in China in concentration camp-like settings. Pakistan and other countries who have blasphemy laws were also discussed. Blasphemy laws are used to marginalize, prosecute, and kill minority religious followers in many countries. The US Commission on International Religious Freedom has called for the elimination of blasphemy laws throughout the world. Under such laws, women such as Asia Bibi (one of the speakers at the conference) have been sentenced to death for blasphemy. Ms. Bibi, a Christian in a majority Muslim country, was only released from prison after ten years under a death sentence for allegedly drinking water from the same vessel as Muslim co-workers on a farm.

Eighty-four countries around the world maintain blasphemy laws that criminalize religious expression. The US Commission on International Religious Freedom recently released a groundbreaking report on those countries and how the laws are harmful to the free expression of religious faith or no-faith. Atheists and non-believers are often targeted under these laws and imprisoned or criminally charged.

greg mitchell speaking cropped

No one should suffer for their faith or non-belief. We support religious freedom for everyone, everywhere, all the time.”
— Greg Mitchell, Chairman of the IRF Secretariat

The hosting organization, the International Religious Freedom Secretariat which oversees the International Religious Freedom Roundtable, talked about the positive movement internationally to protect religious believers and non-believers. Greg Mitchell, Chairman of the Secretariat, said, “No one should suffer for their faith or non-belief. We support religious freedom for everyone, everywhere, all the time.” He continued with discussing the formation of IRF Roundtables in more than thirty regions of the world where religious leaders of all faiths and none meet regularly and work to improve religious freedom laws in various countries and to protest the jailing of prisoners of conscience who are suffering for their beliefs.

The bipartisan Summit was organized by former Senator and former Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, Sam Brownback, and Katrina Lantos Swett, former US Commission on International Religious Freedom Commissioner and the daughter of former Congressman Tom Lantos, the only Holocaust survivor to serve in Congress. Speakers included US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The event can be viewed at www.irfsummit.com or go to www.irfroundtable.org for information.

They were joined on stage or via video by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Senator James Lankford (R-OK), Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ), Congressman Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Cardinal Timothy Dolan Archbishop of New York, Muslim American actor Mahershala Ali and the Dalai Lama. Several foreign government leaders highlighted their support of religious freedom for everyone including a video message from the President of Guatemala and a memorandum of understanding signing ceremony with a Kazakhstan government representative.

Over twenty faith and human rights organizations contributed to religious and human rights education with booths in the Summit’s exhibit hall. These included the Church of Scientology National Affairs Office whose booth featured educational materials on international religious freedom laws and treaties and human rights education materials from Youth for Human Rights International. Other exhibiting groups included 21Wilberforce, the Baha’is of the US, Campaign for Uyghurs, Conference of European Rabbis, Institute for Global Engagement, Regent University, and many others. Several Uyghur booths exposed the genocide occurring against the Uyghur population in China and proposed solutions to the persecution of Uyghurs around the world.

The wide variety of religious traditions represented at the Summit as well as the high-level and bipartisan Congressional speakers conveyed the importance of religious freedom in today’s world. It is more apparent than ever that people of all religious beliefs and no belief need to work together to ensure human rights and freedom of religion and belief (or no belief) is respected throughout the world.

The summit can be viewed at www.irfsummit.com or go to www.irfroundtable.org for information on the group or www.humanrights.com for information on human rights issues.

<

Susan Taylor
National Affairs Office
+1 202-667-6404
email us here

The Invisible Forewomen project
The Invisible Forewomen project

United Religions Initiative MENA along with its partners;  UiL-LdV, Albania, TEKMED, Turkey, Have A Dream, Egypt & DRPDNM, Slovenia co-organized a five-day Train of Trainer workshop  for 30 marginalized women from Albania, Egypt, Jordan, Slovenia and Turkey. The workshop, which was held in a hybrid style where young women from each country gathered physically and connected online with young women from other countries. This workshop is the fourth milestone of the Invisible Forewomen project, which is generously funded by the Anna Lindh Foundation.

URI MENA selected seven marginalized young women from fewer opportunity regions/ backgrounds based on their personal qualities. The young women of all five countries gained essential competences (skills, Knowledge and positive attitudes) needed for enhancing marginalized women participation in socio-cultural and economic life. Additionally, they acquired the needed skills to train others in this field. Therefore, they will train another 25 marginalized women in their communities.

The workshop tackled the following topics:

  • Developing key skills for women Empowerment (Personal and Soft skills)
  • Role and importance of social – cultural engagement of women
  • Women economic empowerment- Entrepreneurship, Business Model Canvas, Business Plan and Financial Literacy.
  • Customer service
  • Marketing
  • Digital Literacy- Technological transformation vs. Women Empowerment
  • Sustainable Tourism and relevant toolkit

Shaden, a participant from Jordan, says: “For me it was an overall great experience. Listening to the challenges that other woman around the globe face, made it once again clear to me, that I should fight for my rights “

This hybrid workshop is part of a comprehensive project cycle called “The invisible Forewomen”, which consists of the following six phases, whereas the hybrid workshop represents only one out of all phases.

Phase 1: Research study about marginalized young women to define their needs for socio-economic inclusion. The study will be conducted in 8 countries; 5 partner countries (Albania, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, Slovenia), Italy, Lebanon and Morocco.

Phase 2: Develop a Toolkit (under the name “Women Lead Change”), which will provide guidance to empower marginalized young women and enhance their socio-economic inclusion.

Phase 3: Select a sample of 25 young women from our target group from partners’ countries

Phase 4: Conducting the hybrid workshop from woman of all 5 countries

Phase 5: Organize a 3-days conference in Jordan inviting 100+ members of the Anna Lindh Foundation’s networks in Europe & MENA Region. A half day of the conference will be dedicated to visiting marginalized communities in Jordan and we will organize a day Expo to enable marginalized young women to apply what they learnt in the training in selling their products (brought from home), showcase their talents and share their cultural rituals.

Phase 6: The trained woman shall conduct a similar workshop within their communities

Currently, the URI MENA team in Jordan is preparing the “Invisible Forewomen” conference to be held in Jordan later this month.

– Venue: La Casa Hotel, Amman (4 Star)

– Date: From 29-31 July 2021

– Themes: The conference will tackle marginalized women sociocultural and economic empowerment to boost their participation in the social, professional and public life. It is a serious attempt to raise awareness about challenges that deprive marginalized women from their full citizenship and leave them susceptible to marginalization, violence and discrimination.

– Sponsor: Anna Lindh Foundation (ALF)

Please check the link below about this activity:

China developing new fighter aircraft base near Ladakh
China developing new fighter aircraft base near Ladakh

Rafale fighter jet operating in Ladakh area (File Photo)

By  —  Shyamal Sinha

China is building an airport for fighter aircraft operations near the Eastern Ladakh area in Shakche, Xinjiang province. This aims to dissolve obstacles in its fighter aircraft operations along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India.

Seeking to overcome limitations in its fighter aircraft operations along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India, China is developing an airbase for fighter aircraft operations close to the Eastern Ladakh area in Shakche town in the Xinjiang province.

“The base is coming up between the existing airbases of Kashgar and Hogan which have been carrying out fighter operations along the Indian borders for a long time. This new base for fighter operations will fill up the gap for the Chinese Air Force in this region,” government sources told ANI.

Shakche town already has an airbase and that is being upgraded for fighter aircraft operations, they said.

The sources added that the base would be ready for fighter aircraft operations in near future and the work has been expedited on it.

The gap between the existing air bases in China close to the LAC for fighter aircraft operations was around 400 kms but this would be bridged with the operationalisation of the Shakche airfield.

The Indian agencies are also keeping a close watch on an airfield near the Uttarakhand border in Barahoti with China where the Chinese have brought in a large number of unmanned aerial vehicles which are continuously flying in that region.

Recently, the Chinese Air Force held an exercise in the new inning of the summer near the Indian territories and the sorties were undertaken by them mainly from the Hogan, Kashgar and Gar Gunsa airfields.

The drills were watched closely by the Indian side and the Indian side was at a high state of readiness during that period.

The Chinese Air Force has traditionally been weak in this part of the LAC with India which has a number of airfields in the relatively short distance airfields along the LAC and has an adage over the Chinese Air Force in terms of strike capability.

The Chinese side has strengthened its air defence further in the area with the deployment of their S-400 air defence systems imported from Russia even as India has deployed a large number of systems to take care of the Chinese fighter aircraft fleet, in case it is required ever.

The Indian side has also deployed a number of fighter aircraft at the Leh and other forward airbases which can take on both China and Pakistan simultaneously from its bases in Ladakh.

The deployment of the Rafale fighter aircraft at the Ambala and Hashimara airbases and their operationalisation has also given a boost to India’s readiness against the Chinese.

Senior government sources told ANI that one such camp is coming up few kilometres inside the Chinese territory opposite the Naku La area in north Sikkim area, which is barely a few minutes distance from the area where Indian and Chinese troops had clashed last year when the confrontation started and also in January this year.

Interfaith Youth Camp “Bridge-Inter-Cultures”
Interfaith Youth Camp “Bridge-Inter-Cultures”

 “Bridge-Inter-Cultures” is a 5-day youth forum of tolerance and intercultural dialogue.

Eastern European Forum for Dialogue – BRIDGES in partnership with the Foundation “Plovdiv 2019” for the fifth year (excluding 2020) implements an initiative that aims to work with children of Bulgaria belonging to different religious communities and cultures. This is not just an initiative, but a cause.

This cause is called “Bridge-Inter-Cultures” and we hope that once again civil organizations, local authorities, volunteers and media will stand behind it. Living together for five days (27-31.07.2021) in the International Youth Center in Plovdiv, 16 teenagers from different religious background will build bridges of tolerance and mutual understanding. Will observe acceptance and respect between spiritual traditions, generations and cultures, will learn how to work in a team and will develop their creativity and understanding of the basic principles driving humanity. The conclusions from cohabitation is that in dialogue you keep your identity and faith, and at the same time you are enriched by the culture of your friend.

The main Camp’s theme, edition 2021 is Ecology of the Soul

Within five days, young people will have the opportunity to meet with representatives of different religions and learn more from them about the religion and faith. In the Armenian complex, the participants will get acquainted with the activities of the Armenian organization “Parekordzagan” and the Armenian Apostolic Orthodox Church “Surp Kevork”. With visits to the Orthodox Church “St.St. Constantine and Elena ”and the Catholic Cathedral, the participants will touch two of the Christian denominations. During their visit to the Dzhumaya Mosque, a workshop on the dangers of addiction will be held with the young people with a representative of the organization Yeshilay Bulgaria. A visit to the Zion Synagogue and a meeting with Jewish youth leaders will broaden the horizons of each of the participants in a direction hitherto unknown, through a meeting with Jewish culture and traditions.

Through various joint activities, young people will have the pleasure to discover what they have in common despite their differences. The creative workshop “Mosaic of Faith” and the workshops on ecology and emotional intelligence will contribute to enriching the knowledge of young people on current topics related to our responsibility to ourselves and the world in which we live. Sports are also present in the program. A football tournament will be held at the “Botev” Stadium in Plovdiv, which is traditionally an integral part of the project. With professional players from the youth team of the host club, everyone will have the opportunity to look at their friends in a new way, as partners in a team game that has conquered the world. Due to the impossibility to hold this year’s international edition of the camp, we plan a ZOOM meeting with siste intercultural youth camp, organized by our URI partners from The Hague, Netherlands and youth leaders from the URI network from Cape Town, South Africa and Ankara, Turkey.

Youth representatives of different religious communities from Bulgaria, who typically do not gather in one place, will have the opportunity to expand their knowledge about the other and the different through participation in intercultural activities, creative workshops, trainings and discussions, convincing themselves of their closeness. In addition, they will acquire skills for teamwork and teamwork through classes with professional sports clubs in the city. Promoting tolerance will strengthen personal responsibility in the fight against prejudice and hate speech. As a result of the project activities, the capacity will be built and increased not only of the participants in the project, but also of many cultural specialists and representatives of the local government and the various communities that will partner in the project.

Web-based link for the event: : http://bridges-forum.org/work/bridge-interfaith-youth-camp-2019/ ; https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?vanity=bridges.forum&set=a.2625175690899757

ARIUS THE HERESIARCH AND HIS FALSE TEACHING 2
ARIUS THE HERESIARCH AND HIS FALSE TEACHING 2

A modern reading and analysis of the poetic form of Arius’s peculiar “Arian Bible” entitled “Thalia” is found in Rowan Williams and William Bright (cf. Bright, William. The Historical Writings of St. Athanasius according to the Benedictine Text, Oxford : Clarendon, 1881, pp. 259-60, cf. Williams, Rowan Arius: Heresy and Tradition, Revised Edition, Grand Rapids: Eerdman’s, 2002, pp. 62-66, 98-116, cf. West, ML The Meter of Arius’ “Thalia.” – In: The Journal of Theological Studies, 33, Oxford, 1982, pp. 98-105) . Thalia /blooming/ was the muse of comedy and light poetry. She is the wife of Apollo, and their children are the Coribans. She is depicted with a comic mask in her left hand and a shepherd’s gag in her right head with a laurel wreath) which can be translated as “abundance”, “banquet”, “feast”. The work is written in poetic form to facilitate the memorization and oral dissemination of Arian ideas. Fragments of the work are preserved in the works of his opponent, the Alexandrian church leader Athanasius, who gives us the first description of the Arian doctrine in the Word against the Arians (1.5-6) ​​- a paraphrase intertwined with many negative comments, making it very difficult to sift out the real words of the heresiarch from Athanasius’ notes on them. Interestingly, St. Athanasius was one of the few (both anti-Arians and followers of heresy) in the fourth century who quoted Arius in his work, e.g. in their accusations against the followers of Eusebius, “exalted for defending the Christ-fighting heresy who dare to draw up a definition of the faith; and when they themselves are judged as guilty, like Caiaphas, they begin to judge for themselves, they compose Thalia, wanting to believe them when they themselves do not know what they believe in. ”- St. Athanasius the Great, Regional Message to the Bishops of Egypt and Libya against the Arians (Epistola encyclica ad episcopos Aegypti et Libyae contra Arianos, PG , pp. 25, col. 537-594). Second, a more direct quotation from “Thalia”, we find in St. Athanasius ep. Alexandrian in “On the Councils of Rimini and Seleucia” (15):

Wisdom became Wisdom by the will of the Most Wise God. Because He thinks in countless aspects. He is Spirit, Power, Wisdom, glory of God, Truth, Image and Word.

Understand that He thinks of Himself as Light and Light.

He who is higher is able to give birth to the Son, but no one is more important, or higher, or greater.

By God’s will, the Son has the greatness and characteristics he possesses.

His essence since and from whom, and since then – are all from God.

He, though a strong God, glorifies his superior…

In short, God is inexpressible to the Son.

For, He is in Himself what is, and it is, unspeakable, So that the son does not understand any of these things or does not have the understanding to explain them.

Since, it is impossible for him to comprehend a Father, Who is Himself.

Since the Son himself does not even know his own nature,

Because, being a Son, He really exists by the will of Father.

New US Under Secretary of State appointed, expected to be next Tibet coordinator
New US Under Secretary of State appointed, expected to be next Tibet coordinator

By –Shyamal Sinha

Uzra Zeya worked as a diplomat in the U.S. Foreign Service for 27 years. During the Obama administration, Zeya served as the acting assistant Secretary and principal deputy assistant secretary in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. She also worked in the Embassy of the United States, Paris from 2014 to 2017.

The US senate on Tuesday confirmed Uzra Zeya for the State Department’s Under Secretary of State Bureau of Civilian Security, Democracy and Human Rights . The American diplomat is expected to also be appointed as the next US Special coordinator for Tibet, as the post has traditionally been assumed by the Under Secretary of the state. Republican Robert Destro served as the Tibet coordinator previously.

The Kashmiri-origin diplomat spoke of Chinese repression during her nomination in April, “The [Chinese government is] repressing Tibetans, Christians, and other ethnic minorities.” She also noted her work experience with Chinese dissidents and criticised the current genocide against the Uyghur community. Zeya also wished to use congressional tools such as the Global Magnitsky Act and the Uyghur Human Rights Act during her tenure as Under Secretary.

“Based on her credentials, Ms. Zeya could be a formidable Special Coordinator, and we look forward to the possibility of working with her soon,” Representative Ngodup Tsering said of her potential as the new Special Coordinator under the Biden Administration.

Uzra Zeya has previously served as the acting Assistant Secretary and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor under the Obama administration. She would become the first Asian American to serve as the Under Secretary of State, with 73 votes in favour and 24 against, who was sworn into office by Deputy Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman on Wednesday.

The appointment of the Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues is mandated by the Tibetan Policy Act of 2002 and is also an indication of the US government’s commitment to a negotiated resolution on Tibet and for the preservation of religious, cultural and linguistic heritage of the Tibetan people. The first Tibet coordinator Gregory Craig, Director of Policy Planning, was appointed on Oct 13, 1997.

Ms. Zeya is a Life Member of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) and co-authored a 2020 CFR report on Revitalizing the State Department and American Diplomacy. Her insights on U.S. diplomacy, human rights, and national security policies have been highlighted in Politico, Foreign Affairs, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and international media.

Ms. Zeya speaks Arabic, French and Spanish. She has a Bachelor’s Degree from Georgetown University and is the recipient of several State Department Superior Honor and Senior Performance awards, the Presidential Rank Award, and the French Legion d’Honneur.

ARIUS THE HERESIARCH AND HIS FALSE TEACHING 3
ARIUS THE HERESIARCH AND HIS FALSE TEACHING 3

Another important document on the decrees of the Council of Nicaea and early Arianism, authored by Emperor Constantine and addressed to Arius, is The Wicked Interpreter – Message of the Decrees of the Council of Nicaea, incipit: Κακὸς ἑρμηνεὺς (The Wicked Interpreter; dating: 333. The document ends with the words “Performed by Syncletius and Gaudentius, magistrates, when Paterius was prefect of Egypt, and was read in the palace.” (43.) And on the other hand: May God protect you, beloved.

It is curious that in the heated dogmatic disputes the Arianis themselves do not refer to the founder of their false doctrine and even deny it. As early as the Council of Antioch of 341, in preparing the First Antiochian Creed, the church bishops denied that they were followers of a priest (Arius). The Omani bishops of Nike, 359, deliberately swear that they were not Arians. Bishop Auxentius of Milan, although he himself began his clerical ministry in the Church of Antioch under the Arian bishop George of Cappadocia, responded to the accusations of Arianism made to him by Bishop Hilary of Poitiers that “he had neither heard of Arius nor seen him personally.” teaching ”. When, at the Council of Aquileia in 381, Bishops Palladius and Secundian were accused of Arianism, they publicly denied belonging to the Arian sect. Indeed, Emperor Constantine the Great ordered the writings of Arius to be burned, and they themselves were most likely circulating in a small number of titles and copies, which explains this general silence of his opponents and followers.

In 328, Arius was returned from exile, and in 336 he was to be solemnly accepted into the clergy, but died unexpectedly when he left the imperial palace after meeting the emperor. Constantine, to whom both in writing and with an oath he renounced his false teaching. The oath of Elder Arius to Emperor Constantine was most likely performed in the likeness of New Testament oath formulas and with a hand on the gospel.

Socrates Scholasticus describes in detail in his “Church History” the last moments of the heresiarch: Soon after his fainting, and with the evacuation, his intestines protruded, followed by heavy bleeding and the exit of the small intestine; In addition, parts of his spleen and liver were brought out (rectum) in a hemorrhage, so he died almost immediately. ”

In the old dining room of the Bachkovo Holy Monastery we find an image from a later era of Archbishop Arius, near the diocesan center of Plovdiv-Philippopolis. This is a series of scenes with the Seven Ecumenical Councils on the north wall in the interior of the dining room above the entrance to it. The frescoes are from the 16th century. Each of the Ecumenical Councils is depicted, using the same formula as in the writing of the First Ecumenical Council, the Council of Nicaea of ​​325: The emperor presides over the council, which is located in a semicircular room, sitting on the same level with the bishops . Two imperial officers are seen in the background behind Caesar. Also in the background are many buildings. In the foreground on the ground is Arius wearing a turban. An inscription in Greek explains that this is the First Ecumenical Council, held during the reign of Emperor Constantine the Great. The next scene is different: It depicts the First Council of Constantinople. Two bishops hold books, and the hierarch to the emperor’s right wears a crown. There is no image of a heretic, which is almost the only difference between the two scenes. The inscription explains that it refers to the Second Ecumenical Council during the reign of Emperor Theodosius the Great. The scenes representing the other Ecumenical Councils follow the model described above. The scene with the First Ecumenical Council can be found in the exo-narthex of the church “St. Nativity of Christ ”in the village of Arbanassi in the Diocese of Veliko Tarnovo: The bishops-members of the council are located around the figure of the emperor in a semicircular hall. Two bishops, to the left and right of the emperor, carry a miter and hold the ends of an unfolded parchment scroll on which the first words of the Creed are written in Greek. Behind the emperor are two guardsmen, and behind the Orthodox hierarchs we see clergymen of various degrees.

The far right of the stage depicts a fallen figure without a halo. The inscription clarifies that he is a heretic. In the foreground, in front of the emperor is Arius in a position of proskinisis, but with his head raised. The explanatory inscription reads: “Arius, the accursed heretic.” In the background is the Vision of St. Peter of Alexandria.

Many church writers refer to the Vision of St. Peter of Alexandria to denounce the Arian heresy or heresy in general – such are St. Herman of Constantinople (beginning 730/742) in his homily “To Deacon Antim”, Eutychius of Alexandria (877-940), Theophanes Kerameus (XII century) in his fifth homily, as well as Manuel Philes , which dedicates an epigram to the Vision of St. Peter of Alexandria. In all the medieval images of the subject in the monumental painting, Christ is depicted with a torn chiton, as he appeared to St. Peter. In this way he symbolizes the schism in the body of the church, which Arius caused with his teaching, which undressed the Lord from His divinity, and down through the altar table Arius covered his head with his hands, as seen in the fresco of the prosthesis of the church “St. Our Lady of Peripleptos ”(1294/1295) in the city of Ohrid.

Although we have a small number of preserved fragments of the works of the heresiarch, it is possible to reconstruct his dogmatic postulates. It can be summarized that the Alexandrian priest-heretic Arius taught about the inequality of the Son of God with God the Father, in the sense that God is inexpressible to the Son: “Wisdom became Wisdom by the will of the Most Wise God. Because He thinks in countless aspects. He is Spirit, Power, Wisdom, glory of God, Truth, Image and Word. Understand that He thinks of Himself as Light and Light. ”

TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (5)
TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (5)

In the first volume of the magazine Strannik in 1901 appeared an extensive article by B. Titlinov devoted to the decline of religion and morality, a phenomenon we observe today – the beginning of the 21st century of the third millennium.

The end of the Middle Ages was also the end of the age of faith. Mankind has entered a new phase of its development; religiously, there was a turn in consciousness. Human thought awoke from long sleep, and man seemed to be born into a new life, into a new adolescence. Italy, shrouded in the halo of a glorious past, still stands at the forefront of the movement. The famous epoch, known as the epoch of the revival of sciences and arts, has begun. The ancient world seemed to have risen from the ashes of the ages, and the powerful genius of Phidias and Apelles, of Plato and Aristotle, seemed to give the world again the most beautiful works of art and creative thought.

They usually consider the heyday of the classical sciences in Italy only to reflect the brilliance of their noblest performances. The dark sides of Italian humanism must not be forgotten either. And the darkest of these is precisely this frivolous attitude towards the Church and religion, which characterized the society at that time.

They usually consider the heyday of the classical sciences in Italy only to reflect the brilliance of their noblest performances. The dark sides of Italian humanism must not be forgotten either. And including the darkest is precisely this frivolous attitude towards the Church and religion, which characterized the society at that time. Along with the sciences and the arts, skepticism, buried more than a millennium ago, has clearly risen. In Italy, disbelief spread, which manifested itself in the circles of educated society as philosophical disbelief, and among the lower strata of the people manifested itself as complete indifference. His nurseries were universities and scientific academies; thus the University of Padua was accused of being the center of atheism for a long time, and the scientific academies of Modena and Venice were closed several times for heresy (cf. Dreper, History of the Mental Development of Europe, vol. II, p. 185).

The Platonic Academy in Florence replaced Plato’s philosophy with Christianity. Savonarola zealously fought against pagan immorality and pagan unbelief, which were practiced even among the highest prelates. “Here one speaks to the other: What do you think of our Christian faith? How do you look at her? And the latter answers: faith, in my opinion, is only a dream, a subject for sensitive women and monks. ” This is how not only the preachers of repentance saw it in practice, but Machiavelli also openly said: “We Italians are mostly without religious and evil.” And to this he adds: “because the Church, in the person of her representatives, sets the worst example.” Along with ancient pagan education, both ancient pagan unbelief and ancient pagan vices resumed. It is not possible to describe the situation of the clergy of that time. Even papal dignitaries, such as Guichardini, speak on this occasion with the sharpest words. In the Roman court much attention was paid to the fine arts, but very little to theology and Christianity. It has come to the point that the head of Western Christianity has been credited with the sentence: “how much the tale of Christ has brought us is well known to all,” as well as another expression that it is “better not to believe in the immortality of the soul ”. From Italy, the spirit of humanism spread to other European countries, and at the same time, religious skepticism began to spread. By the way, the resulting Reformation, with its serious orientation, mastered it from the very beginning. For Europe, a time of faith came again for a period of time with religious enthusiasm and theological controversy. This mood was not stable. Skeptical rationalism did not disappear and continued its destructive work. The consequences were not long in coming.

From the second half of the eighteenth century began a marked decline in religious feeling in European society, and at a much larger scale than in the era of the Italian Renaissance. The anti-religious movement began in England with deism, which intended to replace Christianity with natural religion, but reached its full development in France. Here deism became a perfect negation of the Deity. Voltaire, the idol of his time, set himself the most important task of life, the struggle against the Church and revelation. Christianity seemed to him an inadmissible superstition, and his favorite expression was, “Destroy wickedness.” He asked for the hope that in a few decades his wish would come true.

The ideas of this century are expressed in the famous encyclopedia of Diderot and D’Alembert, which has long dominated the minds. The acquaintance with some thoughts from this work, as well as from other famous writers of that time, reveals to us the general mood of European thought. How open religion was viewed then, we understand from the following words of Diderot, with which he tries to prove that man has enough natural religion: “The law of revelation does not contain any moral rules that have not been prescribed and not be practiced under the influence of natural laws, so that he does not teach us anything new about morality. The law of revelation does not introduce us to any new truths, because truth is nothing but a definition of an object that expresses such ideas that are clear to me and the connection between which is also clear. But outright religion does not give us such definitions. Everything she added to the natural law is contained in five or six propositions, which to me are so incomprehensible as if they were written in an ancient Carthaginian dialect, that the ideas expressed through these propositions and the interrelation between them are incomprehensible to me. the ideas themselves”.

“The Catholic religion,” he wrote in one of his letters, “represents to me the most ridiculous and cruel in its dogmas, the most incomprehensible and obscure, the most metaphysical, the most confused, and therefore leading to strife, to the emergence of sects, schisms and heretical teachings, the most harmful to public peace, the most dangerous to monarchs, due to its hierarchical structure, its tasks and its discipline; the most tasteless, the darkest, the most gothic and the most unattractive in its church rites, the most petty and uncommunicative in its moral rules, which have nothing to do with the ubiquitous rules of morality, but represent only to it the belonging evangelical, apostolic and Catholic morality – of all the most prone to intolerance. Having removed some absurdities, the Lutheran faith is better than the Catholic faith, socialism is better than Protestantism, and deism with temples and church rituals is better than socialism. If a person prone to superstition needs an idol, it is preferable for that idol to be the most ordinary and harmless.” This is what the thoughts of one of the most famous leaders of public opinion look like. We can imagine the impact on religious consciousness of such thoughts as the ideas with which the famous encyclopedia is imbued, although in the latter there is some respect for religion. The Enlightenment movement was proud of the ideas it raised about humanity, tolerance of individual freedom, and so on, and this pride of the human mind played a significant role in maintaining anti-religious tendencies. How far this exaltation of man has come is evident in the above-mentioned Diderot in the conclusion of his treatise The Interpretation of Nature: “I began with nature, which they call Your creation, and I will end with You, whose name on earth is God. Oh God, I don’t know if you exist, but I think as if You could see my soul and I will act as if I am standing before You. I am not asking You for anything in this world, because the course of events follows itself, provided that You do not exist, or by Your will, if You exist. I hope to receive from You a reward in the other world, if it exists; although everything I do in this world I do only for myself. And if I do good, it is without any thought even for You. Such is I, a necessary organized particle of eternal and necessary matter, or, perhaps, Your creation. ”

The above words reveal to you the true mood of the philosopher and his time. He was a materialist, like the others of the century. As for the expressions concerning the conditional existence of the Deity, they are used rather for decency, as they are not at all in unison with materialism. The indisputable materialism of Diderot’s views is also proved by the following passage from D’Alembert’s dream: “There is only one substance in the world. The marble of the statue can be turned into a human body and vice versa. Turn the piece of marble into a fine powder, mix it with chernozem or other land suitable for growing vegetation; mix them well, pour this mixture with water and let it rot for a year, two years, a whole century – here time does not matter. From here will sprout a plant that will feed man and in this way will be the transformation of marble into a human body and so on.

By the way, materialism did not fully develop in Diderot. Holbach’s System of Nature was an expression of this trend, a book that made a great noise in its time and became a dogma for its followers. It is not surprising that the eighteenth century eventually came to materialism; this was a natural result of the whole anti-religious movement in the Enlightenment. Once the thought deviated from the Christian worldview, there was nothing left but to immerse itself in matter. The new deity of humanity, the mind, has decided for itself that there is no God, that the universe is nothing but moving matter, and that what people call a soul dies with the body, just as when music stops when the strings break. All these ideas were systematically developed in the “System of Nature”. There is only eternal matter, which has received motion by itself, because it is a great whole, encompassing everything. All nature is in motion and all its phenomena are only a combination of this same matter. Beginning with the stone in the bowels of the earth and ending with the sun, beginning with the petrified conch and ending with man, everything is a continuous movement, an endless chain of movements from which beings differ only in the variety and size of the original elements. The soul is a sum of bodily functions, thinking and will – chemical processes in the brain, there is no freedom, no immortality, no virtues and conscience; egoism is the only principle of human action. Everything is sensory, no sensory experience; faith in God is based on the false distinction between spirit and matter. “Let man cease,” says the author of the System, “his search outside this world in which he lives, for such beings as would bring him that prosperity which nature does not give him; let him study this nature, become acquainted with its laws, and understand the energy and unchanging permanence, with which it acts; let him take advantage of his discoveries for his own well-being and silently obey the laws from the action of which nothing can save him; let him resign himself to the thought that the reasons for what he is will forever remain unknown to him, for to him they are veiled with an impenetrable veil; let him relentlessly obey the orders of the ever-increasing power.

ARIUS THE HERESIARCH AND HIS FALSE TEACHING (1)
ARIUS THE HERESIARCH AND HIS FALSE TEACHING (1)

Being an “Antiochian”, Arius chose Alexandria as his field of activity, where he was ordained a presbyter. Here he entered into a dispute with Bishop Alexander and began to preach about the Son of God that He was not born of eternity from the being of God the Father, but was created in time. If He also represents the highest creation of God, through Whom the world was created, but is not equal and is not eternal to the Father, and although He is called the Son, then this is not in essence, but in adoption.

Mikhail Posnov synthesized the heresy as follows: The teaching of Arius was largely determined by the general preconditions of the Antioch school of Aristotle’s philosophy. At the beginning of theology was the situation of God’s transcendence and (as a conclusion) his non-involvement in any emanations – or in the form of an outpouring (προβολή, prodatio), or of division (διαίρεσις, divisio), or of birth – εός άγεννητος. From this point of view, it could not be a question of υίός Θεοΰ, as eternal to God; the idea of ​​the birth of the Son by the Father would also be in sharp contradiction, albeit in time. We can speak of the Son only in a time that appeared and did not originate from the essence of the Father, but was created from nothing (κτίσμα έξ ούκ δντων). The Son of God, according to Arius, came by the will of God, earlier than time and centuries, precisely when God wanted to create us through Him.

Arius (256-336) was one of the most famous heretics, brought up under the guidance of St. Lucian; presbyter in the Alexandrian church. His main work, “Θαλια” (“Feast”), is a defense of his teaching in a semi-poetic, semi-prose form; with the exception of a few fragments in the works of St. Athanasius the Great, it has not reached us. The letters of Arius to the bishops Eusebius of Nicomedia and Alexander of Alexandria are preserved. The main sources of information about the heresiarch are, in addition to fragments of his own writings, the works of St. Athanasius, 68 and 69 chapters from the work of Epiphanius on heresies, the church stories of Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret and Philostorgius.

Prot. S. Bulgakov, considering the doctrine of Wisdom in St. Athanasius the Great and other fathers of the Church, in his attempt for a dogmatic interpretation of certain features in the Orthodox veneration of the Mother of God, analyzes the Arian heresy and parallels with Neoplatonism: “Arianism raises a double question, fueled by two sources of doubt. The first refers to the doctrine of St. Trinity, the second to the doctrine of God as the Creator of peace now. With regard to the first Arianism, there is essential anti-Trinitarianism. He understands God as one-person, and the thought of a three-person God seems foreign and unacceptable to him. God himself is only the Father, and the Son and the Holy Spirit are in themselves His powers, degrees of His revelation. This is the trinity of Neoplatonism with its gradual gradation, where there are no equal and equal divine hypostases. Arianism imagines God as one in the sense of a one-person monad: The one-person and monadity of the Deity is the starting point for him. ” One of the central biblical passages on which Arius bases his arguments is the word of the Wisdom of God from the Old Testament Book of Proverbs 8: 22-31.

22. The LORD hath been with me in the beginning of his way, before his creation, from everlasting;

23. I have been anointed from the beginning, before the earth was created.

24. I was born when there were no abysses, when there were no springs, abundant with water.

25. I was born before the mountains were set, before the hills,

26. When the LORD had not yet made the earth, nor the field, nor the first dust of the universe.

27. When He prepared the heavens, I was there. When he drew the circle on the face of the abyss,

28. When he established the clouds above, when he strengthened the fountains of the deep,

29. When he gave the law to the sea, that the waters might not pass over its borders, when he laid the foundations of the earth,

30. I was with Him an artist, and I rejoiced all the day long, rejoicing before Him all the time,

On the occasion of the heresy of Arius, Bishop Alexander of Alexandria, in one of his conversations with the clergy, stated that “St. Trinity is in trinity one ”, ie expresses the idea of ​​the unity of all persons of St. Trinity. Presbyter Arius, who was present at this talk, objected that if the Father gave birth to the Son, then the Born One, as such, has the beginning of his being: therefore, there must have always been a time when the Son was not and He has his being in non-existence. This is how the church historian Socrates tells us about the beginning of the heresy of Arius. According to Sozomen, Arius repeatedly expressed the view that “the Son came from the non-existent,” that “He is of his own accord capable of evil as well as of virtue,” that He is a creature and a creature. Those who listen to these reflections require the bishop to forbid Arius from committing such a mistake, because God did not create the creatures from his Divine essence, God created the world from nothing. It is characteristic of creatures in relation to God that they are not one with Him. It is in the realm of the ears, in the realm of nature, that the gap between the created and God is impassable. The head of the Alexandria Cathedral, Alexander, organized a competition in this subject, after which he joined the opinion that “the Son is eternal and one in essence with the Father,” and then forbade Arius to spread his teaching. Arius, already having several elders and even bishops on his side, disobeyed the ban and continued to preach his teaching, which soon spread far beyond Alexandria. Then ep. Alexander, with the consent of the ecclesiastical Egyptian, Tivaid, Syrian, Libyan bishops, excommunicated Aria, who in turn appealed against Bishop Alexander to the bishop of Nicomedia, Eusebius, with whom he studied theology at the famous St. Lucian in the Antioch school. Bishop Eusebius instructed Arius to preach on the subject: “What happened was not before the moment it happened.” Bishop Eusebius of Nicomedia and Arius were joined by five other bishops, including the most famous scholar of the fourth century, Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea. Alexander, Bishop of Alexandria, addressed the bishops of various cities with messages in which he expounded and refuted the teachings of Arius; Arius, on the other hand, spreads his work “Waist”, in which, partly in verse, partly in prose, he formulates his ideas in more detail. Jacob Latham, a professor at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, presents the Mediterranean city, performed in pompous processions, where social rituals are the focus of ancient urban life, which is the main reason for the fierce Christian controversy against traditional spectacles, which they call pompa diaboli. In the fourth century in the Mediterranean, churches developed their own forms of public ceremonialism to build their own civic identity. One such example from Alexandria is Presbyter Arius, who composed easy-to-remember verses performed by his supporters in processions organized by them in the city. The Alexandrian Melitian schismatics, in turn, exhumed the bodies of the martyrs and marched through the streets to the parish temples. St. Gregory of Nazianzus (Bishop of Constantinople, 379-381) organized a solemn liturgical procession for the return of a church occupied by the Arianists, and his opponents lined up in the procession and abused Gregory’s Nicaean supporters. As early as the beginning of the next century in Constantinople, intra-Christian rivalry led to duels between the religious processions of the late Aryan followers and those of the Nicene Creed.

At the first information about Arianism, Emperor Constantine took a neutral position between the disputing parties, advising them to stop “arguing” and “to keep their special opinions in the secret of their souls.” Finally, the emperor decided to convene a council of bishops of the whole church.

The Great Orthodox Alan Metropolitanate
The Great Orthodox Alan Metropolitanate

At the beginning of the 1st century, the Alans occupied the lands along the middle and lower reaches of the Don. According to written sources, from the second half of the 1st century to the 4th century, they headed a strong union of Sarmatian tribes. In the II-III century, they created problems for the Roman Empire by invading its Danube and Caucasian provinces. Herodotus describes the Alans as “tall blond people with short haircuts, unlike the Scythians” (Herodotus, Book IV). Amian Marcellin says: “Almost all Alans are tall and good-looking, their hair is usually blond” (Ammianus Marcellinus, XXX.2.21). “Geography” (XXIII, 11.v) of Strabo, who was born in Pontus on the Black Sea, but judging by the forms of the tribal names, he probably also uses Iranian sources, he mentions Aorsi. The Jewish historian Josephus, a contemporary of the events, writes in The Jewish Wars (Book 7, Chapter 8.4) that the Alans (whom he calls a Scythian tribe) living near the Sea of ​​Azov crossed the Iron Gates to plunder and defeat the armies of the Median king Pacor II and the Armenian king Tiridates I.

Under pressure from the Huns in the 5th century, some of them entered Western Europe and in 429, together with the vandals, in North Africa. Vandal kings in Africa use the traditional title of King of Vandals and Alans (Rex Wandalorum et Alanorum). Some of the Alans who went west joined the invasion of the Germanic tribes of Vandals and Svevi in ​​the Roman province of Gaul. Gregory of Turkey mentions in his “Liber historiae Francorum” that the Alan king Respendial saved the vandals in their clash with the Franks when they crossed the Rhine on 31 December 406.

It is believed that the descendants of the Alans are today’s Ossetians. The various forms of Alan, as well as Iron, the self-name of today’s Ossetians, are associated with Arian (“noble” in Avestan and Sanskrit). According to some hypotheses, the Alans are one of the branches of the Indo-Iranians, from which the Indo-Aryans and the Iranian peoples are descended. In the course of history, the Alans are also known by another group of related names. They were originally called in Greek Αορσι, which from the IX century was shortened to aces, aces or wasps, in Russian yasis, in Georgian wasps. The modern Ossetians also derive from this name. As early as the 4th and 5th centuries, the Alans were at least partially Christianized by Arian missionaries. Particular attention to the Christianization of the Caucasus Mountains pays imp. Justinian the Great (527-565). In the Caucasus there are several dioceses within the Patriarchate of Constantinople. “Georgian chronicles testify that the Sixth Ecumenical Council subordinated Ossetia and Circassia to the Mtskheta Patriarchal Throne”. After Justinian I, the influence of Byzantium in the Caucasus weakened and probably for this reason these chairs were handed over to the Georgian Church. In the tenth century, however, the Byzantine emperors again paid serious attention to the Caucasian borders. It was between the 10th and 14th centuries that there was fertile ground for a religious mission. In the Palaeologus epoch, the place of the Justinian dioceses was taken by the Great Archbishopric of Alan, which soon received the status of a metropolitanate, and included the lands of the Circassians. The present-day town of L. Arkhiz by the Golyam Zelenchuk River was apparently the Alan diocesan center. In his historical work, Metropolitan Gideon cites in support of this hypothesis the many church-historical and archeological monuments preserved in the region, e.g. the stone statues of Christian warriors, who have crosses on their foreheads and shoulders, and in their hands – a cup, symbolizing the trials to the bottom of suffering. The same thesis is advocated by the historian of the Alans and their descendants – the Ossetians, B. Cynthia, considering the perfection of the architectural forms of the four medieval temples and the wall-painting in them (quoted in Metrop. Gideon, ibid., P. 45). At the beginning of the third millennium a unique find was discovered – on a vertical rock above the river G. Zelenchuk, in a natural rock niche, on the smooth stone surface is skillfully painted by a Byzantine icon painter image of Jesus Christ, strikingly similar to the image of the Savior from Turin’s shroud (cf. monk Feognost Pushkov).

After the Cumans, the Alans made the most significant contribution to the history of Bulgaria in the 12th and 14th centuries. In 1301, Theodore Svetoslav allowed the Alans, who were part of Nogaev’s troops, to pass through Bulgaria and go to Byzantium. Remnants of these Alanian cavalry, after being defeated by the Catalans around Gallipoli, and in Thrace killed their leader Girkon, sought refuge from Tsar Theodore Svetoslav and were settled in the region of Tatar-Pazardzhik (Pazardzhik) in 1306-1307. Because these Alans have been Orthodox Christians for centuries, they quickly integrated into the Bulgarian environment. Here we can make a connection with the nearby Georgian holy monastery – Bachkovo, which was probably the center of these believers, cared for in their homeland until the tenth century by the Georgian Church. According to Serbian sources, other Alans, from the so-called “Dominion of Iasi” (probably in today’s Romanian part of Moldova), were allies of Michael III Assen Shishman in his war with the Serbian King Stefan Decani in 1330. In 1365. in the army of the Vidin king Ivan Sratsimir (1356-1397) there were parts of such “clear ismaelites”, i.e. Muslims. In 1187, when the Alanian prince David Soslan married Queen Tamara, the beginning of the dynasty that ruled Georgia for the next 6 centuries. On several occasions Alanian princesses also married Russian princes, for example Maria, the wife of kn. Vsevolod and grandmother of Alexander Nevsky. A centralized Alan state, known in sources after the eighth century as Alanya, with the capital Magas, controlled the important trade route through the Darial Pass. Alanya existed until 1238-39, when it was destroyed by the Mongol invasions.

In 1323, several hundred Alan cavalry, led by their leaders Itil (“Volga”) and Temir (“Iron”), defended Plovdiv under the command of General Ivan Rusina. Between 1263 and 1322 Plovdiv was a possession of the Byzantine Empire and belonged to the Stenimachos (now Asenovgrad) -Cetina (near the village of Dorkovo in the Rhodopes, today Chepino).

For a short period (1322-23), as a result of the military campaign of Tsar George II Terter (from the Kuman dynasty, founded by Tsar George I Terter, 1280-1292) in Thrace, the city was again under the rule of the Bulgarians. We know that the commander-in-chief of the garrison of the Bulgarian tsar’s deputies was Ivan Rusin (The Russian). The Bulgarian garrison consisted of 1,000 Alani and Mizi cavalry (ie Bulgarians) and 2,000 heavily armed infantry (paid professional foreign soldiers). The military conadiers of the Alans and the Mizi were Itil and Temir, as well as the Hungarian Inas, who were named archons by the chronicler John Cantacuzino, and the garrison itself was headed by Ivan Rusin, called a strategist. They withstood a 4-month siege by the forces of the imp. Andronicus III of the city and attacks with unprecedentedly large mobile siege towers, even after the death of the Bulgarian king in the spring of 1323. Emp. Andronicus III had as his ally despot Voysil (ruler of the fortresses from Stilbos-Sliven to Kopsis-Sopot), who was a Byzantine vassal with the title “despotic Moesia”, who succeeded the old emperor Andronicus II and supported the young Andronicus III, whom in turn betrayed at a crucial moment, declaring himself dead as a result of mushroom poisoning.

Only in August this year. The “Moesian nobles” chose as their king Michael, the ruler of Vidin, whose mother was an unknown daughter of Theodora-Anna (daughter of Tsar Ivan II Assen) and Sevastocrator Peter, and his father was the Bulgarian leader of Cuman origin Shishman – Vidin ruler. Tsar Michael III Shishman Assen (1323-1330) could not hold the city after a bad chance when withdrawing the mercenary army defending Plovdiv.

The struggle of Bulgarians, Alans and Russians against the Tatar “Golden Horde” was common. After the abdication of the founder of the Terter dynasty, Smilets (1292-1298), a protégé of the Tatar khan Nogai, was installed on the throne in Tarnovo. The son of the legitimate Bulgarian Tsar George I Terter, Theodore Svetoslav was taken hostage by the Tatar horde. The son of Nogai Chaka (Choki) in 1299 even ascended the Bulgarian throne, but Theodore Svetoslav (1300-1322) managed to remove the Tartar.

The decline of the Tatar state unification began – from 1357 to 1380 25 inns changed. Khorezm, Astrakhan, Poland and Lithuania took over the Golden Horde and took over lands in the lower basin of the Dnieper River. The Tatar ruler Mamai suffered a crushing defeat in the Battle of Kulikovo in 1380 with the troops of the united Russian principalities, led by Moscow. Khan Tokhtamish (1380-1395) controlled the internal unrest and strengthened the central government. He defeated Mamai on the Kalka River and in 1382 advanced on Moscow, which he conquered by deception and set fire to.

When in 1381 Metropolitan Kyprian (of the Bulgarian family Tsamblak) Kievski took over the metropolitan throne of Russia, one of his first initiatives was to introduce the veneration of St. Prince Alexander Nevsky, the victor of the Teutonic Knights, as an example for all fighters. is against the Tatar plague.

The Russian people were finally liberated from Tatar-Mongol slavery in 1480, and the Great Horde, which inherited the Golden Horde, ceased to exist in the early 16th century.

In 1328 the old emperor already ruled only Constantinople and the adjacent territories. Abandoned by Stefan Dechanski, he sought help from the Bulgarian king. Mikhail Shishman, who amassed troops along the border with Byzantium, and 3,000 cavalry, again led by Rusyn Ivan, set out for Constantinople to guard Andronicus II. But the old emperor did not allow the detachment in the palace, due to a warning from his grandson, the young Vasilevs, that this was a pretext for the Bulgarians to seize the capital, and the king withdrew his cavalry, fearing that he would lose it. Mikhail Shishman, who failed to take advantage of the strife in Byzantium to impose his rule in Eastern Thrace, concluded an anti-Serbian alliance with Andronicus III in the spring of 1330 and attracted the rulers of Wallachia, Moldavia and the Black Yasis to the coalition. Strategist Ivan probably took part in the battle of Velbuzh on July 28, 1330, where, according to Nicephorus Gregory, Michael Shishman had 12,000 Bulgarian and 3,000 “Scythian” (Tatars, Iasi, Alans and Vlachs), but the Serbian king Stefan Dechanski with his 14,000 men, who were later joined by 300 (according to Cantacuzino) or 1,000 (according to Grigora) Spanish German Catalans, defeated the army of the Bulgarian king, who, badly wounded, died three days later in captivity.

TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (4)
TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (4)

In order to make even clearer the condition of mankind in the next epoch, which is a characteristic phenomenon of the remarkable rise of religious feeling, it would be quite useful to turn our attention to the transitional stage connecting the epoch of faith with the preceding period. The vague wanderings in the paths of the philosophical schools, the torturous tension of the spirit tormented by “eternal questions,” the eagerly longing to resolve these questions, and the passionate search for truth that flowed from it, are the hallmarks of the transition period. We find a reflection of the inner state of the people of that time in a work from the 2nd century AD. – “Clementines”. His hero, Clement, reveals the state of his spirit in the following way: “From an early age I was overwhelmed by doubts, and I myself do not know how they got into my soul. Will my existence end with death, and will not the memory of me disappear, as infinite time covers in oblivion all human deeds? But, in that case, did it make sense to be born into this world? When was the world created and what was before its creation? If the world has existed for centuries, should it exist forever; and if the world has a beginning, it should have an end. What will happen at the end of the world if not silence and mortal peace? Or maybe something will happen that is now impossible to think about? Carrying in myself constantly these questions, which arose of my own accord, I suffered greatly, turned pale, exhausted; and the most horrible thing was that when I wanted to get rid of such thoughts, as useless and unnecessary, they clung to my soul with new force and caused me new tortures… Possessed by such thoughts, I turned to the schools of philosophers, for to get some resolution of doubts there, but I found nothing there but the construction and destruction of certain philosophical positions, eternal disputes, in which, for example, the opinion that the soul is immortal, and vice versa, that it is subject to death. The first opinion prevailed – and I rejoiced, the other triumphed – and I fell into despondency again. This is how the different views led me in one direction or another, and I had to admit that things are presented not as they really are, but in the form in which one or another point of view imagines them. And again my head was dizzy and I suffered with all my soul. “

Apparently, it was not only Clement who suffered and suffered under the oppression of unsolvable doubts. So did the people of his day, in search of solace for their wandering soul. The general awakened spiritual thirst also influenced philosophy. The latter, yielding to the demands of religious feeling, wanted to correct her previous mistake and undertook to erect the same building she had been working on for so long. Philosophers became creators of religious systems. The beliefs of Chaldea, Persia, and even distant India came to the fore. Of all the world’s religions, philosophers sought to create a new world religion, and as a result of these efforts, Alexandrian theosophy and Neoplatonism emerged. But all these attempts proved fruitless; philosophy has lost its credibility. A new star has risen in the world — Christianity, and in this religion of love and forgiveness the religious feeling of humanity has found a way out for itself.

When the Christian religion appeared, it found the religious feeling of people in crisis. It gave a strong impetus to this consciousness, and provoked a reaction with remarkable force. Tired of previous wanderings and fruitless attempts, tormented by skepticism and doubt, human thought longed for peace and finally found it where all working and burdened people still find refuge. Man’s spiritual powers have found a field for the widest development, and the world seems to have celebrated its triumph and its salvation through the mighty impulse of religious enthusiasm. It is not necessary to explain at length how this impulse manifested itself wherever the light of the gospel penetrated and reached the word of redemption. Interrogations, the sword, the shackles of prison, all the torments that human malice could invent could not shake the power of faith. Calmly, as if at a feast, people went to slaughter, and the glow of the fires only illuminated the burning faces with the flame of religious feeling. This flame spread farther and farther, embracing the old world and infusing new life into the veins of humanity. True, the initial animation faded relatively soon, but the rise of religious life lasted a whole millennium.

Many accusations have been leveled against the Middle Ages and many dark sides have been pointed out in the life of those times. These are centuries of darkness, ignorance and superstition, when the world was considered inhabited by unclean spirits, witches and others. under., when man could not realize the most ordinary natural phenomena, and was content with their rough personifications. Then the thought fell into a deep sleep, frozen by authority. Then freedom was trampled on illegally, human dignity was humiliated with impunity. Then the Inquisition ruled with its horrors, then its fires burned, drowning out the moans of the human beings tormenting them. The historian disgustedly stopped at these phenomena and tried to pass this sad epoch at once, not recognizing in it any significance for progress and seeing in it simply a ten-century cessation of human development.

No one will undertake to justify the dark sides of medieval life and idealize this period of history. For the historian, as such, he will never get a pink color. But it is not in this situation that one wishes to study the course of the religious life of mankind. He is not interested in the point of view of the objective observer of the scale of the measured event, but in the point of view of the psychologist, who gives the question a completely different look. Medieval history paints before us a spectacular picture of the kingdom of the Church, faith and religion. The contrast between these centuries and the previous state of society is inadvertently striking. Until the Christian world ended with skepticism, indifference and apathy; the Christian world began its life with the resumption of the religious movement. Many events in history would be completely incomprehensible to us if we did not take into account the main engine of life during this period, the main life impulse of human activity – religious feeling. Take, for example, dogmatic theological debates, all the excitement about heresies, schisms, and so on. At first glance, it seems rather strange that theological, sometimes too delicate, issues can conquer society in such a way that it can be debated in the streets and squares, exiled, deprived of property, social status and other misfortunes. Every strangeness disappears when we remember the moods of the people at that time. Religion was not something abducted to them, religious truths were not just mental exercises that did not go beyond the realm of thought. On the contrary, religion was for them a work of life and convictions, had the most vital interest, and there was no area of ​​human relations where its influence did not penetrate. Man selflessly surrendered to the will of Providence, in a selfless sense of devotion stood prostrate before the altar and entrusted his only good to the Church. From here all areas of life received a religious imprint. The state and the Church entered into an inseparable union that it was even difficult to determine where one ended and where the other began: the functions of state and church life were so intertwined. The very idea of ​​theocracy, the realization of which constituted and still constitutes the pium desiderium of the papacy, could have arisen and existed, and even partially realized, only in the Middle Ages. The world domination of the popes, their aspirations for unconditional authority and blind obedience are explained by the purely psychological and spiritual state of Europe. In this state finds its explanation one of the most remarkable events in history – the Crusades. What could have caused huge masses of people to leave their home, homeland, even family, and set out for an unknown distant land where the Savior of the world once was? For several generations the people with unstoppable force rushed east; this happened as a new migration of nations. There are writers (Robertson) who see this as nothing more than the greatest monument to human stupidity. But such a stern condemnation cannot be considered fair. The Crusades are not a monument to human stupidity, but the most significant monument to religious feeling. It was this stimulus that moved the huge crowds and only the simple words: “God willing,” hundreds of thousands of brave warriors gathered under the banner of the cross, lighting before them the shining star in the roar of the battle with Muhammad’s moon. And that historian, who in this grandiose phenomenon does not want to see anything but stupidity, reveals himself as an extremely bad psychologist and simply does not pay attention to the guiding principle of the whole medieval life of man, determining all his actions – big and small.

TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (3)
TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (3)

This becomes even clearer and clearer when we deal with the moral teaching of Stoicism, which has undoubtedly had the strongest influence compared to its theoretical positions. Stoicism created the Buddhist ideal of the serene-calm sage, indifferently watching the stage of life, and in this ideal he sought happiness and satisfaction. The wise do what is necessary, doing as the knowledge of good dictates; his conviction is unwavering; indifferent, calm, happy internally, he is the master of his desires and completely independent of external factors; only he is free because he reaches his goal with a calm soul; he is the real rich man, because he does not need anything and everything can be used as follows; he is a true king, to whom everything obeys, a true poet and the only priest, because he proclaims the word of truth and honors God with pious deeds; in him reason is realized, he hovers like God among mortals, resembling Zeus in the blessed life. We cannot but agree that the ideal Stoic sage involuntarily attracts us with the purity of his spirit. But we cannot deny that it is this clarity, this complacency, that completely focuses attention on the external and hinders the spirit in its sublime impulses to heaven, stifles its best aspirations – to believe and to pray. The proud sage cannot bend his knees, he cannot indulge in the rapture of self-humiliation – he himself is a god, he unconditionally relies on his moral strength and is guided by the suggestions of his own reason.

We see that the influence of Greek philosophy was detrimental to the religious feeling of mankind. Epicureanism destroyed him with its materialistic views and mocking indifference, Stoicism with its proud doctrine of a pantheistic character; until finally, the skeptical school or new academy existing alongside these schools, preaching the impossibility of knowledge, infects with its incurable skepticism. And, in fact, under the influence of all these influences, faith seems to have abandoned humanity. And not only were the educated strata of society indifferent, but the masses were imbued with skepticism both with regard to the national religion and with regard to religion in general.

The disastrous example set by the upper classes could not fail to have consequences, all the more so as literature and science itself — these drivers of public opinion — were conductors of anti-religious tendencies. . For Cicero, Scevola, Varon, and others, religion is simply a useful state institution, and the performance of religious rites is necessary not as a need of inner feeling, but as an obligation to recognize state power. Pliny the Elder considers madness the belief in the gods, in the immortality of the soul. The wise do not need a positive religion, it is needed only by the uneducated crowd. “It would be unfair to distinguish popular opinion from the opinion of enlightened people. These same writers were both mentors, publicly teaching their teachings, and priests, performing religious rites; moreover, they were the glory of their age not only in mind but also in spiritual nobility. They expressed a common conviction, and no voice condemned or contradicted them. In general, there was little difference between the so-called crowd and the so-called thinkers. In the ignorant apathy of the plowman unconsciously lies as much disbelief as is expressed in the eloquence of the writer. In any case, what is written by everyone is thought by all non-writers, if not today, then tomorrow ”(Khomyakov, Sochineniya, vol. IV, p. 405).

Of course, philosophical views could not be consciously assimilated into the simple, illiterate crowd. In it the teachings that excite the society vaguely reached as an echo: scientific notions about the deity, the deification of nature, faith in destiny, etc. under. The majority, obviously, could not realize these concepts if they were asked to do so; but this circumstance did not prevent him from ridiculing the gods and religion together with philosophers and scientists. The point was that not every scientific theory reached the lower strata, but they were accessed by every mockery, every mockery of old beliefs. The result was the same: some did not believe by conviction, others became skeptics by frivolous imitation. “No one believes that gods are gods,” says Petronius, “no one gives a hair for Jupiter: we are not religious at all.” The temples were deserted, Juvenal notes, or were visited only as a place of debauchery: “Laughter was received by the simpleton, who claimed that the deity lived in temples and on altars stained with sacrificial blood.” According to Propertius, the sciences wrapped the shrine in their cobwebs and the altars were overgrown with grass.

The collapse of religion in cultural humanity at the end of the pre-Christian era and at the beginning of our era was complete. The religious feeling seemed to be dead. Only the painful mysticism that was spreading at that time testified that the religious need was not yet alien to the human soul, that it was simply silenced under the cold influences of skepticism. Such a state could not last long. The philosophy that planned to replace human faith did not keep its promises. Her dreams of building a worldview on the beginnings of reason, answering all questions, and solving all the problems that troubled humanity have proved unfulfilled. In the field of knowledge, disappointment has come a long time ago. The earliest philosophical experiments ended in skepticism, and since then the skeptical trend has run like a red thread through the entire history of philosophy. But this disappointment was not gloomy at first. The faith in man, the faith in the moral ideal, was still alive; alive was the hope of finding complete satisfaction in the type of natural wisdom created by reason. It was only when this ideal was shattered that this hope faded, and only then did humanity realize its complete disappointment. Self-belief turned out to be an exaggeration, the ideal sage turned out to exist only in the imagination. The pride of the will surrendered. The pride of reason surrendered even earlier. “Virtue, you are an empty word,” said the Roman world through Brutus. “What is truth?” He asked through Pilate’s mouth, asking his question without hoping for an answer. “There is neither the beauty of the will – virtue, nor the beauty of knowledge – the truth; the world was left without deities. ”

From here begins a turn in the religious life of mankind. The age of decline is over; could not proceed further. The bitter feeling of deceived expectations made people think and led them back to faith. Started movement, diametrically opposed to the previous one. At the same time, we observe that the crisis is approaching with extremely fast steps. The religious feeling, so long suppressed, surfaced, and the enthusiasm it gave rise to ever wider parts of the world. And during this time the world’s greatest historical event took place – Christianity appeared.

TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (2)
TIMES OF RISE AND DECLINE OF RELIGION AND MORALITY (2)

In the first volume of the magazine Strannik in 1901 appeared an extensive article by B. Titlinov devoted to the decline of religion and morality, a phenomenon we observe today – the beginning of the 21st century of the third millennium.

In the subsequent historical course, before us appears the chosen people of God – Israel. Although he was not destined to play a significant historical role, although he was one of the smallest peoples in Asia, but in religious terms, he had such an influence on all later centuries that the history of his religious life could not be silent. Despite Israel’s highly developed religious consciousness, the fluctuation of its religious sentiment cannot be ignored. Indeed, there was no room for skepticism or disbelief in the people of Israel; but his whole life is a story of turning away from Jehovah and returning to Him. And these retreats and returns testify to the decline, or rise, of religious inclinations. It is remarkable that what was observed in the later stages of human life can be seen in this case. The successes of external material life, external prosperity coincide with religious decline. Suffice it to recall the period of the judges. External enemies are defeated, peace comes to the country. Jehovah is forgotten and incense is burned before pagan deities. When troubles from the neighboring nations came and Israel groaned under the yoke of slavery, the priests again gathered at the altar, again Israel flocked to the sanctuary to pray for help and deliverance. A particularly strong rise in religious life took place after the Babylonian captivity. Foreign domination and the destruction of Jerusalem seemed to shatter all the national expectations of the Jewish people, and in this predicament, religion was the only consolation. On the banks of the mighty Euphrates, far from home, the full force of religious feeling awoke in the Jews. The people lived with him in the subsequent period of their existence.

The first crisis in the religious life of historical humanity, which deserves serious attention, dates back to the last centuries of the pre-Christian era. This is an age that is unparalleled in later centuries. Even when there were periods of declining religion and a weakening of religious sentiment, the anti-religious movement never deeply affected the masses themselves, but rather attracted, for the most part, the upper classes. We should not consider this phenomenon as sudden, unrelated to the previous course of development. On the contrary, it has been prepared for centuries, and in recent times before Christmas, religious skepticism has manifested itself with particular force. Its origin can be traced to Greece, five centuries before our era, and only by tracing it to this source is it possible to understand the state of the world in the period under consideration. Greece, as is well known, is the birthplace of philosophy and science. Here, first after India, philosophical thought awoke. To Greece the world owes the grandiose creations of reason, the most beautiful works of art, but to it, too, unfortunately, owes the eternal disease of mankind, the disease of its spiritual organism – religious skepticism. “Once the spirit has reached itself, when the power of thought is already freed from authority and ever-reliable support, and by way of free conviction, to bring the mind to the ideal, the good, and the divine, as one fully approved by of reason. Then the seeking thought must be aroused against all prejudices, and usually opinions must be accepted only by faith, until everyone with his own mind generates and brings to himself the consciousness of universal truth ”(Carrier, Art in connection with the general development of culture, vol. .II, pp. 167-168). This is the task set by Greek philosophy – to build on the principles of reason a complete worldview, free from any influence of authority. By setting a goal in this way, she naturally came into conflict with religious beliefs. As diverse as the philosophical schools of Greece were, they all had one thing in common – the destructive influence on religion. The free development of thought required, above all, freedom in the religious sphere. Then the man was filled with faith in himself. He drove his adolescence, proud of his own strength, free himself from the shackles of authority. He hoped, indeed, to find his support in reason itself, he hoped to reach the truth completely. How great was Elina’s arrogant pride is clear from the fact that Greece deified man. Amazed by his beauty, first physical, then spiritual, she worshiped this beauty, and from that time man became the true deity of Greece. However, such self-deification could not be called religion. It satisfied the aesthetic rather than the religious needs of the human spirit. A kind of spontaneous indifference was the main characteristic of Greek life at that time. The Greek, as if he did not need a deity, was completely immersed in the world of poetry and beauty. In the beginning, we still see a desire to maintain a crumbling religion, and one of the victims of that desire was Socrates, but only a century later, this same Athenian people apparently completely lost their religious sense.

When Dimitar Poliorket settled in the temple of Athena Paladas, his people sang a hymn to one true deity with the words:

“O son of the supreme god, son of Poseidon

 And Aphrodite!

 Are the other gods without ears?

Or they are too far,

Do they exist at all, but in the end

They don’t care about us…

Here we see your face…

So we pray to you! ”

In these words there is not just indifference, but ridicule of religion, a mockery of careless frivolity, testifying to the complete decline of religious attraction among the people who composed such hymns. From Greece, the wave of disbelief spread to other countries, drawing more and more circles into society. Philosophy, completing its destructive work in the homeland, acquired more and more proselytes outside it. Rome, the lord of the world at that time, is known to have been completely under the spiritual influence of conquered Greece. Two philosophical schools in Greece attracted the most followers from Roman society, and both, although diverging in their basic principles, worked together to destroy the religious foundations of life. These two schools were the Epicurean and the Stoic.

Epicureanism is a system of an absolutely materialistic nature. For the philosophers of this trend, the world was a collection of atoms, infinitesimal indivisible particles, the various combinations of which explain all the phenomena of life. Man revolved entirely in this cycle of matter; both his body and his soul are no more and no less aggregates of material particles, whose ultimate destiny was the destruction, the decomposition of their constituent elements. The ultimate goal in this life was the enjoyment, the harmonious enjoyment of the world, to which the Epicurean assigned all his happiness. It is understandable in what relation to religion such a doctrine stood. There is no place for the deity in this world, since the latter is reduced to a simple conglomeration of matter. “Everything is a lie that the gods usually tell us,” Epicurus wrote in one of his letters, “and there is nothing just in the punishments that are supposed to be sent to the wicked, nor in the rewards provided for the good.” The students were faithful to their teacher. The derisive and contemptuous attitude towards religious beliefs was forever a hallmark of the Epicureans. Lucretius mocks the belief in variety. Heaven is powerless before fate and the laws of nature. There is no deity, no afterlife, no fear of punishment. Nature is the only deity worthy of worship, and only its sacred harmony is worthy of worship, because nature is the source of all life, it creates and develops everything according to its own laws. This deity of Epicurean philosophy needed no sacrifices, no worship, no prayers. Tears would be in vain here – the universe is eternally silent and no, because atoms are indifferent to human suffering. By the way, this circumstance did not bother the followers of Epicurus in the least. It seemed to them that they did not need a living deity, because the very need for a religious feeling had almost died out in their souls. On the contrary, even the very thought of a being above nature and beyond seemed unpleasant and disgusting to them, because it disturbed the clear and bright state of their spirit, disturbed his happy peace.

Stoic philosophy found its widest distribution in the ancient world on the border between the Old and New Testaments. But her influence is no less anti-religious than that of Epicurus. And if the latter was materialism in its purest form, then the former embodied the pantheistic worldview. There the world is seen as a collection of atoms, here descended from the deity, evolving from him according to certain laws, as from the grain grows a plant. There the deity was banished from the world, and his place was taken by the universe; here it merged with the universe, and, therefore, in the end, a lifeless, dead nature remained again. In this way, two different teachings merged into their final conclusions, and if the Epicureans suppressed any religious inclinations, their doctrine had the same effect on the Stoics.