Protestors converge on EU agri meeting to demand radical policy reform

Protestors rallied in the German city of Koblenz on Sunday (30 August) and participants told EURACTIV they were demanding sweeping farming reforms as EU agricultural ministers began two days of informal talks hosted by Germany’s Agriculture Minister Julia Klöckner.

As Germany currently chairs the rotating presidency of the EU Council, Klöckner is tasked with leading the negotiations on the EU agricultural reform to a political conclusion in the Council.

Prior to the actual meeting of the ministers on 1 September, Klöckner invited her counterparts from across the EU to her home region of Rhineland-Palatinate for informal talks about EU farm subsidies and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Special focus will be on EU-wide animal welfare labelling scheme and animal welfare during transport.

The protest, organised by a German campaigning platform for sustainable agriculture, Wir haben Agraindustrie satt! (“We are fed up!”), saw more than 400 European civil society organisations and more than a thousand people take to the streets, calling for “radical” changes to the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

An open letter addressed to the ministers and made available to EURACTIV, demanded reforms able to meet the objectives of halting biodiversity loss, climate neutrality, and animal welfare while offering support for measures that enable farmers to invest in an ecological transition.

The letter also highlighted the importance of strengthening the EU’s food sovereignty, saying that the coronavirus pandemic has shown that this must be a priority.

“This requires the EU to redefine the purpose of the CAP and trade agreements, which currently threaten food sovereignty in Europe and other regions,” it read, highlighting fears over “cheap and unsustainable imports and exports” and stressing that the CAP and current EU trade policy “harms our ability to sustainably feed European communities”.

Saskia Richartz from Wir haben Agraindustrie satt! said:

“We are now literally fighting fires on all issues: the soil and harvests suffer from drought and intensification, insects are dying, animal welfare and working conditions are being abused to cut costs, and diverse, smaller-scale farms − which are essential for local food production − cannot survive the intense competition for land and cheap food.”

She called on the EU to “discontinue blind payments to agro-businesses,” emphasising that “all public investments should exclusively support farmers in delivering the agro-ecological transition to reduce emissions and environmental impacts and improve animal and social welfare.”

“The reform must align agriculture policies with the EU Green Deal and the recently published Farm to Fork Strategy,” said Eric Gall, policy manager at organics association IFOAM EU, stressing that the EU’s farming subsidy policies “must underpin these goals and help farmers to transition to organic and agroecological farming.”

From Farm to Pitchfork: farmers take to Brussels streets ahead of EU summit

Farmers from across Europe fired up their tractors and drove to Brussels on Thursday (20 February), rallying against proposed cuts in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). They also demanded that the EU does not leave them out of the environmental transition requested in the Commission’s new flagship policy, the Green Deal.

EU farmers association COPA-COGECA also issued video messages in the lead up to the meeting, urging ministers to learn from the lessons from the COVID-19 crisis and work to strengthen the EU’s farming sector.

Speaking on a video shared on the organisation’s Twitter account, Copa President Joachim Rukwied  underlined that a strong Europe “can only subsist with strong farming families and with strong rural areas.”

“The coronavirus crisis has shown how important it is to supply the population with local, high-quality food,” he said, adding that this can only be achieved through a competitive agricultural sector and a level playing field for farmers.

“Security of supply and maintaining competitiveness must be the centre of the discussions of the agriculture ministers,” he urged.

[Edited by Zoran Radosavljevic]

Historic Bristol Bay, Alaska salmon fishery dealing with latest challenge: COVID-19

Northwest summers mean salmon on the grill. While Alaskans fill freezers with their own catch – our freezers are filled with enough salmon to last until next summer – those grilling elsewhere must buy either farm-raised salmon or wild sockeye salmon caught in Bristol Bay, Alaska.

Wild salmon return from the ocean to restart a life cycle that has persisted for millions of years. Wild Alaska sockeye (a favorite species of salmon) is caught over the course of a four- to six-week season, from mid-June through July, when the largest remaining wild salmon population returns to Bristol Bay.

These fish have been harvested by Alaska native peoples for thousands of years. Sockeye have been smoked, filleted, canned and frozen – and given, traded, sold and eaten – for generations.

But the fishermen, seafood processors and communities of Bristol Bay are under threat, and not for the first time. Bristol Bay carries painful memories of the 1918 Great Influenza, which devastated the local indigenous population. Now, the global economy has collapsed in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the market for seafood, often eaten at restaurants, has collapsed along with it.

In response to COVID-19, the state of Alaska imposed restrictions on the industry, including quarantines and social distancing mandates. Salmon processors have also imposed their own rules to keep workers restricted to company grounds.

All of this means the processors of Bristol Bay’s salmon catch face higher costs and lower retail prices. This has resulted in a dramatic 48% fall in prices paid to fishermen for their catch.

Fishermen, who must own or rent expensive permits to participate in harvesting, maintain boats and equipment and pay crew, face being forced out of the fishery.

An evolving business

In the late 19th century, commercial salmon fishing first drew fishermen to Bristol Bay from what Alaskans refer to as “Outside.” The fishing was first done via sailboat.

Seafood companies owned the boats, hired the crews and towed them to the fishing grounds, allowing the industry to restrict who fished and where. This control prevented overfishing and protected profits.

Seafood companies resisted modernization of the fleet until 1951, when the introduction of powerboats led to a new arrangement with fishermen, who at that point shifted to working more independently from the processing companies that handled cleaning, filleting and packaging the fish.

Fishermen have informal relationships with processors, to whom they deliver their product before knowing the price they’ll be paid. They receive bonus payments after the season based on market conditions and practices they can adopt that affect fish quality, including chilling fish as soon as they are caught, bleeding them and handling them carefully to protect the quality of the fish.

Disagreements about fishermen safety, unionization or cooperatives, and conflicts about prices have existed as long as the fishery. Fishermen, suspicious that processors were colluding to hold down prices, sued in the early 2000s. Though the lawsuit was settled, skepticism persisted.

Money for inside Alaska and Outside

Today, Alaskans make up about half the 2,500 fishermen who flock to catch sockeye in a Bristol Bay salmon run. Of the US$250 million of fish that was caught in 2018, fishermen who call the remote Bristol Bay area home took just under 20% of the money paid to fishermen, with the rest of the money going to other Alaskans or fishermen primarily from Washington, Oregon and California.

While fish are caught by a mix of Alaskans and fishermen from Outside, they are handled, cut and processed by a workforce that’s decidedly more geographically diverse, from places as far away as Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. Just a handful of processing jobs are performed by local residents.

Average total individual wages – around $8,000 for the season – for processing workers are higher than the median monthly household income in Bristol Bay but may also include room and board and other compensation in the self-sufficient canneries that spring up in Bristol Bay during the season.

Overall fishing activity provides millions of dollars in tax revenue annually to the Bristol Bay region, which has a total population of only a few thousand people.

Emerging competition

Bristol Bay has always faced challenges based on the uncertain size of runs and external market competition. However, the structure of the market started to change significantly with the start of salmon aquaculture in Norway, with fish not caught by independent fishermen but raised by farmers in pens.

Through selective breeding and domestication, by the early 2000s, farmed salmon had grown to surpass wild salmon in volume of harvest, and today farmed salmon are grown at 2.5 times the rate wild salmon are caught. This has been a part of the shift in volume to farmed salmon in the market.

The volume of farmed salmon is not limited by nature, but rather by regulatory regimes and the ability of farmers to find fertile ocean. Conversely, Bristol Bay is not a factory, and wild production is influenced by myriad natural factors, including climate change. The fishery is managed for sustainability, and therefore cannot respond to a growth in demand for fish by increasing production.

The growing market share of farmed salmon has put pressure on Bristol Bay producers and fishermen, so the fishermen are now working together to protect the value and reputation of their product. Producers aim to maintain the catch’s value by marketing the fact that Bristol Bay sockeye are sustainably managed and not just organic but one of the last true wild food sources.

Recent years have been good for the fishery as it has seen record runs and harvests. At the same time, wholesale prices remained high for much of the last several seasons as processors shifted away from canning and toward higher-quality products like fillets. Fishermen have also captured more value from their catch through various quality bonuses for bleeding and better handling of their catch.

Yet the average size of fish caught has been trending downwards, forcing producers to adjust the types of products that can be produced. Larger fish are generally more valuable, as they can be turned into more, and higher-quality, fillets.

Is it worth it?

Fishing for Bristol Bay salmon has always been tough, not least because making your living on these cold northern waters is risky and sometimes deadly. The development of farmed salmon added to the challenge, but the wild industry was adapting, as fishermen tend to do.

And then the pandemic arrived.

This year, communities are trying to protect public health and their economies in the face of the coronavirus. Fishers traveling from outside the state must test and quarantine, and processors have implemented comprehensive testing for their workers traveling in from out of state. Fishermen and processing-plant workers have not been uniformly compliant with health mandates from state and local governments for social distancing and mask wearing.

[Get our best science, health and technology stories. Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter.]

As the run came to an end in mid-August, there have been 87 non-Alaska resident and 16 Alaska resident cases of COVID-19 in the Bristol Bay region. This is in the context of calls from some members of the community to shut down the fishery in response to COVID-19. It is unclear if these were detected because of more stringent controls by the industry, or the result of the fishery opening.

Fishermen wonder if the all the trouble is even worth their time. The reduction in demand has resulted in a dramatic fall in prices, making fishermen question whether they will break even.

And this happens at a time when farmed salmon is an ever-growing part of the industry. It is an open question what the long-run impact of this season will be, but in 2020 the average sockeye fillet on the grill in the lower 48 comes with a long history of conflict, cooperation and courage.

An International Viewpoint On The Willamette Valley Wines Of Oregon

Jarad Hadi was born in Clackamas, Oregon—southeast of the city of Portland. While growing up, his family spent time living in Paris, and he traveled throughout Europe and portions of the Middle East. His father introduced him to wine, which sparked a lifelong interest.

“When I turned 21, I decided that instead of buying it, I should try to make it. A neighbor had grape vines—I wouldn’t be able to tell you what sort—but I made my first wine in the basement from trial and error and reading books. I also had a job taking me to different countries, and was trying different wines.”

His life as a professional winemaker, however, was partially launched through poetry.

“A small publisher in Buenos Aires, Argentina, was going to publish a translation of my poetry book. Probably the most exciting point in my life.”

Because Hadi was finishing studies and lacked funds, he needed money for his stay in South America. An Argentinian winery named Bodega Calle agreed to provide employment.

“That’s how I made my way down to this poetry book release—working for empanadas and a small stipend. It was great because they let me make wine on the side. That was important—I felt that hands-on learning was really big. You can work at a winery, but to understand the full picture, it’s interesting to make your own product. From that experience, my winemaking blossomed every year, every vintage.”

Back in the U.S., Hadi met Victoria Coleman of Lobo Wines of Napa Valley, California, as well as Michael Silacci of Opus One Winery. Both had had experiences in Bordeaux in France, and both encouraged Hadi to study there. He did so—graduating with a master degree in vineyard and winery management. He followed that with a stint of working with Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse in the Médoc region of Bordeaux.

Hadi then returned to North Plains, Oregon. He brought his new wife Giulia Schiavon—an Italian from Padova, located west of Venice (Giulia’s grandfather was a winemaker). He now manages a five-acre [2 hectare] parcel of his own vines (Grape Ink Wines) and produces 500 cases annually. He also consults for neighboring winemakers who own 45 acres [18 hectares] in northern Willamette Valley—including Mason Hill Vineyards, Eagles Nest Winery, Mason Ridge Farms, Lindas Vineyard and Highgrove Estate. When we recently spoke, Hadi explained the unique attractions of the region.

“Oregon and the Willamette Valley are in a cold climate region that can create wines of elegance: acid driven wines. But this also leaves you with creativity—there are still pioneering areas to look at within a region that has been established. We don’t have many families here beyond second generation wine growers.

“I found the Willamette one of few places that had attention for creating quality wines, but at the same time had space for new ideas. Although they found their voice producing great Pinot Noirs and more recently extraordinary Chardonnays rivaling those of Burgundy, the region is beginning to find its own identity after years of following Eurocentric tendencies. Producers are beginning to understand terroir not only as influence from soil, topography and climate but also their cultural interactions with the landscape. That’s led many to examine their own practices in vineyards and led the industry toward a sustainable revolution in adoption of organic, biodynamic and natural farming methods. The combination of these and other forces have been spicing up the diversity and quality of wines coming out of the valley. It’s exciting to dive into this together.

“Challenges here? You’re in the middle of nature. Mendoza, Argentina, was pretty barren. They planted most of their trees. Same in France—certain little areas are forests, and very controlled. Here—forests are everywhere. You wake up and there might be 50 elk in a pasture where you were going to plant a vineyard. The other day Giulia and I were trying to chase a deer out of a vineyard.

“Another challenge is climate. To make a quality wine you have to ride the line of being able to just ripen grapes each year. We have relatively dry summers, but if rains come at the wrong time, that’s difficult. You are always in this balancing act.

“Another challenge is carving out something in the market place. A lot of customers were used to wines from Napa Valley—rich and opulent. Those styles were initially pushed in Oregon: big business Pinot Noirs and Chardonnays. Now people are looking to create more authentic wines in a cold climate area—wines to age with acidity, and with brighter styles—more vibrant, mineral driven. We’re trying to introduce people to a different style of palate. I want to taste where it’s from, feel the wind in the bottle, taste the struggles, difficulty or successes. Or else wine becomes a science experiment, and less an expression of terroir. But that niche market is still only a sliver, for those ready to understand that sort of wine.”

Hadi told of lessons from Bordeaux and Mendoza that apply to the Willamette Valley.

“In Mendoza what was important was learning traditional, rustic styles of winemaking techniques. To work with different sorts of materials in the cellar—using different vessels for fermentation. That’s something we’re now implementing a lot in Willamette—not just traditional stainless-steel tanks, but also concrete, amphorae, large wooden vats—and finding what that does to wine.

“In France, one important thing was finding more of an intuitive style of winemaking. The most important aspect of winemaking is not only looking at the ongoing project and analyzing it, but also designing wine while in the vineyard–thinking about the forthcoming wine while you are picking grapes, while you are considering the harvest date. This approach is confident about what sort of wine you are going to make from the vineyard—instead of what sort you are going to make in the cellar. Completely European mentality. It helps extraordinarily. In California and Oregon people are asking me about numbers, science, juice panels, brix and malic acid. Those can be your backup plan to help understand the health of grapes, but they can’t be your decision maker. Your palate has to be your guiding tool.”

Hadi chose to settle in the northernmost region of the Willamette Valley to find a wide variety of expressions for Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and a few mountain varieties. It has allowed him to ‘push varietal expression’ by farming well, picking at optimal times and allowing wines to age.

“A huge focus of mine is to create wines that can last 100 years. Because, dinners in France at Academie des vins Ancienne in Paris—with bottles at least 50 to 100 years old—really sparked an interest in trying to create wines that could last forever.

“We’re looking at different varieties to experiment with for future climate change, and planting parcels strategically. One wine is Pinot Noir, Monduese from the Savoie [in France] and Trousseau from Jura. We’re looking at those outliers because they’re planted at high elevations in warmer areas. The blend is unique. Hasn’t been done here or anywhere else. Younger winemakers realize the Willamette Valley is a diverse landscape—not so singular that every site is going to produce world class Pinot Noir. That has to be removed from the vernacular because it’s not true; it’s too diverse of a landscape—different soil types and elevations and mode esprit, different winemakers who have different skill sets.”

Hadi also works with his wife Giulia to merge wine and art.

“She’s a painter and sculptor and I’m focused on wine. Trying to link it up was the idea of Grape Ink. I’ll create a wine, she’ll try it, and then create a painting. Or I’ll look at a painting and then try to create a wine based on what sort of emotions that paining brings out. This would be linked to textures of her paintings. A lot would be for summer releases because she paints bright and vibrant colors. The idea was to have that same sort of vibrancy come out through wines. Having characteristics that would bring out all three— white, rosé and red wines—and be able to evoke feelings of all three expressions—say Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris—in one bottle.”

Hadi actively promotes the recently created Tualatin Hills American Viticultural Area (AVA) appellation in the northernmost region of the valley—abutting the Colombia gorge.

“A lot of people tell me just to focus on my property. But I think it’s important to focus on everyone around also and help them out—because we’re going to need to do this together. I don’t think one producer can change a region. But if we group together, we have a good chance to show what we think is special.”

What advice would he give winemakers interested in moving to the region?

“The Willamette Valley is still very collaborative, so expect good friendships. Unique to the area? We are not looking at everyone as competitors, but as collaborators. Important to people coming here—or to any region—is not to work off anecdotal knowledge, not just listen to what the neighbors tell you—but to pay attention to what you feel, what you know, what you can specialize in. And for anyone coming to a new region, it will be nice to see them bring something innovative and new.”

Jarad and Giulia will soon be parents—grounding their union and marrying their lives even closer to Willamette Valley. As their own parents and grandparents sparked their mutual interests in wine, no doubt they will one day do alike—but also adding lessons learned from working in a different hemisphere, as well as from living on other continents.