Vietnamese diocese marks bishop’s first visit 350 years ago - Vatican News
Vietnamese diocese marks bishop’s first visit 350 years ago – Vatican News

By Robin Gomes

Bishop Joseph Vo Duc Minh of Nha Trang launched the year-long celebration on Sunday, calling on Catholics to nurture and strengthen the faith received from the missionaries and their ancestors. 

The Catholics of the south-central diocese are marking the first visit of French Bishop, Pierre Lambert de la Motte on Sept. 1, 1671, to the local parishes at Cho Moi Church in the coastal city of Nha Trang, where today there is a diocese.

Bishop de la Motte was the first bishop of Dang Trong (Cochinchina) Vicariate that was established in 1659 and covered southern Vietnam including today’s Nha Trang Diocese.

Some 40 priests, including a representative from the Paris Foreign Missions Society (MEP), joined the special Mass at Cho Moi Church on September 6, attended by 1,000 people.  For the occasion, local authorities relaxed the Covid-19 social distancing measures in the area on Sept. 5.

“We are happy to be in the land where our ancestors joyfully received Bishop de la Motte,”  Bishop Minh told the congregation.  “God chose the land to receive the apostolic successor.” 

At that time, when Catholics were subject to severe persecution, Bishop de la Motte, a founding member of the Paris Foreign Missions Society (MEP), made his pastoral visit, accompanied by two French missionaries and two Vietnamese priests from Siam.  They arrived at Lam Tuyen fishing village, now Cho Moi Parish. 

Bishop de la Motte blessed the faithful and administered confirmation to 200 children and some adults while the visiting priests heard confessions.

The bishop established Lam Tuyen Parish and assigned Father Guillaume Mahot Mão to the new parish. He established the Lovers of the Holy Cross congregation for local women. The bishop and his delegation also visited other parishes in the area.

Pointing out that the Catholic Church loves and serves all people in the name of Christ, the only Saviour, Bishop Minh said the missionaries came only to be present among their ancestors, offered pastoral care and blessed them and their land.

The bishop urged the faithful to be grateful and proud of their ancestors who were faithful to the Church, vigorously maintained their faith and courageously bore witness to the Good News.

He thus urged Catholics to work and live in harmony with others in society, joining in initiatives to help develop the nation and their society.

Bishop Minh has been appointed by the Vietnamese bishops to prepare documents for the sainthood cause of Bishop de la Motte.  The MEP missionaries have played a significant role in establishing the Church in Vietnam.

Cho Moi Parish, which is home to many martyrs, has over 3,000 Catholics.  Nha Trang Diocese, established in 1957, covers the provinces of Khanh Hoa and Ninh Thuan, which are home to 115 parishes served by nearly 300 priests.

Boris Johnson 'will not back down' amidst growing Brexit stand-off with EU
Boris Johnson ‘will not back down’ amidst growing Brexit stand-off with EU
        <!-- Ad Placements Start -->




A defiant Boris Johnson today said “I will not back down" amidst a growing stand-off with the European Union.































The Prime Minister made the comment in a Tory Party email ahead of the start of the eighth round of Brexit talks on a trade and co-operation treaty with the EU on Tuesday.




































It comes as Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European commission, warned Mr Johnson not to break international law following claims that <a href="/news/politics/brexit-override-brexit-withdrawal-agreement-a4541371.html" class="body-link" data-vars-item-name="BL-4541896-https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-override-brexit-withdrawal-agreement-a4541371.html" data-vars-event-id="c23">Downing Street is planning to overwrite parts of the Withdrawal Agreement.</a>


Mr Johnson has set a five-week deadline to either reach agreement or for both sides to accept there will be no deal when the current transition period ends at the close of the year.



































An email from the PM this afternoon, sent out by the Conservative Party, said in its headline: “I will not back down”.
(Conservative Party)

Mr Johnson added: “If we can’t agree by then [October 15], then I do not see that there will be a free trade agreement between us, and we should both accept that and move on.

“We’ll then have a trading arrangement with the EU like Australia’s. I want to be absolutely clear that, as we have said right from the start, that would be a good outcome for the UK.































“As a Government we’re preparing, at our borders and at our ports, to be ready for it.”































He said the UK would have “full control” over laws, rules, fishing waters and the freedom to do trade deals with every country in the world, adding: “We will prosper mightily as a result.”























    <!-- AYL ads -->
















Signing off, the Prime Minister said he would be “delighted” if the EU “rethink their current positions” but added: “We cannot and will not compromise on the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country to get it.”































The email was sent out after it was reported that the Government was preparing to overwrite parts of the Withdrawal Agreement that the Prime Minister had signed just months ago.

<!-- perform eplayer -->














It has sparked a clash with the EU over concerns that the UK could walk away from the Northern Ireland protocol – aimed at ensuring there is no return of a hard border with the Republic – if talks on a free trade deal fail.























<!-- mpu0 ads for mobile -->













EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier said he was “worried” while the Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney warned that it would be “a very unwise way to proceed”.































Ms von der Leyen warned there could be no backtracking by the UK on its previous commitments if it wanted to reach a free trade agreement.
Ursula von der Leyen (REUTERS)

She said: “I trust the British Government to implement the Withdrawal Agreement, an obligation under international law and prerequisite for any future partnership.

<!-- mpu0 ads for mobile -->













"[The] protocol on Ireland-Northern Ireland is essential to protect peace and stability on the island and integrity of the single market."































Downing Street played down the row, saying the proposal was a “safety net” in case EU-UK trade talks fail.































The Prime Minister's official spokesman said the Government was proposing "limited clarifications" to the law to ensure ministers can preserve the gains of the Good Friday Agreement in the event of no deal.























<!-- mpu0 ads for mobile -->













<aside class="inline-block inline-related item-count-5 align-right"><h2 class="box-title">Read more</h2>

</aside>The Internal Market Bill - to be tabled on Wednesday - will ensure goods from Northern Ireland continue to have unfettered access to the UK market while making clear EU state aid rules - which will continue to apply in Northern Ireland - will not apply in the rest of the UK.































In addition, an amendment to the Finance Bill will give ministers the power to designate which goods going from Great Britain to Northern Ireland are considered "at risk" of entering the EU single market and are therefore liable to EU tariffs.































"As a responsible Government, we cannot allow the peace process or the UK's internal market to inadvertently be compromised by unintended consequences of the protocol," the spokesman said.























<!-- mpu0 ads for mobile -->













"So we are taking limited and reasonable steps to clarify specific elements of the Northern Ireland protocol in domestic law to remove any ambiguity and to ensure the Government is always able to deliver on its commitments to the people of Northern Ireland."































A UK official added: "If we don't take these steps we face the prospect of legal confusion at the end of the year and potentially extremely damaging defaults, including tariffs on goods moving from GB to Northern Ireland."































<amp-iframe height="188" sandbox="allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-forms allow-popups" layout="fixed-height" frameborder="0" src="https://embed.acast.com/theleader/acoronavirusvaccineforthenewyear-matthancockthinksso-andwhyanodealbrexitsbackonthetable" class="i-amphtml-layout-fixed-height i-amphtml-layout-size-defined" i-amphtml-layout="fixed-height"/>







Although the UK formally left the EU in January, it has continued to follow rules set in Brussels during a transition period - which ends on 31 December - while discussions over a long-term trade agreement continue.








        <!-- Ad Placements End -->






            <aside class="tags"><span>More about:</span>

                <span class="separator">|</span>
                <a href="/topic/boris-johnson">
                  Boris Johnson
                </a>

            </aside>
UK plans to override parts of EU Brexit deal
UK plans to override parts of EU Brexit deal

The UK government is planning legislation that will override key parts of the Brexit withdrawal agreement, British newspaper the Financial Times reported Sunday.

The so-called internal market bill, due to be published Wednesday, is expected to “eliminate the legal force of parts of the withdrawal agreement” in areas relating to state aid and Northern Ireland customs, according to the newspaper.

Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney, who was key in negotiating the withdrawal agreement, tweeted that the reported plan “would be very unwise.”

The status of the UK’s only land border with the EU, between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, has been one of the most difficult sticking points in negotiations.

Read moreBrexit: Europe, UK trade talks stall over ‘serious differences’

‘Self-defeating’ strategy

The UK formally left the EU on January 31 this year, three-and-a-half years after the country narrowly voted to leave the bloc in a politically divisive referendum.

A status-quo transition period following its formal departure ends on December 31. Until then, the UK is bound by EU rules as it negotiates the terms of its future relationship with the bloc, its largest trading partner.

Environment Minister George Eustice attempted to downplay the legislation on Monday morning, saying that the UK was committed to the Northern Ireland protocol and that the internal market bill would tidy up some “legal ambiguities.”

But EU diplomats said any plan to override part of the divorce agreement would be a “desperate and ultimately self-defeating strategy.”

“I remain worried … the negotiations are difficult, because the British want the best of both worlds,” the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier told French radio.

Johnson confirms October 15 deadline

Johnson on Sunday also restated the deadline of October 15 for a free trade deal with the European Union, after which Britain would walk away from the post-Brexit negotiations if the two sides failed to reach a deal.

The British leader’s warning comes ahead of a crucial round of post-Brexit negotiations which are to resume in London on Tuesday.

Australia-style deal?

Johnson said that in case of a no-deal Brexit, the UK would “prosper mightily” even if it had “a trading arrangement with the EU like Australia’s,” which he argued would still be a “good outcome.”

Australia trades with the European Union under World Trade Organization rules and tariffs.

Read moreTony Abbott’s UK post-Brexit trade role sparks outrage

“As a government we are preparing, at our borders and at our ports, to be ready for it,” the prime minister said. “We will have full control over our laws, our rules, and our fishing waters,” he said.

“We will of course always be ready to talk to our EU friends even in these circumstances … Our door will never be closed, and we will trade as friends and partners — but without a free trade agreement.”

Johnson did not rule out a deal altogether, saying that if the EU were to rethink its current position, an agreement would still be possible.

“But we cannot and will not compromise on the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country to get it,” he said.

ed,adi/sri (AP, AFP, Reuters)

A new international day to celebrate clean air – and a sustainable recovery from COVID-19
A new international day to celebrate clean air – and a sustainable recovery from COVID-19

The first ever International Day of Clean Air for blue skies on 7 September 2020 gives us an opportunity to celebrate the importance of clean air – something that is so fundamental to us all for our health and well-being. Air, both indoors and outdoors, can be contaminated by chemical, biological or physical agents that modify its natural characteristics. The global challenge of tackling air pollution is a two-fold problem.

Firstly, and most importantly, air pollution has a measurable health impact. Globally, air pollution is the second leading cause of death from noncommunicable diseases after tobacco smoking. Air pollutants of major public health concern include particulate matter (PM), tropospheric (ground-level) ozone (O₃), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and sulphur dioxide (SO₂), which can affect many organs and systems. The evidence is strongest for cardiovascular and respiratory effects. Other possible health outcomes include metabolic effects, atherosclerosis, impaired neurological and lung development in children, and even an association with neurodegenerative diseases. It is also a problem of inequity, as air pollution particularly affects those already disadvantaged or vulnerable: people cannot choose the air they breathe.

Secondly, some air pollutants – particularly black carbon (a component of PM) and tropospheric O₃ – are also short-lived climate pollutants, which are linked with both health effects and near-term warming of the planet. They persist in the atmosphere for as little as a few days or up to a few decades, so their reduction has co-benefits not just for health but also for the climate.

Linkages between COVID-19 and air quality

Poor air quality is an important risk factor for both acute and chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. People who have these underlying medical conditions are thought to be at a greater risk of developing severe disease from COVID-19 infection; thus, air pollution is most likely a contributing factor to the health burden caused by COVID-19.

During this global COVID-19 pandemic, however, we have also seen an important, albeit short-term, reduction of air pollution across cities. This reduction is more prominent in the case of nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), a pollutant very much related to traffic, which is one of the activities most affected by the lockdown measures. European data for some cities has shown a reduction of around 50%, and in some cases up to 70%, in NO₂ levels compared to pre-lockdown values.

COVID-19 is an unfolding tragedy but, at the same time, it has given us an unprecedented opportunity to witness how policies related to transport, and the way people work, study and consume, could be capitalized upon as we collectively move forward towards a “new normal” that could deliver environmental and health benefits.

Building back better

“Air pollution is a leading cause of mortality. The International Day of Clean Air for blue skies is a pertinent reminder that we must work together to combat air pollution to protect the health and lives of current and future generations,” said Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge, WHO Regional Director for Europe. “COVID-19 has had a devastating impact across the world. But the response measures have not only protected our health but also managed to achieve short-term improvements in air quality. With planned and sustainable action on air pollution, we have proof that we can tackle the long-term health burden and climate challenge, drastically improving quality of life.”

This ambition of longer-term environmental sustainability, is reflected in the recently published WHO “Manifesto for a healthy recovery from COVID-19”, which has a strong focus on reducing air pollution and recognizing the broad benefits of improved air quality. This follows a United Nations-wide call from Secretary-General António Guterres in May “to use the recovery to build back better”, to take advantage of the opportunity that COVID-19 has presented us. A responsible social and economic recovery can also address urgent environment and climate change concerns. In the European Union (EU) this resonates in the European Green Deal, launched at the end of last year as a push towards a just transition of the EU’s economy.

Improving air quality can enhance climate change mitigation, and climate change mitigation efforts can in turn improve air quality. By promoting environmental sustainability hand-in-hand with economic recovery, we can make large steps towards mitigating climate change and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Over the long run, this will also protect our health and the resilience of our health systems, leaving no one behind.

Build a better future with blue skies for all, UN urges, marking first International Day of Clean Air
Build a better future with blue skies for all, UN urges, marking first International Day of Clean Air

In a message, UN Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted the dangers posed by air pollution and urged greater efforts to address it. 

“Air pollution contributes to heart disease, strokes, lung cancer and other respiratory diseases; [it] also threatens the economy, food security and the environment,” he said. 

We need dramatic and systemic change. Reinforced environmental standards, policies and laws that prevent emissions of air pollutants are needed more than ever – UN Secretary-General

“As we recover from the coronavirus pandemic, the world needs to pay far greater attention to air pollution, which also increases the risks associated with COVID-19,” he added. 

Globally, nine out of every ten people breathe unclean air, and air pollution causes an estimated seven million premature deaths every year, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries. 

This year, while the lockdowns associated with the global pandemic led to dramatic falls in emissions – providing a glimpse of cleaner air in many cities – emissions are already rising again, in some places surpassing pre-COVID levels. 

“We need dramatic and systemic change. Reinforced environmental standards, policies and laws that prevent emissions of air pollutants are needed more than ever,” stressed Mr. Guterres. 

Climate action and clean air 

Addressing climate change can also cut back air pollution. 

“Limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees will help reduce air pollution, death and disease,” said the Secretary-General, calling on countries to end subsidies for fossil fuels as well as to use post-COVID recovery packages to support the transition to healthy and sustainable jobs. 

“I call on governments still providing finance for fossil fuel-related projects in developing countries to shift that support towards clean energy and sustainable transport.” 

“At the international level,” he added, “countries need to cooperate to help each other transition to clean technologies.” 


WHO video | Air pollution and health: How will our children continue to breathe?

The International Day 

The International Day of Clean Air for blue skies, to be commemorated on 7 September annually, was established in 2019 by the UN General Assembly, which recognized the importance of clean air and the impact of air pollution on human health and ecosystems, in particular its disproportionate affect on women, children and older persons.  

The resolution emphasized “the need to strengthen international cooperation at the global, regional and subregional levels in various areas related to improving air quality, including the collection and utilization of data, joint research and development, and the sharing of best practices.” 

The International Day aims to raise awareness clean air is important for health, productivity, the economy and the environment; demonstrate the close link of air quality to other environmental and developmental challenges such as climate change; promote solutions that improve air quality by sharing actionable knowledge best practices, innovations, and success stories; and bring together diverse actors for concerted national, regional and international approaches for effective air quality management. 

Commemorations

Around the world, UN agencies, governments, civil society organizations and NGOs organized several events – many virtual due to the coronavirus pandemic – to commemorate the International Day and spur action. These include discussions and webinars, musical performances, documentary screenings, exhibitions, and donating plants and trees. 

Individuals too can play a part: by cycling to work, not burning trash (it causes air pollution), and pressuring local authorities to improve green spaces in cities, everyone can contribute to making the air cleaner and skies bluer. 

A ‘solidarity clause’ in the EU climate law
A ‘solidarity clause’ in the EU climate law

The European Union should include a “solidarity clause” in its climate law to ensure that member states most burdened by the EU’s new carbon reduction targets are compensated for the additional costs of purchasing allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System, writes MEP Anna Zalewska.

Anna Zalewska is a polish Member of the European Parliament for the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group. She is shadow rapporteur on the proposed Climate Law on behalf of ECR.

The European Climate Law aims to set a legally binding target for climate neutrality by 2050, and consequently, to increase the level of reduction ambitions for as early as 2030. With this, the European Climate Law should include a solidarity clause that guarantees a proportional increase in the compensation provided for in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) Directive for Member States most burdened when implementing these specific EU goals.

In addition, before proposing climate neutrality as a legally binding objective, the European Commission ought to carry out its ongoing impact assessment of the investment and operational costs that the new EU objectives will require and publish its results for individual Member States, not just aggregates for the entirety of the EU across sectors.

Considering the differing levels of wealth and energy sector structure mix across EU Member States, country-specific results would make clear which countries would be encumbered with the highest cost resulting from the new EU commitments per capita. In such a scenario, it would seem fair that these baskets be distributed according to the level of society’s wealth.

Due to the considerable water sources in Sweden, about 40% of electricity is generated from hydropower, and about 39% from nuclear energy, i.e. zero emission energy sources. Denmark, in turn, began construction of its first wind farms in the 1970s, enabling its energy sector composition to have reached about 50% of wind energy from its total consumption. In turn, the Polish communist authorities, based on available raw materials, decided to develop coal-based electricity, which has its consequences to this day.

Poland does intend to modernise its energy mix accordingly with international commitments at the UNFCCC forum and climate objectives adopted unanimously at the European Council summit. However, if one considers increasing ambition for 2030, which had already been agreed on at the EU summit in 2014, we, as Poland and other EU Member States in similar positions, would therefore also have the right to expect solidarity from our European partners. It is not a farfetched argument to suggest sharing both profits and burdens resulting from new EU challenges evenly. This should not be a zero-sum situation, where the profit of some comes at the expense of others, namely resulting from different starting points and the pressured transfer of technology from Western to Eastern Europe. It is a matter of European justice to ensure this is formulated properly.

At present, Poland continues to be burdened with a disproportionally heavy net loss from its participation in the EU ETS. Companies which are subject to bear carbon cost in Poland must spend much more money compared to revenues from the national budget through the auctioning of allowances. In other words, those companies are obliged to buy CO2 allowances also from the national pool of other Member States, resulting in cash outflows of potential investment funds from Poland. Furthermore, with the CO2 prices which can be anticipated to be even steeper in the near future, this deficit will only widen. Its value may reach tens of billions of Euros if the European Commission takes on a new climate goal which is presently being considered.

The current proposal from the European Commission of the European Climate Law would oversee further tightening of the CO2 reduction target by 2030 from the current 40% to at least 50-55% by 2030, with growing investment expenditure related to the change in the energy mix and the development of low-carbon installations. In the ambitious reduction target scenario (55% by 2030), CO2 prices may exceed the ceiling of €75 per tonne and the total cost of purchasing allowances for Poland’s energy sector by 2030 is estimated in this scenario at approximately €68.5 billion.

This means that, compared to the baseline scenario (current 40% emission reduction target by 2030), the purchase of emission allowances alone will cause approximately €30 billion of additional operating costs for Poland’s energy sector. In this way, instead of spending funds to build new low-carbon assets, energy companies will have to allocate their resources to settle their emissions allowances and maintain the operation of generating units, which due to Poland’s energy structure cannot be changed, let alone shut down, overnight.

Only in taking into account the aforementioned estimates can one more realistically assess the real value of the currently proposed compensation mechanisms for energy companies under the EU ETS such as the Modernisation Fund. In this scenario of higher CO2 prices, Poland’s envelope of the Modernisation Fund will amount to about €6.7 billion, which means that in order to obtain full compensation only for the additional operational costs of an ambitious climate policy, it would need to be increased about five times over.

In this regard, the European Climate Law should explicitly declare an increase in resources for transforming the energy mix, in proportion to the additional costs, to be allocated to the poorer Member States and to the EU Member States undergoing the most drastic changes as a result.

Notwithstanding, revenues from the sale of emission allowances at the national level – last year it was €2.5 billion – ought to be transferred to the low-emission transformation of the largest payers of the ETS system. Otherwise, decarbonisation of the energy mix will unfortunately lead to a loss of domestic generation potential and sustainable import of electricity.

As part of the work on European Climate Law and in the subsequent work on the EU ETS Directive, for the above-mentioned reasons I aim to propose that the additional costs of purchasing allowances be fairly divided between individual EU Member States. This would constitute one of the key ways to ensure that Europeans are not divided into winners and losers of the energy transformation.

The European Commission says that it understands these dilemmas, but the mechanisms it proposes to overcome these unevenly distributed costs of transformation between EU Member States are unfortunately insufficient to a too large extent to ignore. For instance, according to the European Commission, Poland may receive about €2 billion for investment and retraining of employees from the Just Transformation Fund, if it is created for 2021-2027. However, to our understanding, these measures represent only about 1% of the investment costs the electricity sector would need to achieve climate neutrality in 2050, creating a clear mismatch.

If the EU takes the idea of solidarity seriously, most of the profits from the EU ETS auction should go to the EU Member States most in need so as to facilitate their transformation and economic development, especially in times of crisis. Then it would be possible to establish a better understanding between Eastern and Western Europe, around what we can call a just energy transformation that leaves not even one participant in this transformation process behind.

UK overriding Brexit divorce deal would be
UK overriding Brexit divorce deal would be “self-defeating” – EU diplomats

BRUSSELS, Sept 7 (Reuters) – Britain’s reported plans to override parts of its Brexit divorce agreement with the EU would amount to “a desperate and ultimately self-defeating strategy”, a diplomat with the bloc said on Monday.

Talks on a new relationship from 2021 between the estranged allies plunged into a fresh crisis on Monday after Britain warned the European Union that it could effectively override the divorce deal it signed earlier unless the bloc agrees to a free trade deal by Oct. 15.

“‘Pacta sunt servanda’ meaning ‘agreements must be kept’ is a fundamental principle in international law. If the UK chose not to respect its international obligations, it would undermine its international standing,” said an EU diplomat.

“Who would want to agree trade deals with a country that doesn’t implement international treaties? It would be a desperate and ultimately self-defeating strategy.”

Another EU diplomat, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, echoed that in referring to Britain’s divorce deal with the bloc last year:

“Without correct implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement, I cannot imagine the EU would conclude a treaty with a country that does not abide by its treaty commitments.” (Reporting by Gabriela Baczynska, John Chalmers; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

Boris Johnson warns EU not to expect compromise
Boris Johnson warns EU not to expect compromise
The UK is stepping up preparations for Brexit trade talks to fail, as time runs out for reaching a deal.

Boris Johnson will tell the European Union on Monday he’s willing to walk away rather than compromise on what he sees as the core principles of Brexit, setting an October 15 deadline for a deal even as UK officials draft a law that risks undermining the already fragile negotiations. The pound edged lower against the euro.

His government is preparing to publish new legislation designed to dilute the legal force of the divorce deal he signed with the EU this year if outstanding issues can’t be resolved on the thorny question of Northern Ireland. The plan was first reported by the Financial Times.

The Internal Market Bill, expected to be published on Wednesday, is designed to lessen the power of the Brexit withdrawal agreement on issues including state aid and customs in Northern Ireland, a person familiar with the British plan said. The aim of the bill is to ensure smooth trade between the UK’s four nations, avoiding tariffs between Northern Ireland and the mainland after Brexit, for example.

But any move to unravel the Brexit divorce deal is a gamble. While UK officials say the draft law is only intended as a fall-back option in case talks fail, there’s a risk it will further poison the negotiations with the EU on a future trade deal, said the person, speaking on condition of anonymity. The trade talks are stuck and Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney tweeted his disapproval of Johnson’s latest maneuver.

An EU diplomat said the UK’s planned move would be a desperate and ultimately self-defeating strategy. If the UK doesn’t respect its obligations, this will undermine its international standing and its ability to strike trade deals, the diplomat added, asking not to be identified by name, in line with policy.

On Monday, Environment Secretary George Eustice said the UK government is working in “good faith” in line with the agreements already reached with the EU.

“We are still working through the detail with the joint committee on making the Northern Ireland protocol work: we’re absolutely committed to it as part of the Withdrawal Agreement,” Eustice told Sky News. “But where there are legal ambiguities at the end of that, things like exit declarations and things like that, we may need to provide businesses with the certainty that they need.”

The developments came as both sides prepared for a crucial round of talks in London this week that seem unlikely to deliver a breakthrough. The UK is due to leave the EU single market and customs union when the Brexit transition agreement expires at the end of December. If a new deal isn’t struck, UK-EU trade is likely to be hit by chaotic scenes of long queues at the border and costly new tariffs on goods.

Yet for Johnson, who led the pro-Brexit campaign in 2016, a bad deal would be worse than no deal. On Monday, he’ll say the UK is prepared to leave the transition period without an agreement — a scenario he’ll describe as a “good outcome,” his office said in an emailed statement.

Realists versus ideologues

“There is still an agreement to be had,” Johnson will say, pledging that his government will work hard through September and urging the bloc to “rethink” its positions. “But we cannot and will not compromise on the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country to get it.”

A European diplomat, who asked not to be named, said informal consultations ahead of this week’s talks yielded no shift in positions. A second diplomat said the view in Brussels is that there’s a fight between Brexit realists and Brexit ideologues in the British government, and it’s uncertain which side will prevail.

The UK will revert to trading with its biggest market on terms set by the World Trade Organisation if there’s no agreement in place by December 31. That means the return of certain tariffs and quotas, as well as extra paperwork for businesses. Though the British government describes that as an “Australia-style” agreement, it’s an outcome feared by British businesses who warn of severe disruptions to vital just-in-time supply chains.

Johnson will say that in the absence of a deal, the UK will be “ready to find sensible accommodations on practical issues,” including aviation, haulage, and scientific cooperation, according to his office.

The two sides have been at an impasse for months over state aid and fisheries. The EU is seeking to keep the access its fisherman currently have to UK waters to protect jobs and coastal communities, while Britain wants reduced access for EU boats and to make it conditional on regular negotiations.

On state aid, or so-called level playing field regulations, Johnson’s government wants the freedom to chart its own course, while the EU is demanding to know what the British government plans to ensure fair competition.

Negotiators have scheduled eight hours of talks on both issues this week, according to an agenda published on Friday.

On Sunday, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab accused the bloc of trying to undermine the UK’s Brexit decision by keeping it bound to the rules of the EU’s single market.

‘Point of principle’

“This week is an important moment for the EU to really effectively recognise that those two points of principles are not something we can just haggle away — they are the very reasons we are leaving the EU,” Raab told Sky News. He said the issue of state aid is a “point of principle” for the UK rather than an indication the government is preparing major interventions.

“I don’t think the EU should be worried about that,” he said.

There’s pessimism in Brussels about the prospects of a breakthrough, and for now, Brexit isn’t on the agenda of the September 24 EU summit.

Michel Barnier, the bloc’s top negotiator, said last week he was “worried” and “disappointed” by the current state of the talks, saying Britain would need to shift its position to reach an agreement.

The EU also hit back at reports in the British media that Barnier is being sidelined in an attempt to push forward a trade agreement, calling them “unfounded rumors.”

“Whoever wants to engage with the EU on Brexit needs to engage with Michel Barnier,” Sebastian Fischer, a Brussels-based spokesman for the German government, whose country holds the EU presidency, said in a tweet over the weekend.

The two sides are even at loggerheads on how to negotiate, with the EU demanding progress on all issues and the UK seeking initial agreements on less contentious points to build momentum toward a final deal.

Serious

Ahead of the meetings, the UK’s chief negotiator, David Frost, warned that his side would “not blink,” and contrasted Johnson’s steadfast approach with that of his predecessor, Theresa May. British officials have also repeatedly complained about the EU’s position.

“A lot of what we are trying to do this year is to get them to realise that we mean what we say and they should take our position seriously,” Frost said in an interview with the Mail on Sunday.

The standoff comes amid warnings from British businesses, particularly the haulage industry, about the UK’s ability to mitigate disruption at ports.

Raab told the BBC on Sunday that earlier planning for a no-deal Brexit and the measures put in place during the coronavirus pandemic have put the UK “in a much stronger place” to handle the risks. “But we’d much rather have a deal with the EU.”

© 2020 Bloomberg
UK ups the ante on EU ahead of crunch Brexit trade talks
UK ups the ante on EU ahead of crunch Brexit trade talks

David Frost, the UK’s chief negotiator on a post-Brexit trade deal on Sunday (6 September) upped the ante ahead of a crunch week of negotiations, warning that Boris Johnson’s government was not “scared” of walking away from talks without a deal to govern trade from 2021.

Frost will host EU counterpart Michel Barnier for the eighth round of talks in London, starting on Tuesday, with both sides under pressure to break a lengthy log-jam on regulatory alignment and fisheries.

In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, Frost also pinned the blame for the impasse on the team of Boris Johnson’s predecessor as Prime Minister, Theresa May, who he said had “blinked and had its bluff called at critical moments” during negotiations on the Withdrawal Agreement that took the UK out of the EU this January.

As a consequence, Frost said that the EU had “learned not to take our word seriously”.

That prompted an angry reaction from Gavin Barwell, chief of staff for May, who accused Frost of “brass neck”, pointing out that 95% of the Withdrawal Agreement signed off by Johnson was negotiated by May.

“The 5% that was new involved giving in to the EU’s key demand,” said Barwell, a reference to Johnson agreeing to the EU’s ‘backstop’ proposal to avoid a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Although the post-Brexit transition period ends on 31 December, the window for agreeing a new trade pact with sufficient time for it to be ratified by national parliaments and the European Parliament is steadily closing.

In a BBC interview on Sunday, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab also sought to put the pressure on Barnier, warning that this week’s round would be “a wake-up call for the EU” and repeated that a deal was “there for the taking” if the two sides could broker a compromise on state aid and fisheries.

Fisheries appears to be tougher to resolve. The EU has demanded fishing arrangements that gives EU trawlers access to UK waters comparable to that offered by the Common Fisheries Policy, while the UK wants the EU’s 40 year old fisheries agreement with Norway to be the model for its own settlement.

Boris Johnson’s government is expected to outline its plans for the UK’s future state aid regime later this month, a move which officials hope could pave the way to a compromise. Barnier has stated that the EU cannot agree to a trade deal without knowing what the UK’s subsidy regime will look like, though Barnier’s team have indicated that this does not mean that the UK must necessarily mirror EU state aid rules.

“I think this week is an important moment for the EU to really effectively recognise that those two points of principle are not something we can just haggle away,” said Raab.

The two sides’ positions have hardened in recent weeks. Last week, Barnier said that he was ‘worried and disappointed’ by the UK’s refusal to offer compromises, while French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian blamed the lack of progress on “the UK’s uncompromising and, to be frank, unrealistic attitude”.

Brexit: UK plans to override parts of EU withdrawal deal
Brexit: UK plans to override parts of EU withdrawal deal

The UK government is planning legislation that will override key parts of the Brexit withdrawal agreement, British newspaper the Financial Times reported Sunday.

The so-called internal market bill, due to be published Wednesday, is expected to “eliminate the legal force of parts of the withdrawal agreement” in areas relating to state aid and Northern Ireland customs, according to the newspaper.

Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney, who was key in negotiating the withdrawal agreement, tweeted that the reported plan “would be very unwise.”

The status of the UK’s only land border with the EU, between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, has been one of the most difficult sticking points in negotiations.

Read moreBrexit: Europe, UK trade talks stall over ‘serious differences’

‘Self-defeating’ strategy

The UK formally left the EU on January 31 this year, three-and-a-half years after the country narrowly voted to leave the bloc in a politically divisive referendum.

A status-quo transition period following its formal departure ends on December 31. Until then, the UK is bound by EU rules as it negotiates the terms of its future relationship with the bloc, its largest trading partner.

Environment Minister George Eustice attempted to downplay the legislation on Monday morning, saying that the UK was committed to the Northern Ireland protocol and that the internal market bill would tidy up some “legal ambiguities.”

But EU diplomats said any plan to override part of the divorce agreement would be a “desperate and ultimately self-defeating strategy.”

“I remain worried … the negotiations are difficult, because the British want the best of both worlds,” the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier told French radio.

Johnson confirms October 15 deadline

Johnson on Sunday also restated the deadline of October 15 for a free trade deal with the European Union, after which Britain would walk away from the post-Brexit negotiations if the two sides failed to reach a deal.

The British leader’s warning comes ahead of a crucial round of post-Brexit negotiations which are to resume in London on Tuesday.

Australia-style deal?

Johnson said that in case of a no-deal Brexit, the UK would “prosper mightily” even if it had “a trading arrangement with the EU like Australia’s,” which he argued would still be a “good outcome.”

Australia trades with the European Union under World Trade Organization rules and tariffs.

Read moreTony Abbott’s UK post-Brexit trade role sparks outrage

“As a government we are preparing, at our borders and at our ports, to be ready for it,” the prime minister said. “We will have full control over our laws, our rules, and our fishing waters,” he said.

“We will of course always be ready to talk to our EU friends even in these circumstances … Our door will never be closed, and we will trade as friends and partners — but without a free trade agreement.”

Johnson did not rule out a deal altogether, saying that if the EU were to rethink its current position, an agreement would still be possible.

“But we cannot and will not compromise on the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country to get it,” he said.

ed,adi/sri (AP, AFP, Reuters)

Harbert European Growth Capital Fund II Provides Butternut Box with Debt Capital
Harbert European Growth Capital Fund II Provides Butternut Box with Debt Capital

Harbert European Growth Capital Fund II Provides Butternut Box with Debt Capital – Organic Food News Today – EIN News

  <div class="eh-ribbon">

      Trusted News Since 1995

    <span class="prof not-if-mobile-w820">A service for food industry professionals</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w820">·</span>
    <span class="date">Monday, September 7, 2020</span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w430">
      ·
      <a class="article_live_counter" href="/live_feed">525,690,321</a>
      Articles
    </span>
    <span class="not-if-mobile-w550">
      ·
      3+ Million Readers
    </span>
  </div>
</header>
<footer><div class="sitemap">
    <h2 class="subheading-osc g_roboto">News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools</h2>
    <div class="row-fluid">
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>News Topics</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Newsletters</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>Press Releases</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Events &amp; Conferences</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>RSS Feeds</h3>
          </section><section><h3>Other Services</h3>
          </section></div>
      <div class="span3">
        <section><h3>Questions?</h3>
          </section><br/><section/></div>
    </div>
  </div>
</footer>



<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script src="/js/excanvas.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<![endif]--><!-- Start Alexa Certify Javascript --><noscript/>
<!-- End Alexa Certify Javascript -->
<!--[if IE 7]>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/json2.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

Boris Johnson sets October deadline for post-Brexit deal with EU
Boris Johnson sets October deadline for post-Brexit deal with EU

The UK government is planning legislation that will override key parts of the Brexit withdrawal agreement, British newspaper the Financial Times reported Sunday.

The so-called internal market bill, due to be published Wednesday, is expected to “eliminate the legal force of parts of the withdrawal agreement” in areas relating to state aid and Northern Ireland customs, according to the newspaper.

Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney, who was key in negotiating the withdrawal agreement, tweeted that the reported plan “would be very unwise.”

The status of the UK’s only land border with the EU, between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, has been one of the most difficult sticking points in negotiations.

Read moreBrexit: Europe, UK trade talks stall over ‘serious differences’

‘Self-defeating’ strategy

The UK formally left the EU on January 31 this year, three-and-a-half years after the country narrowly voted to leave the bloc in a politically divisive referendum.

A status-quo transition period following its formal departure ends on December 31. Until then, the UK is bound by EU rules as it negotiates the terms of its future relationship with the bloc, its largest trading partner.

Environment Minister George Eustice attempted to downplay the legislation on Monday morning, saying that the UK was committed to the Northern Ireland protocol and that the internal market bill would tidy up some “legal ambiguities.”

But EU diplomats said any plan to override part of the divorce agreement would be a “desperate and ultimately self-defeating strategy.”

“I remain worried … the negotiations are difficult, because the British want the best of both worlds,” the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier told French radio.

Johnson confirms October 15 deadline

Johnson on Sunday also restated the deadline of October 15 for a free trade deal with the European Union, after which Britain would walk away from the post-Brexit negotiations if the two sides failed to reach a deal.

The British leader’s warning comes ahead of a crucial round of post-Brexit negotiations which are to resume in London on Tuesday.

Australia-style deal?

Johnson said that in case of a no-deal Brexit, the UK would “prosper mightily” even if it had “a trading arrangement with the EU like Australia’s,” which he argued would still be a “good outcome.”

Australia trades with the European Union under World Trade Organization rules and tariffs.

Read moreTony Abbott’s UK post-Brexit trade role sparks outrage

“As a government we are preparing, at our borders and at our ports, to be ready for it,” the prime minister said. “We will have full control over our laws, our rules, and our fishing waters,” he said.

“We will of course always be ready to talk to our EU friends even in these circumstances … Our door will never be closed, and we will trade as friends and partners — but without a free trade agreement.”

Johnson did not rule out a deal altogether, saying that if the EU were to rethink its current position, an agreement would still be possible.

“But we cannot and will not compromise on the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country to get it,” he said.

ed,adi/sri (AP, AFP, Reuters)

Election Notes from Donald Trump’s America, By  Dakuku Peterside
Election Notes from Donald Trump’s America, By Dakuku Peterside
Dakuku Peterside

On November 3, 2020, Americans will go to the polls. The two leading contenders for the office of the President are the incumbent President, Donald J. Trump, and the former Vice President, Joseph R. Biden Jr. Also on the ballot would be 435 seats in the US House of Representatives, 35 of the 100 seats of the US Senate, 11 governorship seats and numerous other state and local elections.

Even with the perception that the American form of democracy and electoral process is not perfect, yet there are some lessons Nigerians can learn from the ongoing political process in the United States of America. These are lessons that if adopted, will improve our elections, impact positively on the entire political process and ultimately lead to good governance and development.

Politics of ideology reigns supreme in the US. A candidate’s dominant ideology must be in line with the core overarching party ideology. In most cases, there is clarity regarding a candidate’s stance on significant issues in line with party ideology. A republican, for example, is likely to stand for lower taxes, free-market capitalism, deregulation of corporations and restrictions on labour unions. On the other hand, the Democrats support social equality, higher taxes for big businessand tax break for families, protection of the environment, egalitarianism, the strengthening of the social safety net, voting rights and minority rights, LGTB rights, multiculturalism and religious secularism.

This clear ideology makes it easier for the voter to choose which party that better represents his or her worldviews and values and which candidates would likely protect his or her interest. In many primary contests in the US, the candidates strive to demonstrate to the party faithful that he or she most epitomizes the party’s principles and ideologies. For example, when a contestant served as a legislator, his voting records in the legislature are used as a parameter to judge if he genuinely reflects the ideals of the political party. Although little deviations in some ideological issues may be allowed, most candidates must be in tune with the core ideological stance of the party.

The politics of ideology is lacking in Nigeria. Majority of the voters cannot place where a candidate’s political ideology lies neither do they know where those seeking their votes stand on issues that are critical to them. The cacophony of mudslinging, abuses, arms flexing, name-calling, fake news and misinformation and violence drowns any serious ideological discourse.

This issue breeds politics of opportunism and makes it easier for Nigerian politicians to decamp from one party to another without any compunction or quibble and also makes it difficult for the led to hold the rulers accountable to campaign positions and promises. Instead of fundamental ideologies, parties and candidates play politics of religiosity, ethnicity, and the latest is “ stomach’ infrastructure “, a veiled term for money politics. The first two concepts (religion and ethnicity) often determine who runs for office, with whom and unfortunately the outcome of the elections. Parochialism and mediocrity thrive when meritocracy and moralities are sacrificed on the altar of political bigotry.

Campaign financing is another area Nigeria needs to learn from the US, especially in the areas of individual contributions, disclosure rules and the use of money raised from political campaigns. Every US citizen can donate up to $2,800 per election. This donation can go to a single candidate, multiple candidates or a political party. This type of gift can be significant to a candidate because it constitutes the bulk of campaign funds available to him or her.

For instance, in February 2020, Senator Bennie Sanders, who was running for the Democratic ticket for the office of the President, raised a whopping $46.5m from 2.2 million individual donors. Individual donations to political campaigns aside from connecting the candidate to the electorate, also makes the leader directly accountable to the led, most of whom may have funded his or her ascent to political office.

This vital ingredient is conspicuously lacking in Nigerian elections. It is pertinent to posit that in Nigeria, people do not pay party dues nor make meaningful contributions to the party and candidates of the party. The general attitude is that the party and candidate should provide money to members of the party who sometimes make outrageous demands from the party or candidate for election. Some party members see party politics as an enterprise, and after elections boast of huge money, they made from the polls. Most politicians across all parties in Nigeria think of what they will profit from the party and not what they will do for their parties. Many people see the party as a ‘benefit institution’.

Although not making an excuse for candidates, many resort to moneybags, godfathers, government coffers or special interests to fund their elections often at a high cost to governance and their integrity. The people lose the moral right to ask for accountability and probity when candidates are already indebted to their sponsors and are accountable to them.

In the US, full and transparent disclosure to the electoral commission on funds raised, how much spent and the remaining balance is expected. Candidates fall foul of the law when they use individual donations raised from electioneering campaigns for personal purposes. Candidates must return leftover funds after the election, or carry it over to another contest. This practice engenders confidence in the donors, reassures them and strengthens the entire campaign financing process.

Nigeria is different in this regard. There are usually accusations and recriminations over the application of campaign funds no matter how the funds are raised. INEC is already saddled with huge responsibility and may not be in a position to monitor election campaign financing. The Electoral Offences Commission Bill is the instrument that should cater for this electoral maleficence, but, sadly, it is yet to see the light of the day. Even though the country has other laws guiding campaign financing, it is virtually unheard of in Nigeria that someone is criminally prosecuted and convicted on account of running foul of campaign finance laws.

Even with its fair share of contested and violent elections at some point in the past, one significant attribute in US elections is transparency. It creates the ease with which defeated candidates concede electionvictory to their opponents. In most cases, whenever in the course of tallying of votes a candidate discovers that his opponent has opened an insurmountable lead, he or she usually eats the proverbial humble pie and calls the opponent to congratulate the victor. It brings the contest to an end.

This act is significant and consequential. Aside from reducing tension and limiting or eliminating post-electoral violence, it also helps to enhance post-election unity and togetherness as it brings relief to the victor and accelerates healing for the vanquished. It also helps in development as the victor would focus on governance from the date of winning the election and not be bogged down with needless protests and litigation.

In Nigeria, there is no transparency in the electoral process, and that explains why those who lose elections seldom concede. The electoral flaws give room for discrepancies and challenges to the outcome of the result. Unfortunately, even before elections hold, perception of electoral malpractice is high, and an attitude of a win at all cost pervades the electoral landscape.

It is also sad to note that the judiciary now is included in electoral strategy. Even before the election holds, parties and candidates have started collecting evidence for challenging the result of the election in court. It is, alleged that candidates in power seek the favour of the judges to compromise them before elections. Little wonder some people are worried about the quality of some of the election judgements in election tribunals and courts in Nigeria.

Instituting court cases by those who lose elections is the rule rather than the exception in Nigeria. In some cases (before the Electoral Law was amended to limit the litigation period) these litigations last well into the last days of the tenure of the winner.

It is undeniable that the presidency of Donald Trump has altered American politics and affected the way many people around the world perceive not just the President but the country as a whole. Whether the perception is positive or negative probably depends on which part of the world you find yourself in and what forms your core values and beliefs.

While Trump is very unpopular in much of Western Europe and Asia, he is relatively popular in Nigeria even though he reportedly called Africa ‘shithole’, banned immigration of partners of Nigerians living in the US from Nigeria and is considered as a racist by many black Americans. Many Nigerians support Trump because of his perceived restoration of ‘godly’ values to America, like his more conservative stance on gay and transgender issues in contrast with President Barrack Obama, who irked most Africans by trying to force them to accept gays and lesbians and to protect the rights of all LGBT people.

The upcoming American elections are already showing the ‘Trump Effect.’ General elections in the US have always been a brutal affair. The major political parties often deploy billions of dollars, coupled with aggressive campaigning and massive rallies. There is also mischaracterization of political opponents and utilization of all manner of propaganda and negative advertising to overcome adversaries.

However, under Trump, the President has been accused of stoking the embers of violence that often leads to death and destruction for political gain. President Trump may have also put the integrity of the entire election process in question by railing against the use of Mail-in Ballots necessitated by the COVID-19 Pandemic, claiming that it would lead to massive fraud. He has also declined to commit himself to accept the election results in the event he loses on November 3.

Any comparison between US elections and Nigerian elections must be in context. Most of the issues are both social and cultural vis-a-vis the political culture and history of these countries. America’s democracy is over 400 years, while our mundane democratic experiment was just barely 21 years ago. But the fact remains that sound democratic tenets link to sustainable development in the US, and if Nigeria adopts same, may go in the same direction.

Nigerians seem enchanted with the US presidential elections, and this year’s election has captured our imagination even more. America is split in the middle – dogged conservatism versus rapacious liberalism. With all its imperfections, the US presidential election this year seems exciting. Relax, tighten your seatbelt, “watch, look and learn”.

Researchers Find Christians in Iran Approaching 1 Million - Christianity Today
Researchers Find Christians in Iran Approaching 1 Million – Christianity Today

Missiologists have long spoken of the explosive growth of the church in Iran.

Now they have data to back up their claims—from secular research.

According to a new survey of 50,000 Iranians—90 percent residing in Iran—by GAMAAN, a Netherlands-based research group, 1.5 percent identified as Christian.

Extrapolating over Iran’s population of approximately 50 million literate adults (the sample surveyed) yields at least 750,000 believers. According to GAMAAN, the number of Christians in Iran is “without doubt in the order of magnitude of several hundreds of thousands and growing beyond a million.”

The traditional Armenian and Assyrian Christians in Iran number 117,700, according to the latest government statistics.

Christian experts surveyed by CT expressed little surprise. But it may make a significant difference for the Iranian church.

“With the lack of proper data, most international advocacy groups expressed a degree of doubt on how widespread the conversion phenomenon is in Iran,” said Mansour Borji, research and advocacy director for Article 18, a UK-based organization dedicated to the protection and promotion of religious freedom in Iran.

“It is pleasing to see—for the first time—a secular organization adding its weight to these claims.”

The research, which asked 23 questions about an individuals’ “attitude toward religion” and demographics, was run by professors associated with the respected Dutch universities of Tilburg and Utrecht.

The general presumption of doubt risked influencing asylum applications by Iranians seeking resettlement in Europe or elsewhere.

“We do not regard it as remotely plausible that there are as many as 1 million people secretly practicing Christianity in Iran today,” wrote a UK judge in a March ruling establishing best practice guidelines, following a case that ultimately denied asylum to an Iranian convert.

“The huge numbers of converts claimed by various evangelical missions must be viewed in light of the fact that … the more converts they can claim, the greater the incentive for co-religionists to donate.”

Yet despite the widespread skepticism, research conducted by Christian advocacy organizations has begun to produce results.

In 2005, the United Nations created the Geneva-based Universal Periodic Review to evaluate the human rights status of every nation every 4.5 years. During its review session in February, for the first time recommendations for Iran included its treatment of “Christian converts,” issued by Norway and the Netherlands.

“We try to build relations with diplomats as much as they allow,” said Wissam al-Saliby, advocacy director for the World Evangelical Alliance.

“Without such reporting, news of Christian persecution will not filter into Geneva circles, and nations will not feel any pressure.

“It is important for Iran to hear the distinction between its traditional Christian communities, and its converts to the Christian faith.”

But according to the GAMAAN survey, there is another distinction Iran must make.

“The real news is not the number of Christians,” said Johannes de Jong, director of the Sallux (“Salt-Light” in Latin) think tank, affiliated with the European Christian Political Movement.

“It is the massive secularization of Iranian society as a whole.”

Only 32 percent of those surveyed identified themselves as Shiite Muslim. Officially, Iran puts their number at 95 percent.

“The Islam in Iran is a political system, not a faith embraced by any majority,” said de Jong, who has worked with Iranian asylum seekers and opposition politicians over the last 20 years.

“A free Iran would see an implosion of Islam, and a very significant rise of Christianity, Zoroastrism, and atheism.”

The survey already bears this out.

Atheists poll at 9 percent of the population (and nones, or no religious affiliation, overall at 22%); Zoroastrians at 7 percent. The 2011 census numbered Zoroastrians at only 25,000. Extrapolating the percentage from this survey, which GAMAAN stated is 95 percent accurate, that would now be 5.6 million. (Sources said this may indicate a non-Islamic Persian nationalism rather than a true system of belief.)

Nearly half (47%) said they used to be religious but are no longer.

Only 6 in 10 Iranians surveyed said they were born into a religious family. But 6 in 10 also do not say their daily prayers. And 7 in 10 do not want legislation based on religion (68%); state-funded religious institutions (71%); or mandatory head covering (73%). A majority (58%) do not believe in wearing the hijab at all.

And according to a 2019 survey by GAMAAN, 79 percent of the population would vote against an Islamic republic.

While this might seem a fertile field for Christian witness, David Yeghnazar of Elam Ministries warns against the “clay feet” of secularism. For example, almost 4 in 10 Iranians (37%) drink alcohol—which is forbidden in Islam.

“Iranians are attracted to Christianity because they think it is part and parcel of the free, secular, and democratic West,” he said. “It is important for Christian agencies to pry Christianity away from that mould.”

He was also cautious about endorsing the survey statistics as a true estimate of the body of Christ. In a secular survey, “Christian” can imply anything from a “vague attraction” to a “genuine love of Christ and a growing knowledge of the Scriptures.”

Yeghnazar believes the house churches’ lack of governing structure will harm the growing movement. False teaching, financial irregularity, and pastoral dictatorship may begin to plague them.

Borji agrees.

“There is a very real risk that church growth is outpacing discipleship,” he said. “But the problem is exasperated by the fact that many leaders are now in prison, or have been forced out of the country.”

The impact, said Mike Ansari, president of Heart4Iran, is that the church is “highly marginalized, scattered, and segmented.”

Ansari believes personal evangelism is the most effective method for spreading the gospel and the reason behind much of Christianity’s growth in Iran. But given that it is “extremely risky,” satellite television has become the leading factor.

Ansari’s Mohabat TV noticed a surge in conversions during COVID-19. Whereas the channel was informed of 324 conversions through its ministry in March 2019, there was a tenfold increase one year later, with 3,088 new believers.

And if the exponential growth of house churches fails to keep up with conversions, satellite TV must fill in the gap.

Mohabat TV does its best. Elam Ministries’ Safar [Farsi for “journey”] program also helps.

Is it enough?

“Without meaningful face-to-face fellowship and discipleship, the future of the Iranian Church remains uncertain,” Ansari said.

“Isolation is the biggest enemy of church growth.”

It may prove a more effective foe than the Iranian government.

Wybo Nicolai of Open Doors International, based in Holland, noted that rapid church growth began in 2004, when the state put pressure on officially registered churches ministering through the Farsi language. (Iran’s traditional Christian communities use the Armenian and Assyrian languages of their ethnic communities.)

Consequently, ministry was forced underground where it “spread like wildfire” through cell groups and house churches.

“The Iranian authorities lost oversight of it,” said Nicolai. “There was nothing they could do to stop the spread of the gospel.”

They tried, and are trying still. Contrary to official accusations of Christians being Zionist agents and a threat to national security, an Iranian official recently told clerics in the holy city of Qom that “these converts are ordinary people, whose jobs are selling sandwiches or similar things.”

He complained that conversion is “happening right before our eyes.”

But the evidence of Iran’s failure as a theocracy to protect Islam is seen far beyond the Christian tally in the GAMAAN survey. If its overall statistics are valid, only 1 in 3 Iranians claim their national religion. And 4 in 10 believe every religion should be free to propagate its beliefs.

“The hearts and minds of the Iranian people have been plowed and made ready by Iranian government behavior over the last 40 years,” said Borji.

“The people’s resistance to the gospel has been neutralized.”