Use of coercion and force is widespread in psychiatry
Use of coercion and force is widespread in psychiatry

*Featured photo by Pete Linforth from Pixabay / This article is part of the series “Mental Health in crisis

The still legally accepted possibility of using coercion and force in psychiatry is a very controversial issue. It is not only widespread but indicators and statistics from various European countries show it is increasing.

More and more people are being subjected to coercive psychiatric interventions. The phenomena that one would believe is only applied in extreme cases and to a very few exceptional and dangerous persons is in fact very common practice.

Around the world, people with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities are frequently locked up in institutions where they are isolated from society and marginalized from their communities. Many are subjected to physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and neglect in hospitals and prisons, but also in the community. People are also deprived of the right to make decisions for themselves about their mental health care and treatment, where they want to live, and their personal and financial affairs,” Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) noted in a United Nations meeting on human rights in mental health held in 2018.

And in the speech delivered on his behalf by Dr. Akselrod, Assistant DG WHO for Mental Health he added,

Unfortunately, these violations of human rights are all too common. They do not occur only in low-income countries with few resources, they occur everywhere around the world. Rich countries can have mental health services which are inhuman, deliver poor quality care and which violate human rights. What is particularly shocking is that these violations occur in the very places where people should be receiving care and support. In this respect, some mental health services themselves have become agents for human rights violations.

The implementation of human rights in psychiatry, and with that the phasing out any use of coercion – by law and actual practice – has become an important topic on the human rights agenda of the United Nations. But not only by the UN, in many European countries, by professionals working in the field of mental health and not the least by persons who have experienced the use and abuse of coercion in psychiatry.

Violence potentially amounting to torture

During the same United Nations meeting on mental health and human rights the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights, Mr. Zeid Al Hussein noted: “Psychiatric institutions, like all closed settings, generate exclusion and segregation, and being forced into one amounts to arbitrary deprivation of liberty. They are also, often, the locus of abusive and coercive practices, as well as violence potentially amounting to torture.

The High Commission on Human Rights made it clear that: “Forced treatment – including forced medication and forced electro convulsive treatment, as well as forced institutionalisation and segregation – should no longer be practiced.

He added that “Manifestly, the human rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities and those with mental health conditions are not being widely upheld around the world. This needs to change.

The use of coercive measures (deprivation of liberty, forced medication, seclusion, and restraint and other types) are in fact very widespread and common in psychiatry. This may be because psychiatrists generally do not consider the patient’s viewpoints or respect their integrity. One may also argue that because the use of these uses of force is legally authorized they are used, because that is what has been done for centuries. The health care professionals in the psychiatric service are not educated and experienced in how to deal with people from a modern viewpoint of human rights.

And that traditional and widespread thinking appears to be the cause of an escalating use of force and abusive atmosphere in many mental health settings.

The rising trend is damaging for patients

Professors of psychiatry, Sashi P Sashidharan, and Benedetto Saraceno, former director of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse and currently the Secretary General of the Lisbon Institute for Global Mental Health, discussed the matter in an editorial published in the internationally respected British Medical Journal in 2017: “The rising trend is damaging for patients, unsupported by evidence, and must be reversed. Coercion in its various guises has always been central to psychiatry, a legacy of its institutional origins.

mental health 2019924 700px 1 e1622718800771
You get vaccinated and play tombola
You get vaccinated and play tombola

The first in the world was Serbia, which gives 25 euros to each of its vaccinated citizens. President Aleksandar Vucic explained that the aim of the initiative is to encourage people. Persons over 16 years of age and those who have already received one or two doses, as well as those who have been vaccinated with at least one dose by May 31, receive a one-time fee of about 3,000 dinars, which is about 5 percent of the average salary for the country.  Vucic announced that public sector employees who are not immunized will not be paid sick leave if they become infected.

State lottery in Poland for vaccinated: To encourage vaccination, the Polish authorities will play a lottery with prizes of up to 1 million zlotys or nearly 223 thousand euros. The raffle will be organized by state companies with the help of a sports tote. One in every 2,000 vaccinated will be able to win 500 zlotys (about 110 euros), and two lucky ones will receive the grand prize money and a hybrid car. There will also be financial incentives for the municipalities that have reached the highest vaccination rate. Nearly 70 percent of Poles have already expressed a desire to be vaccinated, but the government says an incentive is needed to make it happen really quickly.

Vaccines in California will take part in a raffle with high cash prizes: ten people will receive $ 1.5 million each, and another 30 will receive $ 50,000 each.

The state of California is offering $ 116.5 million in cash prizes to people living there who will be vaccinated against COVID-19 by June 15, the Associated Press reported. Governor Gavin Newsom’s initiative aims to increase vaccination before the restrictive measures are lifted on June 15. Ten people who are vaccinated before that date will receive $ 1.5 million each, and another 30 will receive $ 50,000 each. The first two million Californians to be vaccinated as of yesterday will receive $ 50 gift certificates.

All Californians who have been vaccinated since the beginning of the campaign will be able to participate in the grand prizes. Funding for the awards comes from an unprecedented state budget surplus.

Other states also offer incentives to vaccinate against COVID-19. They range from three tickets to baseball games to university scholarships and big cash prizes. Abigail Bugenski has already won $ 1 million in the Ohio state-run lottery, which will have four more draws.

The mayor of Lancaster, California, is offering a raffle for scholarships, including a grand prize of $ 10,000, for teenagers who are being vaccinated against the coronavirus. In this way, the city authorities hope to persuade hesitant young people to get vaccinated.

For the week of April 18-25, vaccinations fell by 56% in Los Angeles County, which includes Lancaster. So far, 15.8% of people between the ages of 16 and 29 have received at least one dose of the vaccine.

The special raffle # 10kVaxChallenge, announced on May 3, includes students who are between 16 and 18 years old and who have been fully vaccinated. The deadline is June 30.

The winner will receive $ 10,000. The second in the raffle will take $ 5,000, and the 20 eligible winners will receive a third prize – a $ 50 gift card. Mayor R. Rex Paris told ABC News that he had created the raffle, “so that the youth of our community feel more excited and motivated to participate in the process of defeating the coronavirus.”

 “All members of our community want the pandemic to stay behind us, and teenagers may be even more eager to return to their normal lives. But in order to return to the “normal”, each of us must do his part and get vaccinated. Now that safe and effective vaccines are available for everyone over the age of 16, I want to motivate them to take advantage of this opportunity. ” More and more teenagers have signed up for the vaccine since the raffle was announced.

To participate in the raffle, teens must post a photo of themselves on social media saying they received the second vaccine, tag five of their friends in the post, and use the hashtags “# 10kVaxChallenge” and “#VaccinateLancaster.”

Other states also offer incentives to vaccinate against COVID-19. They range from three tickets to baseball games to university scholarships and big cash prizes. Abigail Bugenski has already won $ 1 million in the Ohio state-run lottery, which will have four more draws.

A $ 1 million reward for five of those vaccinated in Ohio, for example. Ohio authorities have announced a raffle with prizes, including a large sum of $ 1 million, tickets for baseball games and free beer. Five random residents of the state who have received at least one dose will have a chance to grab the grand prize, which will be drawn once a week.

The governor of Ohio wrote on Twitter that the idea may seem like a waste of money, but the real waste at this point is to have vaccines available, but to prefer to die from COVID-19. In recent weeks, the number of vaccinated in the United States has fallen due to skepticism about vaccines and the declining number of cases.

A raffle for an apartment for over a million in Hong Kong for vaccinated – another 20 winners will receive bank cards with 13,000 dollars each.

A new $ 1.4 million apartment will be the grand prize in a special lottery to be held in Hong Kong only among residents fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The aim is to encourage people to become more actively involved in the government’s immunization program.

The grand prize will be provided by a large brokerage house. The remaining 20 winners will receive $ 13,000 bank cards.

In turn, the administration of Hong Kong International Airport has initiated a raffle of 60,000 free plane tickets for its employees and residents of the city, who will receive two doses of the vaccine by the end of September.

The Hong Kong government is concerned about the low immunization rate among the population, especially among young people. In a metropolis with a population of almost 8 million people, 17.6% of residents received the first dose of the vaccine, and only 12.9% received two.

Promoting cycling can save lives and advance health across Europe through improved air quality and increased physical activity
Promoting cycling can save lives and advance health across Europe through improved air quality and increased physical activity

On World Bicycle Day, celebrated on 3 June, WHO highlights a new master plan that calls countries to acknowledge cycling as an equal mode of transport and to double the level of cycling by 2030.

The Pan-European Master Plan for Cycling Promotion provides a set of recommendations to reallocate space for cycling and walking, improve active mobility infrastructure, increase cyclist and pedestrian safety to reduce fatalities, develop national cycling policies, and integrate cycling into health policies and urban and transport planning.

Cycling can contribute to improving the environment as well as people’s health, safety and overall quality of life. Each year, about 1 million deaths in the WHO European Region are attributed to insufficient physical activity. Increasing the level of cycling can help to prevent these deaths. The Pan-European Master Plan for Cycling Promotion, endorsed by 56 countries of the pan-European region in May, supports this goal.

During the pandemic, cycling emerged as a viable mobility option that enables physical distancing, relieves the burden on public transport and helps people to meet the minimum requirement for daily physical activity. Many countries have seen an increase in bicycle usage and developed new initiatives to support cycling that are opening the door for new, lasting policies.

Cycling benefits both health and the economy

Active mobility can prevent noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer, and their risk factors such as hypertension and obesity. In the European Region, NCDs account for more than 70% of all deaths. Regular cycling, such as commuting to work, can reduce the total risk of mortality by about 10%.

An increase in physical activity would also reduce expenses related to the health sector. The global cost of physical inactivity is estimated to be US$ 54 billion per year in direct health care expenses and an additional US$ 14 billion in lost productivity.

Cycling also reduces emissions of transport-related greenhouse gas and air pollutants, which in Europe cause around 500 000 deaths each year. The cycling-friendly redesign of traffic areas, including green spaces and public gardens, creates valuable public space, nicer areas to live and an improved quality of life for all.

A focus on safety for cyclists

To ensure that cycling can deliver all these health benefits, safety is paramount. This requires safe infrastructure, road design that provides the measures cyclists need, and reduced speeds. The 6th United Nations Global Road Safety Week this year calls for 30 km/h speed limits to be the norm in cities, towns and villages worldwide. This would decrease the number and severity of collisions involving cars, cyclists and pedestrians.

The Master Plan calls countries to integrate cycling into national and international road safety policies, and to expand the infrastructure for cycling and walking in every country in Europe. It also highlights the importance of strengthening awareness among public health professionals to advocate cycling as a tool for promoting physical activity and improving public health. All health-related benefits of cycling should be promoted through formal and informal education from early childhood.

The Pan-European Master Plan for Cycling Promotion was elaborated under the Transport, Health and Environment Pan-European Programme (THE PEP) Partnership on Cycling Promotion.

Mental health in crisis
Mental health in crisis

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Friday (28 May 2021) United Nations human rights experts called upon the Council of Europe to withdraw a possible new legal instrument that would maintain an approach to mental health policy and practice that is based on coercion, which is incompatible with contemporary human rights principles and standards.

The United Nations experts who are having extensive expertise in the field of disability, mental health and human rights noted that “Overwhelming evidence from the European Disability Forum, Mental Health Europe and other organizations and growing consensus within the United Nations including at the World Health Organization, show that forced admission to medical institutions and coercive treatments in institutions will bring harmful effects such as pain, trauma, humiliation, shame, stigmatisation and fear to people with psychosocial disabilities.”

What is the actual scene? How widespread is the use of forced admissions and coercive treatments?

The European Times will be covering the matter in an article series starting today.

See also article on Council of Europe in big controversy here.

List:

  1. Use of coercion and force is widespread in psychiatry. 3 June 2021
  2. European psychiatry in bad shape. 3 June 2021
  3. Patients see restraints as torture. 5 June 2021
  4. The WHO seeks to end human rights violations in psychiatry. 11 June 2021

 

 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Amidst COVID surge, Asia-Pacific region needs ‘immediate and stronger support’ 
Amidst COVID surge, Asia-Pacific region needs ‘immediate and stronger support’ 
With the coronavirus still raging in many parts of the world, the UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, warned on Tuesday of vaccine shortages, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, and urged “immediate and stronger support” for the global COVAX initiative for equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, “including for refugees and asylum-seekers”. 
“This is critical to save lives and curb the impact of the virus, particularly in developing nations”, UNHCR spokesperson Andrej Mahecic told a regular press briefing at the Palais des Nations in Geneva. 

Swelling numbers 

Although Asia-Pacific countries host the vast majority of more than 80 million forcibly displaced people around the globe, they have benefited from only a fraction of the world’s COVID-19 innoculations, according to the agency. 

Concern over the situation in the region continues to rise as the number of cases has surged to the largest increase globally.  

UNHCR stressed that the pandemic will only be defeated when vaccinations are available everywhere “on an equitable basis”. 

Struggling with surges 

Over this period, some 38 million COVID-19 cases have been recorded along with more than half a million deaths, devastating many already fragile health systems in the region.  

“The lack of hospital beds, oxygen supplies, limited intensive care unit (ICU) capacities and scarce health facilities and services have worsened outcomes for those infected with COVID-19, particularly in India and Nepal”, said Mr. Mahecic. 

Moreover, the highly infectious variant of the virus which first emerged in India “threatens to rapidly spread in the sub-region”, including among refugee populations, he added. 

Particularly vulnerable 

Amidst overcrowded settings, limited water and inadequate sanitation facilities, refugees remain especially at risk of COVID-19. 

In Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, where almost 900,000 Rohingya refugees are living in the single largest and most densely populated cluster of refugee camps in the world, the number of cases has jumped considerably in the last two months, UNHCR emphasized.  

“As of 31 May, there have been over 1,188 cases confirmed among the refugee population, with more than half of these cases recorded in May alone”, the agency’s spokesperson told journalists. 

“We have also seen a worrying increase in the number of COVID-19 cases among refugees and asylum-seekers in Nepal, Iran, Pakistan, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia”, he said.  

Shots on the move 

While efforts are underway to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, preventive measures must be complemented with intensified vaccinations. 

Although some refugees, including in Nepal, have received their first jab with COVAX-provided supplies, not a single vaccine has been administered to Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. 

The scarcity of supplies in the country means that some of the world’s most vulnerable people remain susceptible to the virus. 

“UNHCR is adding its voice to the calls for countries with surplus doses to donate to COVAX, and for manufacturers to boost supplies to the COVAX facility”, said Mr. Mahecic. 

Included in its regular budget, UNHCR’s total financial requirements for COVID include $455 million in supplementary needs and $469 million in COVID-related activities.  

To date, including projected contributions, UNHCR has received $252.8 million or only 27 per cent of these requirements.

© UNICEF/Amarjeet Singh

Patients receive treatment in the COVID-19 care centre at the Commonwealth Games Village (CWG) in New Delhi, India

Orthodoxy and modern psychology
Orthodoxy and modern psychology

Archpriest Vadim Leonov is a doctor of theology, associate professor, vice-rector for scientific and theological work at the Sretensky Theological Seminary, Moscow. The article is based on a report presented by the author of the conference “The place of psychology in spiritual education” at the Orthodox University “St. John the Theologian “on March 22, 2021

Attempts at rapprochement between Orthodoxy and modern psychology seem to me to be a mutual coincidence between two travelers who want to walk together on the same path, but are at a distance from each other – at opposite ends of a large field dotted with beautiful flowers and fragrant herbs.

However, under the cover of the beautiful greenery there are mines, without the disposal of which their rapprochement is impossible. I see my task in this – to mark the explosive topics, as I see them from the position of an Orthodox pastor. It is clear that something else is being seen on the other side, and the relevant work must be done by both sides. Without identifying dangerous “zones” and their “demining”, it is difficult to talk about rapprochement, and in the case of real reckless interaction without prior resolution of existing contradictions, severe injuries cannot be avoided.

So, to list some of the most obvious problematic topics and issues in the field of interaction between Orthodox pastoral care and modern psychology.

Heterogeneity, multiplicity, internal contradiction of psychological teachings

If the question of the interaction between Orthodox pastoral care and psychology is placed in a general plan, it means that in the future Orthodox pastors should interact not with a limited circle of selected psychologists with an Orthodox worldview [1], but with psychology as a science.

If such a task were set with respect to physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, genetics, or any other traditional science, then even despite the discrepancies in our understanding of the world and man, we would generally have a holistic view of church and scientific teaching that we would we could compare, contrast, oppose, build bridges between them, etc. Unfortunately, in the case of psychology, everything is much more complicated. Every bright person in psychology, and there have been and are many of them, tries not only to develop what existed before him, but also to build something fundamentally new: his system, his school, which, after it has already appeared. , began to live his own life along with many other schools. Such endless swarming is observed even within a psychological direction.

Let’s take the story of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis. At the beginning, his student Alfred Adler dropped out of it, creating his own psychoanalytic concept, severely condemned by the founder Freud. Then separated Carl Jung, who was actively interested in mythology, spiritualism and occult theories. Subsequent neo-Freudians also set about establishing their own psychoanalytic schools (Erich Fromm, Karen Horne, Eric Bjorn, Harry Sullivan, etc.). This process of swarming, opposition, mutual refutation continues to this day. Modern psychoanalysis in a broad sense – these are more than 20 concepts of mental development of man, and psychotherapeutic methods in psychoanalysis differ as much as the theories themselves.

Therefore, if, for example, the task is set to compare the ascetic teaching of the Church and psychoanalysis, the question arises: with which of the twenty theories of psychoanalysis should we compare? Which one is the most authoritative? No one in the psychoanalytic community knows the answer to this question. But psychoanalysis is only a small part of modern psychology. In its other areas, we also encounter a huge number of contradictory or autonomous theories explaining the same psychological phenomenon in different or even opposite ways. On this basis, many even more contradictory psychological methods are built. Obviously, we cannot build meaningful relationships with all these concepts at once, but if we are crossing bridges with only a few “chosen ones”, then what should be our selection criteria? Where is the truth?

The lack of an effective “immune system” in psychology

In church life and the classical natural sciences, there are internal mechanisms that protect fundamental principles, values, and ideas from distortion. Using these mechanisms, the Church condemns delusions and heresies, rejects heretics and various others for their doctrinal apostasies and moral transgressions.

There are similar mechanisms in the traditional sciences. In them, the unproven claim, the unverifiable experience is rejected, and all attempts to introduce magic or unfounded mysticism into scientific constructions are severely denounced as manifestations of pseudoscience, and their authors as charlatans. It is impossible to imagine a priest who considers himself a colleague of a shaman, or an astronomer who publishes an article in a scientific journal with a professional astrologer.

However, psychology shows great tolerance in this regard. In the famous Internet portal of psychologists www.b17.ru in the list of offered methods of psychological help are listed and hypnotherapy, and NLP, and integrated neuroprogramming, and transpersonal psychotherapy, and many other things that cause from a scientific point of view big questions, and from a Christian point of view they are completely unacceptable. Moreover, a large number of these psychologists (more than 40,000 graduates are registered) openly practice astrology, astropsychology, Vedic astrology, and various types of hypnosis, deal with tarot card predictions and other occult methods. Often all these things go together in a common package of services provided by a certified psychologist. We can see the same diversity and syncretism in every bookstore if we look in the Psychology section. Books on scientific psychology occupy a very modest and inconspicuous place there. Most are books with varying degrees of occultism, magic and unreviewed populism.

Attempts to develop an “immune system” for self-purification and self-defense against charlatanism and unscrupulous people are also made in psychological organizations. But even if such protective mechanisms arise, they work only within local groups and do not have a purifying effect on the psychological community as a whole.

We cannot but acknowledge the high degree of scientific development of some sections of general, age, clinical, pedagogical psychology and clinical psychiatry. However, experts in these fields do not openly distance themselves from all unscientific and even overtly occult methods used by other colleagues, and this is the main sign of an ineffective “immune system”. An occult psychologist rejected in one place can easily find a haven in another without losing his status as a psychologist. Therefore, until the mechanisms of self-purification begin to work effectively, it is not worth opening the gates of the Church to the whole psychological community in its diversity.

Council of Europe in big controversy on human rights abuse
Council of Europe in big controversy on human rights abuse

A Committee of the Council of Europe is about to complete the work on a possible new legal instrument, that if approved will authorize states the continued use of practises deemed a violation of human rights by the United Nations. This include such practices as locking up persons or forcing certain medications on people, stated to be suffering from a mental disorder.

The Committee on Bioethics, a Committee working at the Committee of Ministers’ level of the Council of Europe is meeting this week to discuss a final draft of a new legal instrument that was to protect human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorders. The document however has received severe criticism culminating in the United Nations stepping in with a joint statement of its human rights experts requesting the delegates of the meeting to “object to the draft Additional Protocol in the upcoming meeting and we urge the Council of Europe to end legitimising forced institutionalization and the use of coercion against persons with disabilities, including older persons with disabilities.”

we urge the Council of Europe to end legitimising forced institutionalization and the use of coercion against persons with disabilities, including older persons with disabilities“.

UN Experts

About the draft of Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe.

The United Nations experts, which include their Special Rapporteurs on rights to physical and mental health and on disability and the UN Committee specialised on Disability, stated that, “The coercive approach to mental health is doing harm to people with disabilities and we should not go backwards to authorize this outdated approach. People with psychosocial disabilities have the right to live in the community and to refuse medical treatment.”

Parliamentary Assembly of the CoE against the CoE Committe on Bioethics

The statement follows a long series of protests already voiced. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has worked over several years looking in to the matter and already in 2016 issued a recommendation stating that “Involuntary placement and involuntary treatment procedures give rise to a large number of human rights violations in many member States, in particular in the context of psychiatry.

The Parliamentary Assembly with the Recommendation stated, “While the Parliamentary Assembly understands the concerns that prompted the Committee on Bioethics to work on this issue, it has serious doubts about the added value of a new legal instrument in this field. Nevertheless, the Assembly’s main concern about the future additional protocol relates to an even more essential question: that of its compatibility with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” (read full Recommendation here)

The Parliamentary Assembly noted that the United Nations’ Committee monitoring this Convention “interprets Article 14 as prohibiting the deprivation of liberty on the basis of disability even if additional criteria, such as dangerousness to one’s self or others, are also used to justify it. The committee considers that mental health laws providing for such instances are incompatible with Article 14, are discriminatory in nature and amount to arbitrary deprivation of liberty.”

Since then, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly issued another recommendation in 2019, “Ending coercion in mental health: the need for a human rights-based approach.” The Assembly reiterated “the urgent need for the Council of Europe, as the leading regional human rights organisation, to fully integrate the paradigm shift initiated by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) into its work regarding the protection of human rights and dignity of persons with mental health conditions or psychosocial disabilities.(full recommendation here)

In a follow-up Resolution, the Parliamentary Assembly noted that “The overall increase in the use of involuntary measures in mental health settings mainly results from a culture of confinement which focuses and relies on coercion to “control” and “treat” patients who are considered potentially “dangerous” to themselves or others.”

The Assembly based a concern on evidence from sociological research in the field on persons with mental health conditions “points to overwhelmingly negative experiences of coercive measures, including pain, trauma and fear. Involuntary “treatments” administered against the will of patients, such as forced medication and forced electroshocks, are perceived as particularly traumatic. They also raise major ethical issues, as they can cause irreversible damage to health.”

The Assembly further considered that “Mental health systems across Europe should be reformed to adopt a human rights-based approach which is compatible with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and is respectful of medical ethics and of the human rights of the people concerned, including of their right to health care on the basis of free and informed consent.”

Commisioner on Human Rights: the draft provokes disprotection

The Council of Europe’s Commissioner on Human Rights, Dunja Mijatović, in a written comment to the Committee on Bioethics called on the Committee to not adopt the new legal instrument. She added that “While noting that the Committee on Bioethics started this work with the commendable intention of improving the protection of persons with psychosocial disabilities with regard to involuntary measures ordered in a medical context, she considers that the draft Additional Protocol [the new legal instrument], rather than satisfying that ambition, unfortunately risks provoking the opposite result.”

Civil society is against the draft

The International NGO Human Rights Watch in a statement on the Committee on Bioethics’ document noted “In what may seem like a contradiction, the Council of Europe—the continent’s leading human rights body—continues to pursue a new legal instrument that would undermine the rights of people with disabilities. Today’s meeting of the Council of Europe’s Committee on Bioethics— the body responsible for this treaty known as the draft Additional Protocol to the Oviedo Convention on Bioethics, signals that states are prepared to adopt new rules regarding forced treatment and detention of people with psychosocial disabilities, despite existing human rights obligations.”

The European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI) earlier called upon the Council of Europe Committee on Bioethics to withdraw the document. They followed up with a new statement, that “The draft Additional Protocol creates the risk of a conflict between international norms at the global and European levels” as the document “lacks clear, strong procedural safeguards to ensure respect for the rights of persons with disabilities.”

The European Disability Forum, an umbrella organisation of persons with disabilities defending the interests of over 100 million persons with disabilities in the European Union, together with their members, in particular the European Network of (Ex)-Users and Survivors of Psychiatry, Mental Health Europe, Autism-Europe, Inclusion Europe and the European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities, have been in strong opposition to the drafted new legal instrument and expressed deep concerns over the human rights violations potentially about to be undertaken by the Council of Europe.

These comments of the European disability representative organizations were also endorsed by the International Disability Alliance, an umbrella organisation bringing together over 1,100 organisations of persons with disabilities and their families from across eight global and six regional networks.

Committee on Bioethics is aware of the critics

Ms. Laurence Lwoff, the Head of Council of Europe’s Bioethics Unit told The European Times, that “The delegations to the Committee on Bioethics are aware of the statement released by UN Rights experts which will also be referred to at the meeting by the Chair of the Committee on Bioethics.” She refused that the Committee does have the intention to disregard the views expressed by the UN Rights experts.

The meeting at which the possible new legal instrument will be reviewed starts today. The European Times was informed that “it is not possible to attend the meetings of the Committee on Bioethics (as this is the general rule for any other intergovernmental committees’ meeting) which are not opened to the press.”

The meeting at which the possible new Legal instrument will be reviewed starts today. When the meeting is done, the Committee either have tied down the Council of Europe or as the UN Experts put it, used the “unique opportunity to shift away from old-fashioned coercive approaches to mental health, towards concrete steps to promote supportive mental health services in the community, and the realization of human rights for all without discrimination on the grounds of disability.”

The first bicycle ambulances into operation
The first bicycle ambulances into operation

The first Turkish bicycle lines were put into operation this week on the “princely” islands of Buyukada and Heibeliada near Istanbul. Equipped with four bicycles, a team will be available to intervene when accidents occur on the islands on weekends and holidays.

Ambulances are adapted to provide emergency first aid with an oxygen tank and an automatic external defibrillator. The team is prepared for any scenarios they may face, including rescuing people from drowning, treating those who have fallen from great heights, and responding to patients with acute coronary syndrome.

The bicycle lines will work on weekends and holidays, when the islands are particularly crowded with tourists and it is extremely difficult to get around.

Team members who have completed first aid training will answer emergency calls before a normal ambulance arrives if necessary.

If several emergency calls are received at once, the ambulance team will determine which patients should be prioritized. In this way, patients who need further treatment will be transferred to the city faster.

Bicycle is an evolution trend for giving help to people in congested areas. But is it the right solution for everyone? We try to explain when you can choose a bicycle ambulance and when you need something different.

A cycle response unit is a crew of two or more paramedic equipped with bicycles that can operate as a frontline response to ordinary emergencies in a town centre. When traffic congestion, pedestrian areas and crowds of people can make it difficult to reach a patient.

What kind of Medical device do you need on a bicycle ambulance?

The cycle responders’ kit is very similar to a standard Basic Life Support (BLS) equipment that we can found on ambulances, without electro-medical instruments and transportation devices. As for the fast response unit on car, or the motorcycle response units (MRU), you need to have:

Defibrillator

Oxygen

Pulse oximeter monitor

Blood pressure device

Adult and paediatric BLS kit (bag, valve, mask, ecc..)

Small bag of drugs like (for Paramedic and Professionals)

Bandages and dressings

Rubber gloves

Cleanses

Soft splint

Ice pack

Burn pack

Commit to Quit smoking this World No Tobacco Day
Commit to Quit smoking this World No Tobacco Day

Today on May 31, WHO/Europe celebrates World No Tobacco Day. Under the tagline “Commit to Quit”, the aim of this year’s campaign is to support 100 million people worldwide in their attempt to give up tobacco through a range of initiatives and digital solutions.

This includes Florence – WHO’s digital health worker – who helps smokers build a plan to quit, combats misinformation about COVID-19 and tobacco, and refers tobacco users to other digital cessation services such as free quit-lines and apps. WHO has also developed a WhatsApp Quit Programme which provides support via text message over the course of 6 months to each user.

Although many smokers are keen to kick tobacco and nicotine addiction, many don’t have adequate means or support to do so. Without assistance, only 4–7% of those who attempt to quit succeed in doing so. Structured, well-funded and accessible cessation programmes are therefore an important component of World No Tobacco Day’s celebration of “Commit to Quit”.

One of the biggest threats to global health

The scale of the tobacco epidemic is colossal, posing one of the biggest threats to global health ever faced and killing over 8 million people every year. The dangers extend beyond the physical health of individuals – also impacting social and economic well-being with the annual cost of smoking estimated to be $1.4 trillion worldwide.

As an addictive substance, it can be a struggle to end reliance on nicotine. Certain groups may find quitting more challenging than others, particularly if smoking is compounded by other addictions or social vulnerabilities, such as unemployment. Nonetheless, there is hope: not only are tobacco users aiming to quit, but with the help of well-planned cessation services they can triumph over tobacco and nicotine addiction.

Besides the long-established harmful effects of tobacco use, quitting is particularly important this year due to the coronavirus pandemic: the global crisis has supercharged health complications for smokers. Coronavirus gives a strong motivation to quit tobacco use as smokers are at much greater risk. The underlying diseases caused by smoking are key risk factors for death from COVID-19 and smoking is associated with increased severity of disease and death in hospitalized patients.

Furthermore, support for quitting – like many other services – was seriously impacted by lockdown. The pandemic dramatically reduced access to and the availability of face-to-face advice services that individuals may usually receive through health services. Reinvigorating support for those eager to give up tobacco is thus a WHO priority for 2021.

Cessation services can help double the chances of putting out tobacco products for good. Thanks to monumental public health efforts, one-third of the world’s population – 2.4 billion people, including 140 million in the WHO European Region – now have access to cessation services at the best practice level. These are essential services for all countries in the grip of the tobacco epidemic.

Ireland leads the way on tobacco cessation programmes
Ireland leads the way on tobacco cessation programmes

As a recognized global leader in tobacco control, Ireland has worked hard to develop comprehensive treatment for tobacco dependence. The country’s efforts are underpinned by ambitious goals: it aims to be tobacco free by 2025 with a smoking prevalence equal to or lower than 5%. One of Ireland’s keys to success is a rigorous national cessation programme that provides care and support for those struggling with tobacco and nicotine dependence.

As part of the 2021 World No Tobacco Day campaign “Commit to Quit”, we explore Ireland’s world-class stop-smoking services, shining a light on the success of countries working to create a tobacco-free world.

“We now have more quitters than smokers in Ireland,” says Martina Blake, National Lead of the Health Service Executive (HSE) Tobacco Free Ireland Programme. “Unfortunately, as we know from the Healthy Ireland survey, most smokers try to quit alone and don’t use recognized and evidence-based cessation aids. We would like to encourage all smokers to give themselves the best chance of success and use our friendly and supportive services.”

It can be hard to quit smoking, but the chances of succeeding are drastically increased with the right support. Smokers are twice as likely to succeed in ending tobacco addiction with the help of tobacco cessation programmes provided by Ireland’s HSE, and 4 times more likely with a combination of cessation programmes and medication.

Comprehensive cessation programmes

Ireland’s comprehensive cessation services cover a bespoke range of options for tobacco users who want to quit, from a free quitline and live chat on the quit.ie website to “community quitters” Facebook groups and a free online quit plan. The headline service is the structured behavioural support programme.

Implementing comprehensive cessation programmes is important, but can appear daunting or resource-intensive for some countries. A stepwise approach can be helpful for developing support systems in an affordable manner. Ensuring that everyone in society – particularly the most vulnerable – can access cessation services increases the chance of success and boosts progress towards a tobacco-free future.

Tailored support

Ireland is tailoring tobacco-cessation support to specific groups, particularly those in disadvantaged communities, whose unique needs are assessed early in the process.

“Those who have a long smoking history, are heavily addicted or have mental health difficulties often need extra and extended support, particularly in line with other factors like unemployment or concurrent addictions,” Martina says.

“We are beginning to invest in specific services for pregnant smokers and for those in disadvantaged communities. Extra behavioural support sessions are available for people in these groups and can extend beyond the standard 8 sessions over the 12-month period.”

Tobacco advisers for disadvantaged groups are often local peer leaders trained within the community they serve. This improves rates of quitting by increasing engagement and building trust, and places cultural sensitivity at the forefront of the cessation programme.

Affordable support in the right place

Ensuring that smoking cessation services are free to everyone and medication is free to those most in need is key to success. In Ireland, the HSE programme advises all smokers to combine the quit service with stop-smoking medications.

Over 30% of people in Ireland have medical cards, which entitles them to a range of services and medicines free of charge. This means low-income smokers can access stop-smoking medications without denting their wallets.

In addition to affordability, rigorous logistical planning helps ensure that smokers have timely support to quit. “We have a national digital patient-management system, which allows advisers to schedule call-backs,” Martina explains.

“It now also facilitates the electronic referral of smokers from all general practitioners in primary care into a centralized referral processing centre, after which they will be assigned to a stop-smoking adviser and service local to them.”

High uptake of the cessation services has largely been driven by referrals from health professionals and well funded, active mass media campaigns.

The HSE and the National Clinical Effectiveness Committee of the Department of Health have developed best-practice guidelines on diagnosing and treating tobacco addiction, which will be shared with health professionals. This goes hand in hand with investment in people.

“Countries should agree to invest in standardized training for stop-smoking advisers,” says Martina. “This will ensure that a specific role is identified for the treatment of tobacco dependence.”

Impact of COVID-19

Efforts to help people quit have never been more important in light of the coronavirus pandemic. COVID-19 has given many people a strong motivation to quit tobacco use, as smokers have a greater risk of developing a severe case of COVID-19 and dying from the disease.

Although the pandemic has further highlighted the risk of smoking, the picture is not straightforward. In some cases, stress and disruption from the pandemic have caused an increase in tobacco use among current users.

In a survey conducted by Ireland’s HSE in April 2020, 35% of women and 26% of men who were using tobacco noted an increase in usage. As demonstrated by the HSE, redoubling efforts to commit to quit in light of the risks and pressures of COVID-19 is critical.

Drones deliver blood to prevent maternal death in Botswana
Drones deliver blood to prevent maternal death in Botswana
Drones are providing life-saving care to women in remote parts of the southern African country, Botswana, who otherwise may die in childbirth, thanks to support from the United Nations. 
 
For women in Botswana, especially those living in remote communities where medical supplies and blood may not be in stock, giving birth can be life-threatening. In 2019, the country recorded a maternal mortality rate of 166 deaths per 100,000 births, more than double the average for upper-middle-income countries. 

“When a woman has lost a lot of blood during childbirth and may need to be transferred to a bigger medical facility, she first needs to be stabilized where she is before being driven out of that place. Timely delivery of blood can be lifesaving. A drone can be sent to deliver the blood so that the patient is stabilized,” says Lorato Mokganya, Chief Health Officer in the Ministry of Health and Wellness. 

In an effort to curb the country’s preventable maternal deaths and overcome geographical barriers this innovative initiative will revolutionize the delivery of essential medical supplies and services across Botswana.   

“Timeliness in attending to women who experience pregnancy and childbirth-related complications is paramount, especially in remote and hard-to-reach areas,” says Dimane Mpoeleng, Computer Science Lecturer at the Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BIUST). 

The leading causes of maternal deaths in Botswana are excessive bleeding, complications after abortion and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.  

However, the last-mile delivery of lifesaving medical products and supplies can be challenging in this large and sparsely populated country with long distances between lower and higher-level facilities. This is heightened in hard-to-reach places where there may be a shortage of vehicles, inaccessible roads, and inefficient supply chain systems.   

© UNFPA Botswana

A nurse places a cargo of medical supplies in a drone before take-off.

Drones for Health 

In May, the university, the government and the  United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) joined forces to launch Botswana’s first drone delivery project, called “Drones For Health. With this initiative, Botswana also became the first country in southern Africa and third on the African continent, after Ghana and Rwanda, to pilot drone technology for health care support. 

Drones are expected to drastically reduce the delivery time from hours to minutes, improving the delivery of obstetric emergency supplies and thus saving more lives. 

Beatrice Mutali, UNFPA Botswana Country Director, believes the project is a game-changer, which will not only improve the maternal health situation in Botswana, but also transform the entire health system for the country. 

“At UNFPA, we envision a world where no woman dies while giving a life, and this initiative promises to alleviate the problem of maternal deaths in Botswana,” Ms. Mutali says, stressing that innovation is an indispensable engine to bring transformative change for women, girls, and young people.  

For example, women at rural facilities such as Mogapi Health Centre, which serves a population of over 3,000, will benefit immensely from the speed and efficiency that the newly launched drone technology will bring to the health sector.  

According to Dr. Mpoeleng, the project leader of Drones For Health, each battery-powered flying aerodrone has a delivery distance of 100 kilometers and can carry up to 2 kilogrammes of cargo.  

Four villages were chosen for the pilot project. The drones will be automatically programmed for takeoff and landing and can carry back another load of supplies. Community members in the pilot areas supported the project by building all drone landing pads at the designated health posts. 

© UNFPA Botswana

Members of the community helped to build the drone landing pad at the remote Moremi health post.

In 2017, Botswana set a national maternal mortality ratio target of 71 deaths per 100,000 live births by 2025 reducing to 54 deaths by 2030 in order to achieve Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3. If the current maternal death trend continues, Botswana is likely not to meet the SDG target. 

Speaking at the launch, the Minister of Health and Wellness, Dr. Edwin Gorataone Dikoloti said, “The need to invest in innovative options to bridge the long distances, reduce current transportation costs, overcome road infrastructure challenges, and improve timely availability of essential emergency obstetric care drugs, commodities and supplies is therefore urgent.” 

A 2017 report on maternal mortality rate shows that a significant proportion of maternal deaths in Botswana are preventable.  

“Now more than ever, innovation is critical to achieving the ‘leaving no one behind’ goal. And with innovation come powerful partnerships, hence our work with the university and ministries. We believe that today’s problems and changing context call for harnessing innovations that can provide breakthrough solutions that deliver sexual and reproductive health for all,” UNFPA’s Country Director says. 

COVID-19: Pharmaceutical companies urged to support knowledge-sharing platform
COVID-19: Pharmaceutical companies urged to support knowledge-sharing platform
Dramatically increasing global manufacturing of COVID-19 vaccines, tests and treatments, and ensuring equitable access, is the fastest way to end the pandemic, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) said on Friday. 
Speaking during his latest briefing from Geneva, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus pushed for more developers to support the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP), the voluntary platform for sharing scientific knowledge, data and intellectual property.  

“We’re holding the door open for pharmaceutical companies that have become household names, although too few households have benefited from the life-saving tools they have developed”, he said.  

“They control the IP that can save lives today, end this pandemic soon and prevent future epidemics from spiraling out of control and undermining health, economies and national security”. 

Vaccine inequity unacceptable

C-TAP was established a year ago by the President of Costa Rica, Carlos Alvarado Quesada, and more than 40 Heads of State, together with WHO

President Alvarado Quesado, who also addressed journalists, underlined the need to protect everyone, everywhere. 

“It is not acceptable that more than 50 per cent of the globally available vaccines were used in only five countries that account for 50 per cent of global GDP. Shamefully, low-income countries have received only 0.3 [per cent] of the world’s doses”, he said. 

Tedros explained that contributing to C-TAP  will allow qualified producers across the world to manufacture products against COVID-19.  

If fully functional, it could lead to increased supply for countries and the global vaccine solidarity initiative, COVAX

Study into COVID-19 origins ‘poisoned by politics’ 

Investigations into the origins of COVID-19 are being “poisoned by politics”, a senior WHO official said on Friday. 

Dr. Michael Ryan, Executive Director, was responding to a journalist’s question regarding a lack of progress on the launch of a second phase following an international expert mission to China in January. 

Preliminary results, announced in February, found the novel coronavirus was “extremely unlikely” to have come from a lab, but perhaps jumped from animals to humans. 

Dr. Ryan noted that there have been increased media reports about the investigation in recent days “with terribly little actual news, or evidence, or new material”, which he found disturbing. 

“We would, though, like for everyone out there to separate, if they can, the politics of this issue from the science. This whole process is being poisoned by politics”, he said. 

Dr. Ryan added that countries and entities are free to pursue their own theories of origin. 

“Putting WHO in a position like it has been put in is very unfair to the science we are trying to carry out. And it puts us as an organization, frankly in an impossible position to deliver the answers that the world wants”, he said. 

“So, we would ask that we separate the science from the politics and let us get on with finding the answers that we need in a proper, positive atmosphere where we can find the science to drive the solutions, through a process that is driven by solidarity, as Dr. Tedros always says”. 

Halt legislation on coercive mental health measures in Europe – UN experts 
Council of Europe wants to enforce harmful coercive psychiatric treaments – UN experts oppose
Independent UN human rights experts called on Friday for a European body of intergovernmental experts to stop legislation supporting coercive mental health measures.
Five UN experts issued a statement calling upon the Council of Europe’s Committee on Bioethics to withdraw a draft  Additional Protocol to the Oviedo Convention – a treaty protecting the human rights of people with regard to biology and medicine – that would codify a  mental health policy based on coercion and bring “stigmatization and fear to people with psychosocial disabilities”.“Overwhelming evidence from the European Disability Forum, Mental Health Europe and other organizations and growing consensus within the United Nations including at the World Health Organization (WHO), show that forced admission to medical institutions and coercive treatments in institutions will bring harmful effects such as pain, trauma, humiliation [and] shame”, the experts said.This is incompatible with contemporary human rights principles and standards.

Quell the draft

If adopted during a vote in early June, the draft Additional Protocol would continue to allow all the 47 State parties of the Council of Europe to use coercive measures against people with mental health conditions, including their forcible committment to psychiatric institutions.

The coercive approach to mental health is “doing harm to people with disabilities” and “we should not go backwards to authorize this outdated approach”, the experts said, adding that individutals with psychosocial disabilities “have the right to live in the community and to refuse medical treatment”.

“We call upon all State delegations to object to the draft Additional Protocol in the upcoming meeting and we urge the Council of Europe to end legitimizing forced institutionalization and the use of coercion against persons with disabilities, including older persons with disabilities”, they underscored.

Be part of the future

The controversial draft treaty has also aroused opposition within Europe and from the international community.

Voices within the Council of Europe, such as the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly and the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights have all been vocal against the draft Protocol.

“When there are efforts worldwide to reform mental health policy, it comes to our surprise that the Council of Europe, a major regional human rights organization, is planning to adopt a treaty that would be a setback to reverse all positive developments in Europe and spread a chilling effect elsewhere in the world”, the experts said.

They stressed that the Council of Europe now has “a unique opportunity to shift away from old-fashioned coercive approaches” to mental health, towards concrete steps to promote supportive mental health services and realize human rights for all “without discrimination on the grounds of disability”.

“We urge the Council of Europe to be part of the future and not part of the past in mental health”, concluded the experts.

Click here for the names of the experts who endorsed in this statement.

Special Rapporteurs and independent experts are appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a specific human rights theme or a country situation. They are not UN staff nor paid for their work.

Europe’s farm fail
Europe’s farm fail

Press play to listen to this article

EU governments showed their true colors on reforming the bloc’s mammoth farm policy this week — and that color’s not green.

Four days of negotiations billed as the prime moment to finalize a new Common Agricultural Policy blew up on Friday in a skull-crunching head-to-head clash between governments and members of the European Parliament over how much of the €270 billion budget should be set aside for greener kinds of farming.

The CAP is the single biggest tranche of the regular EU budget and campaigners have pressed the European Commission’s green supremo Frans Timmermans to ensure that those payments secure a paradigm shift from business-as-usual industrial farming to more environmentally friendly methods.

That switch to greener farming looked a remote prospect after Friday’s breakdown, with talks now shunted into June. The failed negotiations revealed a chasm of divergent views between governments, EU officials and MEPs on how to make agriculture more climate-friendly, and left the bloc’s 10 million farmers in the dark about what’s in store in the next five-year CAP, which has already been delayed by two years.

“Some member states have zero willing, but really zero, to change anything. They wanted a reform that does not change anything at all,” said European People’s Party lawmaker Herbert Dorfmann.

As talks reached their climax on Thursday afternoon, MEPs were seething at a proposal from EU countries that walked back the environmental ambition even further than what countries had offered the previous day, and was light-years away from what the European Parliament wanted.

The proposal would have given countries a loophole to spend just 18 percent of their main subsidies pot on the new “eco-scheme” programs, a flagship element of the CAP meant to encourage more sustainable farming from agro-forestry to organic agriculture. Countries argued the loophole was needed in case farmers don’t take up the green schemes, but Parliament rejects that and has pushed for a higher 30 percent ring-fence.

MEPs flatly rejected the offer from countries, as represented by the Council of the EU. They regarded the offer as an attempt to bulldoze the Parliament, an institution which is often considered the junior partner in EU negotiations.

Agriculture ministers reacted furiously at a 2 a.m. roundtable. Greece’s Spilios Livanos accused MEPs of blackmailing democratically elected governments by daring to turn down their proposal. “I sincerely don’t understand how the European Parliament reacts to this dialogue and I find it totally disrespectful to all of us,” he told ministers and diplomats, to a round of applause.

Into the dark

Shortly afterward, the Council turned off the cameras despite the session having been advertised to journalists as a public session and ministers continued their talks in what was described by an EU diplomat as “a very bad atmosphere.” Countries ultimately did not give Portugal, which holds the rotating presidency of the Council, a fresh mandate to keep negotiating with Parliament, torpedoing the talks early on Friday.

The reluctant decision to postpone talks for another month represents a blow for Portugal, whose Agriculture Minister Maria do Céu Antunes had stressed that the end of May was the latest possible moment for tying up the CAP.

At a press conference, she put a positive spin on the talks, saying: “We did say that we would have liked to conclude this process in May but that doesn’t mean we are giving up.” She said that Portugal still aims to wrap up the CAP reform before the end of its presidency and insisted that “there are a whole host of points on which we do agree.”

But the reality was that negotiating sides drifted further apart, rather than converging, across the week.

Negotiations broke off with Parliament still pushing the Council to be greener on a host of other issues. These included linking the CAP strongly to the EU’s broader Green Deal plans, the basic land management conditions farmers will have to meet to receive any EU subsidies, how much money to set aside for longer-term green investments, and also which payments should be classed as climate-friendly.

Diplomats from two EU countries said they felt Portuguese diplomats had made a grave error by presenting the provocative proposal to the Parliament, as there was no way it could have formed the basis for a reasonable compromise.

“In Council last night it became really clear that it was impossible to get a new proposal that would allow for a deal today. It was a clusterfuck,” one of the EU diplomats commented. They described the week of talks as “so unprofessional from every side.”

But on Friday France was keen to project an image of unity among countries, stressing that Portugal still had the full backing of the Council. Turning its guns on MEPs, the French agriculture ministry signaled to journalists that all ministers were united in opposing the Parliament’s proposals, deeming them unworkable, and arguing that the Parliament showed little willingness to listen.

MEPs from across the political spectrum were united in criticizing the Council’s attitude toward them. The EPP’s Norbert Lins told journalists: “I expect the Council to respect us as co-legislators.” This was echoed by Green lawmaker Benoît Biteau, who said: “The Council has not understood that the Parliament is a co-legislator, that it is not for the Council to impose their vision of things, of the CAP, of European agriculture.”

The bitter post-mortem of the breakdown of talks was not limited to a spat between MEPs and governments.

EU Agriculture Commissioner Janusz Wojciechowski defended the role he and his superior Timmermans played in the talks, having taken flak from powerful agricultural ministers of Germany and Spain for so strongly supporting the Parliament’s greener push. “The role of the Commission is as a kind of facilitator and mediator, but I don’t think it can be a completely neutral role.”

Styling himself as the champion of real farmers, he took a dig at pesky national administrations, whom he blamed for whipping up fears that eco-schemes money would go to waste.

The skirmish leaves MEPs emboldened to push home their demands for a greener CAP during the next set-piece negotiations in Luxembourg on June 28 and 29.

Want more analysis from POLITICO? POLITICO Pro is our premium intelligence service for professionals. From financial services to trade, technology, cybersecurity and more, Pro delivers real time intelligence, deep insight and breaking scoops you need to keep one step ahead. Email [email protected] to request a complimentary trial.

UN chief underlines need to step up COVID-19 vaccine production, equitable distribution
UN chief underlines need to step up COVID-19 vaccine production, equitable distribution
The world is far from achieving equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, a tragedy that must be avoided at all costs, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said on Friday during an online conversation on fair access to these lifesaving treatments. 
Participating in the Global Solutions Summit 2021, the UN chief stressed the need to defeat the virus through doubling the number of doses produced and ensuring their fair distribution among countries. 

Scale-up production 

“It is absolutely essential to double the production of vaccines, and there are different mechanisms that are needed for that…but we absolutely must have an equitable distribution, and we are far from having it”, he said. 

“We have seen vaccine nationalism, hoarding of vaccines, many countries buying three or four times the volume of their population. And on the other hand, we see enormous difficulty in supplying vaccines to the Global South. And this is a tragedy that we need to avoid at all cost”. 

Earlier this week, the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) described the ongoing vaccine crisis as “a scandalous inequity”.  When asked his opinion about the situation, the Secretary-General responded, “it’s exactly that”. 

Risk of inequity 

Just 10 countries have received 75 per cent of all vaccines administered so far, he said, while 0.3 per cent have gone to lower-income nations, with the African continent receiving just one per cent. 

The Secretary-General highlighted the risk inequity poses in the face of a virus that spreads and mutates, noting “this is a race against time”.

He warned that either vaccination becomes much quicker and more equitable, and thus able to prevent “a possible dramatic mutation”  that is immune to vaccines, or countries which have inoculated their populations “might discover that those vaccines will serve no purpose because the mutations in the Global South will undermine the vaccination campaign in the Global North.” 

Fully support COVAX 

At the recent G20 Health Summit, vaccine producers committed to delivering one billion doses to poorer countries. While welcoming the development, the Secretary-General said it was far from enough. 

Mr. Guterres stressed the need to fully fund and supply the global vaccine equity initiative, COVAX.  He noted that one of its main manufacturers, the Serum Institute of India, has had to cut back supply due to the surge in cases in the country, while deliveries from other contractors have been later than expected. 

He urged countries to channel their excess vaccines through COVAX, “instead of a geo-strategic competition, with several powerful countries giving vaccines to their friends, or trying to compete with each other to see who gains more influence, thanks to the vaccines”. 

The Secretary-General also reiterated his proposal for a G20-led Task Force that would work with pharmaceutical companies, and other stakeholders, on providing vaccines for all people, everywhere.

WHO recognizes decades of service of Ukrainian researchers in radiation medicine
WHO recognizes decades of service of Ukrainian researchers in radiation medicine
WHO recognizes decades of service of Ukrainian researchers in radiation medicine

Nataliia Korol / National Research Center for Radiation Medicine

The National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine (NRCRM) was today awarded the 2021 Dr Lee Jong-wook Memorial Prize for Public Health, at WHO’s 74th World Health Assembly.

Following the Chernobyl disaster, the NRCRM has worked closely with WHO and other partners to understand and mitigate the impact on human and environmental health. This award honours over 30 years of work in this area.

Read the full story on the WHO website – link below.

The Beautiful Game:  keeping spectators, players and communities safe
The Beautiful Game: keeping spectators, players and communities safe

With the summer season approaching, excitement is building among people to once again attend major sporting events, such as tennis tournaments, football matches, horse races and cycling competitions. Declining trends in reported cases and deaths due to COVID-19 in some countries of the WHO European Region are encouraging governments and sports organizers to restart events that bring together large numbers of people.

Throughout this pandemic, countries have been facing a delicate balance between protecting their people’s health while minimizing socioeconomic damage. However, there is no zero risk of infection. Last year’s experience showed us that reopening societies too early and rapidly can result in the resurgence of cases that will also create new socioeconomic problems. WHO’s recently released considerations for countries in the European Region will help them to take decisions with a risk-based approach about if, when and how to allow travel and gatherings of people.

Applying high caution

Sports events, such as the UEFA European Football Championship, can attract a large number of domestic and international visitors coming together at stadiums, and gathering before and after the tournaments themselves. Increased interactions might be at fan zone activities, celebrations, airports, with the local community, including on public transport and other “pinch points” where people congregate in large numbers. Across Europe, fans will also meet to watch the games and socialize with other fans in sports bars or in designated sites for fans.

With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, new variants of concern in circulation and many people still awaiting vaccination in countries throughout the European Region, WHO recommends that countries of the European Region exert high caution in the following ways:

  • Coordinate the decision-making process around an event with all stakeholders and, in particular, with the event organizers in an inclusive, transparent and open way.
  • Rethink the need for international travel and the necessity to organize mass gathering events where spectators attend in person if community transmission is ongoing.
  • Use a risk-based approach to decide whether to hold, modify, postpone or cancel mass gatherings.
  • Enhance public health and social measures if events do take place, not just in competition venues, but also outside in places and on transport used by fans and the host community.

Using a “risk-based approach”

The decision to hold major sporting events sits with national governments and organizers. If a country is considering hosting a sports event, WHO recommends that authorities and organizers carry out a continuous risk assessment placing the health of spectators, athletes, delegates and, importantly, hosting communities as priority. Risk assessments should be carried out before coming to any decision to host an event, and continuously revised before it begins and during the event.

Enhancing public health and social measures

If a host country and the event organizer jointly decide to allow international spectators to participate in an event, risk mitigation measures should be considered, particularly bearing in mind the spread of new COVID-19 variants. Such measures should include the following:

  • enhanced testing in cities hosting the event(s);
  • coordinated contact-tracing between the visitor’s country of origin and the game hosting country
  • prioritized vaccination for at-risk groups, not special groups of people such as athletes or spectators;
  • targeted risk communication to travellers to inform their decisions to travel and minimize risks.

On request, the WHO Regional Office for Europe can provide tools for conducting risk assessments, training and simulation exercises and conduct event-based monitoring of the COVID-19 situation in the host countries, in collaboration with national health authorities.


This article was amended on 28/05/2021 to remove a quote which was included in error.

Blending bush tucker with European cuisine?
Blending bush tucker with European cuisine?

By ERWIN CHLANDA

Bush food from The Centre seems set to play a role in international export and investment as relations with China are in turmoil and Australia is negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union (EU).

A 19 member delegation from 14 countries – ranging from Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, to the new ones, like Estonia – were in Alice Sprigs yesterday.

The group was headed by the German ambassador of the EU to Australia, Michael Pulch, in search of “opportunities for trade and investment”.

Asked for what he regarded as the highlights he named a demonstration and tasting of bush foods by Rayleen Brown, co-founder and owner of Kanga’s Can Cook.

He said blending traditional foods with modern cuisine in Europe would “enrich” the food.

“I am convinced there is a market for these type of products in Europe.

“Particularly young Europeans are now looking for healthy food, organic food.

“There is a strong vegan development in Europe, and many of these products would fall exactly into these type of categories.”

Aboriginal art came a close second for Dr Pulch: “And of course Central Australia is the birth place of Indigenous arts, and no visit to Alice Springs would be fully consumed without having access to the fine art that is produced here by Indigenous artists.”

He described the planned national Aboriginal art gallery as a “very good idea”.

The Indigenous owned dialysis service The Purple House impressed the delegation by “how they deal with medical supplies in their care for the Indigenous population”.

Dr Pulch said the development of technology permitting the reduction of coal requires rare earths, scheduled to be mined north of Alice Springs, and other minerals: “We are very interested in diversifying our supplies.”

The negotiations started in June 2018, with the 11th round due next week. Dr Pulch says he is “optimistic” a conclusion can be reached by the end of this year or early next year.

The deal wants to engage small to medium-sized companies: “These are the backbone to our economy in Europe and in Australia,” including Indigenous businesses, traditional food, medicine and arts.

PHOTO: Dr Pulch (front) and European delegates are introduced to bush tucker by Rayleen Brown.

UN chief appeals to business leaders to help quell ‘a tsunami of suffering’ caused by COVID 
UN chief appeals to business leaders to help quell ‘a tsunami of suffering’ caused by COVID 
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought “a tsunami of suffering”, taken over 3.4 million lives and 500 million jobs, while wiping trillions of dollars from global balance sheets, Secretary-General António Guterres told business leaders on Thursday, appealing for equitable vaccine distribution worldwide. 
“This is indeed much more than a health crisis. It’s a social crisis and an economic crisis, with dramatic long-term consequences for livelihoods, businesses, and for economies”, he said to a virtual roundtable event – part of the UN’s global campaign, #OnlyTogether – hosted jointly with the IKEA Foundation and Purpose – the social mobilisation organization which partners with the Department of Global Communications leading the UN Verified initiative, to combat misinformation. 

The UN chief recognized the many lives that have been saved: “To have you leading this meeting is a guarantee of success because what our partnership has always represented is indeed the very symbol of the values we represent”. 

Vaccine equity to prevent ‘further havoc’ 

Having delivered safe and effective vaccines in record time, science has shone a light for some parts of the world. 

However, despite the World Health Organization’s (WHO) authorization for 13 vaccines and the “incredible success” of rollouts in more than 170 countries, Mr. Guterres bemoaned “a large and growing vaccine gap between rich and poor countries”. 

“Just ten countries have administered more than 75 per cent of all vaccine doses. In poorer countries, even health workers and people with underlying conditions cannot access them”, he said, adding, “this is not only unjust, it’s self-defeating and dangerous – to everyone”. 

Fast, equitable vaccination is the only way “to prevent new and more dangerous variants from emerging and wreaking further havoc”, in rich and poor countries alike, said Mr. Guterres. 

Global vaccination plan 

He said a global vaccination plan was needed, beginning with a G20 Task Force comprised of countries with vaccine production and manufacturing capacities, the WHO and Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) partners, as well as international financial institutions.  

“I am ready to mobilize the entire United Nations System to support this effort, but we need political will to move forward”, he said. 

To this end, Mr. Guterres highlighted that the private sector could leverage its influence and expertise, use its communication channels to share accurate information and donate its service and resources, to encourage innoculation. 

While this sector has been “central to every breakthrough” throughout the pandemic, he reminded that it achieved this by collaborating with countries, communities and the public sectors. 

“By working together, we can vaccinate the world, end the pandemic, and kick-start a strong recovery”, the Secretary-General concluded. 

Surge in South Asia threatens COVAX initiative  

In a further development, WHO, GAVI the vaccine alliance and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) issued a joint statement warning against “patchy achievements made so far”. 

While cases of COVID-19 are declining in some countries, South Asia is suffering a traumatic surge. And because vaccine access is important to stem the tide, “we must focus on ensuring countries who have not benefitted from these life-saving tools do so now, and with urgency”, the statement said. 

Although COVAX, the global mechanism for equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, has proven itself time and again, the harrowing surge in India has severely impacted its supply to the point that by the end of June it will face a 190-million-dose shortfall. 

Up against ‘catastrophic’ consequences 

Although more vaccine doses will be available later this year, the statement said, “if we do not address the current, urgent shortfall the consequences could be catastrophic”. 

At the World Health Assembly last Friday, governments recognized the political and financial urgency of supporting COVAX with doses and dollars.  

“It is now imperative…to secure full funding for COVAX and more vaccines – right now – for lower income countries at the Advance Market Commitment Summit on 2 June”, read the statement. 

© UNHCR/Allana Ferreira

Women from Venezuela’s indigenous Warao refugee community attend a COVID-19 educational session in Brazil.

Ambitious solutions 

For COVAX to deliver on the promise of global equitable access, the partners called for the immediate funding of the Gavi COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC), the mechanism that allows COVAX to provide doses to lower income economies; sharing of doses; and freeing up of supply chains by removing trade barriers, export control measures, and other restrictive barriers. 

“Now more than ever, at the peak of the pandemic, we need ambitious, global solutions. When it comes to worldwide vaccine distribution, COVAX is the only initiative capable of rising to the challenge of this moment”, the statement spelled out. 

While understandable that some countries wish to inoculate all their citizens, by donating vaccines to COVAX alongside domestic vaccination programmes, at-risk populations globally can be protected, which is “instrumental to ending the acute phase of the pandemic, curbing the rise and threat of variants, and accelerating a return to normality”. 

Since COVAX was established in mid-2020, it has had the support and resources of 192 of the world’s economies, enabling it to deliver an unprecedented global rollout.  

“It’s time to finish the job”, the statement concluded.