Hackers attack 70 times per minute
Hackers attack 70 times per minute
Hackers attack 70 times per minute: what happens when a computer is left unsecured on the internet

Every device connected to the internet has a unique IP address. Those IP addresses are public, and they allow computers to find and communicate with each other via the Internet Protocol. Normally, we want to allow legitimate parties to connect to our IP addresses, and keep out adversaries by using firewalls, authentication, and access control.

But what if we didn’t take any of those precautions? How long would it take for malicious hackers to find and attack your device? What methods would they use? What do they seek? And where do they come from?

Comparitech researchers sought to find the answers to these questions by setting up honeypots—dummy computers designed to lure in attackers so we can record their every step.

Researchers set up honeypot devices emulating a range of internet-accessible services and supporting a wide range of protocols including RDP, SSH, MySQL, VNC, and more. The honeypots were left unsecured so that no authentication was required to access and attack it. Using this method, Comparitech researchers sought to find out which types of attacks would occur, at what frequency, and where they come from.

In total, our researchers found 101,545 attacks in a 24-hour period, or 70 attacks per minute. To give you some idea of how much attacks have increased, a 2007 University of Maryland study recorded a mere 2,244 attacks per day, a fraction of what we recorded in 2021. Read more on the FULL STUDY– Comparitech Study

About Comparitech: A pro-consumer website providing information, tools, and comparisons to help consumers in the US, UK and further afield to research and compare tech services. Founded in 2015, it is now a remote team of 30 researchers, writers, developers, and editors covering a wide range of online services including VPNs, password managers, ID theft protection, antivirus, internet providers, network monitoring. Each month, over 1 million people visit Comparitech.com and trust them to help them make more savvy decisions. Collectively they have produced over 1,200 reviews and guides. They conduct a battery of tests on all products and services they review, such as the 200+ automated speed tests that they perform daily on a wide range of VPNs.

Metamorphosis: The Fascinating Secrets of How Clownfish Earn Their Stripes
Metamorphosis: The Fascinating Secrets of How Clownfish Earn Their Stripes
Clownfish Amphiprion percula

Amphiprion percula, a species of clownfish photographed in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. Credit: Tane Sinclair-Taylor

The distinctive white stripes in clownfish form at different rates depending on their sea anemone hosts, a PNAS study finds.

  • Clownfish species develop their characteristic white stripes, or bars, during the process of metamorphosis
  • Researchers have now discovered that the white bars form at different speeds depending on the sea anemone the clownfish live in
  • Thyroid hormones, which are important for metamorphosis, control the speed the white bars form
  • Levels of thyroid hormones are higher in clownfish that live in the giant carpet anemone compared to clownfish living in the magnificent sea anemone
  • Clownfish living in the giant carpet anemone also show increased activity of duox, a gene involved in forming thyroid hormones

Charismatic clownfish, the coral reef fish made famous by the film Finding Nemo, are instantly recognizable by their white stripes. These stripes, which scientists call bars, appear as clownfish mature from larvae into adults in a process called metamorphosis, but how these distinctive patterns form has long remained a mystery.

Now, a new study has found that the speed at which these white bars form depends on the species of sea anemone in which the clownfish live. The scientists also discovered that thyroid hormones, which play a key role in metamorphosis, drive how quickly their stripes appear, through changes in the activity of a gene called duox.

“Metamorphosis is an important process for clownfish – it changes their appearance and also the environment they live in, as clownfish larvae leave life in the open ocean and settle in the reef,” said senior author Professor Vincent Laudet, who leads the Marine Eco-Evo-Devo Unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST). “Understanding how metamorphosis changes depending on the sea anemone host can help us answer questions not only about how they adapt to these different environments, but also how they might be affected by other environmental pressures, like climate change.”

In the study, published on May 24th, 2021 in PNAS, a team of researchers from the Centre for Island Research and Environmental Observatory (CRIOBE) in France first surveyed the clownfish species, Amphiprion percula, in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea.

Two Species Sea Anemone

The clownfish species, Amphiprion percula, relies on either the long-tentacled sea anemone, Heteractis magnifica (left) or the short-tentacled Stichodactyla gigantea (right) as its host. The sea anemones, armed with toxic stinging cells on their tentacles, protect clownfish from predators on the reef. The clownfish also protect the sea anemone from predators and provide nutrition and oxygenation to their host. Credit: Kina Hayashi

The clownfish there can live either in the magnificent sea anemone, Heteractis magnifica, or the more toxic giant carpet anemone, Stichodactyla gigantea.

During the survey, the team made a fascinating observation; the juvenile clownfish that lived in the giant carpet anemone gained their adult white bars faster than clownfish living in the magnificent sea anemone.

Clownfish Develop Their Stripes at Different Rates

During metamorphosis, the clownfish, Amphiprion percula, turns a vibrant orange and develops three white bars in succession, from head to tail. The rate at which the bars form depends on the sea anemone that the clownfish live in. Clownfish living in the long-tentacled anemone, Heteractis magnifica, (left) have fewer stripes than clownfish of the same age and size living in the shorter, carpet-style anemone, Stichodactyla gigantea (right). The image shows the typical appearance of clownfish aged 150-200 days. Credit: Fiona Lee, Academia Sinica, Taiwan

“We were really interested in understanding not only why bar formation occurs faster or slower depending on the sea anemone, but also what drives these differences,” said first author Dr. Pauline Salis, a postdoctoral researcher at the Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-sur-Mer, Sorbonne Université Paris, who studies color patterning in coral reef fish.

In the lab, the team worked with the clownfish, Amphiprion ocellaris, a close relative of Amphiprion percula. They focused on thyroid hormones, which are known to trigger metamorphosis in frogs.

Lab-Raised Clownfish

The clownfish, Amphiprion ocellaris, is one of the rare few species of coral reef fish that can be raised in a lab. Prof. Laudet uses the species to study the hormones involved in life history strategies, including metamorphosis. Credit: OIST

The researchers treated larval clownfish with different doses of thyroid hormones. The higher the dose of thyroid hormones, the faster the clownfish developed the white bars, the team reported. Conversely, when the researchers treated the clownfish with a drug that stopped thyroid hormones from being produced, bar formation was delayed.

The white bars form due to pigment cells, called iridophores, which express a specific subset of genes. Thyroid hormones accelerated white bar formation by activating these iridophore genes, the research team found.

Thyroid Hormones Accelerate the Development of White Bars in Clownfish Larvae

Clownfish larvae treated with thyroid hormones formed a higher number of bands at an earlier stage of development, compared to control larvae that weren’t treated with thyroid hormones. The image shows a control clownfish larvae (top) and a larvae five days after it was given a dose of thyroid hormones (bottom). Credit: Pauline Salis, first author

Next, the scientists tested whether these observations held true the field. When the CRIOBE lab returned to Kimbe Bay, they transported juvenile clownfish from both species of sea anemone back to Dr. Salis in France.

Levels of thyroid hormones were much higher in the clownfish from the giant carpet anemone than in the clownfish from the magnificent sea anemone, Dr. Salis confirmed.

To gain insight into what caused these higher levels of thyroid hormones, the team measured the activity of most genes in the clownfish genome.

“The big surprise was that out of all these genes, only 36 genes differed between the clownfish from the two sea anemone species,” said Prof. Laudet. “And one of these 36 genes, called duox, gave us a real eureka moment.”

Duox, which makes the protein dual oxidase, plays an important role in the formation of thyroid hormones, previous research has shown. The duox gene showed higher levels of activity in clownfish from the giant carpet anemone, compared to clownfish from the magnificent sea anemone.

Further experiments in collaboration with Professor David Parichy from the University of Virginia, U.S., confirmed that duox is important for developing iridophore pigment cells. When the duox gene is inactivated in mutant zebrafish, development of the iridophore pigment cells is delayed, the study found.

Taken together, the data suggests that increased activity of duox in clownfish living in the giant carpet anemone result in higher levels of thyroid hormones, and thus the faster rate of white bar formation as iridophore pigment cells develop quicker.

However, the research raises still more questions for the scientists to answer, including the ecological reason for this variation in the rate of white bar formation.

It may be because the giant carpet anemone is more toxic, with thyroid hormone levels increasing as a response to stress, the researchers speculated.

“Here at OIST, we’re starting to delve into some possible explanations,” said Prof. Laudet. “We suspect that these changes in white bar formation are just the tip of the iceberg, and that many other differences are present that help the clownfish adapt to the two different sea anemone hosts.”

Reference: “Thyroid hormones regulate the formation and environmental plasticity of white bars in clownfishes” by Pauline Salis, Natacha Roux, Delai Huang, Anna Marcionetti, Pierick Mouginot, Mathieu Reynaud, Océane Salles, Nicolas Salamin, Benoit Pujol, David M. Parichy, Serge Planes and Vincent Laudet, 24 May 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101634118

Funding: Agence Nationale de la Recherche, National Institute of Science

More than 50 billion birds fly around the world, most of them rare species
More than 50 billion birds fly around the world, most of them rare species

Most birds are located in the Northern Hemisphere

According to a new estimate, there are at least 50 billion individual wild birds in the world. House sparrows alone make up about 1.6 billion of them. However, most bird species are rare. This type of screening of the global bird population will help in efforts to protect birds from extinction, says a team from the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.

“We spend a lot of time and money counting our own species, but we really need to think about how we count the biodiversity we share the planet with,” researcher Dr Corey Callaghan told the BBC.

Counting the number of birds in the world is a complex task, without definite answers, they explain. In past rough estimates, there are 200 to 400 billion birds, classified as 10 to 13,000 bird species.

Australian researchers analyzed 9,700 species of live birds (excluding all poultry) using data from the last decade recorded by observers in an online database. They refined the data using modeling and information from on-site experts to form a more accurate evaluation.

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [PNAS May 25, 2021 118 (21) e2023170118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023170118 Edited by Simon Asher Levin, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved March 28, 2021 (received for review November 16, 2020)], suggests that most birds are found in the Northern Hemisphere: in Europe, North Asia, North Africa, parts of the Arabian Peninsula and North America. In contrast, very few birds are found in Madagascar and Antarctica.

The research provides data for nearly all the world’s bird species

Data Availability: eBird data are freely available to download from https://ebird.org/data/download. Population estimates were extracted from refs. 62 T. Will et al., Handbook To the Partners in Flight Population Estimates Database, Version 3.0 (PIF Technical Series, 2019) and 63 A. Musgrove et al., Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. Br. Birds 106, 64–100 (2013) and http://datazone.birdlife.org/home. Range maps used to adjust population areas are available from BirdLife International. All trait data are freely available through the sources mentioned above. Code and necessary data to reproduce our analyses are available from Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4723365 (C. T. Callaghan, S. Nakagawa, W. K. Cornwell, Data and code for Callaghan et al. 2021. Global abundance estimates for 9,700 bird species. PNAS. Deposited 27 April 2021).

According to Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2019 impact factor of 9.412. PNAS is the second most cited scientific journal, with more than 1.9 million cumulative citations from 2008 to 2018. In the mass media, PNAS has been described variously as “prestigious”, “sedate”, “renowned”, and “high impact”. Nature, Science, and PNAS are the three most prestigious general-science journals, and Nature and Science are among the most influential journals overall, based on the journal Impact Factor (IF).

A walk through the space race: who is taking the lead?
A walk through the space race: who is taking the lead?

The space industry and space travel have suffered a considerable loss of reputation and public interest from its boom back in 1969 with the famous quote from Neil Armstrong “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” upon his landing on the Moon, till the beginning of the 2000s. The fall of the Iron Curtain officially led to the end of the space race between the USA and the USRR to govern the skies.

The public funding to space-related projects was substantially reduced and important institutions as NASA were downgraded to a group of enthusiastic scientists with no resources to achieve their dreams. However, the irruption of new players into the game, such as the super tycoons Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, moved the focus back to this exciting adventure.

The world is very excited about space travel and the cinema industry exploit this feeling with several super film production. One of the latest news is that Tom Cruise is in negotiations with SpaceX, NASA, and Universal Pictures to shoot the first movie in space. Tom Cruise already tried to do it 20 years ago with James Cameron, but it seems that now he will not surrender. Tom Cruise, one of the most popular representatives of Scientology and a well-known actor for his stunts, is decided to be the first actor filming a space movie in a real space environment.

The new space race is now a reality. Space agencies are running their machines at full powers and hundreds of novel private companies fight every year to get their piece of the pie. Such a space marathon started a few decades ago with the foundation of the two major representatives of the private sector in the space industry: Blue Origin and Space X. Blue Origin was founded in 2000 by Jeff Bezos, Amazon magnate. Since his childhood, Bezos had been interested in space with a major dream in mind: building hotels in space. Blue Origin’s plans were very secret until 2015 but its idea was to reach space quickly, cheaply, and safely. On the other hand, SpaceX was founded in 2002 as the most personal project from Elon Musk, who made an “all in”, investing most of his fortune after the sale of PayPal. Musk’s main target: colonizing Mars.

Both Musk and Bezos brought forward the idea of ​​reusing part of the rockets and considerably cheapen the design and production process in the sector. Although Blue Origin had been working in the shadows for a long time, SpaceX managed to be the first private company to put a rocket (Falcon 1) in orbit in 2008. Musk’s company got a contract with NASA to develop the Falcon 9 rocket, the Dragon capsule and resupply the ISS (International Space Station).

In 2015, when the gates from Blue Origin’s secret laboratory opened, the world first learned about Bezos’s space company and its New Shepard rocket. The artefact effectively performed a couple of suborbital flights, becoming the first rocket to reach space and land back. This major achievement was rapidly followed by SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket raising the bet to an orbital flight. Elon Musk, not content enough with SpaceX triumph, gloated that Bezo’s rocket was much simpler, rejecting the comparison between the two. This was one of the first public clashes between the two space suitors, firing up a real race towards the lead of the rockets and launchers business. 

After this, Musk lightened the pace. SpaceX took the lead to place satellites in orbit and refuelling the ISS while their new rocket effectively performed a landing manoeuvre, hence reusing it. On the other side of the pitch, Blue Origin kept playing on a minor league of suborbital flights for certain experiments.

The turning point in the trajectory of Blue Origin seemed to occur in 2016 with the presentation of Bezo’s plan to build a large orbital rocket, the New Glenn. However, it has not yet been developed while SpaceX already had plans for a large rocket as well, the Falcon Heavy, which first flew in 2018, making it the most powerful rocket in operation. Musk strikes again.

SpaceX’s next milestone is the announcement of the creation of a constellation of satellites to provide internet to anywhere in the world in 2017, Starlink. Following the trend, Bezos sold out the Kuiper project through Amazon in 2019. This also sparked the occasional dispute between the companies since Bezos denounced that SpaceX was covering too many orbits that could harm the performance of other constellations. Meanwhile, SpaceX began to develop its new rocket: Starship. This rocket will be the largest and most powerful rocket ever developed and still the cheapest. Despite all of Musk’s propaganda verbiage, the disastrous flight attempts of the Starship have been the main topic of conversation within the space community. Anyway, Musk is never ready to lose and Starship performed its first successful landing manoeuvre on the 5th of May of 2021. Indeed, NASA chose SpaceX and its Starship to return to the moon. This was chosen in a competition in which Blue Origin was also participating with a lander. Elon Musk used the occasion to tease Bezos writing on Twitter: “Can’t get it up (to orbit) lol.”

As of today, it seems that Elon Musk is confident to lead the development of the space industry being one of the major ambassadors of the idea of colonizing Mars. Nonetheless, a new business gap is to be filled: space tourism. Although SpaceX has already sent two groups of astronauts to the ISS, the North American company is still a neophyte in the space tourism sector. This business strategy became real with the first space tourist back in 2001, Dennis Tito. The American billionaire reached an agreement with the Russian space agency (Roscosmos) despite stiff American opposition. Tito took off on April 28, 2001, at sixty years of age, becoming the second oldest person to reach space, second only to John Glenn. 

Blue Origin is now auctioning tourist seats for its maiden flight, which is expected soon. SpaceX for its part will use Starship to take tourists to the Moon, all paid for by Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa. In this new game, it is worth mentioning Sir Richard Branson and its company Virgin Galactic, which are actively working on this ostentatious feat.

Let’s see who will take the lead in such an exciting race.

Europe manufactures an Anti-Coronavirus iron, B&B Trends informs
Europe manufactures an Anti-Coronavirus iron, B&B Trends informs

Tested by external studies sustained at the Technological Center of Catalonia (EURECAT) and the University of Navarra // It is endorsed by two patents that allow the eradication of COVID-19, as well as other viruses and bacteria, from any type of tissue // It has an efficiency of more than 99.999999%. This technology is the response to the present pandemic and future threats

Europe manufactures the iron that can be used on any type of tissue, deactivating the virus. The B&B Trends Group (Barcelona, ​​Spain), manufacturer of the UFESA and Di4 brands, has managed to reconcile the recommendations of the health authorities regarding clothing hygiene with care so these would be free of COVID-19 or coronavirus. “With this ironing solution it is not necessary to expose the clothes when laundering at 60º, which in most cases it gravely damage the fabric. This innovation allows to iron, either vertically or horizontally, any kind of fabric at a higher temperature range and, in addition, the exclusive pulse steam ejection technology provides a higher speed when transferring this temperature to clothing without damaging it, reaching all points of the garment and ending with the COVID-19”, they assure from the company.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends washing and disinfecting tissues at 60-90º. However, the labels in the clothes do not suggest washing them above 30-40º, because according to recommendations of textile fabricants the piece of clothing reduces its size; the colors fade; wrinkles get fixed; and, if it contains any elastics, they become loose.

Healthy Program. EURECAT and the University of Navarra

B&B Trends has carried out in the laboratories of the prestigious University of Navarra a study of the Healthy Program, a technology designed in the R&D department of the company itself.

The analysis has focused on testing four types of microbes (C. Albicans; S. Aureus; E-coli; and B. Sutilis), resulting in the fact that this technology completely eliminates these bacteria.

The study in question validates that viruses with lipid envelopes, such as Sars-CoV-2, have lower resistance at certain temperatures than the E-coli type bacteria and much lower than bacteria with spores such as the B subtilis, both observed and tested in the study. Hence this, the same laboratory corroborates that its effective results can be extrapolated against COVID-19.

It is an accessible and available technology for professionals, such as dry cleaners and the textile commerce, for example, and for individuals. Two Di4 signature models equip the Healthy Program.

The Business Group

B&B Trends has extensive experience in manufacturing and developing small household appliances. It manufactures and markets brands such as UFESA, DAGA, Zelmer and Di4, as well as for other manufacturers.