an environmental crisis in waiting
an environmental crisis in waiting

Representative Sonam Tsering Frasi, Office of Tibet, London speaking at the discussion titled ‘Tibet: an environmental crisis in waiting’ organised by the Democracy Forum.

London: Representative Mr. Sonam Tsering Frasi, Office of Tibet, London was invited by Lord Bruce, President of the Democracy Forum to give introductory remarks in a virtual panel discussion organised by the Democracy Forum. Watch here.

The discussion entitled “Tibet: an environmental crisis in waiting” was broadcast live on Tuesday, 16 March 2021, between 2-4pm UK time and 7.30-9.30 India time chaired by Humphrey Hawksley, author & former BBC Asia Correspondent and joined by panellists, Tempa Gyaltsen Zamlha, senior fellow/Head of Tibet Environment Desk, Tibet Policy Institute, Dharamsala, India, Dechen Palmo, Environment researcher at Tibet Policy Institute, India, John H. Knox, Henry C. Lauerman Professor of International law, Wake Forest University and former UN special rapporteur on Human Rights and Environment and Christa Meindersma, Director of Advocacy & communication, International Campaign for Tibet, Europe.

Lord Bruce, President of the Democratic Forum extended a warm welcome to the team of experts and panellists for agreeing to participate in the public event discussing a topic of such profile importance organised by the Forum. He mentioned a view of crises facing Tibet today was clearly enunciated at the Paris climate summit in 2015, highlighting a recorded message for the summit from His Holiness the Dalai Lama.

Lord Bruce, President of the Democratic Forum addressing the panel.

“Tibet is the roof of the world, the third pole. Once its ecology is damaged, it would take a longer time to recover”, he emphasised the impact of the plateau on the lives of billions of people in China, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. This is not a question of one nation or two nations. This is nothing less than the survival of humanity. Mr Bruce highlighted the importance of the preservation of Tibet’s rivers and informed data and report from the Tibet Policy Institute and UN team on China’s mismanagement of Tibet’s resources which led to the rising temperature faster than the global average causing flood in the country. Finally, he shared his anxiety about glaciers facing an awful scenario and assuming the audience will draw their own conclusion after listening to the speakers.

Representative Sonam Tsering in his introductory remarks said The Tibetan Plateau is called the Third Pole because its glaciers, ice fields and permafrost, contain the largest deposits of freshwater sources outside the two polar regions. Many of the most famous rivers of Asia flow out of Tibet, making Tibet, the water tower or the water reservoir for a very large part of the Indian subcontinent and the whole of South-East Asia. The Crisis in environmental issues in Tibet has adversely impacted the Tibetans already. The Chinese Communist State in the name to protect the headlands of rivers that feed the Yellow, Yangtze and Mekong have involved the uprooting, relocation and settlement of thousands and thousands of Tibetan nomads. Regardless of any political or cultural view, the environmental impact of the Tibetan Plateau – the Third Pole – is one of the key issues of our time. To mitigate and plan for such a future, requires a sustained international response focused on the preservation of the Tibetan Plateau as well as on the question of Tibet’s sovereignty.

Professor John H. Knox during the discussion.

Professor John H. Knox, in his remarks, said that the core of the rights-based approach to environmental protection is to the protection of the rights of environmental human rights defenders. That is those who work to protect the only right is to protect the right of others. This means that China like every other country has an obligation to protect the rights of those who criticise its policies. Not to detain them or prosecute them for peaceful actions and protest. An obligation to investigate and punish actions taken to persecute them. Unfortunately, these rights are often not protected in many countries perhaps most countries in the world. Environmental defenders are often at great risk. In recent years, UN special rapporteurs said multiple communications to china raising concerns about critical allegations that Tibetans should protest against mining and other environmental issues as well as other human rights issues such as rights to teach Tibetan language in school.

Tempa Gyaltsen Zamlha, senior fellow/Head of Tibet Environment Desk, Tibet Policy Institute in Dharamsala in his presentation mentioned that Tibet is called the Third pole because the Tibetan plateau is home to the third-largest concentration of ice beside the north and south pole with 46000 glaciers on the plateau.

He further stressed that because of the large presence of ice on Tibet’s plateau, it also influences climate condition across Asia and as far as Europe and North America. He mentioned that there are some scientific findings that the intensity of the monsoon is influence by what’s happening in the Tibet plateau and also recent increase in heatwave across Europe is also due to the loss of glacier on the Tibet plateau. This means the importance of the Tibet plateau is not only across Asia but also for Europe and America.

Tempa Gyaltsen Zamlha, Head of Tibet Environment Desk, Tibet Policy Institute presents on the global significance of the Tibetan plateau.

Dechen Palmo, an Environment researcher in her presentation mentioned the increased number of dams built in China and Tibet. According to the International Commission on large dams, China has 23,841 large dams, accounting for 41% of the world total dams. China is one of the three countries in the world that voted against the convention on the law of Non-Navigational Uses of international watercourses adopted by the UN general assembly in 1997.

Mrs Palmo particularly spoke about the importance of the Mekong river in Tibet, the longest river in south-east Asia and the flow of the river dropped due to China’s construction of dams.

Christa Meindersma from ICT Europe said climate change is inextricably linked to biodiversity loss on the Tibetan plateau. The Tibetan plateau encompasses three biodiversity hotspots. We find as the earth’s most biologically rich but threatened regions. Divers of climate change such as extractive industries, pollution, infrastructure development, damming to the exclusion of Tibetan nomads as well as the effect of climate change including the certification grassland degradation and water shortage also lead to biodiversity loss. The global environmental governance report 2020 stresses that climate change and biodiversity loss are on the same side of a coin. And point to the need for a coherent approach to avoid climate action having unintended negative consequences for biodiversity.

Finally, Barry Gardiner MP and chair of The Democracy Forum in his closing remark said ‘we failed to hold the loss of biodiversity in 2010, we failed in 2020 and here we are beginning in a new decade and China is really committed to setting in place a target that doesn’t fail. Now there are two ways you can do that. You can either reduce the aspiration level of the target themselves so they are easy to meet. We do need very serious diplomatic engagement with China at an early stage in order to ensure that there is real cooperation that we bring to COP15 and they bring to COP26 in return. I think we need to be looking for areas where we can engage together because this is critical’.

  • filed by Office of Tibet, London

Dechen Palmo, an Environment researcher presents the threat of China excessive damming.

Christa Meindersma, Director of Advocacy and Communications, ICT Europe speaks on the impact of biodiversity.

Barry Gardiner MP and chair of The Democracy Forum speaks on need for diplomatic cooperation with China.

Carrie Underwood announces Gospel album release
Carrie Underwood announces Gospel album release
(Photo: Facebook/Carrie Underwood)

When Carrie Underwood turned 38, she said she wants to give a gift to her fans, the release of a song from her upcoming album, “My Savior.”


It’s an old standard loaded with Biblical truth: “Nothing but the Blood of Jesus,” CBN News reported on March 12.

The country and western and pop star announced the release on Instagram, where she also shared some of the behind-the-scenes thinking about how to approach the old hymn.

“For as long as I can remember I have wanted to record an album of my favorite gospel hymns, and after #MyGift felt like the perfect time to make it happen. It’s called #MySavior and it will be here March 26, just in time for Easter!” says Underwood on her Facebook page.

“‘Nothing But The Blood Of Jesus’ is my birthday gift to YOU! Thanks to Bear Rinehart of NEED TO BREATHE for harmonizing with me!”

“Nothing But the Blood of Jesus” was originally composed in the mid-1870s by Robert Lowry, but Underwood shared a country twist to the classic hymn.

In a behind-the-scenes video about her rendition of the song, Underwood said the original song is “very kind of lopey,” so she wanted to “kind of mess with it … really kind of put some tempo behind it, and wanted to add these harmonies on it.”

It’s a simple rendition, like she said in her post, with an updated touch, but one that still echoes the eternal truth that’s stirred the hearts of Christians for 2,000 years, said CBN.

The country queen posted a kind of b-day haiku along with a picture of her smiling face, Billboard reported.

She tweeted, “I am not 38 years old. I am not 38 years young. I am 38 years strong. 38 years accomplished. 38 years happy! 38 years amazing!!! I am 38 years blessed…thank you, Lord, for all the trips around the sun!”

 

The decision of the Court of Ghent against Jehovah’s Witnesses is dangerous for the Catholic Church
The decision of the Court of Ghent against Jehovah’s Witnesses is dangerous for the Catholic Church

The decision of the Court of Ghent against Jehovah’s Witnesses is dangerous for the Catholic Church

Willy Fautré, director of Human Rights Without Frontiers

Catholic priests in Belgium and all other countries are forbidden from blessing same-sex couples and are at risk of being prosecuted for discriminating against homosexuals, as a consequence of a judgment issued yesterday by the Court of Ghent against Jehovah’s Witnesses.

On 16 March, the First Instance Court of Ghent condemned the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (CCJW) to a fine of 12,000 EUR on the ground that their teachings about the social distancing of their members from excluded members and other ex-members amount to discrimination and incitement to hatred.

The Catholic Church and the ban on the blessing of homosexual couples

In the last few days, in a message approved by Pope Francis, the Roman Catholic Church announced it cannot bless same-sex marriages regardless of how stable or positive the couples’ relationship may be. That statement came in response to recent questions whether the church should reflect the increasing social and notably legal acceptance of same-sex unions.

“Does the Church have the power to give the blessing to unions of persons of the same sex?” the question asked, to which the response was “Negative.” The Vatican added that that marriage should be limited to a union between a man and a woman, and that same-sex marriage is not part of God’s plan for family and raising children.

Explaining this decision in a lengthy note, the Holy See referred to same-sex unions as a “choice” and described them as sinful.

“The blessing of homosexual unions cannot be considered licit,” the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, wrote in the statement.

God “does not and cannot bless sin,” the statement added.

This doctrine stated and to be strictly implemented by the clergy was fixed by the Catholic Church in Rome on the basis of its interpretation of the Bible.

Catholic priests in Belgium and all other countries are therefore forbidden from blessing same-sex couples and are at risk of being prosecuted for discrimination against homosexuals and incitement to hatred.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses’ case

On 16 February, a trial started against the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (CCJW) at the criminal court of Ghent (East Flanders) on the alleged grounds of discrimination and incitement to hatred with a particular focus on their shunning (ostracization) practice in cases of disfellowshipping (exclusion) and disassociation (voluntary resignation).

A former Jehovah’s Witness who had voluntarily left the movement in 2011, filed a criminal complaint against the CCJW in 2015, and managed to have it supported by over a dozen more former Jehovah’s Witnesses.

According to the internal religious practice of Jehovah’s Witnesses, when the elders of a local congregation exclude a member or are notified about a voluntary resignation, they make a short neutral public announcement which states: “[Name of person] is no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses”. The CCJW is not involved in the making of that neutral announcement but is notified about the decision.   

In their conclusions provided to the Court before the trial, they said that they do not segregate excluded or resigning members as these can always attend their religious services. They also point out that baptized Jehovah’s Witnesses who no longer actively associate with fellow believers, are not shunned.

Clarifying the relations between Jehovah’s Witnesses and disfellowshipped or disassociated family members, they say: “In the immediate household, although the ‘religious ties’ the expelled or disassociated person had with his family change, … blood ties remain. The marriage relationship and normal family affections and dealings continue.” In other words, normal family affection and association continues.

In addition, the CCJW had provided the Court with nine statements of individuals who had been excluded and who had since been reinstated as Jehovah’s Witnesses. In their testimonies, they explained how they had been fairly treated by congregation elders, family, and others in the congregation when they were excluded.

The social distancing doctrine stated and practiced by Jehovah’s Witnesses in Belgium and all other countries was fixed by their Central College in the United States on the basis of their interpretation of the Bible.

The CCJW considers it is not legally responsible for the intra-familial relations between its members and former members, as it is an individual choice.

Conclusion

Are we on the way to put in the dock the Bible, the interpretation and the implementation of its doctrines fixed by the highest religious authorities and powers in the name of interpretations and implementation of human rights fixed by national judicial powers? If so, this would be a pandora box that would affect other religions and other holy scriptures.

Jana Riess: ‘Allergic to religion’ — Conservative politics can push people out of the pews
Jana Riess: ‘Allergic to religion’ — Conservative politics can push people out of the pews

There’s a massive religious shift occurring in America as one of the world’s most religious nations becomes more secular every year.

In “Secular Surge: A New Fault Line in American Politics,” political scientists David E. Campbell and Geoffrey C. Layman of the University of Notre Dame and John C. Green of the University of Akron argue that the nation’s secular population is larger and more diverse than previously acknowledged — and that a big part of what’s driving secularity is actually religious people’s political behavior.

In other words, some highly vocal and visible religious people are inadvertently pushing other people who don’t share their political views out of religion.

The dramatic rise of various kinds of nonreligion in the U.S. population has been tracked by numerous surveys. This is the group of people who check “none” or “nothing in particular” when asked about their religious affiliation. They are large — and still growing.

“This is a stunning change in the American social landscape,” Campbell, said in a Zoom interview. “To put it in context, prior to 1990, virtually no Americans identified in public opinion surveys as nonreligious. It was as low as 5%, which is close to the margin of error. And by the time we get to the year 2000, at that point you’re talking about 14% to 15% of the population. And now, that is a huge change. We do not typically see change of anything on that scale in a relatively short period of time.”

What’s responsible for this rapid change? Various studies have argued that one reason for the rapid rise of the nones is a backlash against the actions of the religious right, since so many people who leave religion also seem to be politically liberal. Campbell and his colleagues designed a series of experiments that could test that hypothesis: Was it a coincidence? A correlation? Or was religious people’s political activism actually causing increasing numbers of Americans to vote with their feet?

The first phase of each experiment asked people to choose their religious affiliation from a list and also asked other questions about their behavior and beliefs. The second phase, given to the same respondents a week later, had them read a news story that looked realistic but was actually fictionalized. The news stories were all about examples where people had mixed religion with politics, like a clergy member who was active in politics, or a politician who repeatedly referred to his faith on the campaign trail. Then, at the end of the survey, they were given the same demographic questions as before, including the one about their religious identity.

The researchers compared how people responded to the religious affiliation question to the baseline they had established a week earlier. For respondents who had already identified themselves as Republicans, being presented with these examples of the mixing of God talk and politics had no effect on how they characterized their religious identity the second time around.

Democrats, however, showed a clear aversion after reading the reports about mixing religion and politics. When surveyed the second time, their rate of religious affiliation had dropped by 13 points.

Campbell said the findings were dramatic. Just reading the news story, he said, is apparently “enough to push a sizable number of people away from holding a religious affiliation. That’s one story at one point in time, and we can get that effect. Imagine what happens when people are exposed to hundreds of stories over many, many years. It would only reinforce that idea that religion and the Republican Party go together, and that if you’re not sympathetic to the Republican Party, you don’t want anything to do with religion.”

While most of the attention has been given to the way nones are leaving religion because of the religious right’s political stances on issues like LGBTQ rights or anti-Muslim immigration policies, the left doesn’t have a pass to mix religion and politics, either, Campbell said.

“I would say to churches, on both the left and the right, that if you want to bring people back to the pews, you want to stay out of politics. And that’s true of mainline Protestant churches, Catholic parishes, Jewish synagogues — any religious community. While most of the allergic reaction is against the right, there is a general sentiment among people that they really don’t like the mixture of the two.”

“Secular Surge” does a deep dive into what the rise of the nones — and their demonstrated allergy to mixing religion and politics — might mean for politics in America going forward. In addition to the massive religious-secular divide in America as a whole, in which Republicans remain highly religious and most nonreligious people gravitate toward the Democratic Party, there’s also an intraparty fault line that could become a problem in the near future.

“In the Democratic Party, this is a brewing storm,” Campbell said. “The secular activists are a large number of the grassroots volunteers for the Democratic Party.” But the Democratic Party has traditionally been the home of African American and Latino voters, who are often highly religious. Will the party be able to hold together in its aims, given that religious and secular voters often have very different priorities?

“Frankly, the Biden administration will be the test. Can Joe Biden manage to keep these two wings of the party together? Thus far, they have managed to tamp down any potential tensions between the religious and secular wings of the party. But I wouldn’t be surprised if in the next four years, you do see more of those tensions arising.”

Biden, he noted, has been unusual in being so public about his Catholic faith, both on the campaign and in his presidency. “Here you have a candidate who is very open about his religion, but he’s heading up a party that has this strong secular wing.”

A rupture is not inevitable, he said. But preventing it will take sensitivity to divergent points of view within the party.

Don Lemon says God is not about judging people and religion is a 'barrier' that keeps people from 'actually getting to know each other'
Don Lemon says God is not about judging people and religion is a ‘barrier’ that keeps people from ‘actually getting to know each other’
CNN host Don Lemon said that Christians need to re-examine their beliefs and claimed that God doesn't judge people when responding to a statement from the Vatican on same-sex unions.



Lemon, 55, made the theologically questionable comments as a guest on "The View" on Monday


Co-host Meghan McCain quoted a comment from the Vatican saying that the church could not bless same-sex unions because "God cannot bless sin," and asked Lemon, who is openly gay, to respond.



 "Do you think this sends a damaging message? How do you feel about that given that obviously you're now engaged and going to get married?" McCain asked.



'Well I think there are, listen, I respect people's right to believe in whatever they want to believe in their God," Lemon claimed.



"But if you believe something that hurts another person, or does not give someone the same rights or freedoms, not necessarily under the Constitution because this is under God," he continued. "I think that this is wrong, and I think that the Catholic Church and many other churches really need to re-examine themselves and their teachings. Because that is not what God is about. God is not about hindering people or even judging people."

‘Go out and have a barbecue’

Lemon went on to put the issue in the “context of race” by quoting Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who decried segregation in churches.

“So I think that religion and the pew keeps us from actually, they are barriers from people actually getting to know each other,” Lemon continued.

“So I would say to the Pope and the Vatican, and all Christians or Catholics, or whomever, whatever religion you believe out, you have to belong to out there, go out and meet people and try to understand people and do what the Bible and what Jesus actually says, if you believe in Jesus, and that is to love your fellow man and judge not lest ye be not judged,” he misquoted.

“Instead of having the pew hinder you, having the church hinder you, instead of being segregated in the church and among yourselves, go out and have a barbecue,” he concluded. “And meet people and start breaking bread with people and getting to know them.”

Some Christians on social media objected to Lemon’s watered down version of historical Christian teaching.

Here’s the video of Don Lemon’s advice to Christians:

<

p class=”shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube”>


Don Lemon Addresses Trump, Voter Suppression, Racism in Book “This Is the Fire” | The View

www.youtube.com

Buddhist Times News – Ladakh UT Buddhist conclave commences in Leh 
Buddhist Times News – Ladakh UT Buddhist conclave commences in Leh 

A two days long Buddhist conclave themed, ‘Ladakh UT Buddhist Council’ was inaugurated on March 13 at Sherab Skyadtsal ling Learning and Library Centre, Thiksey monastery

It is located on top of a hill in and is the largest gompa in central Ladakh, notably containing a separate set of buildings for female renunciates that has been the source of significant recent building and reorganisation.

The Buddhist conclave was organised by the Indian Himalayan Council of Nalanda Buddhist Tradition in collaboration with International Buddhist Confederation, Ladakh Buddhist Association, Ladakh Gonpa Association and  Ministry of Culture, Govt. Of India, New Delhi.

His Eminence Togdan Rinpoche stressed the importance of standing together as a Buddhist before following any school of thoughts and sects. He suggested forming of a committee to work for the promotion and development of Nalanda tradition in Himalayan region.

Keynote speaker of the inaugural day, Secretary, Indian Himalayan Council of Nalanda Buddhist Tradition, Maling Gombu said, “We need to evolve with time for the development of the Buddhism. The issues have to be resolved unitedly without any differences and the time has come to get a positive change.”

Talking about the future crisis which can be faced, he stressed having a plan and course of action.  He highlighted several issues concerning Buddhism and stressed the need to form a National Sangha Community to solve an unseen future crisis.

Talking about the issues of not having recognition of monastic education in India, Maling Gombu sighted an example of Nepal where monastic education is recognised. He said that it is high time that we should strive towards getting monastic education recognised so that it will further boost the development of Buddhism.

He said that the meeting and discussions on various issues by Lama Rinpoche on one platform in regular intervals will send across a strong message of unity and strength.

Congratulating Ladakh for the Union Territory status, Ven. Dr. Dhammapiya, Secretary-General, International Buddhist Confederation said that the main objective of organising Buddhist conclave is to bridge Buddhist people residing in different parts of India. He highlighted the various practice and sects in Buddhism which needs to be set aside to get identified as Buddhist first.

“The core responsibility is to identify the real root and nurture it rather than focussing on branches of Buddhism. The point is to understand Buddha Dhamma and practise it in our daily life to be called as a Buddhist”, he added.

Reiterating the words of His Holiness Dalai Lama to be 21st century Buddhist, Ven. Dhammapiya stressed practising it in daily life.

Talking about the various issues such as decreasing population of Buddhist, the crisis and issues he said, “ It is us who have to take the responsibility in understanding our problems and to get it solved. No one from the outside will  solve the crisis, we must protect our own tradition and culture.”

International  Buddhist Confederation (IBC) is a global umbrella Buddhist body headquartered in New Delhi. The IBC was conceived in August 2011, at an International Workshop in New Delhi, where 28 delegates from 11 countries unanimously agreed to form a new international Buddhist umbrella body that could serve as a common platform for Buddhist worldwide.

Addressing the gathering, His Eminence Thuksey Rinpoche also stressed the importance of recognising monastic education.

His Eminence said, “ The idea of following and practising Buddhism by only monks and nuns needs to be changed. The responsibilities lie on each and every one. It is  important to inculcate the habit of practising Buddhism from a family and at a very young age.”

Thupstan Chhewang, President, Ladakh Buddhist Association said that on one hand the practice of Buddhism is growing in European countries but on the other hand Buddhist community residing in the Himalayan region is facing a threat of losing its identity.  He said that such a Buddhist conclave is the need of the hour to address the issues.

He stressed standing unitedly to face all the challenges and prosper Buddhism in its true sense.

MP Ladakh, Jamyang Tsering Namgyal also expressed happiness of organising Buddhist conclave in Ladakh which he said will prove beneficial to the Buddhist population residing in Ladakh. Highlighting the small population of Buddhists in India, he stressed the need for a policy to strengthen Buddhists in the country.

He said, “We as a Ladakhi failed to promote and strengthen Buddhist tradition culture and learning in true sense. We have also failed to promote our own language.”

Dr. Jamyang Gyalson and Tsultim Gyatson spoke on Indian Himalayan Buddhist Communities, culture, preservation, and identity- challenges and way forwarding the 21st century.  A discussion was held on history, culture, preservation and identity in Ladakh, challenges and way forward in the 21st century.

source  –  Reach Ladakh Bulletin

Love is Sophia Brown’s ‘religion’
Love is Sophia Brown’s ‘religion’

Recording artiste Sophia Brown has teamed up with fellow artiste, Duane Stephenson, on a soulful acoustic reggae track titled My Religion.

The song, which was produced under Brown’s Music Mecka label, was released last month. She said that it is a track to which everyone can relate.

“It is speaking about promoting love and not hate because no matter how we look at it, racism is still a big factor in our society,” Brown said. With such a strong message delivered over an easygoing beat, it’s no wonder that the song has performed quite well since its release.

“The response has been great, the song is very relatable so I didn’t expect anything less than the response I’m receiving currently. We have also had tremendous feedback as well,” the singer said.

While she started her label in 2006, Sophia Brown has been spreading her art since the 90s. A well-rounded creative, the artiste has balanced her time in the studio with her feats as an accomplished dancer and choreographer. Her previous tracks include Stronger, Senorita and Changes, which features Ginjah.

“I do contemporary, lovers’ rock and social commentary. I make music for everyone; there is something in the Sophia Brown catalogue for everyone,” she said.

Supreme Court's COVID-19 cases stir up battle between religion, same-sex couples over foster care
Supreme Court’s COVID-19 cases stir up battle between religion, same-sex couples over foster care

John Fritze
 
| USA TODAY

4714d889 bd2a 4ec9 988a ff931ce05b3a RectThumb03

play
Show Caption

WASHINGTON – As religious freedom emerges as a major theme at the Supreme Court this year, some court watchers predict a series of opinions involving COVID-19 restrictions have put that issue on a collision course with gay rights.

In nine cases since November, the high court has sided with churches and synagogues that sued over coronavirus regulations limiting the number of worshippers who can attend services. The disputes have put religious freedom center stage and may provide clues about how the justices will handle a blockbuster case involving same-sex couples. 

The Supreme Court is set to rule this year on a major case questioning whether Philadelphia can stop working with a Catholic charity that declined to screen same-sex couples as foster parents, Fulton v. Philadelphia. Some legal scholars said the COVID-19 disputes show the Catholic group may have momentum on its side.

More: Supreme Court hears Philadelphia foster parent dispute

“This voting lineup makes clear that Fulton is going to be reversed,” predicted Douglas Laycock, a University of Virginia law professor and expert on religious liberty. “At least five, and maybe all six, of the conservatives will protect the Catholic Church from having to place children with same-sex couples or else losing its foster-care mission entirely.”

Though not everyone has signed on to that assessment – including the organizations that support Philadelphia – there is agreement the court’s new conservative 6-3 majority has already looked favorably on religious freedom claims and will probably continue to do so. 

Even before Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett took her seat on the court in October, adding another conservative voice to the bench, the justices have looked kindly on religion in high-profile cases. The court allowed taxpayer money to be directed to religious entities in some situations, exempted employers with religious objections from requirements that they provide health insurance coverage for contraceptives and let a massive Latin cross stay on government land within a few minutes’ drive from the nation’s capital.

More recently, the court overturned coronavirus regulations that curtail indoor religious services because they included exceptions for secular businesses, such as retail stores and hair salons. Those decisions have come through the court’s so-called shadow docket, meaning they have been decided quickly – without oral argument – and often without an opinion from the court.

Shadow docket: Supreme Court blocks some COVID-19 rules for churches

Six years later: The impact of the Supreme Court’s 2015 same-sex marriage ruling   

Those cases have represented a huge win for evangelical Christian congregations and other religious groups who say the government shouldn’t be able to force them to take positions that conflict with their belief. 

“People felt more excited than usual because there was nothing to fear,” Adelheid Waumboldt, a spokeswoman and parishioner at Harvest Rock Church in California, said as she described services after the church won a case at the Supreme Court last month. “There was no fear of being arrested or fear of persecution.”

Same-sex foster parents 

Fatma Marouf and Bryn Esplin sat in stunned silence for a few seconds when the person on the other end of the line told them that if they wanted to qualify as foster parents, their home would need to “mirror the Holy Family.” For a second, they weren’t completely sure what that meant. It became clear soon enough. 

Marouf, director of the Immigrant Rights Clinic at Texas A&M School of Law, works professionally with Catholic Charities Fort Worth and had toured the center where the organization helps care for unaccompanied refugee children for the federal government. In 2017, she and Esplin, a bioethics professor at the University of North Texas, decided they wanted to help in a more direct way.

Catholic Charities was the only foster agency available for the migrant children. 

“I thought, for sure, this can’t be legal,” Marouf said. “This is a federal program using taxpayer funds.”

The prohibition, Esplin said, not only shrinks the pool of potential foster parents, it also assumes there are no LBGT children who might benefit from same-sex parents.

One of the questions raised by the Fulton case is whether government contractors, such as the Catholic foster care agency, may object to anti-discrimination requirements – after all, they work for the government. Another question is whether the government must offer exceptions to religious groups if they offer them to secular organizations. 

That second question, several observers said, is where the COVID-19 cases may become relevant.  

The foster agency case pits Philadelphia’s position that it can prohibit same-sex discrimination by its contractors against Catholic Social Services, which asserts it cannot screen same-sex couples to be foster parents because it opposes gay marriage on religious grounds. The court heard arguments in November.

Part of the issue in the Philadelphia dispute is what test the court will use to determine whether a law violates the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion. The outcome could turn on whether the court finds that any secular exceptions to a law – say, allowing people into a hardware store during the pandemic – means there must be exemptions for religious activity, such as attending Sunday morning services. 

“The opinions we’re seeing and the votes we’re seeing in the shadow docket coronavirus and church closing cases suggest that in the Fulton case, the court is going to come out in favor of the Catholic adoption agency,” said Richard Garnett, director of the University of Notre Dame law school program on church, state and society. “They do involve a similar question of, ‘Once you open the door, then what?’”

Attorneys for the Catholic charity said the city’s other foster care agencies benefit from exemptions to the city’s nondiscrimination rules. They might not place a disabled child with a family if the would-be parents don’t have the means to care for her. If the city allows that, attorneys said, it must allow religious exemptions.   

Others said that’s not the same as Catholic Social Services declining all same-sex couples.   

Patrick Elliott, senior counsel at the Freedom From Religion Foundation, conceded that the Supreme Court has been willing to give “special preferences to religion even when that causes harm to third parties.” He also agreed that the COVID-19 cases have been a part of that trend under the court’s more conservative majority. 

But Elliott disputed that the church cases have anything to do with Fulton. 

“Philadelphia’s rules requiring nondiscrimination are altogether different,” he said. “CSS has a complete ban against same-sex couples providing a loving home for foster care children. Philadelphia has neutral rules that prohibit that type of discrimination in the foster care certification process.”

Controversial precedent 

The Supreme Court ruled in a 1990 decision that a government can impose restrictions that affect a religious entity as long as they are applied equally to religious and secular activities. A city can impose a 30 mph speed limit, for instance, and if someone claims his religion requires him to drive 60 mph, too bad. The claim gets tossed.

Some conservatives want to overturn the precedent – which, ironically, was written by Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, a stalwart conservative in his time on the bench. Critics said the opinion, Employment Division v. Smith, reduced religious protections provided by the First Amendment.

Voting: Supreme Court’s conservatives question effort to unwind voting laws

Warrants: Court debates whether misdemeanors can trigger warrantless searches

Three years after Smith, in another groundbreaking case, the court invalidated a Florida city’s attempt to stop a church from performing animal sacrifices. The justices found that laws that are not applied equally must receive far more scrutiny and that secular exceptions to a law restricting religion signal that the higher scrutiny should apply.

In other words, if a city tried to ban animal killings in a church because of objections from neighbors but exempted the slaughterhouse or the killing of pests from that rule, it would probably be in for a much tougher fight in federal courts. 

Snap forward 30 years to a world besieged by a pandemic that has killed more than 530,000 people in the USA and that sent officials scrambling to pass restrictions on gatherings. Many of those regulations affected churches, and many included exemptions for “essential” secular activities.

Shadow docket

In one of the first such cases, the justices ruled in July that Nevada could impose tighter crowd restrictions on churches than casinos. In the 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four liberals. The court did not explain its order.

Four months later, after Barrett was seated, the court took the opposite tack, ruling 5-4 against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s crowd limits on houses of worship in the state’s hardest-hit regions.

In an unsigned opinion, the justices noted New York allowed exceptions to the COVID-19 rules for acupuncture clinics, garages and campgrounds. They applied the tougher standard and ruled against New York. In subsequent disputes, including one involving five California churches that the court decided last month, the conservatives again noted exemptions to the COVID-19 restrictions for retail stores and hairstylists and blocked the rules. 

The latest on NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo: Allegations of sexual harassment

Psaki: Biden’s ‘Neanderthal’ comment was a ‘reflection of his frustration’

Liberal justices have countered the exemptions are not similar – a church, where people may sit together for an hourlong service, is more like a theater than a grocery store, they said. Entities that health officials describe as similar to churches, such as movie theaters, have generally been subject to the same COVID-19 restrictions.

Frank Ravitch, a Michigan State University law professor who studies law and religion, said the Supreme Court majority’s comparisons of churches to grocery and other retail businesses “are ridiculous and trample on public safety measures created by state health officials and trample on common sense, in my view.”

More: Supreme Court faces balancing act between physical and spiritual health

‘Actual proof of harm’

Lori Windham, an attorney who represents Catholic Social Services in the Fulton litigation, said the COVID-19 cases have demonstrated that when a government begins making exceptions for secular activity, it’s going to have to find a “really good reason” for why it doesn’t make similar accommodations for religious organizations or activities. Windham is a senior counsel at Becket, a nonprofit law firm that represents litigants fighting for religious freedom.

“The second part of that is the COVID cases show that when the government is restricting religious exercise, it needs to show actual proof of harm,” she said. 

In the COVID-19 cases, Windham said, local governments haven’t proved religious services are more dangerous than gyms or big box stores. In the Fulton case, no same-sex family was turned away by the Catholic charity, because none came to the group looking for a foster child in the first place. 

Instead, those families went elsewhere.

Catholic Church 'does not have power' to bless same-sex marriage, says Vatican
Catholic Church ‘does not have power’ to bless same-sex marriage, says Vatican
(Photo: REUTERS / Benoit Tessier)People wave trademark pink, blue and white flags during a protest march called, “La Manif pour Tous” (Demonstration for All) against France’s legalisation of same-sex marriage and to show their support of traditional family and education values, in Paris February 2, 2014. In April 2013 the French parliament approved a law allowing same-sex couples to marry and to adopt children, a flagship reform pledge by the French president. Banners read, “French Muslims Say NO to Marriage of Homosexuals” (L) and “No to Gender Theory” (R).

The Catholic Church does not have the power to bless same-sex unions although it can give blessings to individual persons “with homosexual inclinations,” the Vatican has said.


The message on March 15, approved by Pope Francis, came in response to questions about whether the church should reflect the increasing social and legal acceptance of same-sex unions.

“Does the Church have the power to give the blessing to unions of persons of the same sex?” the question asked.

“Negative,” replied the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is responsible for defending Catholic doctrine.

In its “explanatory note,” the Vatican said that in some ecclesial contexts, plans and proposals for blessings of unions of persons of the same sex were being advanced.

“Such projects are not infrequently motivated by a sincere desire to welcome and accompany homosexual persons, to whom are proposed paths of growth in faith, ‘so that those who manifest a homosexual orientation can receive the assistance they need to understand and fully carry out God’s will in their lives.'”

As blessings on people are in relationship with the sacraments, the blessing of homosexual unions cannot be considered acceptable.

“This is because they would constitute a certain imitation or analogue of the nuptial blessinginvoked on the man and woman united in the sacrament of Matrimony, while in fact ‘there are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family.'”

NOT INTENDED AS ‘UNJUST DISCRIMINATION’

The doctrinal congregation said that the declaration of the unlawfulness of blessings of unions between persons of the same sex is not intended to be, a form of unjust discrimination.

It is rather “a reminder of the truth of the liturgical rite and of the very nature of the sacramentals, as the Church understands them.”

The declaration said the Church recalls that God Himself never ceases to bless each of His pilgrim children, because for Him “we are more important to God than all of the sins that we can commit.”

“But he does not and cannot bless sin: he blesses sinful man, so that he may recognize that he is part of his plan of love and allow himself to be changed by him. He in fact ‘takes us as we are, but never leaves us as we are.'”

“For the above mentioned reasons, the Church does not have, and cannot have, the power to bless unions of persons of the same sex in the sense intended above.”

The National Catholic Register in the United States ran a story on the announcement headlined, “Vatican says priests can’t bless gay couples. Why did Pope Francis approve this decree?”

“Pope Francis, who made headlines in the first months of his papacy by responding, “Who am I to judge? when asked about gay priests, has now signed off on a Vatican decree that priests cannot bless same-sex unions since God “cannot bless sin.”

“For some, the new decree may result in whiplash, coming less than five months after the Pope made headlines in a documentary film for once more affirming his support of civil union laws for same-sex couples.

“For others, it’s further affirmation of the church’s teaching that ‘homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.’ But for all, it’s another tricky move in Francis’ tightrope walk of upholding church teaching, while also trying to extend a warmer welcome to LGBTQ persons.”

NCR said the Vatican’s decree comes at a time when Catholics in Western Europe and the United States are increasingly accepting of LGBTQ relationships, with 61 percent of U.S. Catholics approving of gay marriage.

Another U.S. outlet Christian Headlines reported, “The Vatican on Monday pointed to Scripture and centuries of church teaching in stating it does not have the power to bless same-sex unions.

2021 COMECE Spring Assembly: EU Bishops to meet with European Commission’s Vice President Margaritis Schinas
2021 COMECE Spring Assembly: EU Bishops to meet with European Commission’s Vice President Margaritis Schinas

2021 COMECE Spring Assembly

EU Bishops to meet with European Commission’s Vice President Margaritis Schinas

 

Delegates of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Union will participate in the COMECE Spring Assembly to be held in a digital format on 17-18 March 2021 with the participation of European Commission’s Vice President Margaritis Schinas. The focus of the Assembly will be: Covid-19 recovery, Migration and Asylum policies, Freedom of Religion inside the EU.

 

In the context of the first anniversary of the Covid-19 pandemic, which has caused the death of more than 2,5 million people across the globe, the Bishops of the European Union will exchange on the current status of the recovery process in  the EU and its Member States. 

 

Bishops will also discuss on how to better promote a people-centred and value-based approach in EU policies, which has become even more urgent due to the socio-economic impact deriving from Coronavirus. 

 

First Selection M 2 0The participation of European Commission’s Vice President Margaritis Schinas will allow the EU Bishops to analyse the state of play of the “open, transparent and regular dialogue” between Churches and EU institutions as enshrined in Article 17 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 

 

The meeting will also be an occasion for the Bishops to restate some concrete policy recommendations to be considered in view of the future negotiations on the  EU Pact on Migration and Asylum. These recommendations are contained in a statement elaborated by the COMECE Working Group on Migration and Asylum in December 2020. 

 

In the light of various national concerns towards the promotion and protection of Freedom of Religion inside the EU, the Bishops of the European Union will also reflect on  how to address future challenges to this fundamental right. 

 

Journalists and media operators interested in conducting remote interviews with the Bishops are strongly encouraged to contact COMECE Media and Communication Officer.

‘Saint Maud’ Review: An Unsettling and Fantastic Story of Trauma and Religion
‘Saint Maud’ Review: An Unsettling and Fantastic Story of Trauma and Religion
Rose Glass makes a massive directorial debut with her sinful story that can shock any audience.

The Buchtelite is continuing to review movies that are on the radar for Oscar nominations. The second movie in this series is “Saint Maud, written and directed by Rose Glass.  

Saint Maud explores uncomfortable topics such as trauma, PTSD and religion to highlight the horrors that in-home nurse, Maud, played by Morfydd Clark (“Crawl,”) experiences after she suffers a traumatic experience at the hospital she used to work at, Maud  turns to religion in a very unhealthy and obsessive way that is starting to affect her everyday life and actions. After that experience, she takes care of patients who are in Hospice and wish to pass away at home. She is placed with a blunt and eccentric patient named Amanda, played by Jennifer Ehle (“Zero Dark Thirty,”) who is a former dance prodigy and does everything that Maud is morally against. Maud becomes dangerously obsessed with trying to save Amanda’s soul with religious practices and actions that lead to her growing insanity. 

Saint Maud is a movie that is best watched with very limited knowledge of the plot and characters when going into it. The most interesting aspects of the story are the surprises and turns that Maud makes while she is going through the journey of trying to save Amanda and her sinful soul. 

The pacing of this film truly stands out. It is a shorter film with only 84 minutes runtime, but it carries a punch of impact. The movie is wrapped up in the final seconds that perfectly demonstrate Maud’s journey throughout the entire film. 

Morfydd Clark’s performance is astonishing throughout the entire film with how perfectly she encapsulates the character of Maud and the complete transformation she makes during the film. Her performance is one of the best female horror performances of modernday cinema. She is easily put on the list with big names such as Toni Collete for “Hereditary, Florence Pugh for “Midsommar, Anya Taylor-Joy for “The Witch” and Lupita Nyong’o for “Us. 

Rose Glass makes her directorial debut by leaving the horror community speechless. She is leading the way for more women to be included in the horror movie scene that has been dominated by  male directors for many years.  

Gore and violence can be a very tricky subject and can be very hard to master without being too little or too much. Saint Maud has the perfect amount of gore and violence that can make an audience feel disgusted and uneasy. Audiences can still stay engaged in the storyline and not feel the need to turn the movie off due to excessive violence that many horror films gravitate towards.  

A24 never fails to put out terrifying and unsettling horror films even when faced with huge delays and limited theater releases. “Saint Maud” still holds the same terrifying experience even when having to watch the movie from home and not in a large movie theater making it the perfect movie to watch during COVID-19. 

Overall, “Saint Maud” does an amazing job of being able to crawl under the skin and use the most distressing experiences to make audiences as uneasy as possible. It is important to note that this is a very dark movie with heavy subject matter that may not be suitable for all audiences. Saint Maud is rated R for gore, heavy violence, sexual content, and strong language. 

Grade: A- 

Saint Maud is available to stream through Epix Films and Amazon Prime. 

Assam polls: ‘Politics of religion should not be done,’ says Rajnath Singh
Assam polls: ‘Politics of religion should not be done,’ says Rajnath Singh

Mar 14, 2021, 11:33PM ISTSource: ANI

Defense Minister Rajnath Singh during his address in poll-bound Assam’s Dergaon on March 14 expressed concern on the current status of Congress and accused them of joining hands with All India United Democratic Front for the sake of votes. Defense Minister said that politics should be done to build the country and society but politics of religion should not be done. “We believe in justice for all, appeasement of none,” he added. Giving reference of former Congress Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi’s government, which ruled Assam for 15 years, Rajnath Singh said, “Tarun Gogoi’s government was here for 15 years, but it never joined hands with AIUDF. But today for the sake of votes, Congress has aligned with a party like AIUDF. What has happened to it?”

Your Religion News: March 13, 2021
Your Religion News: March 13, 2021

Published: 3/14/2021 2:57:09 PM

Franklin County UUs meet this Sunday on ZoomAll Souls Church of Greenfield, Bernardston Unitarian Church and First Parish of Northfield, Unitarian, will worship together at 10:30 a.m. on Sunday, March 14, in a videoconference service led by the Rev. Alison Cornish. The topic is “Embracing Truth.”

Truth — and its distortions — has made national headlines particularly over the past few years. Yet if we are honest with ourselves, each of us, every day, has a slippery relationship with total truthfulness. “Tell all the Truth but tell it slant …” wrote Emily Dickinson. No one speaks the truth all the time; so, how might we most often opt for truthfulness, and what do we base our practices and decisions on? And, what difference might it make if truth-telling is part of our religious practice?

Stream the service via this live public link, https://www.youtube.com/user/FranklinCountyUUs. To participate in the service on Zoom, contact fpnorthfieldma@gmail.com for the link.

March 25: ‘Lifting the veil on racism in Franklin County’

The Interfaith Council of Franklin County is sponsoring the last of three online Zoom programs titled, “Lifting the veil on racism in Franklin County.”

On Thursday, March 25, from 7 to 8:30 p.m., a panel will feature Black, Brown and White anti-racist activists sharing their stories from the justice movement.

It is the Interfaith Council’s recognition that the change we hope to see in our country is in our hands now and it is our hope that these panels are just the beginning of anti-racism work taken on by various groups, congregations and families. To register for any of these programs, email Interfaithcfc@gmail.com

24th annual Lenten Discussion Series

Due to the continuing pandemic, all sessions will be live-streamed. Please send an email to randyc1897@gmail.com for each week’s unique Zoom log-in link.

Wednesday, March 17:

Fourth session offered by the Rev. Dr. Cynthia Crosson-Harrington at 7 p.m. Pastor of the Whately Congregational Church, UCC. Session Title: Beauty in the Broken Places.

Wednesday, March 24:

Fifth session offered by the Rev. Dr. Robert Gormbley at 7 p.m. Interim pastor of the Shelburne Congregational Church, UCC. Session Title: Failure Isn’t Fatal.

Trinitarian Congregational Church Sunday service

NORTHFIELD — Worship services at the Trinitarian Congregational Church are Sundays at 10 a.m. via Zoom. Please contact the church office for a link: 413-498-5839 or email busoff147@gmail.com by Thursday at noon.

Businesses thrives on principles and not on religion – Economic Consultant
Businesses thrives on principles and not on religion – Economic Consultant
11843431

Business News of Sunday, 14 March 2021

Source: GNA

2021-03-14

Stephen Boafo believes businesses do not thrive on religion

Becoming successful in business does not depend on your religion; it is about attitude, discipline and knowledge, Mr Stephen Boafo, a Business Consultant, has stated.

He explained that the success or otherwise of any business venture does not only depend on one’s religious standings, but rather adherence to business ethics.

Mr Boafo told the Ghana News Agency in an interview at Tema that entrepreneurship depended on following fundamental principles of economics.

He noted that, the difference between successful and unsuccessful businessmen and women had nothing to do with the religious affiliations.

According to him, it was all about being trustworthy and to ensure that customers were treated well and it would bring repeated purchase.

He advised that finances should be managed well when starting businesses to avoid mismanagement; pricing should be done well in order not to incur cost.

He claimed that some Christian businessmen and women thinks that they can sell their products anyhow with the view that God will definitely bless them, so they do not price their products very well, this is wrong.

Mr Boafo alleged that sometimes some Christians think that by virtue of being Christians their businesses should be successful. “Some Christians would leave their business for days or weeks without opening to go and pray somewhere”.

He added that businesses thrive on principles and once you do not follow the principles, your business would not grow.

Celebrating the Birthday of Scientology Founder L. Ron Hubbard
Celebrating the Birthday of Scientology Founder L. Ron Hubbard

Born March 13, 1911, L. Ron Hubbard once remarked that there are only two tests of a life well lived: “Did he do what he intended? and Were people glad he lived?” In testament to his accomplishment of these tests are his more than 10,000 authored works and 3,000 recorded lectures in Dianetics and Scientology and the hundreds of millions whose lives have been bettered because he lived.

Smithsonian Magazine listed L. Ron Hubbard among the 11 most influential religious figures in American history and one of the 100 most significant Americans of all time.

Publishers Weekly called his seminal work, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, “perhaps the best-selling non-Christian book of all time in the West,” and bestowed its Century Award on the book for appearing on its bestseller list for more than 100 weeks.

His discoveries in the field of the mind, spirit and life have empowered men, women and children from all walks of life. These breakthroughs have freed the addict from drugs, transformed illiteracy into comprehension and restored self-respect and decency. Founder of the only major religion to emerge in the 20th century, millions follow his path to greater ability and spiritual freedom.

“I like to help others and count it as my greatest pleasure in life to see a person free himself of the shadows which darken his days,” he wrote in describing his own philosophy.

“These shadows look so thick to him and weigh him down so that when he finds they are shadows and that he can see through them, walk through them and be again in the sun, he is enormously delighted. And I am afraid I am just as delighted as he is.”

One of the best ways to get to know L. Ron Hubbard is by reading his books. There is also the Scientology Network, which was announced at the annual celebration of his birthday in 2018 and began broadcasting the following day.

Airing 24/7, the network aims to satisfy the overwhelming curiosity about the religion and its founder as evidenced by the fact that every six seconds, someone searches the question “What is Scientology?” A new genre of religious broadcasting, the network includes original programs including a three-part series L. Ron Hubbard: In His Own Voice, a number of his most popular articles and several of his books on film. The Network also takes viewers into the everyday lives of Scientologists, the Church as an institution and its organizations. It airs at DIRECTV 320 in the U.S. and streams at Scientology.tv, on mobile apps and via Roku, Amazon Fire and Apple TV platforms.

_______________

The Founder of the Scientology religion is L. Ron Hubbard and Mr. David Miscavige is the religion’s ecclesiastical leader.

For more information, visit the Scientology website or the Scientology TV network.

Shrine of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá: Completion of floor slab for main edifice marks major milestone | BWNS
Shrine of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá: Completion of floor slab for main edifice marks major milestone | BWNS

BAHÁ’Í WORLD CENTRE — Construction of the Shrine of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá has passed a significant milestone this week with the pouring of the concrete floor slab for the main edifice and the surrounding plaza. After many stages of preparation, the floor of the central area is among the first parts of the project to reach its final form as some of the walls enclosing the north and south plazas are nearing completion.

These and other recent developments on the site are featured in the images that follow.

Concrete was poured across an area of 2,000 square meters, creating a platform that will be paved with local stone and reach a final floor height of about 3.5 meters above the original ground level of the site.

The concrete surface of the floor slab is smoothed after pouring.

Views of the central plaza area before (top) and after (bottom) this week’s work.

Once the concrete of the plaza floor sets, the construction of the folding walls around the plaza and the pillars of the main edifice can proceed.

Pictured (center) is the purpose-made formwork that will used as a mold for the eight pillars of the main edifice, each of which will stand at 11 meters.

Work continues to advance on the portal walls enclosing the north and south plazas, as well as the pillars that will support the floor of the north plaza (foreground).

Formwork is being raised for the portal wall on the west side of the north plaza.

The portal wall on the east side of the north plaza is nearing completion.

Pictured here are two views of work on the east portal wall of the south plaza. The wall was built up in several layers, and its sloped upper edge is now being completed.

In a view of the site from the west, progress on a path encircling the Shrine can be seen in the foreground.

With the foundations and central floor slab completed and the portal walls nearing completion, the Shrine and its associated structures will begin to take form before long.

On Religion: Is ‘Southern’ more important than ‘Baptist’?
On Religion: Is ‘Southern’ more important than ‘Baptist’?

When megachurch pastor J.D. Greear became the 62nd president of the Southern Baptist Convention, he saw all kinds of statistics headed in all kinds of directions.

After decades of growth, America’s largest Protestant flock faced steady decline as many members joined thriving nondenominational evangelical and charismatic churches. Ominously, baptism statistics were falling even faster. On the other side of the 2018 ledger, worship attendance and giving to SBC’s national Cooperative Program budget were holding strong.

But one set of numbers caught Greear’s attention, he told the SBC’s executive committee, as he nears the end of his three years in office.

“Listen, I made diversity … one of my goals coming into this office, not because it’s cool, or trendy, or woke,” he said. “It’s because in the last 30 years, the largest growth we’ve seen in the Southern Baptist Convention has been among Black, Latino and Asian congregations. They are a huge part of our future. … Praise God, brothers and sisters.”

Greear’s blunt, emotional address came during a Feb. 22 meeting in Nashville in which SBC leaders ousted two churches for “affirming homosexual behavior” by accepting married gay couples as members, and two more for employing ministers guilty of sexual abuse.

Those issues loomed in the background during Greear’s remarks, which ranged from a fierce defense of the SBC’s move to the right during 1980s clashes over “biblical inerrancy” to his concerns about “demonic” attacks from social-media critics who are “trying to rip us apart.”

“I’ve read reports online that I was privately funded by George Soros with the agenda of steering the SBC toward political liberalism,” he said. “My office has gotten calls from people who say they’ve heard that I am friends — good friends — with Nancy Pelosi and that we text each other regularly; that I am a Marxist; a card-carrying member of the Black Lives Matter movement and that I fly around on a private jet paid for by Cooperative Program dollars.”

Greear urged a renewed focus on evangelism and church planting, with a steady drumbeat of references to the Great Commission — the command by Jesus that Christians should spread the faith worldwide. After all, back in 2012, the SBC’s national meeting approved the use of “Great Commission Baptists” as an unofficial name — a move hailed by those seeking distance from the term “Southern” and the convention’s roots in an 1845 split over slavery.

“Do we want to be a Gospel people or a Southern, Republican culture people?” asked Greear. “Which is the more important part of our name — the ‘Southern’ or the ‘Baptist’?”

The ultimate challenge, he said, will be creating a “movement of churches that engages all of the peoples in America, not just one kind. … That is very difficult. Bringing together people of different backgrounds and cultures and ethnicities into one body creates challenges, and anybody who says that that’s not true has never actually done it. People bring in their music and their style preferences and political approaches and they all are as passionate about these things as we are, and that creates friction. But it is biblical.”

In recent months, leaders of the SBC’s National African American Fellowship have expressed concerns about statements by seminary presidents that — while condemning racism outright — claimed “affirmation of Critical Race Theory” is incompatible with the Baptist Faith and Message doctrinal statement. Several prominent Black pastors, in response, led their congregations out of the convention.

Greear stressed the need for SBC leaders to commit to more “robust, Bibles open, on our knees” dialogues with Black church leaders on what parts of CRT are inherently secular and clash with biblical teachings on racism and sin.

“We should mourn when closet racists and neo-Confederates feel more at home in our churches than do many of our people of color,” he said.

The painful reality is “that if we in the Southern Baptist Convention had shown as much sorrow for the painful legacy that racism and discrimination have left in our country as we have passion to decry Critical Race Theory, we probably would not be in this mess. It’s not that clarity about the dangers of Critical Race Theory is not important. It is. It’s that, as Jesus said, we’ve ignored some of the weightier parts of the law — justice, mercy and compassion.”

Terry Mattingly leads GetReligion.org and lives in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. He is a senior fellow at the Overby Center at the University of Mississippi.

On Religion: The old hymns and new anthems of the Covid year
On Religion: The old hymns and new anthems of the Covid year

It’s a hymn that the faithful start singing whenever a Baptist church organist plays the opening chords – because everyone knows it by heart.

All together now: “When peace like a river attendeth my way, when sorrows like sea billows roll; whatever my lot, Thou hast taught me to say, It is well, it is well, with my soul.”

Chicago attorney Horatio Spafford wrote those words after losing his son to scarlet fever and then, a few years later, all four of his daughters in an 1873 shipwreck. His wife, Anna, survived, and her telegram home from England began: “Saved alone. What shall I do?”

No one should be surprised that worship leaders frequently turned to “It Is Well With My Soul” as their people wrestled with the coronavirus pandemic, said the Rev. Roger O’Neel, who teaches in the worship and music program at Cedarville University in Ohio.

“People were feeling their way in 2020,” he said. “It wasn’t just the pandemic and people being locked down, worshipping in (online) streamed services. We were also facing all the bitter political conflicts in our nation and the racial divisions that we were experiencing. … People were trying to find hymns that would speak to all of that, to the pain that everyone felt last year.”

Faithlife, a Bellingham, Washington, company that publishes online worship and Bible study tools, recently released a report covering 2020 trends spotted in its Proclaim software. “It Is Well With My Soul” topped the hymns list, with usage increasing 68 percent after the pandemic hit.

The classic hymn “Great Is Thy Faithfulness” came next, with a 64 percent increase. It begins: “Great is Thy faithfulness, O God my Father; there is no shadow of turning with Thee. Thou changest not; Thy compassions, they fail not. As Thou hast been, Thou forever wilt be. Great is Thy faithfulness! … Morning by morning, new mercies I see; all I have needed, Thy hand hath provided – great is Thy faithfulness, Lord, unto me.”

In contemporary music, the unofficial pandemic anthem was “Way Maker,” by Osinachi Kalu Okoro Egbu of Nigeria, a Pentecostal songwriter known as Sinach in America. This hit topped charts in Christian radio and was No. 1 in the Faithlife “worship songs” list, along with the year’s rankings with Christian Copyright Licensing International. Christianity Today noted that “Way Maker” was sung by many marchers calling for racial justice.

It’s easy, agreed O’Neel, to see how these lyrics spoke to millions in 2020: “You wipe away all tears, you mend the broken heart. You are the answer to it all, Jesus. … Way maker, miracle worker, promise keeper, Light in the darkness – my God, that is who you are.”

For centuries, hymn writers and pastors have wrestled with sobering questions linked to the theological term “theodicy.” The American Heritage Dictionary defines theodicy as a “vindication of God’s goodness and justice in the face of the existence of evil.”

There was no way to avoid dealing with that in 2020.

“I don’t want to debate the theological intricacies as to whether God is allowing the virus or caused the virus, but I do know that He is in control,” wrote O’Neel in an online essay for clergy and students, posted early in the pandemic. “I don’t want to presume to know what He is doing in allowing this in our lives and in the lives of people all around the world. …

“Perhaps God is making us lay down for some rest or spiritual renewal,” he continued. “If so, embrace the rest. Don’t spend too much time thinking about what you are missing, worrying about the virus or economy. … Maybe your Shepherd is making you lie down.”

Now, many worship leaders are contemplating what they have learned after months away from sanctuaries packed with worshippers belting out Christian-rock anthems, hands raised high in the air.

“We’ve joked that some people had to learn how to do church without their smoke machines,” said O’Neel, referring to the clouds of mist that make lighting more dramatic in some modern sanctuaries. “We want to get back to normal, but what is ‘normal’? One guitar or one piano? When will we have a full band? When will we reach the stage where choirs return?

“We all had to pause this year and ask questions about how we worship.”

Terry Mattingly leads GetReligion.org and lives in Oak Ridge, Tenn. He is a senior fellow at the Overby Center at the University of Mississippi.

What happens now Beth Moore says she's no longer a Southern Baptist?
What happens now Beth Moore says she’s no longer a Southern Baptist?
(Image: https://www.lproof.org/welcome)

The popular American evangelist and Bible teacher Beth Moore made headlines when she said she is no longer a Southern Baptist and ended her longtime partnership with the evangelical denomination’s publishing arm, Lifeway Christian Resources.


Some commentators have asked, will it matter? Will something happen to white evangelical women, or will Moore just be seen as crossing over the cultural divide to the liberals? Can she play a bridging role?

When a high-profile person like Moore leaves the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the United States, it is likely bound to impact white evangelicals wrestling with their direction.

The story of her departure was broken by Religion New Service and a central characeter in her tale is the former president, Donald Trump.

Moore retweeted the RNS story, but her spokesperson told The Tennessean that Moore has no plans to comment further on her decision.

LIVING PROOF MINISTRIES

Moore founded Living Proof Ministries, a Bible-based organization for women based in Houston, Texas.

The ministry focuses on aiding women who desire to model their lives on evangelical Christian principles.

Ashlie D. Stevens wrote in Salon on March 11, “Moore has been viewed for decades, as the ‘Evangelical Julia Roberts meets Oprah,’ according to Anne Helen Peterson’s recent ‘Culture Study; newsletter.

Moore has published over 20 Bible studies, and her Living Proof conferences drew thousands of women who would pack into stadiums to hear her speak about topics like insecurity, forgiveness, and godliness.

A 2008 simulcast of her speaking called “Living Proof Live” is estimated to have been watched by over 70,000 people at 715 locations, Salon reported.

As a Southern Baptist, Moore established herself as a singular voice in a denomination that male thought leaders dominate and offered a generation of evangelical women an opportunity to see themselves in her and through her work, Stevens wrote in Salon.

“Now, however, Moore has announced she’s breaking from the Southern Baptist Convention largely because as a sexual assault survivor, she couldn’t reconcile with evangelicals’ overwhelming hypocritical support of Donald Trump. This raises the question of whether her followers and other women will follow suit.”

STILL A BAPTIST

Moore told RNS, “I am still a Baptist, but I can no longer identify with Southern Baptists.”

“I love so many Southern Baptist people, so many Southern Baptist churches, but I don’t identify with some of the things in our heritage that haven’t remained in the past.”

RNS described her as having been for nearly three decades “the very model of a modern Southern Baptist.”

“She has been a stalwart for the Word of God, never compromising,” former Lifeway Christian Resources President Thom Rainer said in 2015, during a celebration at the Tennessee Performing Arts Center in Nashville that honored 20 years of partnership between the Southern Baptist publishing house and Moore. “And when all is said and done, the impact of Beth Moore can only be measured in eternity’s grasp.”

Moore said she had understood why evangelicals supported Trump, who promised to nominate anti-abortion judges for the federal judicial system.

“He became the banner, the poster child for the great white hope of evangelicalism, the salvation of the church in America,” she told RNS. “Nothing could have prepared me for that.”

But RNS said that changed with the arrival of Trump as the president.

Moore’s criticism of the former president’s abusive behavior toward women and her advocacy for sexual abuse victims changed her from a beloved icon to a pariah in the denomination she loved all her life, said RNS.

“Wake up, Sleepers, to what women have dealt with all along in environments of gross entitlement & power,” Moore tweeted about Trump in Oct 2016, “riffing on a passage from the New Testament Book of Ephesians.”

Stevens wrote, “If you’ve paid attention to news surrounding evangelical leaders over the last several years, it’s not surprising. In 2020, former Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. tumbled into one scandal after another, before finally, officially plummeting from grace.”